[Samba] Solaris ACL vs Unix permissions
Jeremy Allison
jra at samba.org
Thu Feb 9 17:46:10 GMT 2006
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 11:30:38AM -0500, linolil at equoria.net wrote:
>
> We are seeing a lot of inconsistant access behaviour on
> our server since upgrading from 2.2.8a to 3.0.20. The
> bottom line is that the Unix group permissions on the
> file system seem to be ignored.
>
> ========================================================
> [sharename]
> comment = shared files
> path = /export/directory
> force group = shared
> read only = No
> create mask = 0774
> directory mask = 0774
> guest ok = Yes
> hosts allow = 192.168.1., 192.168.2., 192.168.3.
> ========================================================
>
> Did the behavior of "force group" change from 2.2.8a to
> 3.0.20?
>
> When we set unix group restrictions on a folder or file,
> using a different group from the one listed in "force
> group", the unix access permissions do not work. People
> in the correct group do not get access. This used to
> work under 2.2.8a, but is now driving me crazy.
More information please. Give an example of what you expect
and what is happening using specific groups and files please.
Jeremy.
More information about the samba
mailing list