[Samba] Re: sharing NFS mounts

[Tobias Bluhm]

The most elegant would be one box with one domain but then not always does 
elegent = easy.

A quick-n-dirty workaround to avoid nfs in your example:

net use \\serverA\home /user:Adomain\john
net use \\<IP of serverA>\lab    /user:Adomain\labmanager

May work using other names in "netbios aliases" too, haven't tried.


-----------------------------------------------------
toby bluhm
philips medical systems, cleveland ohio
tobias.bluhm at philips.com
440-483-5323









Ben Ransom <bransom at ucdavis.edu>
Sent by: 
samba-bounces+tobias.bluhm=philips.com at lists.samba.org
05/25/2005 01:19 PM
 
        To:     samba at lists.samba.org
        cc:     (bcc: Tobias Bluhm/CLE/MS/PHILIPS)
        Subject:        Re: [Samba] Re: sharing NFS mounts
        Classification: 




True, would be good to share both SMB and NFS from the same 
server.  However, there is a possible reason to use SMB from NFS client 
mount point:  Win clients cannot mount SMB shares of two different user 
names on the same box.  I.E., from a Win box I cannot do:
net use \\serverA\home /user:Adomain\john
net use \\serverA\lab    /user:Adomain\labmanager

In my case, 'home' and 'lab' files were historically in different Win 
domains anyway, so I moved on to a work-around to the above, where I NFS 
mount the 'lab' files from serverA in Adomain to server B in a different 
domain, and I can do:
net use \\serverA\home /user:Adomain\john
net use \\serverB\lab  /user:Bdomain\labmanager

I have a small subset of users in both A Bdomain, so the accounts 
management is not too cumbersome.  Perhaps there are more elegant 
solutions 
though, serving all from the same SMB+NFS box.

Will look at some of the suggestions as to how to get SMB from NFS mount 
to 
work again now with Samba 3
-Ben Ransom


>I think you should have your Samba daemon running on the same machine as
>the NFS daemon. If you do it the other way, then you have two different
>points of latency for file retrieval for the Samba downloads.
>Furthermore, what will happen if you have to take down either Samba or
>NFS for maintenance?  This way they need not both be down.
>
>For larger systems you might consider having an SCSI hard drive with two
>ports so that you can access it from two different machine's busses.
>One machine could run Samba and the other NFS.  For even larger storage
>solutions, think "Network Attached Storage" with a gigabit or fiber
>backbone and possibly Balancing Domain Controllers.
>
>
>Jim C.
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
>Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
>iD8DBQFClALrB4AhF6wVFMERAghWAKCBLIjWP3aNCGQ2PueV29QB/Lnx7ACfS2dn
>kGSrYgOljPo03YYPo2BhtME=
>=JG87
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba