[Samba] Transport endpoint is not connected
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Mon Mar 7 18:39:15 GMT 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Pavel wrote:
| I've seen this issue come up over and over on the mailing list, and yet
| never make it in the FAQ. At some point I've slammed into it as well,
| and had to solve it.
|
| Don't exactly remember where I've found the solution, but it goes
| something like this:
|
| Windows (XP?) tries to connect on both ports 139 and 445, not knowing
| what SMB version the remote machine supports. When it makes a
| successful connection on one of the ports (139), it drops the other, and
| samba gets noisy about it.
It normally drops the connection to port 139.
| It you have a mixed windows environment (XP's, and older ones), you
| might need both ports open. But if you only have XP's, you can safely
| put a
| smb ports = 139
| in your samba.conf file, and the useless messages will dissapear. Even
| if you have a mixed environment, you should probably try this and see
| how it goes.
|
| I am quite sure I got the actual technical details rather wrong -- I've
| read about this a long time ago, so please, somebody correct me.
| However, I am also quite sure the solution works :).
Your explanation was pretty much spot on.
cheers, jerry
=====================================================================
Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) ------- http://www.samba.org
GnuPG Key ----- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCLJ/SIR7qMdg1EfYRAq4MAJ93tB+Ee4urqzD/+rUqT05gYzQbCACfRO8c
eEfO94OrQ+ZcprZ3zrbbA3A=
=SOLS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba
mailing list