[Samba] Re: still ACL bug in 3.0.14a

[Tom Schaefer]

Hello,

I've kind of been hanging with Peter on this whole issue so didn't want to
just abandon him when Jeremy issued the Solaris patch that fixed things
for me.

I went and took a hard look at bug report 2619 that Peter filed and tried
to duplicate it.  He is doing ACLs on specific files, not directories as I
was.  When specifically following Peter's bug report, I CAN duplicate the
bug Peter found under Solaris even with the all inclusive force
group/Solaris patch Jeremy issued yesterday installed.  I put the new
patch on the Linux box, and as Peter is saying, the problem is still there
as well.  I noticed Jeremy requesting level 10 debug logs on the bug
tracking page.  I'll send some as soon as I can.

Tom Schaefer

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 09:45:46 +0200
Peter Kruse <pk at q-leap.com> wrote:

> Hello again,
> 
> Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 06:35:12PM +0200, Peter Kruse wrote:
> > 
> >>
> >>bad news, my problem is not fixed with 3.0.14a
> > 
> > 
> > The log file helped. Try this patch (applies against
> > raw 3.0.14a). Problem was Solaris was returning 2 in a
> > place I expected a 1....
> > 
> 
> tried it, makes no difference here.  I'm neither using "force group" nor
> using Solaris.  Sorry to confuse you, there are probably two different
> problems in the same thread, although the subject is valid for both.
> But as the Solaris issue seems to be resolved, maybe you could
> have a look at my bug report:
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2619
> The bug report includes exact instructions how to reproduce it.
> I get the impression that the acl implementation is wrong.  It looks
> to me that if any user doesn't have write permission then the
> group settings are ignored.
> Jeremy, if you create such a file, do you get correct behaviour?
> 
> Thx,
> 
> 	Peter
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>