[Samba] Re: still ACL bug in 3.0.14a

[Peter Kruse]

Hello,

thanks, I just added a comment to 
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2619 that shows my recent
findings.  It looks like not directly related to ACLs, but more
with "store dos attributes".  I still have the feeling that the
behaviour of samba is somewhat not what you'd expect.

Regards,

	Peter

Tom Schaefer wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I've kind of been hanging with Peter on this whole issue so didn't want to
> just abandon him when Jeremy issued the Solaris patch that fixed things
> for me.
> 
> I went and took a hard look at bug report 2619 that Peter filed and tried
> to duplicate it.  He is doing ACLs on specific files, not directories as I
> was.  When specifically following Peter's bug report, I CAN duplicate the
> bug Peter found under Solaris even with the all inclusive force
> group/Solaris patch Jeremy issued yesterday installed.  I put the new
> patch on the Linux box, and as Peter is saying, the problem is still there
> as well.  I noticed Jeremy requesting level 10 debug logs on the bug
> tracking page.  I'll send some as soon as I can.
> 
> Tom Schaefer
> 
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 09:45:46 +0200
> Peter Kruse <pk at q-leap.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Hello again,
>>
>>Jeremy Allison wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 06:35:12PM +0200, Peter Kruse wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>bad news, my problem is not fixed with 3.0.14a
>>>
>>>
>>>The log file helped. Try this patch (applies against
>>>raw 3.0.14a). Problem was Solaris was returning 2 in a
>>>place I expected a 1....
>>>
>>
>>tried it, makes no difference here.  I'm neither using "force group" nor
>>using Solaris.  Sorry to confuse you, there are probably two different
>>problems in the same thread, although the subject is valid for both.
>>But as the Solaris issue seems to be resolved, maybe you could
>>have a look at my bug report:
>>https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2619
>>The bug report includes exact instructions how to reproduce it.
>>I get the impression that the acl implementation is wrong.  It looks
>>to me that if any user doesn't have write permission then the
>>group settings are ignored.
>>Jeremy, if you create such a file, do you get correct behaviour?
>>
>>Thx,
>>
>>	Peter
>>-- 
>>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>>instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>>