[Samba] still ACL bug in 3.0.14a
eric at lib.usf.edu
Sat Apr 16 17:38:44 GMT 2005
RHEL 3 AS here - test box (via VPN - I'm so interested in this
issue that I'm working on it from home) gave same behavior.
Jeremy got an email from me this morning with log files,
configuration file, getfacl's, ls -la, and an ldd of smbd showing that
the ACL lib was compiled in. Tripwire screamed bloody murder this
morning as well on the box since I added acl to the /etc/fstab of the
partition where the smb share is and rebooted yesterday, noting there
were no ACLs before and now they are there.
So near as I know I have everything compiled/configured right
(Jeremy will have to confirm this, but it wouldn't surprise me if he
said I was missing something) and I'm running into the can't delete
Of course, he is at a conference so we probably won't be hearing
back until he gets back ...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: samba-bounces+eric=lib.usf.edu at lists.samba.org
> [mailto:samba-bounces+eric=lib.usf.edu at lists.samba.org] On
> Behalf Of Schaefer Jr, Thomas R.
> Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2005 11:00 AM
> To: Jeremy Allison
> Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
> Subject: RE: [Samba] still ACL bug in 3.0.14a
> > Just making sure everyone knows before I get on the plane :-).
> > You *must* have configured with --with-acl-support for this to
> > successfully work with ACLs on 3.0.14a.
> > If you don't you get the symptoms you're reporting.
> > Jeremy.
> No no no, I can hardly believe this. I've continued to fight
> with this from home last evening and this morning. I have
> recompiled 3.0.14a on Solaris in a brand new fresh extract of
> the source code from the tar.gz distribution file. smbd -b |
> grep -i acl run against the ealier samba's I was producing
> where I did not specify --with-acl-support shows this..
> The same with my new smbd configured --with-acl-support shows..
> So the configure option seems to be "taking". Guess what??
> No difference in the end. Same same same behaviour. Can
> create or modify files but not delete or rename them.
> I recompiled on the RedHat Linux box this morning. Where
> smbd -b | grep -i acl against the binary I made yesterday yields..
> Today, after reconfiguring and recompiling, smbd -b | grep -i
> acl yields..
> So the configure option seems to be "taking". So, I tried
> it. Guess what?? NO DIFFERENCE (I'm not shouting at anyone
> just shouting). Like on the Solaris box, in the interest of
> saving time I had just done a reconfigure and recompile of
> the same source I had been using yesterday. So, in the
> interest of being thorough, like on the Solaris box, I
> started over yet again, completely from scratch using a brand
> new extract of the samba distribution. Still no dice. After
> Jeremy's confidence yesterday I thought for sure it was going
> to work on the Linux box.
> I can hardly believe it. I'm eagerly awaiting the results
> some of the rest of you get when configuring
> --with-acl-support and recompiling.
> Tom Schaefer
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
More information about the samba