[Samba] SIGUP? Losing Share

[Tony Earnshaw]

Paul Ackerman skrev:

> Do you mean the samba installation or the distro installation?
> I'm getting on the dabian list for more info.

The signal 11 means that you have a memory allocation fault. This could 
be due to a number of things, including incorrect libraries linked into 
binaries, or faulty memory.

If other Debian users are using the same Samba version as you with 
success, and it's a Debian package, then signal 11 would tend to point 
to faulty hardware (RAM).

SIGHUP is simply a signal to a daemon to re-read its config file(s).

--Tonni

--

> Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> 
>> Paul Ackerman skrev:
>>
>>> I'm new to the list and pretty much a newbie to linux and samba. I'm 
>>> quick learner though.
>>
>>
>>
>> You'd bloody well better be ;)
>>
>>>  I have been losing my samba share upon ocasion recently, below is a 
>>> portion of the syslog from the time period that I think is when the 
>>> share goes down. A reboot of the server or a restart of the smbd 
>>> fixes the problem (....until it happens again)
>>>
>>> I don't know what SIGUP is or why this happens, any help would be great.
>>
>>
>>
>> It's not so much the SIGHUP. which could be normal.
>>
>> It's more the signal 11,  which shows either that your installation is 
>> crap or your hardware is crap.
>>
>> Whichever one depemds on your skills as Linux system administrator to 
>> fathom out. Which means for you catch 22. Get onto your distro mailing 
>> list and ask tehere.
>>
>> --Tonni
>>
> 
> 
> !DSPAM:425ca127314251200581864!
> 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.6 - Release Date: 4/11/2005
> 
> 
> !DSPAM:425ca127314251200581864!


-- 

mail: tonye at billy.demon.nl
http://www.billy.demon.nl

They love us, don't they, They feed us, won't they ...