Account with no lanman hash [ was Re: [Samba]
Machine accounts, Samba 3, NT Domain migration
abartlet at samba.org
Sat Mar 27 05:16:58 GMT 2004
On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 15:55, Beast wrote:
> * Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> menulis:
> > > 1. In which tools we trust the output? pwdump or rpc vampire? why
> > > the output is different?
> > Well, I understand how 'net rpc vampire' functions, and as it makes
> > *exactly* the same calls that an NT BDC makes, I consider it to be
> > the'correct' output.
> Just a wishes, is it possible to get pwdump.exe version of net rpc
> vampire? so we can get hashses output without installing full blown of
> samba and *script?
> It then up to administrator what to do with the output, this is the
> cleanest soulution if you already have existing account in ldap.
'net rpc samdump' should do what you need
> Also, net rpc vampire has few advantage over pwdump, it can retrieve
> groups where pwdump can not.
pwdump was a quick hack, from what I understand...
> > I have not looked at the pwdump source, nor had any experience using
> > it, so I don't know why it's output would differ.
> > > 2. Is this mean I can not use 3.0.2 or 3.0.2a if I don't have
> > > LANMAN hash?
> > This is correct.
> Sorry for asking again here, can I use samba 3.0.3pre1? sincei can't
> use older version of samba. Just to make sure...
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20040327/2522b101/attachment.bin
More information about the samba