[Samba] LDAP connection leak?

[Wil Cooley]

On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 14:50, Andrew Bartlett wrote:

> I would not think that 52 was high, given the number of files that slapd
> has to open before it starts serving connections anyway.
> 
> Samba will open one connection per smbd, and nss_ldap will open one per
> program using nsswitch.   Standard posix semantics ensures these close
> on daemon shutdown.
> 
> Do you have anything that indicates that we are actually leaking (rather
> than just using) connections?

Yeah, I think you're right and there is no leak.  I checked and there
are 30+ smbd with the same number of open connections to slapd; plus the
connection from nscd (shouldn't nss_ldap open only one connection when
using nscd?).  I'll keep a closer eye on it to see if the number grows;
I'm still left trying to figure out why slapd started logging "deferring
operation" and what happened to the system, but those are questions for
another list.

Wil
-- 
Wil Cooley                                 wcooley at nakedape.cc
Naked Ape Consulting                        http://nakedape.cc
* * * * * * * Good, fast and cheap: Pick all 3! * * * * * * *
* Naked Ape Consulting             http://nakedape.cc/r/sg  *
*      SnapGear Linux Firewall/VPN Appliances Reseller      *
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20040123/a9495fbb/attachment.bin