[Samba] Help! Samba 3.0 can't use null password with OS X
Andrei Bazhgin
after at nan2d.com
Tue Jan 20 03:28:44 GMT 2004
The latest release (stable) of Samba is 3.0.1, get that - I am sure the bug is
resolved in 3.0.1
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 05:53:10PM -0800, David Wuertele wrote:
> When I made the move to 3.0, I noticed that smbclient no longer works
> with null passwords. Am I missing something? I read the FAQ, which
> suggests that the server is rejecting the null password. But I know
> that null passwords work fine for the 2.2.8a client, so the server is
> not the issue. The FAQ recommends "smbclient -L host -U%", but I
> don't want to set the username to null. I want a non-null username
> with a null password.
>
> I traced the packets on the two smbclients, and I see several
> differences. The command I ran was:
>
> smbclient //g4-box-1/dood -I 192.168.5.90 -U dood
>
> I used the same command on both 2.2.8a and 3.0 systems. Here are the
> differences I saw in the packets:
>
> 1. client sends "Extended Security Negotiation: Extended security
> negotiation is supported" on 3.0, but not on 2.2.8a
>
> 2. 2.2.8a client sends ANSI Password, Unicode Password, and
> uppercased-account name. Meanwhile, 3.0 client doesn't send
> either passwords, and sends a lowercased-account name. I think
> this is actually the key here.
>
> 3. the "primary domain" sent by 2.2.8a is the client's default
> domain, while the "primary domain" sent by 3.0 is the domain of
> the share being accessed
>
> 4. 2.2.8a sends "SMB Command: Session Setup AndX (0x73)" and gets
> response "NT Status: STATUS_SUCCESS (0x00000000)"
> 3.0 sends same command and gets response
> "NT Status: STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE (0xc000006d)"
>
> Any suggestions how to get 3.0 to work with null passwords?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
andrei bazhgin | aftermath
programmer
http://nan2d.com
More information about the samba
mailing list