[Samba] security = server [was Re: Problems with 2003 Server and Samba 3.0.1]

Gerald (Jerry) Carter jerry at samba.org
Fri Jan 9 21:42:44 GMT 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Andrew Bartlett wrote:

> > hmmm...have you considered try security = domain ?  it could also be an 
> > issue in your configuration with SMB signing.
>
> I broke that so many times over the course of my NTLM2 changes it became
> quite silly.  I think it's finally all OK in 3.0.2pre1, but it's also a
> good reason to upgrade your network to 'security=domain'.

The official stance is that security = server will continue to 
provide past functionality (so we promise not to break it), but 
it is inherently a bad idea due to the protocol mechanisms 
needed to make it work.  When possible, always use 
"security = domain".  




cheers, jerry
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Hewlett-Packard            ------------------------- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team                 ---------------------- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key                  ---- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 "If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song" --Switchfoot (2003)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE//yBUIR7qMdg1EfYRApNWAKCckfGCL9sSBAi3a5UKpWH7GkIeegCgqkbp
8yyF1WhJ0JbnMTQ/0QqXVpo=
=yBST
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the samba mailing list