[Samba] LDAP versus LDAPSAM
abartlet at samba.org
Tue Feb 3 09:08:00 GMT 2004
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 08:29, Philip Juels wrote:
> Okay, that makes sense. So, since I'm running a SuSE 8.2 system
> openldap-2-2.1.12-74 and samba-2.2.7a-72 (ldap option), I don't need to
> worry about ldapsam. Does samba under this installation know to use the
> ldap.conf for ldap client settings or does it need to have entries in
> the smb.conf?
If you are running Samba 2.2, compiled for ldap, then you will need to
use the 'ldap server' and associated options.
However, I would strongly suggest running Samba 3.0, as ldap support is
*much* better in 3.0
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20040203/fba18733/attachment.bin
More information about the samba