[Samba] "net setlocalsid" question

[Misty Stanley-Jones]

Hi,

I'm a tad confused about something.  I've got a production instance of Samba 
running.  I am trying to get a test version running on the same box, with the 
same SID.  Without the test server running, I used "net setlocalSID 
<oldsid>" (the net binary is the one for the new server).  Then when I issued 
'net getlocalsid' it returned it.  I thought I was fine.  But when I issue 
"net groupmap list" all the SID prefixes still show the old SID.  Did I do 
something wrong?  Did it not work since I have another instance of Samba 
running?  Is this something to be alarmed about?  Also, if I do "net 
getlocalsid" by itself, I get the SID I expect.  If I do "net getlocalsid 
<domainname>" I get the SID that I see in the groupmap list.  Output is 
below:

[root at furnsrv bin]# ./net getlocalsid
SID for domain FURNSRV is: S-1-5-21-383998039-2845272951-4289691644

[root at furnsrv bin]# ./net getlocalsid furn
SID for domain furn is: S-1-5-21-2095913833-1271187511-909365273

[root at furnsrv bin]# ./net groupmap list
System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) -> -1
Domain Users (S-1-5-21-2095913833-1271187511-909365273-2007) -> everyone
Replicators (S-1-5-32-552) -> -1
Guests (S-1-5-32-546) -> -1
Power Users (S-1-5-32-547) -> -1
Domain Users (S-1-5-21-2095913833-1271187511-909365273-513) -> -1
Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) -> -1
Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) -> -1
Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-2095913833-1271187511-909365273-512) -> -1
Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-2095913833-1271187511-909365273-514) -> -1
Account Operators (S-1-5-32-548) -> -1
Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1470575258-2074721094-725182960-512) -> -1
Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-2095913833-1271187511-909365273-2021) -> admins
Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1470575258-2074721094-725182960-513) -> -1
Backup Operators (S-1-5-32-551) -> -1
Users (S-1-5-32-545) -> -1
Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1470575258-2074721094-725182960-514) -> -1

On a side note, the syntax "mangle case = yes" is no longer recognized in 
smb.conf.  I have looked in the 3.0.6 man pages and the syntax appears to be 
correct.

Misty