[Samba] Samba vs Windows SAK
Bob Crandell
bob at assuredcomp.com
Mon Mar 17 23:05:51 GMT 2003
erx (esteadle at spinnakernet.com) wrote*:
>
>Hi,
>
> SNIP <
>
> If it weren't true, there would be no point at all to marketing.
Marketing isn't based on truth.
>
>
>So you know of nothing, then, that counters Microsoft's arguments?
"Truth in advertising" doesn't apply to Microsoft.
>
>
>
>ERX
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: John H Terpstra [mailto:jht at samba.org]
>>Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 3:11 PM
>>To: erx
>>Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
>>Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba vs Windows SAK
>>
>>
>>On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, erx wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone seen this:
>>>
>>http://www.microsoft.com/windows/Embedded/sak/evaluation/compare/adva
>>ntage.asp
>>>
>>> And has anyone from the Samba team posted a response? It seems like some of
>>> the information presented there is contrary to what I know about Samba.
>>
>>Why reply to Microsoft? What will it achieve?
>>As things stand we can demonstrate that they are not in touch:
>>
- Not with their own customers
>>
- Not with Samba capabilities
>>
>>As to 'Truth' - customers make up their own minds on that one. No one can
>>prove 'Truth' to anyone.
>>
>>- John T.
>>--
>>John H Terpstra
>>Email: jht at samba.org
>
>
More information about the samba
mailing list