No subject


Mon Dec 1 12:27:21 GMT 2003


on "NAT".
There is no lmhosts on "TEO".
Am I doing all right, or not?

Alex.

I am using:
lmhosts:
192.168.1.1     TEO#3
192.168.1.1     TEO#20
192.168.1.2     TORTILLA#1d
192.168.1.2     TORTILLA#1b
192.168.1.2     NAT#3
192.168.1.2     NAT#20
192.168.7.3     BOTSMAN#3
192.168.7.3     BOTSMAN#20
192.168.7.8     GIN'S INC.#1d
192.168.7.8     ZIDAR#3
192.168.7.8     ZIDAR#20
192.168.7.9     WORKGROUP#1d
192.168.7.9     OLLAND#3
192.168.7.9     OLLAND#20
192.168.7.13    TORTILLA#1d
192.168.7.13    TORTILLA#1b
192.168.7.13    NAT#3
192.168.7.13    NAT#20
192.168.7.14    TARKUS#1d
192.168.7.14    GUSEV#3
192.168.7.14    GUSEV#20
192.168.7.21    BRILLIANT#1d
192.168.7.21    ...#3
192.168.7.21    ...#20

smb.conf:
[global]
    workgroup = TORTILLA
    server string = Samba %v
    client code page = 932
    character set = koi8-r
    syslog = 0
    log level = 4
    interfaces = lo eth0 eth1
    bind interfaces only = no
    socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
    local master = yes
    os level = 255
    domain master = yes
    preferred master = yes
    name resolve order = lmhosts wins
    lm announce = no
    lm interval = 0
    wins support = yes
#   wins proxy = yes





More information about the samba mailing list