No subject
Mon Dec 1 12:27:21 GMT 2003
on "NAT".
There is no lmhosts on "TEO".
Am I doing all right, or not?
Alex.
I am using:
lmhosts:
192.168.1.1 TEO#3
192.168.1.1 TEO#20
192.168.1.2 TORTILLA#1d
192.168.1.2 TORTILLA#1b
192.168.1.2 NAT#3
192.168.1.2 NAT#20
192.168.7.3 BOTSMAN#3
192.168.7.3 BOTSMAN#20
192.168.7.8 GIN'S INC.#1d
192.168.7.8 ZIDAR#3
192.168.7.8 ZIDAR#20
192.168.7.9 WORKGROUP#1d
192.168.7.9 OLLAND#3
192.168.7.9 OLLAND#20
192.168.7.13 TORTILLA#1d
192.168.7.13 TORTILLA#1b
192.168.7.13 NAT#3
192.168.7.13 NAT#20
192.168.7.14 TARKUS#1d
192.168.7.14 GUSEV#3
192.168.7.14 GUSEV#20
192.168.7.21 BRILLIANT#1d
192.168.7.21 ...#3
192.168.7.21 ...#20
smb.conf:
[global]
workgroup = TORTILLA
server string = Samba %v
client code page = 932
character set = koi8-r
syslog = 0
log level = 4
interfaces = lo eth0 eth1
bind interfaces only = no
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
local master = yes
os level = 255
domain master = yes
preferred master = yes
name resolve order = lmhosts wins
lm announce = no
lm interval = 0
wins support = yes
# wins proxy = yes
More information about the samba
mailing list