No subject
Mon Dec 1 11:34:25 GMT 2003
apply with setfacl are reflected in the rights of the windows clients. It
seems the only thing that isn't working is actually doing anything with
the acls using a windows client to change them or view them (ie.
security/permissions tab). It works, but only shows the user/group/other
rights that are on the file or dir...in other words, the regular unix
rights. No ACL stuff is shown or viewable or modifieable. I could just go
on and use the command line to change the acls and everything would be
peachy, but I would love to be able to have my mis people use something
simple like the gui tabs in a windows client. Especially since everyone
else seems to have it working. Thanks for the help.
Alex
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Sean P. Elble wrote:
> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:16:23 -0400
> From: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
> To: kill -9 <kill-9 at warbeast.com>
> Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
>
> Well, I'd have a look at the Samba compilation again; unless Samba 2.2
> explicitly stated that ACLs were being enabled during the compile, then
> they're not there. Another simple thing that I almost forgot was that you
> have to specify that you want ACL support (i.e --with-acl-support). Check to
> make sure that there is an acl.h file in your /usr/include/linux directory
> structure; this file came with the XFS acl-devel package, though I'm not
> sure where it might appear for you. However, you do say the rights are
> applied correctly; the way your e-mail was worded, it was hard to tell if
> you are speaking of ACL rights, or regular Unix rights; which one is it?
> I'll do some research on this, and get back to you. Good luck!
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Sean Elble
> Writer, Editor, Webmaster
> MaximumLinux.org
> http://www.maximumlinux.org/
> elbles at maximumlinux.org
> s_elble at yahoo.com
> -----------------------------------------
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "kill -9" <kill-9 at warbeast.com>
> To: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
> Cc: "Libor Vanlk" <lists at conet.cz>; <samba at lists.samba.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 11:26 PM
> Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
>
>
> > I am currently having this same problem with posix acls and redhat 6.2,
> > but I am not using xfs. Everything is installed and compiled. The rights
> > are applied correctly and working so far as the linux system is concerned.
> > Users can only access what they should be able to through samba. But when
> > I try to use any form of windows server or client to change or read the
> > rights, only the user group and other rights are shown, no acls. The only
> > strange thing about my setup is that I am running dual sambas, tng as a
> > pdc and 2.2 as the file server (which has the acl support). The file
> > server is a member of the tng domain. Any ideas?
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Sean P. Elble wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 20:35:00 -0400
> > > From: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
> > > To: "[iso-8859-2] Libor Vanlk" <lists at conet.cz>, samba at lists.samba.org
> > > Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
> > >
> > > Well, you _can_ have very fine-grained access control with the XFS ACLs
> with
> > > Samba 2.2, and it can all be done with Windows 2000. I had a very
> similar
> > > problem; if you are using the RPMs graciously provided by the Samba
> team,
> > > get rid of them; they don't have ACL support, nor do they have support
> for
> > > the kernel oplock mechanism present in the 2.4.x kernels, which you must
> be
> > > using, since you are using XFS. :-) I'd recommend checking out the
> latest
> > > CVS of both the Linux kernel with XFS support, available at oss.sgi.com,
> and
> > > the latest Samba CVS, because many many problems have been fixed in
> both. If
> > > that's not an option, I have a Samba RPM compiled (version 2.2 from CVS
> on
> > > 5/16/01), with 2.4 oplock support, XFS ACL support, and quota support.
> If
> > > you do compile your own, make sure the acl-devel RPM package is
> installed
> > > before you compile Samba; otherwise, you won't be able to have XFS ACL
> > > support. Good luck!
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------
> > > Sean Elble
> > > Writer, Editor, Webmaster
> > > MaximumLinux.org
> > > http://www.maximumlinux.org/
> > > elbles at maximumlinux.org
> > > s_elble at yahoo.com
> > > -----------------------------------------
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Libor Vanlk" <lists at conet.cz>
> > > To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:11 PM
> > > Subject: What can ACL do?
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > > I'd like to ask - what can ACLs (on XFS+Samba 2.2) do for me? I was
> unable
> > > > to find this out. I thought that I can setup rights like "john:rwx,
> > > > jack:r--" but I wasn't (W2k) - I was only able to setup rwx for
> > > > user/group/others :(
> > > >
> > > > Libor Vanek
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > "First, they ignore you. Then they laugh
> > at you. Then they fight you. Then you
> > win." - Mahatma Ghandi
> >
> > In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?
> >
> > Alex West
> > A&M Communications - Tech Guru
> > BioControl Technology Inc., MIS Administrator
> > kill-9 at warbeast.com | kill-9 at ipost.net
> > WebPage -> www.warbeast.com/~kill-9
> > Visit Third Eye Digital Productions -
> http://www.indiana-emall.com/thirdeye
> > Check out my band and FREE music at *** www.mp3.com/snowpants ***
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"First, they ignore you. Then they laugh
at you. Then they fight you. Then you
win." - Mahatma Ghandi
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?
Alex West
A&M Communications - Tech Guru
BioControl Technology Inc., MIS Administrator
kill-9 at warbeast.com | kill-9 at ipost.net
WebPage -> www.warbeast.com/~kill-9
Visit Third Eye Digital Productions - http://www.indiana-emall.com/thirdeye
Check out my band and FREE music at *** www.mp3.com/snowpants ***
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <speed at kumsal.net>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from merkezmail1.kumsal.net (unknown [212.175.9.4]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673414E92 for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:10:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from merkezsql1 ([192.168.1.3]) by merkezmail1.kumsal.net with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.1600); Fri, 15 Jun 2001 17:18:17 +0300
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:38:03 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: J4L-GFIMailer
X-Expid: jajenardmeremesyi
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: 700 Saat Bedava Internet ile Yeni Servis Saglayicinizla Tanisin
Reply-To: speed at kumsal.net
X-JMSavedFile: C:\Program Files\HTML Mailer\Outbound
2942298357046032\mail5023.eml
From: "info at kumsal.net" <speed at kumsal.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-ID: <MERKEZMAIL1ylxN2f9Z00014db9 at merkezmail1.kumsal.net>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jun 2001 14:18:17.0583 (UTC)
FILETIME=[05BA0FF0:01C0F5A6]
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from text/html by demime 0.98b
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
[TABLE NOT SHOWN]
Return-Path: <jon at Osprey.InfotechFL.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from Phoenix.InfoTechFL.Com (hawk-gw.infotechfl.com
[208.62.145.230]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728EB442A
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Osprey.InfotechFL.com (IDENT:jon at Osprey.InfotechFL.com
[204.146.114.55]) by Phoenix.InfoTechFL.Com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP
id f5FEoOr19699 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:50:24
-0400
Received: (from jon at localhost) by Osprey.InfotechFL.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id
KAA04879 for samba at lists.samba.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:50:24 -0400
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:50:24 -0400
From: Jon Wright <Jon.Wright at InfoTechFL.Com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: File Timestamps
Message-ID: <20010615105024.B2711 at Osprey.InfotechFL.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
We have a very interesting situation happening here. I looked in the archives,
and there was a message from Feb. with one follow up, but no solution, so I am
asking for help again.
We have users that are sharing files on a Samba Server (v2.0.5a). When they
OPEN an Excel file that they do not own, the file timestamp is updated to the
current time. This happens only when the user is not the owner, and regardless
of whether the user saves the file or not. Unix diff on copies of a file will
report that the files differ after being opened. When I tried this on a
Samba 2.2.0 server, we received the same results. Also, this has been tested
on a WinNT Server, with the time changes NOT occurring. I am wondering if this
is a quirk in Samba, or my configs. I will provide congig files if anyone wants
to take a look at them, but am not incluing them here out of space
considerations.
Does anyone have any idea as to what is causing this? It is a problem because
we are storing documents where the changing of time stamps can cause problems.
Thank you,
Jon
--
Jon Wright, Network Administrator | 5700 SW 34th St. Suite 1235
Info Tech, Inc. | Gainesville, FL 32608
jon.wright at infotechfl.com | (352)381-4400 Voice
jon.wright at cloverleaf.net | (352)381-4444 Fax
Return-Path: <dhamm at itrepro.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from itrepro.atlanta.itserve.com (festus.itserve.com
[209.4.104.189]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500C3421A
for <samba at samba.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (dhamm at localhost) by
itrepro.atlanta.itserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA31034; Fri,
15 Jun 2001 11:27:42 -0400
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:27:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Hamm <dhamm at itrepro.com>
X-Sender: dhamm at itrepro.atlanta.itserve.com
To: Joachim Feise <jfeise at ics.uci.edu>
Cc: samba at samba.org
Subject: Re: (no subject)
In-Reply-To: <3B28D148.D86F1FE at ics.uci.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10106151126330.30934-100000 at itrepro.atlanta.i
tserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I bet he wants to use smb calls in a script. If so then check out the
"net" command.
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Joachim Feise wrote:
> Russ Ward wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know of a port of smbclient to windows?
>
> What for?
> SMB is native to Windows, so if you want to copy files, you can
> just use Explorer or a command prompt, or write a batch file.
>
> -Joe
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
Return-Path: <mar_garina at opinionz.cjb.net>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailgw2.netvision.net.il (mailgw2.netvision.net.il
[194.90.1.9]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499745495 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from deot.net (ras8-p113.hrz.netvision.net.il [62.0.161.113])
by mailgw2.netvision.net.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA13624 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 21:05:08 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from localhost (mar_garina at localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deot.net
(8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f5FI3iS29348 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 21:03:52 +0300
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 21:03:44 +0300 (IDT)
From: Oren Held <mar_garina at opinionz.cjb.net>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Mounting a cdrom using samba problem
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106152055070.29141-100000 at deot.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello!
(I use SuSE 7.1/Linux 2.4.5/Samba 2.2.0. I'm trying to mount the cdrom
of a win98 machine)
I have a pretty weird problem:
Samba mounts drives on the other computer (win98) very well.
However, when I mount a cdrom on the other machine comes a weird problem.
It mounts well, but then when I try to go into some directory inside the
cd- after several 'ls' commands it tells me either 'Input/output error' or
'Not a directory' error, depends on what I do.
What makes it weird is that in the first 'ls' commands it works, but then
suddenly (usually after one or two working tries) it cannot ls these
directories inside the cd and returns these errors.
Any idea why it happens?
Thanks in advance,
Oren.
P.S. please carbon copy the answer to me because I'm not subscribed.
thanks.
Return-Path: <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net (hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net
[207.217.120.22]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90FE439E
for <samba at samba.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com
[24.151.19.181]) by hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3)
with SMTP id LAA09074; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <005001c0f5cc$fecaa200$0600a8c0 at gateway>
Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
From: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
To: "Andrew Lyon" <Administrator at josims.com>, <samba at samba.org>
References: <C2ADBF38E1F4D3118F9F0060082151A501F680 at CORE>
Subject: Re: ACL's using Redhat 6.2 rpm binary ?
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:57:14 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Andy,
Nope, the Red Hat 6.2 RPM that the Samba Team has so kindly provided us
doesn't have ACL support, nor does it have the 2.4's kernel oplock support;
get the source (I recommend getting the CVS . . . many, many fixes), and
recompile; I use XFS ACLs, so I really can't help you out with that part (at
least by the sounds of your e-mail, you're using the bestbits ACL patch).
Good luck!
Sean Elble
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Lyon" <Administrator at josims.com>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 3:15 AM
Subject: ACL's using Redhat 6.2 rpm binary ?
> Hi,
>
> Does the RPM for RedHat 6.2 have ACL support enabled? If not can I compile
> from tarball and replace a few files to add support? If so which files.
>
> Thanks
> Andy
>
>
> ************************************************************
> Registered Office:
> J.O. Sims Ltd
> Pudding Lane
> Pinchbeck
> Spalding
> Lincs
> PE11 3TJ
> Company reg No: 2084187 Vat reg No: GB 437 4621 47
> Tel: +44 (0) 1775 842100
> Fax: +44 (0) 1775 842101
> Web: www.josims.com
> Email: enquiries at josims.com
>
> ************************************************************
> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential
> and is intended for the addressee only. The contents of
> this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the
> sender's consent. If you are not the intended recipient of
> the message, please notify the sender immediately, and
> delete the message.
>
> The statements and opinions expressed in this message are
> those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those
> of the company. No commitment may be inferred from the
> contents unless explicitly stated. The company does not
> take any responsibility for the personal views of the
> author.
>
> This message has been scanned for viruses before sending,
> but the company does not accept any responsibility for
> infection and recommends that you scan any attachments.
> ************************************************************
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <torriem at cs.byu.edu>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.cs.byu.edu (mail.cs.byu.edu [128.187.2.20]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E182254CB for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from verdi.cs.byu.edu (IDENT:torriem at verdi.cs.byu.edu
[128.187.101.86]) by mail.cs.byu.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5FJ3vP30902; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:03:57 -0600
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:03:57 -0600 (MDT)
From: Michael L Torrie <torriem at cs.byu.edu>
To: Makis Marmaridis <Makis.Marmaridis at learnnow.com.au>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Using disk cloning software and samba pdc
In-Reply-To: <000101c0f56d$0a784b30$943c0a0a at akln01>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106151251320.1175-100000 at verdi.cs.byu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Makis Marmaridis wrote:
> PS: Sorry list if this is getting a little off topic... :-)
This may not relate to samba in some ways (ie samba configuration,
compilation, etc), but it does relate to Samba in that this may be
something that many of Samba deployers will have to deal with.
I'll continue this discussion privately.
Thanks,
Michael
>
> HTH,
>
> Cheers,
> Makis.
>
>
Return-Path: <ccheshire at bigredwire.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from puck.bigredwire.com (puck.bigredwire.com [216.87.233.2])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3635654D0 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bigredwire.com (dilligaf.bigredwire.com [216.87.226.15])
by puck.bigredwire.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id
MAA09168 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:13:09 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: puck.bigredwire.com: Host
dilligaf.bigredwire.com [216.87.226.15] claimed to be bigredwire.com
Message-ID: <3B2A5DA9.C2D3EC2 at bigredwire.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:10:33 -0700
From: Chris Cheshire <ccheshire at bigredwire.com>
Organization: bigredwire.com Inc
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: duplicate share names
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have samba 2.07 set up on Solaris/Intel 2.8.
I have a few directories that I want read only access to one
set of users, but read/write access to another. I tried
putting the same share name in smb.conf with different
rules, but when I ran testparms it just showed the last
configuration entry. Is there any way to achieve this
using the same share name, or do I have to give each
one a different share name?
Thanks
--
Chris Cheshire
Manager of Software Development
bigredwire.com
Email : ccheshire at bigredwire.com
"Ambition is just an excuse for those that
don't have the guts to be lazy"
Return-Path: <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net
(harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.12]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 9651C46A0 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 15
Jun 2001 12:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com
[24.151.19.181]) by harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3)
with SMTP id MAA14558; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <003b01c0f5d2$efa3ca80$0600a8c0 at gateway>
Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
From: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
To: "kill -9" <kill-9 at warbeast.com>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1010615093753.5221G-100000 at elektra.warbeast.c
om>
Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:39:46 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Alex,
Could you be specific as to what you have checked to see if ACLs were
compiled in? From the information you have given me, it sounds as though
ACLs weren't sucessfully compiled in. For POSIX ACLs, during the ./configure
step of the compilation, it should display a message such as "Checking for
POSIX ACLs . . . yes", or something to that extent. If that message is not
displayed, then you don't have ACL support! :-) For you, there should be a
file called acl.h in the /usr/include/sys/ directory (full name of location:
/usr/include/sys/acl.h); if that file isn't there, than Samba 2.2 won't
detect ACL support, and won't compile it in. Also, are you compiling from
the source RPM? If so, then check the Samba RPM spec file to make sure that
the configure line has the --with-acl-support line in it. Sorry if I sound a
slight bit condescending (I've been known to be like that at times :-)),
but, when I had this problem, the soultion just seemed so obvious. Good
luck!
Sean Elble
----- Original Message -----
From: "kill -9" <kill-9 at warbeast.com>
To: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
> From everything I've checked, acls were compiled in correctly. Any acls I
> apply with setfacl are reflected in the rights of the windows clients. It
> seems the only thing that isn't working is actually doing anything with
> the acls using a windows client to change them or view them (ie.
> security/permissions tab). It works, but only shows the user/group/other
> rights that are on the file or dir...in other words, the regular unix
> rights. No ACL stuff is shown or viewable or modifieable. I could just go
> on and use the command line to change the acls and everything would be
> peachy, but I would love to be able to have my mis people use something
> simple like the gui tabs in a windows client. Especially since everyone
> else seems to have it working. Thanks for the help.
> Alex
>
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Sean P. Elble wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:16:23 -0400
> > From: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
> > To: kill -9 <kill-9 at warbeast.com>
> > Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
> > Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
> >
> > Well, I'd have a look at the Samba compilation again; unless Samba 2.2
> > explicitly stated that ACLs were being enabled during the compile, then
> > they're not there. Another simple thing that I almost forgot was that
you
> > have to specify that you want ACL support (i.e --with-acl-support).
Check to
> > make sure that there is an acl.h file in your /usr/include/linux
directory
> > structure; this file came with the XFS acl-devel package, though I'm not
> > sure where it might appear for you. However, you do say the rights are
> > applied correctly; the way your e-mail was worded, it was hard to tell
if
> > you are speaking of ACL rights, or regular Unix rights; which one is it?
> > I'll do some research on this, and get back to you. Good luck!
> >
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Sean Elble
> > Writer, Editor, Webmaster
> > MaximumLinux.org
> > http://www.maximumlinux.org/
> > elbles at maximumlinux.org
> > s_elble at yahoo.com
> > -----------------------------------------
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "kill -9" <kill-9 at warbeast.com>
> > To: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
> > Cc: "Libor Vanlk" <lists at conet.cz>; <samba at lists.samba.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 11:26 PM
> > Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
> >
> >
> > > I am currently having this same problem with posix acls and redhat
6.2,
> > > but I am not using xfs. Everything is installed and compiled. The
rights
> > > are applied correctly and working so far as the linux system is
concerned.
> > > Users can only access what they should be able to through samba. But
when
> > > I try to use any form of windows server or client to change or read
the
> > > rights, only the user group and other rights are shown, no acls. The
only
> > > strange thing about my setup is that I am running dual sambas, tng as
a
> > > pdc and 2.2 as the file server (which has the acl support). The file
> > > server is a member of the tng domain. Any ideas?
> > >
> > > On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Sean P. Elble wrote:
> > >
> > > > Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 20:35:00 -0400
> > > > From: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
> > > > To: "[iso-8859-2] Libor Vanlk" <lists at conet.cz>,
samba at lists.samba.org
> > > > Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
> > > >
> > > > Well, you _can_ have very fine-grained access control with the XFS
ACLs
> > with
> > > > Samba 2.2, and it can all be done with Windows 2000. I had a very
> > similar
> > > > problem; if you are using the RPMs graciously provided by the Samba
> > team,
> > > > get rid of them; they don't have ACL support, nor do they have
support
> > for
> > > > the kernel oplock mechanism present in the 2.4.x kernels, which you
must
> > be
> > > > using, since you are using XFS. :-) I'd recommend checking out the
> > latest
> > > > CVS of both the Linux kernel with XFS support, available at
oss.sgi.com,
> > and
> > > > the latest Samba CVS, because many many problems have been fixed in
> > both. If
> > > > that's not an option, I have a Samba RPM compiled (version 2.2 from
CVS
> > on
> > > > 5/16/01), with 2.4 oplock support, XFS ACL support, and quota
support.
> > If
> > > > you do compile your own, make sure the acl-devel RPM package is
> > installed
> > > > before you compile Samba; otherwise, you won't be able to have XFS
ACL
> > > > support. Good luck!
> > > >
> > > > -----------------------------------------
> > > > Sean Elble
> > > > Writer, Editor, Webmaster
> > > > MaximumLinux.org
> > > > http://www.maximumlinux.org/
> > > > elbles at maximumlinux.org
> > > > s_elble at yahoo.com
> > > > -----------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Libor Vanlk" <lists at conet.cz>
> > > > To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:11 PM
> > > > Subject: What can ACL do?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > I'd like to ask - what can ACLs (on XFS+Samba 2.2) do for me? I
was
> > unable
> > > > > to find this out. I thought that I can setup rights like
"john:rwx,
> > > > > jack:r--" but I wasn't (W2k) - I was only able to setup rwx for
> > > > > user/group/others :(
> > > > >
> > > > > Libor Vanek
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> > > "First, they ignore you. Then they laugh
> > > at you. Then they fight you. Then you
> > > win." - Mahatma Ghandi
> > >
> > > In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?
> > >
> > > Alex West
> > > A&M Communications - Tech Guru
> > > BioControl Technology Inc., MIS Administrator
> > > kill-9 at warbeast.com | kill-9 at ipost.net
> > > WebPage -> www.warbeast.com/~kill-9
> > > Visit Third Eye Digital Productions -
> > http://www.indiana-emall.com/thirdeye
> > > Check out my band and FREE music at *** www.mp3.com/snowpants ***
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> "First, they ignore you. Then they laugh
> at you. Then they fight you. Then you
> win." - Mahatma Ghandi
>
> In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?
>
> Alex West
> A&M Communications - Tech Guru
> BioControl Technology Inc., MIS Administrator
> kill-9 at warbeast.com | kill-9 at ipost.net
> WebPage -> www.warbeast.com/~kill-9
> Visit Third Eye Digital Productions -
http://www.indiana-emall.com/thirdeye
> Check out my band and FREE music at *** www.mp3.com/snowpants ***
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Return-Path: <kill-9 at warbeast.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from elektra.warbeast.com (unknown [63.106.52.242]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF0B5520 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elektra.warbeast.com (IDENT:kill-9 at warbeast.com
[63.106.52.242]) by elektra.warbeast.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with SMTP id
QAA06206; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:14:15 -0400
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:14:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: kill -9 <kill-9 at warbeast.com>
To: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
In-Reply-To: <003b01c0f5d2$efa3ca80$0600a8c0 at gateway>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1010615161218.6186A-100000 at elektra.warbeast.c
om>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Sean,
Yes, it was detected on configure, and that file is there. It is
definately working, or people would be complaining that they can or cannot
see files, dirs, etc. The problem seems to be between the windows domain
member client or server when it is getting the acls from the server, it
just isn't seeing them for some reason. The only thing weird about my
setup is that the pdc is a tng samba running on the same machine, and the
2.2 samba is just a member server.
Thanks for the help.
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Sean P. Elble wrote:
> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:39:46 -0400
> From: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
> To: kill -9 <kill-9 at warbeast.com>
> Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
>
> Alex,
>
> Could you be specific as to what you have checked to see if ACLs were
> compiled in? From the information you have given me, it sounds as though
> ACLs weren't sucessfully compiled in. For POSIX ACLs, during the ./configure
> step of the compilation, it should display a message such as "Checking for
> POSIX ACLs . . . yes", or something to that extent. If that message is not
> displayed, then you don't have ACL support! :-) For you, there should be a
> file called acl.h in the /usr/include/sys/ directory (full name of location:
> /usr/include/sys/acl.h); if that file isn't there, than Samba 2.2 won't
> detect ACL support, and won't compile it in. Also, are you compiling from
> the source RPM? If so, then check the Samba RPM spec file to make sure that
> the configure line has the --with-acl-support line in it. Sorry if I sound a
> slight bit condescending (I've been known to be like that at times :-)),
> but, when I had this problem, the soultion just seemed so obvious. Good
> luck!
>
> Sean Elble
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "kill -9" <kill-9 at warbeast.com>
> To: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
> Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 9:40 AM
> Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
>
>
> > From everything I've checked, acls were compiled in correctly. Any acls I
> > apply with setfacl are reflected in the rights of the windows clients. It
> > seems the only thing that isn't working is actually doing anything with
> > the acls using a windows client to change them or view them (ie.
> > security/permissions tab). It works, but only shows the user/group/other
> > rights that are on the file or dir...in other words, the regular unix
> > rights. No ACL stuff is shown or viewable or modifieable. I could just go
> > on and use the command line to change the acls and everything would be
> > peachy, but I would love to be able to have my mis people use something
> > simple like the gui tabs in a windows client. Especially since everyone
> > else seems to have it working. Thanks for the help.
> > Alex
> >
> > On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Sean P. Elble wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:16:23 -0400
> > > From: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
> > > To: kill -9 <kill-9 at warbeast.com>
> > > Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
> > > Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
> > >
> > > Well, I'd have a look at the Samba compilation again; unless Samba 2.2
> > > explicitly stated that ACLs were being enabled during the compile, then
> > > they're not there. Another simple thing that I almost forgot was that
> you
> > > have to specify that you want ACL support (i.e --with-acl-support).
> Check to
> > > make sure that there is an acl.h file in your /usr/include/linux
> directory
> > > structure; this file came with the XFS acl-devel package, though I'm not
> > > sure where it might appear for you. However, you do say the rights are
> > > applied correctly; the way your e-mail was worded, it was hard to tell
> if
> > > you are speaking of ACL rights, or regular Unix rights; which one is it?
> > > I'll do some research on this, and get back to you. Good luck!
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------
> > > Sean Elble
> > > Writer, Editor, Webmaster
> > > MaximumLinux.org
> > > http://www.maximumlinux.org/
> > > elbles at maximumlinux.org
> > > s_elble at yahoo.com
> > > -----------------------------------------
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "kill -9" <kill-9 at warbeast.com>
> > > To: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
> > > Cc: "Libor Vanlk" <lists at conet.cz>; <samba at lists.samba.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 11:26 PM
> > > Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
> > >
> > >
> > > > I am currently having this same problem with posix acls and redhat
> 6.2,
> > > > but I am not using xfs. Everything is installed and compiled. The
> rights
> > > > are applied correctly and working so far as the linux system is
> concerned.
> > > > Users can only access what they should be able to through samba. But
> when
> > > > I try to use any form of windows server or client to change or read
> the
> > > > rights, only the user group and other rights are shown, no acls. The
> only
> > > > strange thing about my setup is that I am running dual sambas, tng as
> a
> > > > pdc and 2.2 as the file server (which has the acl support). The file
> > > > server is a member of the tng domain. Any ideas?
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Sean P. Elble wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 20:35:00 -0400
> > > > > From: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
> > > > > To: "[iso-8859-2] Libor Vanlk" <lists at conet.cz>,
> samba at lists.samba.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, you _can_ have very fine-grained access control with the XFS
> ACLs
> > > with
> > > > > Samba 2.2, and it can all be done with Windows 2000. I had a very
> > > similar
> > > > > problem; if you are using the RPMs graciously provided by the Samba
> > > team,
> > > > > get rid of them; they don't have ACL support, nor do they have
> support
> > > for
> > > > > the kernel oplock mechanism present in the 2.4.x kernels, which you
> must
> > > be
> > > > > using, since you are using XFS. :-) I'd recommend checking out the
> > > latest
> > > > > CVS of both the Linux kernel with XFS support, available at
> oss.sgi.com,
> > > and
> > > > > the latest Samba CVS, because many many problems have been fixed in
> > > both. If
> > > > > that's not an option, I have a Samba RPM compiled (version 2.2 from
> CVS
> > > on
> > > > > 5/16/01), with 2.4 oplock support, XFS ACL support, and quota
> support.
> > > If
> > > > > you do compile your own, make sure the acl-devel RPM package is
> > > installed
> > > > > before you compile Samba; otherwise, you won't be able to have XFS
> ACL
> > > > > support. Good luck!
> > > > >
> > > > > -----------------------------------------
> > > > > Sean Elble
> > > > > Writer, Editor, Webmaster
> > > > > MaximumLinux.org
> > > > > http://www.maximumlinux.org/
> > > > > elbles at maximumlinux.org
> > > > > s_elble at yahoo.com
> > > > > -----------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Libor Vanlk" <lists at conet.cz>
> > > > > To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:11 PM
> > > > > Subject: What can ACL do?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > I'd like to ask - what can ACLs (on XFS+Samba 2.2) do for me? I
> was
> > > unable
> > > > > > to find this out. I thought that I can setup rights like
> "john:rwx,
> > > > > > jack:r--" but I wasn't (W2k) - I was only able to setup rwx for
> > > > > > user/group/others :(
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Libor Vanek
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > > > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
> > > > "First, they ignore you. Then they laugh
> > > > at you. Then they fight you. Then you
> > > > win." - Mahatma Ghandi
> > > >
> > > > In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?
> > > >
> > > > Alex West
> > > > A&M Communications - Tech Guru
> > > > BioControl Technology Inc., MIS Administrator
> > > > kill-9 at warbeast.com | kill-9 at ipost.net
> > > > WebPage -> www.warbeast.com/~kill-9
> > > > Visit Third Eye Digital Productions -
> > > http://www.indiana-emall.com/thirdeye
> > > > Check out my band and FREE music at *** www.mp3.com/snowpants ***
> > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > "First, they ignore you. Then they laugh
> > at you. Then they fight you. Then you
> > win." - Mahatma Ghandi
> >
> > In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?
> >
> > Alex West
> > A&M Communications - Tech Guru
> > BioControl Technology Inc., MIS Administrator
> > kill-9 at warbeast.com | kill-9 at ipost.net
> > WebPage -> www.warbeast.com/~kill-9
> > Visit Third Eye Digital Productions -
> http://www.indiana-emall.com/thirdeye
> > Check out my band and FREE music at *** www.mp3.com/snowpants ***
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"First, they ignore you. Then they laugh
at you. Then they fight you. Then you
win." - Mahatma Ghandi
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?
Alex West
A&M Communications - Tech Guru
BioControl Technology Inc., MIS Administrator
kill-9 at warbeast.com | kill-9 at ipost.net
WebPage -> www.warbeast.com/~kill-9
Visit Third Eye Digital Productions - http://www..indiana-emall.com/thirdeye
Check out my band and FREE music at *** www.mp3.com/snowpants ***
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net
(harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.12]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D155536 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 15
Jun 2001 13:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com
[24.151.19.181]) by harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3)
with SMTP id NAA03342; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <006601c0f5d7$ffbe28c0$0600a8c0 at gateway>
Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
From: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
To: "kill -9" <kill-9 at warbeast.com>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1010615161218.6186A-100000 at elektra.warbeast.c
om>
Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:16:01 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Alex,
At this point, I'd recommend getting the CVS version, and trying that; there
were a lot of bug fixes, including some ACL fixes. You'll want the SAMBA_2_2
branch. The setup you're using may have something to do with it, though I
doubt it. Sorry I couldn't be of more assistance. :-(
Sean Elble
----- Original Message -----
From: "kill -9" <kill-9 at warbeast.com>
To: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
> Sean,
> Yes, it was detected on configure, and that file is there. It is
> definately working, or people would be complaining that they can or cannot
> see files, dirs, etc. The problem seems to be between the windows domain
> member client or server when it is getting the acls from the server, it
> just isn't seeing them for some reason. The only thing weird about my
> setup is that the pdc is a tng samba running on the same machine, and the
> 2.2 samba is just a member server.
> Thanks for the help.
>
>
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Sean P. Elble wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:39:46 -0400
> > From: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
> > To: kill -9 <kill-9 at warbeast.com>
> > Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
> > Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
> >
> > Alex,
> >
> > Could you be specific as to what you have checked to see if ACLs were
> > compiled in? From the information you have given me, it sounds as though
> > ACLs weren't sucessfully compiled in. For POSIX ACLs, during the
./configure
> > step of the compilation, it should display a message such as "Checking
for
> > POSIX ACLs . . . yes", or something to that extent. If that message is
not
> > displayed, then you don't have ACL support! :-) For you, there should be
a
> > file called acl.h in the /usr/include/sys/ directory (full name of
location:
> > /usr/include/sys/acl.h); if that file isn't there, than Samba 2.2 won't
> > detect ACL support, and won't compile it in. Also, are you compiling
from
> > the source RPM? If so, then check the Samba RPM spec file to make sure
that
> > the configure line has the --with-acl-support line in it. Sorry if I
sound a
> > slight bit condescending (I've been known to be like that at times :-)),
> > but, when I had this problem, the soultion just seemed so obvious. Good
> > luck!
> >
> > Sean Elble
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "kill -9" <kill-9 at warbeast.com>
> > To: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
> > Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
> > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 9:40 AM
> > Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
> >
> >
> > > From everything I've checked, acls were compiled in correctly. Any
acls I
> > > apply with setfacl are reflected in the rights of the windows clients.
It
> > > seems the only thing that isn't working is actually doing anything
with
> > > the acls using a windows client to change them or view them (ie.
> > > security/permissions tab). It works, but only shows the
user/group/other
> > > rights that are on the file or dir...in other words, the regular unix
> > > rights. No ACL stuff is shown or viewable or modifieable. I could just
go
> > > on and use the command line to change the acls and everything would be
> > > peachy, but I would love to be able to have my mis people use
something
> > > simple like the gui tabs in a windows client. Especially since
everyone
> > > else seems to have it working. Thanks for the help.
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Sean P. Elble wrote:
> > >
> > > > Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:16:23 -0400
> > > > From: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
> > > > To: kill -9 <kill-9 at warbeast.com>
> > > > Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
> > > > Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
> > > >
> > > > Well, I'd have a look at the Samba compilation again; unless Samba
2.2
> > > > explicitly stated that ACLs were being enabled during the compile,
then
> > > > they're not there. Another simple thing that I almost forgot was
that
> > you
> > > > have to specify that you want ACL support (i.e --with-acl-support).
> > Check to
> > > > make sure that there is an acl.h file in your /usr/include/linux
> > directory
> > > > structure; this file came with the XFS acl-devel package, though I'm
not
> > > > sure where it might appear for you. However, you do say the rights
are
> > > > applied correctly; the way your e-mail was worded, it was hard to
tell
> > if
> > > > you are speaking of ACL rights, or regular Unix rights; which one is
it?
> > > > I'll do some research on this, and get back to you. Good luck!
> > > >
> > > > -----------------------------------------
> > > > Sean Elble
> > > > Writer, Editor, Webmaster
> > > > MaximumLinux.org
> > > > http://www.maximumlinux.org/
> > > > elbles at maximumlinux.org
> > > > s_elble at yahoo.com
> > > > -----------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "kill -9" <kill-9 at warbeast.com>
> > > > To: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
> > > > Cc: "Libor Vanlk" <lists at conet.cz>; <samba at lists.samba.org>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 11:26 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I am currently having this same problem with posix acls and redhat
> > 6.2,
> > > > > but I am not using xfs. Everything is installed and compiled. The
> > rights
> > > > > are applied correctly and working so far as the linux system is
> > concerned.
> > > > > Users can only access what they should be able to through samba.
But
> > when
> > > > > I try to use any form of windows server or client to change or
read
> > the
> > > > > rights, only the user group and other rights are shown, no acls.
The
> > only
> > > > > strange thing about my setup is that I am running dual sambas, tng
as
> > a
> > > > > pdc and 2.2 as the file server (which has the acl support). The
file
> > > > > server is a member of the tng domain. Any ideas?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Sean P. Elble wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 20:35:00 -0400
> > > > > > From: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
> > > > > > To: "[iso-8859-2] Libor Vanlk" <lists at conet.cz>,
> > samba at lists.samba.org
> > > > > > Subject: Re: What can ACL do?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well, you _can_ have very fine-grained access control with the
XFS
> > ACLs
> > > > with
> > > > > > Samba 2.2, and it can all be done with Windows 2000. I had a
very
> > > > similar
> > > > > > problem; if you are using the RPMs graciously provided by the
Samba
> > > > team,
> > > > > > get rid of them; they don't have ACL support, nor do they have
> > support
> > > > for
> > > > > > the kernel oplock mechanism present in the 2.4.x kernels, which
you
> > must
> > > > be
> > > > > > using, since you are using XFS. :-) I'd recommend checking out
the
> > > > latest
> > > > > > CVS of both the Linux kernel with XFS support, available at
> > oss.sgi.com,
> > > > and
> > > > > > the latest Samba CVS, because many many problems have been fixed
in
> > > > both. If
> > > > > > that's not an option, I have a Samba RPM compiled (version 2.2
from
> > CVS
> > > > on
> > > > > > 5/16/01), with 2.4 oplock support, XFS ACL support, and quota
> > support.
> > > > If
> > > > > > you do compile your own, make sure the acl-devel RPM package is
> > > > installed
> > > > > > before you compile Samba; otherwise, you won't be able to have
XFS
> > ACL
> > > > > > support. Good luck!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----------------------------------------
> > > > > > Sean Elble
> > > > > > Writer, Editor, Webmaster
> > > > > > MaximumLinux.org
> > > > > > http://www.maximumlinux.org/
> > > > > > elbles at maximumlinux.org
> > > > > > s_elble at yahoo.com
> > > > > > -----------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "Libor Vanlk" <lists at conet.cz>
> > > > > > To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:11 PM
> > > > > > Subject: What can ACL do?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > I'd like to ask - what can ACLs (on XFS+Samba 2.2) do for me?
I
> > was
> > > > unable
> > > > > > > to find this out. I thought that I can setup rights like
> > "john:rwx,
> > > > > > > jack:r--" but I wasn't (W2k) - I was only able to setup rwx
for
> > > > > > > user/group/others :(
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Libor Vanek
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
the
> > > > > > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
the
> > > > > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --
> > > > > "First, they ignore you. Then they laugh
> > > > > at you. Then they fight you. Then you
> > > > > win." - Mahatma Ghandi
> > > > >
> > > > > In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?
> > > > >
> > > > > Alex West
> > > > > A&M Communications - Tech Guru
> > > > > BioControl Technology Inc., MIS Administrator
> > > > > kill-9 at warbeast.com | kill-9 at ipost.net
> > > > > WebPage -> www.warbeast.com/~kill-9
> > > > > Visit Third Eye Digital Productions -
> > > > http://www.indiana-emall.com/thirdeye
> > > > > Check out my band and FREE music at *** www.mp3.com/snowpants
***
> > > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> > > "First, they ignore you. Then they laugh
> > > at you. Then they fight you. Then you
> > > win." - Mahatma Ghandi
> > >
> > > In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?
> > >
> > > Alex West
> > > A&M Communications - Tech Guru
> > > BioControl Technology Inc., MIS Administrator
> > > kill-9 at warbeast.com | kill-9 at ipost.net
> > > WebPage -> www.warbeast.com/~kill-9
> > > Visit Third Eye Digital Productions -
> > http://www.indiana-emall.com/thirdeye
> > > Check out my band and FREE music at *** www.mp3.com/snowpants ***
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> "First, they ignore you. Then they laugh
> at you. Then they fight you. Then you
> win." - Mahatma Ghandi
>
> In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?
>
> Alex West
> A&M Communications - Tech Guru
> BioControl Technology Inc., MIS Administrator
> kill-9 at warbeast.com | kill-9 at ipost.net
> WebPage -> www.warbeast.com/~kill-9
> Visit Third Eye Digital Productions -
http://www..indiana-emall.com/thirdeye
> Check out my band and FREE music at *** www.mp3.com/snowpants ***
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Return-Path: <grega at krneki.org>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from razor.arnes.si (razor.arnes.si [193.2.1.80]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58B0420E for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xxx (kr7-114i.dial-up.arnes.si [194.249.3.114]) by
razor.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDBAE699 for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 23:20:59 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <200106152320480910.005434E3 at razor.arnes.si>
X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.10.03.02 (3)
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 23:20:48 +0200
From: grega at krneki.org
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: i see just 256 megs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi
I'm quite new to samba so i'm sorry if
this mail will look funny or dumb.
My problem happens every time I mount a share
from a windows 2k box.
I do:
mount -t smbfs -o username=xxx //f2-ijs/Kgb_backup /backup
bash-2.04# du -H /backup
2.5G /backup
bash-2.04# df -H /backup
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
//f2-ijs/Kgb_backup 262M 262M 0 100% /backup
So hmm how is this possible: i always see just ~256 megs.
There is no max disk size in smb.conf. And besides that
this limit is just "virtual" isn't it?
But I can't write more than that - cp or any other try
to write data fails. And I would desperately
need more space for doing the backups.
It doesn't matter what I mount -
bash-2.04# df -H /backup
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
//f2-ijs/Users 262M 262M 0 100% /backup
always 262 M!
Please help or give some suggestions.
c'ya,
Grega
Return-Path: <gabberatski at freegates.be>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from spoolm2.tiscalinet.be (spoolm2.tiscalinet.be
[212.35.2.51]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34F442F9
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppp-14-249.tiscalinet.be ([212.35.14.250]
helo=thunderbird) by spoolm2.tiscalinet.be with smtp (Tiscalinet) id
15B1aA-00046v-00 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001
23:56:47 +0200
Message-ID: <01db01c0f5e6$c41f1b30$0400a8c0 at thunderbird>
From: "gabberatski" <gabberatski at freegates.be>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Samba as non-root
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 00:01:43 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
How do I configure Samba, so it isn't running as root
Return-Path: <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3C64220 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 15
Jun 2001 15:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as1-232.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.9.232]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2)
with ESMTP id f5FMuMI23999; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 08:56:28 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root at yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
IAA26071; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 08:55:57 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet at piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
IAA29494; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 08:55:56 +1000
Message-ID: <3B2A927C.FFA59557 at bartlett.house>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 08:55:56 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gabberatski <gabberatski at freegates.be>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Samba as non-root
References: <01db01c0f5e6$c41f1b30$0400a8c0 at thunderbird>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
gabberatski wrote:
>
> How do I configure Samba, so it isn't running as root
While possible, it won't work particularly well - if at all. Samba
needs to be root for much of its functionality, including checking
passwords, changing effective user-id and the like. If started as
non-root, and binding to a non-root port it should be possible to login
as that same user - but I am SURE that nobody has tested this in an
absolute age. It might work if you login as guest and have guest being
that same unprivilaged user.
The real question is WHY would you want to do this?
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
Return-Path: <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id C690F4220 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 15
Jun 2001 15:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as1-232.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.9.232]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2)
with ESMTP id f5FMvVI24125; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 08:57:31 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root at yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
IAA26080; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 08:57:06 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet at piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
IAA29503; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 08:57:06 +1000
Message-ID: <3B2A92C2.A4A3C76C at bartlett.house>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 08:57:06 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chris Cheshire <ccheshire at bigredwire.com>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: duplicate share names
References: <3B2A5DA9.C2D3EC2 at bigredwire.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Chris Cheshire wrote:
>
> I have samba 2.07 set up on Solaris/Intel 2.8.
>
> I have a few directories that I want read only access to one
> set of users, but read/write access to another. I tried
> putting the same share name in smb.conf with different
> rules, but when I ran testparms it just showed the last
> configuration entry. Is there any way to achieve this
> using the same share name, or do I have to give each
> one a different share name?
Why not just use file permissions? Samba's restrictions are only an
extra measure on top of what the OS already provides.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
Return-Path: <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 6251A4210; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 21:01:08 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as3-195.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.11.195]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2)
with ESMTP id f5G45NI23500; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 14:05:29 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root at yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
OAA27255; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 14:04:58 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet at piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
OAA30478; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 14:04:56 +1000
Message-ID: <3B2ADAE8.4E88C403 at bartlett.house>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 14:04:56 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sanjeev Chhibber <schhibber at powersurfr.com>,
"samba-patches at samba.org" <samba-patches at samba.org>
Cc: Samba mail list <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Re: password expiration and changing
References: <20010615001242.88482.qmail at web14008.mail.yahoo.com>
<006a01c0f53a$11f151f0$c800000a at dreamtime>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Sanjeev Chhibber wrote:
>
> Is it possible ot expire passwords?
>
> And does anybody know of away to change the password without directly
> interacting with samba server.
>
> Via web interface...or script..
> Or simply through windows.
>
To expire a passwords, I have a patch for samba's PAM support. I also
have a patch that makes unix password sync work sanely with PAM (instead
of going via /bin/passwd) while still using the same config paramaters.
Attached, against current CVS (SAMBA_2_2). Also includes some other
cleanups and associated bits and peices, not all of which is strictly
necercery for this functionality. I also never quite got around to
finishing the big switch statement, so it has a few missing entries -
sorry about that.
The following comments were sent to the last person I provided this
patch for, as a matter of context:
>
> My patch is (will be) to the SAMBA_2_2 cvs tree. You will need to setup
> the proper /etc/pam.d/samba file for anything (including 2.2.0 release)
> to work with PAM. For the CVS tree, you will also need 'obay pam
> restrictions = yes' as a smb.conf option. Once your comfortable with
> that, apply my patch and check nothing breaks.
>
> You will also need 'pam password sync = yes' to get the users new
> password to propogate to PAM. (This replaces the old password chat
> setup, instead of using /bin/passwd we now use PAM, as we get more
> useful info out of it).
>
> Futhermore, it appears that most of this patch has been in production at
> my site for a little while, without (known) adverse effects. That being
> said, my site uses a slightly older version out of CVS.
>
> Also, this patch only does password expiration. There is currently NO
> warning about how many days are left in a password, only a 'you must
> change now' when it actualy expires. Also, becouse we must allow them
> to authenticate to change their password, there are some actions which
> will bypass this check (not normal file access however). And as far as
> I can see, while a password may expire and require changing, it never
> actualy goes dead, but this is a matter for PAM not Samba.
>
> It compiles, and the indidual peices have been tested, but my test
> environment is currently shot, and I havn't had a chance to fix it.
>
> So if you could check its basic functionality before deploying it into
> production, I would appricate it.
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
Index: source/passdb/pampass.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/passdb/pampass.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.2.25
diff -u -r1.1.2.25 pampass.c
--- source/passdb/pampass.c 9 May 2001 21:14:42 -0000 1.1.2.25
+++ source/passdb/pampass.c 16 Jun 2001 03:40:07 -0000
@@ -41,6 +41,14 @@
* which determines what actions/limitations/allowances become affected.
*********************************************************************/
+/********************************************************************
+ WARNING: NT_STATUS codes ahead!
+ All externally accessable functions in this file return NT_STATUS
+ constants. This means that if (smb_pam_whatever()) will give exactly
+ the oppisite result, use if (smb_pam_whatever() == NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO)
+ instead.
+**********************************************************************/
+
#include <security/pam_appl.h>
/*
@@ -82,16 +91,129 @@
*********************************************************************/
static BOOL smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler(pam_handle_t *pamh, int pam_error,
- char *msg, int dbglvl, uint32 *nt_status)
+ char *msg, int dbglvl, uint32 *nt_status,
+ char *user)
{
+ switch( pam_error ){
+ case PAM_SUCCESS:
+ DEBUG(5, ("smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler: PAM successful, would be '%s' for failure.\n", msg));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO;
+ break;
+ case PAM_OPEN_ERR:
+ case PAM_SYMBOL_ERR:
+ case PAM_SERVICE_ERR:
+ case PAM_SYSTEM_ERR:
+ case PAM_BUF_ERR:
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
+ break;
+ case PAM_PERM_DENIED:
+ DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler: PAM: Permission denied.\n"));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED;
+ break;
+ case PAM_AUTH_ERR:
+ DEBUG(2, ("smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler: PAM: Authentication Error for user %s\n", user));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+ break;
+ case PAM_CRED_INSUFFICIENT:
+ DEBUG(2, ("smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler: PAM: Insufficient Credentials for user %s\n", user));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_INSUFFICIENT_LOGON_INFO; /* FIXME: Is this correct? */
+ break;
+ case PAM_AUTHINFO_UNAVAIL:
+ DEBUG(2, ("smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler: PAM: Authentication Information Unavailable for user %s\n", user));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE;
+ break;
+ case PAM_USER_UNKNOWN:
+ DEBUG(2, ("smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler: PAM: Username %s NOT known to PAM\n", user));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER;
+ break;
+ case PAM_MAXTRIES:
+ DEBUG(2, ("smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler: PAM: One or more authentication modules reports user limit for user %s exceeeded\n", user));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_REMOTE_SESSION_LIMIT; /* FIXME: Is this correct? */
+ break;
+ case PAM_NEW_AUTHTOK_REQD:
+ DEBUG(3, ("smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler: PAM: Immidiate password change required for user %s\n", user));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_PASSWORD_MUST_CHANGE;
+ break;
+ case PAM_ACCT_EXPIRED:
+ DEBUG(2, ("smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler: PAM: User %s no longer permitted to access system\n", user));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_EXPIRED;
+ break;
+ case PAM_SESSION_ERR:
+ DEBUG(1, ("smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler: PAM: Session denied for user %s\n", user));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES;
+ break;
+ case PAM_CRED_UNAVAIL:
+ DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_setcred: PAM: Credentials not found for user:%s\n", user ));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_NO_TOKEN; /* FIXME: Is this correct? */
+ break;
+ case PAM_CRED_EXPIRED:
+ DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler: PAM: Credentials for user: \"%s\" EXPIRED!\n", user ));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_PASSWORD_EXPIRED; /* FIXME: Is this correct? */
+ break;
+ case PAM_CRED_ERR:
+ DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler: PAM: Unknown setcredentials error - unable to set credentials for %s\n", user ));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
+ break;
+
+/* 18-19 */
+
+ case PAM_AUTHTOK_ERR:
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
+ break;
+#if defined(PAM_AUTHTOK_RECOVERY_ERR) && !defined(PAM_AUTHTOK_RECOVER_ERR)
+#define PAM_AUTHTOK_RECOVER_ERR PAM_AUTHTOK_RECOVERY_ERR
+#endif
+ case PAM_AUTHTOK_RECOVER_ERR:
+ DEBUG(2, ("PAM: unable to obtain the old authentication token - was the old password wrong?.\n"));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
+ break;
+ case PAM_AUTHTOK_LOCK_BUSY:
+ DEBUG(2, ("PAM: unable to change the authentication token since it is currently locked.\n"));
+ break;
+ case PAM_AUTHTOK_DISABLE_AGING:
+ DEBUG(2, ("PAM: Authentication token aging has been disabled.\n"));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
+ break;
+ case PAM_TRY_AGAIN:
+ DEBUG(0, ("PAM: Could not update all authentication token(s). No authentication tokens were updated.\n"));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
+ break;
+ case PAM_IGNORE:
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL; /* FIXME: What should we do here? */
+ break;
+ case PAM_ABORT:
+ DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler: PAM: One or more PAM modules failed to load for user %s\n", user));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
+ break;
+ case PAM_AUTHTOK_EXPIRED:
+ DEBUG(2, ("smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler: PAM: User %s is valid but password is expired\n", user));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_PASSWORD_EXPIRED;
+ break;
+#ifdef PAM_MODULE_UNKNOWN
+ case PAM_MODULE_UNKNOWN:
+ DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler: PAM: One or more PAM modules is unknown for user %s\n", user));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
+ break;
+#endif
+
+/* 29-30-31 */
+
+ default:
+ DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler: PAM: UNKNOWN ERROR (%d) while running PAM for user %s\n", pam_error, user));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
+ break;
+ }
+
if (smb_pam_error_handler(pamh, pam_error, msg, dbglvl))
return True;
+ DEBUG(5,("smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler: PAM: pam_error was %d\n",pam_error));
+
if (*nt_status == NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO) {
/* Complain LOUDLY */
DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler: PAM: BUG: PAM and NT_STATUS \
-error MISMATCH, forcing to NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE"));
- *nt_status = NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE;
+error MISMATCH, forcing to NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL"));
+ *nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
}
return False;
}
@@ -170,6 +292,85 @@
* echo off means password.
*/
+static void special_char_sub(char *buf)
+{
+ all_string_sub(buf, "\\n", "", 0);
+ all_string_sub(buf, "\\r", "", 0);
+ all_string_sub(buf, "\\s", " ", 0);
+ all_string_sub(buf, "\\t", "\t", 0);
+}
+
+static void pwd_sub(char *buf, char *username, char *oldpass, char *newpass)
+{
+ pstring_sub(buf, "%u", username);
+ all_string_sub(buf, "%o", oldpass, sizeof(fstring));
+ all_string_sub(buf, "%n", newpass, sizeof(fstring));
+}
+
+
+struct chat_struct {
+ struct chat_struct *next, *prev;
+ fstring prompt;
+ fstring reply;
+};
+
+static struct chat_struct *make_pw_chat(char *p)
+{
+ fstring prompt;
+ fstring reply;
+ struct chat_struct *list = NULL;
+ struct chat_struct *t;
+ struct chat_struct *tmp;
+
+ while (1) {
+ t = (struct chat_struct *)malloc(sizeof(*t));
+ if (!t) {
+ DEBUG(0,("make_pw_chat: malloc failed!\n"));
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ ZERO_STRUCTP(t);
+
+ DLIST_ADD_END(list, t, tmp);
+
+ if (next_token(&p, prompt, NULL, sizeof(fstring))) {
+ if (strequal(prompt,".")) {
+ fstrcpy(prompt,"*");
+ }
+ special_char_sub(prompt);
+
+ fstrcpy(t->prompt, prompt);
+ } else {
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (next_token(&p, reply, NULL, sizeof(fstring))) {
+ if (strequal(reply,".")) {
+ fstrcpy(reply,"");
+ }
+ special_char_sub(reply);
+
+ fstrcpy(t->reply, reply);
+ } else {
+ break;
+ }
+
+ }
+ return list;
+}
+
+static void free_pw_chat(struct chat_struct *list)
+{
+ struct chat_struct *t;
+
+ for (t=list->next; list->next; t=list->next) {
+
+ DLIST_REMOVE(list, t);
+ free(t);
+ }
+ free(list);
+}
+
static int smb_pam_passchange_conv(int num_msg,
const struct pam_message **msg,
struct pam_response **resp,
@@ -177,17 +378,22 @@
{
int replies = 0;
struct pam_response *reply = NULL;
- fstring oldpw_prompt;
- fstring newpw_prompt;
- fstring repeatpw_prompt;
- fstring prompt_ret;
- char *p = lp_passwd_chat();
+ fstring current_prompt;
+ fstring current_reply;
struct smb_pam_userdata *udp = (struct smb_pam_userdata *)appdata_ptr;
-
+ struct chat_struct *pw_chat= make_pw_chat(lp_passwd_chat());
+ struct chat_struct *t;
+ BOOL found;
*resp = NULL;
+ DEBUG(10,("smb_pam_passchange_conv: starting converstation for %d messages\n", num_msg));
+
if (num_msg <= 0)
return PAM_CONV_ERR;
+
+ if (pw_chat == NULL) {
+ return PAM_CONV_ERR;
+ }
/*
* Apparantly HPUX has a buggy PAM that doesn't support the
@@ -196,62 +402,73 @@
if (udp == NULL) {
DEBUG(0,("smb_pam_passchange_conv: PAM on this system is broken - appdata_ptr == NULL !\n"));
+ free_pw_chat(pw_chat);
return PAM_CONV_ERR;
}
- /* Get the prompts. */
-
- if (!next_token(&p, oldpw_prompt, NULL, sizeof(fstring)))
- return PAM_CONV_ERR;
- strlower(oldpw_prompt);
- if (!next_token(&p, newpw_prompt, NULL, sizeof(fstring)))
- return PAM_CONV_ERR;
- strlower(newpw_prompt);
- if (!next_token(&p, repeatpw_prompt, NULL, sizeof(fstring)))
- return PAM_CONV_ERR;
- strlower(repeatpw_prompt);
-
reply = malloc(sizeof(struct pam_response) * num_msg);
- if (!reply)
+ if (!reply) {
+ DEBUG(0,("smb_pam_passchange_conv: malloc for reply failed!\n"));
+ free_pw_chat(pw_chat);
return PAM_CONV_ERR;
+ }
for (replies = 0; replies < num_msg; replies++) {
+ found = False;
+ DEBUG(10,("smb_pam_passchange_conv: Processing message %d\n", replies));
switch (msg[replies]->msg_style) {
case PAM_PROMPT_ECHO_ON:
- DEBUG(10,("smb_pam_passchange_conv: PAM_PROMPT_ECHO_ON: Replied: %s\n", msg[replies]->msg));
- reply[replies].resp_retcode = PAM_SUCCESS;
- reply[replies].resp = COPY_STRING(udp->PAM_username);
+ DEBUG(10,("smb_pam_passchange_conv: PAM_PROMPT_ECHO_ON: PAM said: %s\n", msg[replies]->msg));
+ fstrcpy(current_prompt, msg[replies]->msg);
+ strlower(current_prompt);
+ for (t=pw_chat; t; t=t->next) {
+ if (ms_fnmatch(t->prompt, current_prompt) == 0) {
+ fstrcpy(current_reply, t->reply);
+ pwd_sub(current_reply, udp->PAM_username, udp->PAM_password, udp->PAM_newpassword);
+ DEBUG(10,("smb_pam_passchange_conv: PAM_PROMPT_ECHO_ON: We sent: %s\n", current_reply));
+ reply[replies].resp_retcode = PAM_SUCCESS;
+ reply[replies].resp = COPY_STRING(current_reply);
+ found = True;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
/* PAM frees resp */
- break;
-
- case PAM_PROMPT_ECHO_OFF:
- reply[replies].resp_retcode = PAM_SUCCESS;
- if (!msg[replies]->msg) {
+ if (!found) {
+ DEBUG(3,("smb_pam_passchange_conv: Could not find reply for PAM prompt: %s\n",msg[replies]->msg));
+ free_pw_chat(pw_chat);
free(reply);
reply = NULL;
return PAM_CONV_ERR;
}
+ break;
- DEBUG(10,("smb_pam_passchange_conv: PAM_PROMPT_ECHO_OFF: Replied: %s\n", msg[replies]->msg));
-
- fstrcpy(prompt_ret, msg[replies]->msg);
- strlower(prompt_ret);
-
- if (ms_fnmatch( oldpw_prompt, prompt_ret) == 0) {
- reply[replies].resp = COPY_STRING(udp->PAM_password);
- } else if (ms_fnmatch( newpw_prompt, prompt_ret) == 0) {
- reply[replies].resp = COPY_STRING(udp->PAM_newpassword);
- } else if (ms_fnmatch(repeatpw_prompt, prompt_ret) == 0) {
- reply[replies].resp = COPY_STRING(udp->PAM_newpassword);
- } else {
+ case PAM_PROMPT_ECHO_OFF:
+ DEBUG(10,("smb_pam_passchange_conv: PAM_PROMPT_ECHO_OFF: PAM said: %s\n", msg[replies]->msg));
+ fstrcpy(current_prompt, msg[replies]->msg);
+ strlower(current_prompt);
+ for (t=pw_chat; t; t=t->next) {
+ if (ms_fnmatch(t->prompt, current_prompt) == 0) {
+ fstrcpy(current_reply, t->reply);
+ DEBUG(10,("smb_pam_passchange_conv: PAM_PROMPT_ECHO_OFF: We sent: %s\n", current_reply));
+ pwd_sub(current_reply, udp->PAM_username, udp->PAM_password, udp->PAM_newpassword);
+ reply[replies].resp_retcode = PAM_SUCCESS;
+ reply[replies].resp = COPY_STRING(current_reply);
+#ifdef DEBUG_PASSWORD
+ DEBUG(100,("smb_pam_passchange_conv: PAM_PROMPT_ECHO_OFF: We actualy sent: %s\n", current_reply));
+#endif
+ found = True;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ /* PAM frees resp */
+
+ if (!found) {
DEBUG(3,("smb_pam_passchange_conv: Could not find reply for PAM prompt: %s\n",msg[replies]->msg));
- DEBUG(5,("smb_pam_passchange_conv: Prompts available:\n OldPW: \"%s\"\nNewPW: \"%s\"\n \
-RepeatPW: \"%s\"\n",oldpw_prompt, newpw_prompt,repeatpw_prompt));
+ free_pw_chat(pw_chat);
free(reply);
reply = NULL;
return PAM_CONV_ERR;
}
- /* PAM frees resp */
break;
case PAM_TEXT_INFO:
@@ -262,15 +479,17 @@
reply[replies].resp_retcode = PAM_SUCCESS;
reply[replies].resp = NULL;
break;
-
+
default:
/* Must be an error of some sort... */
+ free_pw_chat(pw_chat);
free(reply);
reply = NULL;
return PAM_CONV_ERR;
}
}
-
+
+ free_pw_chat(pw_chat);
if (reply)
*resp = reply;
return PAM_SUCCESS;
@@ -386,7 +605,7 @@
static uint32 smb_pam_auth(pam_handle_t *pamh, char *user)
{
int pam_error;
- uint32 nt_status = NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE;
+ uint32 nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
/*
* To enable debugging set in /etc/pam.d/samba:
@@ -395,42 +614,8 @@
DEBUG(4,("smb_pam_auth: PAM: Authenticate User: %s\n", user));
pam_error = pam_authenticate(pamh, PAM_SILENT | lp_null_passwords() ? 0 : PAM_DISALLOW_NULL_AUTHTOK);
- switch( pam_error ){
- case PAM_AUTH_ERR:
- DEBUG(2, ("smb_pam_auth: PAM: Athentication Error for user %s\n", user));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
- break;
- case PAM_CRED_INSUFFICIENT:
- DEBUG(2, ("smb_pam_auth: PAM: Insufficient Credentials for user %s\n", user));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_INSUFFICIENT_LOGON_INFO;
- break;
- case PAM_AUTHINFO_UNAVAIL:
- DEBUG(2, ("smb_pam_auth: PAM: Authentication Information Unavailable for user %s\n", user));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE;
- break;
- case PAM_USER_UNKNOWN:
- DEBUG(2, ("smb_pam_auth: PAM: Username %s NOT known to Authentication system\n", user));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER;
- break;
- case PAM_MAXTRIES:
- DEBUG(2, ("smb_pam_auth: PAM: One or more authentication modules reports user limit for user %s exceeeded\n", user));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_REMOTE_SESSION_LIMIT;
- break;
- case PAM_ABORT:
- DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_auth: PAM: One or more PAM modules failed to load for user %s\n", user));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE;
- break;
- case PAM_SUCCESS:
- DEBUG(4, ("smb_pam_auth: PAM: User %s Authenticated OK\n", user));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO;
- break;
- default:
- DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_auth: PAM: UNKNOWN ERROR while authenticating user %s\n", user));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE;
- break;
- }
- smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler(pamh, pam_error, "Authentication Failure", 2, &nt_status);
+ smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler(pamh, pam_error, "Authentication Failure", 2, &nt_status, user);
return nt_status;
}
@@ -440,42 +625,12 @@
static uint32 smb_pam_account(pam_handle_t *pamh, char * user)
{
int pam_error;
- uint32 nt_status = NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_DISABLED;
+ uint32 nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
DEBUG(4,("smb_pam_account: PAM: Account Management for User: %s\n", user));
pam_error = pam_acct_mgmt(pamh, PAM_SILENT); /* Is user account enabled? */
- switch( pam_error ) {
- case PAM_AUTHTOK_EXPIRED:
- DEBUG(2, ("smb_pam_account: PAM: User %s is valid but password is expired\n", user));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_PASSWORD_EXPIRED;
- break;
- case PAM_ACCT_EXPIRED:
- DEBUG(2, ("smb_pam_account: PAM: User %s no longer permitted to access system\n", user));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_EXPIRED;
- break;
- case PAM_AUTH_ERR:
- DEBUG(2, ("smb_pam_account: PAM: There was an authentication error for user %s\n", user));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE;
- break;
- case PAM_PERM_DENIED:
- DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_account: PAM: User %s is NOT permitted to access system at this time\n", user));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_RESTRICTION;
- break;
- case PAM_USER_UNKNOWN:
- DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_account: PAM: User \"%s\" is NOT known to account management\n", user));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER;
- break;
- case PAM_SUCCESS:
- DEBUG(4, ("smb_pam_account: PAM: Account OK for User: %s\n", user));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO;
- break;
- default:
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_DISABLED;
- DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_account: PAM: UNKNOWN PAM ERROR (%d) during Account Management for User: %s\n", pam_error, user));
- break;
- }
- smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler(pamh, pam_error, "Account Check Failed", 2, &nt_status);
+ smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler(pamh, pam_error, "Account Check Failed", 2, &nt_status, user);
return nt_status;
}
@@ -486,7 +641,7 @@
static uint32 smb_pam_setcred(pam_handle_t *pamh, char * user)
{
int pam_error;
- uint32 nt_status = NT_STATUS_NO_TOKEN;
+ uint32 nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
/*
* This will allow samba to aquire a kerberos token. And, when
@@ -495,172 +650,110 @@
DEBUG(4,("PAM: Account Management SetCredentials for User: %s\n", user));
pam_error = pam_setcred(pamh, (PAM_ESTABLISH_CRED|PAM_SILENT));
- switch( pam_error ) {
- case PAM_CRED_UNAVAIL:
- DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_setcred: PAM: Credentials not found for user:%s\n", user ));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_NO_TOKEN;
- break;
- case PAM_CRED_EXPIRED:
- DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_setcred: PAM: Credentials for user: \"%s\" EXPIRED!\n", user ));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_PASSWORD_EXPIRED;
- break;
- case PAM_USER_UNKNOWN:
- DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_setcred: PAM: User: \"%s\" is NOT known so can not set credentials!\n", user ));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER;
- break;
- case PAM_CRED_ERR:
- DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_setcred: PAM: Unknown setcredentials error - unable to set credentials for %s\n", user ));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE;
- break;
- case PAM_SUCCESS:
- DEBUG(4, ("smb_pam_setcred: PAM: SetCredentials OK for User: %s\n", user));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO;
- break;
- default:
- DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_setcred: PAM: UNKNOWN PAM ERROR (%d) during SetCredentials for User: %s\n", pam_error, user));
- nt_status = NT_STATUS_NO_TOKEN;
- break;
- }
-
- smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler(pamh, pam_error, "Set Credential Failure", 2, &nt_status);
+
+ smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler(pamh, pam_error, "Set Credential Failure", 2, &nt_status, user);
return nt_status;
}
/*
* PAM Internal Session Handler
*/
-static BOOL smb_internal_pam_session(pam_handle_t *pamh, char *user, char *tty, BOOL flag)
+static uint32 smb_internal_pam_session(pam_handle_t *pamh, char *user, char *tty, BOOL flag)
{
int pam_error;
+ uint32 nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
#ifdef PAM_TTY
DEBUG(4,("smb_internal_pam_session: PAM: tty set to: %s\n", tty));
pam_error = pam_set_item(pamh, PAM_TTY, tty);
- if (!smb_pam_error_handler(pamh, pam_error, "set tty failed", 0))
- return False;
+ if (!smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler(pamh, pam_error, "set tty failed", 0, &nt_status, user))
+ return nt_status;
#endif
if (flag) {
pam_error = pam_open_session(pamh, PAM_SILENT);
- if (!smb_pam_error_handler(pamh, pam_error, "session setup failed", 0))
- return False;
+ smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler(pamh, pam_error, "session setup failed", 0, &nt_status, user);
+
} else {
pam_setcred(pamh, (PAM_DELETE_CRED|PAM_SILENT)); /* We don't care if this fails */
pam_error = pam_close_session(pamh, PAM_SILENT); /* This will probably pick up the error anyway */
- if (!smb_pam_error_handler(pamh, pam_error, "session close failed", 0))
- return False;
+ smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler(pamh, pam_error, "session close failed", 0, &nt_status, user);
}
- return (True);
+ return nt_status;
}
/*
* Internal PAM Password Changer.
*/
-static BOOL smb_pam_chauthtok(pam_handle_t *pamh, char * user)
+static uint32 smb_pam_chauthtok(pam_handle_t *pamh, char * user)
{
int pam_error;
+ uint32 nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
DEBUG(4,("smb_pam_chauthtok: PAM: Password Change for User: %s\n", user));
pam_error = pam_chauthtok(pamh, PAM_SILENT); /* Change Password */
- switch( pam_error ) {
- case PAM_AUTHTOK_ERR:
- DEBUG(2, ("PAM: unable to obtain the new authentication token - is password to weak?\n"));
- break;
-
- /* This doesn't seem to be defined on Solaris. JRA */
-#ifdef PAM_AUTHTOK_RECOVER_ERR
- case PAM_AUTHTOK_RECOVER_ERR:
- DEBUG(2, ("PAM: unable to obtain the old authentication token - was the old password wrong?.\n"));
- break;
-#endif
-
- case PAM_AUTHTOK_LOCK_BUSY:
- DEBUG(2, ("PAM: unable to change the authentication token since it is currently locked.\n"));
- break;
- case PAM_AUTHTOK_DISABLE_AGING:
- DEBUG(2, ("PAM: Authentication token aging has been disabled.\n"));
- break;
- case PAM_PERM_DENIED:
- DEBUG(0, ("PAM: Permission denied.\n"));
- break;
- case PAM_TRY_AGAIN:
- DEBUG(0, ("PAM: Could not update all authentication token(s). No authentication tokens were updated.\n"));
- break;
- case PAM_USER_UNKNOWN:
- DEBUG(0, ("PAM: User not known to PAM\n"));
- break;
- case PAM_SUCCESS:
- DEBUG(4, ("PAM: Account OK for User: %s\n", user));
- break;
- default:
- DEBUG(0, ("PAM: UNKNOWN PAM ERROR (%d) for User: %s\n", pam_error, user));
- }
-
- if(!smb_pam_error_handler(pamh, pam_error, "Password Change Failed", 2)) {
- return False;
- }
+ smb_pam_nt_status_error_handler(pamh, pam_error, "Password Change Failed", 2, &nt_status, user);
- /* If this point is reached, the password has changed. */
- return True;
+ return nt_status;
}
/*
* PAM Externally accessible Session handler
*/
-BOOL smb_pam_claim_session(char *user, char *tty, char *rhost)
+uint32 smb_pam_claim_session(char *user, char *tty, char *rhost)
{
pam_handle_t *pamh = NULL;
struct pam_conv *pconv = NULL;
+ uint32 nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
/* Ignore PAM if told to. */
if (!lp_obey_pam_restrictions())
- return True;
+ return NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO;
if ((pconv = smb_setup_pam_conv(smb_pam_conv, user, NULL, NULL)) == NULL)
- return False;
+ return nt_status;
if (!smb_pam_start(&pamh, user, rhost, pconv))
- return False;
+ return nt_status;
- if (!smb_internal_pam_session(pamh, user, tty, True)) {
- smb_pam_end(pamh, pconv);
- return False;
- }
+ if ((nt_status = smb_internal_pam_session(pamh, user, tty, True)) != NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO)
+ DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_close_session: PAM: Session Claim Failed for user %s!\n", user));
- return smb_pam_end(pamh, pconv);
+ smb_pam_end(pamh, pconv);
+ return nt_status;
}
/*
* PAM Externally accessible Session handler
*/
-BOOL smb_pam_close_session(char *user, char *tty, char *rhost)
+uint32 smb_pam_close_session(char *user, char *tty, char *rhost)
{
pam_handle_t *pamh = NULL;
struct pam_conv *pconv = NULL;
+ uint32 nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
/* Ignore PAM if told to. */
if (!lp_obey_pam_restrictions())
- return True;
+ return NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO;
if ((pconv = smb_setup_pam_conv(smb_pam_conv, user, NULL, NULL)) == NULL)
- return False;
+ return nt_status;
if (!smb_pam_start(&pamh, user, rhost, pconv))
- return False;
+ return nt_status;
- if (!smb_internal_pam_session(pamh, user, tty, False)) {
- smb_pam_end(pamh, pconv);
- return False;
- }
+ if ((nt_status = smb_internal_pam_session(pamh, user, tty, False)) != NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO)
+ DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_close_session: PAM: Session Close Failed for user %s!\n", user));
- return smb_pam_end(pamh, pconv);
+ smb_pam_end(pamh, pconv);
+ return nt_status;
}
/*
@@ -679,7 +772,7 @@
return NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO;
if ((pconv = smb_setup_pam_conv(smb_pam_conv, user, NULL, NULL)) == NULL)
- return False;
+ return NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
if (!smb_pam_start(&pamh, user, NULL, pconv))
return NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_DISABLED;
@@ -739,25 +832,25 @@
* PAM Password Change Suite
*/
-BOOL smb_pam_passchange(char * user, char * oldpassword, char * newpassword)
+uint32 smb_pam_passchange(char * user, char * oldpassword, char * newpassword)
{
/* Appropriate quantities of root should be obtained BEFORE calling this function */
struct pam_conv *pconv = NULL;
pam_handle_t *pamh = NULL;
-
+ uint32 nt_status = NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
+
if ((pconv = smb_setup_pam_conv(smb_pam_passchange_conv, user, oldpassword, newpassword)) == NULL)
- return False;
-
- if(!smb_pam_start(&pamh, user, NULL, pconv))
- return False;
+ return nt_status;
+
+ if (!smb_pam_start(&pamh, user, NULL, pconv))
+ return nt_status;
- if (!smb_pam_chauthtok(pamh, user)) {
+ if ((nt_status = smb_pam_chauthtok(pamh, user)) != NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO) {
DEBUG(0, ("smb_pam_passchange: PAM: Password Change Failed for user %s!\n", user));
- smb_pam_end(pamh, pconv);
- return False;
}
- return smb_pam_end(pamh, pconv);
+ smb_pam_end(pamh, pconv);
+ return nt_status;
}
#else
@@ -769,14 +862,19 @@
}
/* If PAM not used, also no PAM restrictions on sessions. */
- BOOL smb_pam_claim_session(char *user, char *tty, char *rhost)
+ uint32 smb_pam_claim_session(char *user, char *tty, char *rhost)
{
- return True;
+ return NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO;
}
/* If PAM not used, also no PAM restrictions on sessions. */
- BOOL smb_pam_close_session(char *in_user, char *tty, char *rhost)
+ uint32 smb_pam_close_session(char *in_user, char *tty, char *rhost)
{
- return True;
+ return NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO;
}
#endif /* WITH_PAM */
+
+
+
+
+
Index: source/passdb/pass_check.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/passdb/pass_check.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11.4.6
diff -u -r1.11.4.6 pass_check.c
--- source/passdb/pass_check.c 1 May 2001 17:19:58 -0000 1.11.4.6
+++ source/passdb/pass_check.c 16 Jun 2001 03:40:08 -0000
@@ -28,8 +28,10 @@
/* these are kept here to keep the string_combinations function simple */
static char this_user[100] = "";
+#ifndef WITH_PAM
static char this_salt[100] = "";
static char this_crypted[100] = "";
+#endif
#ifdef WITH_AFS
@@ -550,11 +552,12 @@
offset is the first char to try and change (start with 0)
it assumes the string starts lowercased
****************************************************************************/
-static BOOL string_combinations2(char *s, int offset, BOOL (*fn) (char *),
+static uint32 string_combinations2(char *s, int offset, uint32 (*fn) (char *),
int N)
{
int len = strlen(s);
int i;
+ uint32 nt_status;
#ifdef PASSWORD_LENGTH
len = MIN(len, PASSWORD_LENGTH);
@@ -568,11 +571,11 @@
if (!islower(c))
continue;
s[i] = toupper(c);
- if (string_combinations2(s, i + 1, fn, N - 1))
- return (True);
+ if ((nt_status = string_combinations2(s, i + 1, fn, N - 1)) != NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD)
+ return (nt_status);
s[i] = c;
}
- return (False);
+ return (NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD);
}
/****************************************************************************
@@ -582,67 +585,82 @@
offset is the first char to try and change (start with 0)
it assumes the string starts lowercased
****************************************************************************/
-static BOOL string_combinations(char *s, BOOL (*fn) (char *), int N)
+static uint32 string_combinations(char *s, uint32 (*fn) (char *), int N)
{
int n;
+ uint32 nt_status;
for (n = 1; n <= N; n++)
- if (string_combinations2(s, 0, fn, n))
- return (True);
- return (False);
+ if ((nt_status = string_combinations2(s, 0, fn, n)) != NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD)
+ return nt_status;
+ return (NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD);
}
/****************************************************************************
core of password checking routine
****************************************************************************/
-static BOOL password_check(char *password)
+static uint32 password_check(char *password)
{
-
#ifdef WITH_PAM
- return (smb_pam_passcheck(this_user, password) == NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO);
+ return smb_pam_passcheck(this_user, password);
+#else
+ BOOL ret;
#endif /* WITH_PAM */
#ifdef WITH_AFS
if (afs_auth(this_user, password))
- return (True);
+ return (NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO);
#endif /* WITH_AFS */
#ifdef WITH_DFS
if (dfs_auth(this_user, password))
- return (True);
+ return (NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO);
#endif /* WITH_DFS */
#ifdef KRB5_AUTH
if (krb5_auth(this_user, password))
- return (True);
+ return (NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO);
#endif /* KRB5_AUTH */
#ifdef KRB4_AUTH
if (krb4_auth(this_user, password))
- return (True);
+ return (NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO);
#endif /* KRB4_AUTH */
#ifdef OSF1_ENH_SEC
- {
- BOOL ret =
- (strcmp
- (osf1_bigcrypt(password, this_salt),
+
+ ret = (strcmp(osf1_bigcrypt(password, this_salt),
this_crypted) == 0);
if (!ret) {
DEBUG(2,
("OSF1_ENH_SEC failed. Trying normal crypt.\n"));
ret = (strcmp((char *)crypt(password, this_salt), this_crypted) == 0);
}
- return ret;
- }
+ if (ret) {
+ return NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO;
+ } else {
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+ }
+
#endif /* OSF1_ENH_SEC */
#ifdef ULTRIX_AUTH
- return (strcmp((char *)crypt16(password, this_salt), this_crypted) == 0);
+ ret = (strcmp((char *)crypt16(password, this_salt), this_crypted) == 0);
+ if (ret) {
+ return NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO;
+ } else {
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+ }
+
#endif /* ULTRIX_AUTH */
#ifdef LINUX_BIGCRYPT
- return (linux_bigcrypt(password, this_salt, this_crypted));
+ ret = (linux_bigcrypt(password, this_salt, this_crypted));
+ if (ret) {
+ return NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO;
+ } else {
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+ }
#endif /* LINUX_BIGCRYPT */
#if defined(HAVE_BIGCRYPT) && defined(HAVE_CRYPT) && defined(USE_BOTH_CRYPT_CALLS)
@@ -655,20 +673,35 @@
*/
if (strcmp(bigcrypt(password, this_salt), this_crypted) == 0)
- return True;
+ return NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO;
else
- return (strcmp((char *)crypt(password, this_salt), this_crypted) == 0);
+ ret = (strcmp((char *)crypt(password, this_salt), this_crypted) == 0);
+ if (ret) {
+ return NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO;
+ } else {
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+ }
#else /* HAVE_BIGCRYPT && HAVE_CRYPT && USE_BOTH_CRYPT_CALLS */
#ifdef HAVE_BIGCRYPT
- return (strcmp(bigcrypt(password, this_salt), this_crypted) == 0);
+ ret = (strcmp(bigcrypt(password, this_salt), this_crypted) == 0);
+ if (ret) {
+ return NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO;
+ } else {
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+ }
#endif /* HAVE_BIGCRYPT */
#ifndef HAVE_CRYPT
DEBUG(1, ("Warning - no crypt available\n"));
- return (False);
+ return (NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE);
#else /* HAVE_CRYPT */
- return (strcmp((char *)crypt(password, this_salt), this_crypted) == 0);
+ ret = (strcmp((char *)crypt(password, this_salt), this_crypted) == 0);
+ if (ret) {
+ return NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO;
+ } else {
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+ }
#endif /* HAVE_CRYPT */
#endif /* HAVE_BIGCRYPT && HAVE_CRYPT && USE_BOTH_CRYPT_CALLS */
}
@@ -679,28 +712,28 @@
check if a username/password is OK
the function pointer fn() points to a function to call when a successful
match is found and is used to update the encrypted password file
-return True on correct match, False otherwise
+return NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO on correct match, NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD otherwise
****************************************************************************/
-
-BOOL pass_check(char *user, char *password, int pwlen, struct passwd *pwd,
+uint32 pass_check(char *user, char *password, int pwlen, struct passwd *pwd,
BOOL (*fn) (char *, char *))
{
pstring pass2;
int level = lp_passwordlevel();
+ uint32 nt_status;
struct passwd *pass = NULL;
- if (password)
- password[pwlen] = 0;
-
#if DEBUG_PASSWORD
DEBUG(100, ("checking user=[%s] pass=[%s]\n", user, password));
#endif
+ if (password)
+ password[pwlen] = 0;
+
if (!password)
- return (False);
+ return (NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD);
if (((!*password) || (!pwlen)) && !lp_null_passwords())
- return (False);
+ return (NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD);
if (pwd && !user) {
pass = (struct passwd *)pwd;
@@ -726,7 +759,7 @@
if (!pass) {
DEBUG(3, ("Couldn't find user %s\n", user));
- return (False);
+ return (NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER);
}
#ifdef HAVE_GETSPNAM
@@ -790,7 +823,6 @@
#endif
/* extract relevant info */
- fstrcpy(this_user, pass->pw_name);
fstrcpy(this_salt, pass->pw_passwd);
#if defined(HAVE_TRUNCATED_SALT)
@@ -805,30 +837,34 @@
if (!lp_null_passwords()) {
DEBUG(2, ("Disallowing %s with null password\n",
this_user));
- return (False);
+ return (NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD);
}
if (!*password) {
DEBUG(3,
("Allowing access to %s with null password\n",
this_user));
- return (True);
+ return (NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO);
}
}
#endif /* WITH_PAM */
/* try it as it came to us */
- if (password_check(password)) {
- if (fn)
- fn(user, password);
- return (True);
- }
+ nt_status = password_check(password);
+ if (nt_status == NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO) {
+ if (fn)
+ fn(user, password);
+ return (nt_status);
+ } else if (nt_status != NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD) {
+ /* No point continuing if its not the password thats to blame (ie PAM disabled). */
+ return (nt_status);
+ }
/* if the password was given to us with mixed case then we don't
- need to proceed as we know it hasn't been case modified by the
- client */
+ * need to proceed as we know it hasn't been case modified by the
+ * client */
if (strhasupper(password) && strhaslower(password)) {
- return (False);
+ return (NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD);
}
/* make a copy of it */
@@ -837,10 +873,11 @@
/* try all lowercase if it's currently all uppercase */
if (strhasupper(password)) {
strlower(password);
- if (password_check(password)) {
- if (fn)
+ nt_status = password_check(password);
+ if (nt_status == NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO) {
+ if (fn)
fn(user, password);
- return (True);
+ return (nt_status);
}
}
@@ -848,20 +885,24 @@
if (level < 1) {
/* restore it */
fstrcpy(password, pass2);
- return (False);
+ return (NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD);
}
/* last chance - all combinations of up to level chars upper! */
strlower(password);
- if (string_combinations(password, password_check, level)) {
- if (fn)
+ nt_status = (string_combinations(password, password_check, level));
+ if (nt_status == NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO) {
+ if (fn)
fn(user, password);
- return (True);
+ return (NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO);
}
-
+
/* restore it */
fstrcpy(password, pass2);
- return (False);
+ return (NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD);
}
+
+
+
Index: source/rpc_server/srv_pipe.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_pipe.c,v
retrieving revision 1.50.2.15
diff -u -r1.50.2.15 srv_pipe.c
--- source/rpc_server/srv_pipe.c 18 May 2001 01:24:07 -0000 1.50.2.15
+++ source/rpc_server/srv_pipe.c 16 Jun 2001 03:40:09 -0000
@@ -380,6 +380,13 @@
return False;
}
+ if (smb_pam_accountcheck(pipe_user_name) != NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO) {
+ DEBUG(1,("api_pipe_ntlmssp_verify: PAM denied account for user %s.\n",
+ pipe_user_name));
+ unbecome_root();
+ return False;
+ }
+
if(!(smb_pass = getsmbpwnam(pipe_user_name))) {
DEBUG(1,("api_pipe_ntlmssp_verify: Cannot find user %s in smb passwd database.\n",
pipe_user_name));
Index: source/smbd/chgpasswd.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/smbd/chgpasswd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.64.4.3
diff -u -r1.64.4.3 chgpasswd.c
--- source/smbd/chgpasswd.c 2 May 2001 23:32:19 -0000 1.64.4.3
+++ source/smbd/chgpasswd.c 16 Jun 2001 03:40:10 -0000
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@
#ifdef WITH_PAM
if (lp_pam_password_change()) {
- BOOL ret;
+ uint32 ret;
if (as_root)
become_root();
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@
if (as_root)
unbecome_root();
- return ret;
+ return (ret == NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO);
}
#endif
Index: source/smbd/password.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/smbd/password.c,v
retrieving revision 1.186.2.22
diff -u -r1.186.2.22 password.c
--- source/smbd/password.c 31 May 2001 14:14:27 -0000 1.186.2.22
+++ source/smbd/password.c 16 Jun 2001 03:40:14 -0000
@@ -628,7 +628,7 @@
return (pass_check(user, password, pwlen, pwd,
lp_update_encrypted() ?
- update_smbpassword_file : NULL));
+ update_smbpassword_file : NULL) == NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO);
}
/****************************************************************************
Index: source/smbd/session.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/smbd/session.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.2.7
diff -u -r1.1.2.7 session.c
--- source/smbd/session.c 8 Jun 2001 21:28:47 -0000 1.1.2.7
+++ source/smbd/session.c 16 Jun 2001 03:40:14 -0000
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
sessionid.id_num = i;
sessionid.pid = pid;
- if (!smb_pam_claim_session(sessionid.username, sessionid.id_str, sessionid.hostname)) {
+ if (smb_pam_claim_session(sessionid.username, sessionid.id_str, sessionid.hostname) != NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO) {
DEBUG(1,("pam_session rejected the session for %s [%s]\n",
sessionid.username, sessionid.id_str));
tdb_delete(tdb, key);
Index: source/web/cgi.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/web/cgi.c,v
retrieving revision 1.37.2.3
diff -u -r1.37.2.3 cgi.c
--- source/web/cgi.c 9 Mar 2001 01:06:59 -0000 1.37.2.3
+++ source/web/cgi.c 16 Jun 2001 03:40:16 -0000
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@
tested_pass = True;
- if(pass_check(user, user_pass, strlen(user_pass), NULL, NULL) == True) {
+ if(pass_check(user, user_pass, strlen(user_pass), NULL, NULL) == NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO) {
/*
* Password was ok.
Return-Path: <pf-samba at mirkwood.net>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from eriador.mirkwood.net (cc668399-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com
[24.180.97.113]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2951E45B6
for <samba at samba.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 23:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 3813 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2001 06:30:45 -0000
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 02:30:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: PinkFreud <pf-samba at mirkwood.net>
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: Samba 2.2.0 crash
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0106160216241.568-100000 at eriador.mirkwood.net
>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I'm experiencing a crash in Samba 2.2.0, which seems to occur whenever a
user attempts to authenticate.
Logs report the following:
[2001/06/16 00:04:23, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
===============================================================
[2001/06/16 00:04:23, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 25345 (2.2.0)
Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution
[2001/06/16 00:04:23, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
===============================================================
[2001/06/16 00:04:23, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
PANIC: internal error
The above is *not* reported when using a debug level.
configure script was run with the following options:
--enable-debug --with-gnu-ld --with-readline --with-smbwrapper
--with-automount --with-smbmount --with-nisplus --with-ssl
--with-sslinc=/usr/include/openssl --with-profile --with-quotas
--with-utmp --with-msdfs --with-vfs
I believe the problem to be with NIS+ support, as seen in the output of a
stack backtrace in gdb, below. I do not currently have NIS+ configured,
though, intending to set that up later.
By the way, thanks are in order to Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com> for
his suggestion to compile with debugging enabled, and to use 'panic action
= /bin/sleep 90000' (found at
http://samba.cadcamlab.org/lists/samba-technical/Mar2001/00360.html), and
the followup by Michael Sweet <mike at easysw.com> with the suggestion to use
--enable-debug (found at
http://samba.cadcamlab.org/lists/samba-technical/Mar2001/00362.html). I
would never have figured this out without those suggestions. ;)
(gdb) bt
#0 0x401b3b29 in __wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x4020bcf4 in __DTOR_END__ () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x40166d3d in __libc_system (line=0x8191ee0 "/usr/bin/sleep 90000")
at ../sysdeps/posix/system.c:136
#3 0x81008bf in smb_panic (why=0x814af74 "internal error") at
lib/util.c:1137
#4 0x80f253e in fault_report (sig=11) at lib/fault.c:45
#5 0x80f257f in sig_fault (sig=11) at lib/fault.c:65
#6 0x40145428 in __restore ()
at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/sigaction.c:127
#7 0x4011c0f6 in nis_list (
name=0xbfffdb20 "[name=sauron],/usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd",
flags=70, callback=0, userdata=0x0) at nis_table.c:191
#8 0x80ed572 in getnisp21pwnam (name=0xbfffe7e4 "sauron")
at passdb/nispass.c:926
#9 0x80ed7cb in getnisppwnam (name=0xbfffe7e4 "sauron")
at passdb/nispass.c:1015
#10 0x80e9050 in getsmbpwnam (name=0xbfffe7e4 "sauron") at
passdb/passdb.c:166
#11 0x8052b6e in pass_check_smb (user=0xbfffe7e4 "sauron",
domain=0x8170300 "MIRKWOOD",
chal=0xbfffdf7c "Unknown String Removed",
lm_pwd=0xbfffebe4 "Password Removed",
nt_pwd=0xbfffebe4 "Password Removed", pwd=0x0)
at smbd/password.c:530
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
#12 0x8052dcd in password_ok (user=0xbfffe7e4 "sauron",
password=0xbfffebe4 "Password Removed", pwlen=24,
pwd=0x0) at smbd/password.c:596
#13 0x806504d in reply_sesssetup_and_X (conn=0x0, inbuf=0x819d889 "",
outbuf=0x81adc91 "", length=140, bufsize=65535) at smbd/reply.c:949
#14 0x8082293 in switch_message (type=115, inbuf=0x819d889 "",
outbuf=0x81adc91 "", size=140, bufsize=65535) at smbd/process.c:733
#15 0x808231c in construct_reply (inbuf=0x819d889 "", outbuf=0x81adc91 "",
size=140, bufsize=65535) at smbd/process.c:762
#16 0x8082586 in process_smb (inbuf=0x819d889 "", outbuf=0x81adc91 "")
at smbd/process.c:850
#17 0x8082d12 in smbd_process () at smbd/process.c:1230
#18 0x804d4b1 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff514) at smbd/server.c:799
Mike Edwards
Brainbench certified Master Linux Administrator
http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=158188
-----------------------------------
Unsolicited advertisments to this address are not welcome.
Return-Path: <batestim at hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from hotmail.com (f20.law4.hotmail.com [216.33.149.20]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ABC745A3 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 00:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 00:41:43 -0700
Received: from 203.56.239.113 by lw4fd.law4.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Sat, 16 Jun 2001 07:41:43 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [203.56.239.113]
From: "Tim Bates" <batestim at hotmail.com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Windows ME refuses to authenticate.
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 17:11:43 +0930
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F20lNY30kkZIhTrBoe200004503 at hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jun 2001 07:41:43.0950 (UTC)
FILETIME=[CA078AE0:01C0F637]
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I had two Win98 machines and one Red Hat Linux machine happily serving my
files to them with Samba until recently. I bought a laptop running Windows
ME and tried to attach it to the network. However, it cannot even view what
shares are available on the Samba because Samba will not accept my password
for the "\\linux\IPC$" service. It will quite happily converse and share
files with the other Win machines and vice versa, but it will not talk to
the Linux server. Is anyone aware of conflicts with ME or is there something
else I haven't set correctly.
Thanks,
Tim Bates
BTW, it works if I add "laptop" to /etc/hosts.equiv and add "hosts equiv =
/etc/hosts.equiv" to /etc/smb.conf but that creates a security hole...
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Return-Path: <nikolaus at erlm.siemens.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (atlantis.erlm.siemens.de
[212.114.202.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB5F4221
for <samba at samba.org>; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 01:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcenter.erlm.siemens.de (tcenter.erlm.siemens.de
[146.254.160.14]) by atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP
id LAA24827; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 11:02:55 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from luxor.erlm.siemens.de (luxor.erlm.siemens.de
[146.254.161.114]) by tcenter.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP
id LAA09474; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 11:02:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from nikolaus at localhost) by luxor.erlm.siemens.de
(8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA02136; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 11:02:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 11:02:54 +0200
From: Michael Ott <Michael.Ott at erlm.siemens.de>
To: Murugappan <murugappan at hgsolutions.com>
Cc: samba at samba.org, Andrew Lyon <Administrator at josims.com>
Subject: Re: samba help pls
Message-ID: <20010616110254.A1917 at erlm.siemens.de>
Reply-To: Michael.Ott at erlm.siemens.de
References: <C2ADBF38E1F4D3118F9F0060082151A501F684 at CORE>
<00d101c0f5a4$4a30d5d0$956d4040 at hg04>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <00d101c0f5a4$4a30d5d0$956d4040 at hg04>; from
murugappan at hgsolutions.com on Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 09:05:52AM -0500
Organization: Siemens AG, ATD IT PS 51 ERL, Erlangen, Germany
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
hallo!
> but when i do rpm -qa | grep -i samba
> it lists like this
> samba -client 2.0.x
> samba -2.0.x
> samba -common 2.0.x
>
> it doesn't list samba 2.2.0 why??
> now that I can remove samba 2.0.x by saying rpm -e <package> .
> my samba 2.0.x lies in etc/samba directory
>
> my samba 2.2 lies in usr/local/bin directory..
>
> can u help me in saying whats the procedure to completely remove all samba
> compnents and install samba 2.2.0 so that when i do
> rpm -q samba it lists samba 2.2.0
>
you have to install the samba-2.2.0-rpm, which you can download from the
samba-ftp. only rpms input into the rpm-database, no self-compiled sources.
but the redhat-rpms (i believe, you use redhat) is not the same as the rpm,
which you can downloads from samba. you have to deinstall the rpms
your self-compiled samba must you delete handly with rm -rf
--
Gru_ & bye
Michael Ott
---------------------------------
- Siemens AG - I&S IT PS 51 ERL -
- Werner-von-Siemens-Strasse 60 -
- 91050 Erlangen -
- Tel. +49 91 31 7 42 0 54 -
- Michael.Ott at erlm.siemens.de -
---------------------------------
open-source and you have much fun
Return-Path: <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id EBDDF4300 for <samba at samba.org>; Sat, 16 Jun
2001 07:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as2-121.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.10.121]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2)
with ESMTP id f5GEDDI19060; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 00:13:14 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root at yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
AAA31886; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 00:12:49 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet at piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
AAA32377; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 00:12:47 +1000
Message-ID: <3B2B695F.8A1FB301 at bartlett.house>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 00:12:47 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Smoke <barry at arhosting.com>
Cc: jfeise at ics.uci.edu, samba at samba.org
Subject: Samba under cygwin? (was: Re: (no subject))
References: <IMEKIDMFAEBICGFFGJPKAEHDFMAA.barry at arhosting.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Has anybody actualy tried compiling samba under cygwin? It would be
kind of neat, and considering the hostile enviroments it already
compiles in, I would not be that supprised if it actualy worked (at
least on the client side).
Andrew Bartlett
Barry Smoke wrote:
>
> Well actually an ssl enabled smbclient would be really nice
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: samba-admin at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin at lists.samba.org]On
> Behalf Of Joachim Feise
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 9:59 AM
> To: samba at samba.org
> Subject: Re: (no subject)
>
> Russ Ward wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know of a port of smbclient to windows?
>
> What for?
> SMB is native to Windows, so if you want to copy files, you can
> just use Explorer or a command prompt, or write a batch file.
>
> -Joe
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
Return-Path: <cb494 at cyberware.co.uk>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from maildrop.cyberware.co.uk (maildrop.cyberware.co.uk
[194.74.221.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC45044BC
for <samba at samba.org>; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 07:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLUE. (dial61-nat-dyn.cyberware.co.uk [62.172.180.189])
by maildrop.cyberware.co.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.7.2) with SMTP id QAA04508
for <samba at samba.org>; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 16:03:36 +0100 (BST)
From: Jo_Mills <cb494 at cyberware.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:56:17 GMT
Message-ID: <20010615.15561700 at BLUE.>
Subject: Query regarding embedded NT & known bugs with high traffic
volumes
To: samba at samba.org
Reply-To: cb494 at cyberware.co.uk
X-Mailer: Mozilla/3.0 (compatible; StarOffice/5.1; Linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Dear Sir,
Please accept my apologies in advance, but I wasn't sure who else to
turn to for advice.
I work in the Test & Integration dept. (some companies call such a
team the "V.V. & T. Dept") of a mobile communications Company based in
Cambridge, England. To date our base stations and our base site
controllers run the VxWorks RTOS, and whilst it is far from perfect,
this RTOS handles the volumes of data thrown at it during testing
perfectly adequately. Because of a tie up with a foreign firm, our
System Design team are considering moving across to using Embedded NT
as the RTOS. This worries me - I have read various articles that
state that "ordinary" NT cannot cope with large quantities of traffic,
but I cannot find any definitive statements along the lines of:
So much traffic of such a packet size at such a rate causes this
problem or that problem.
I admit I'm biased - I like GNU/Linux & I don't like Microsoft. All
our in house developed test tools - the real time air interface
channel monitor, our protocol test tool and its accompanying tool kit
(s/w MUX, U-Plane gateway, Fibre Optic & Ethernet interface etc.) -
are all written for GNU/Linux and these tools have proved very robust
and extremely useful.
I would be very grateful if you would tell me where I should look to
find one or more detailed bug lists showing the problems people have
found with NT - preferably embedded NT. Volume & stress & soak
failures are of particular interest as our kit is used in the public
safety market and needs to be extremely reliable.
Hoping that you can get me started,
Yours faithfully,
Jonathan Mills.
Return-Path: <vincent.tam at aib.net>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from rex8.aib.net (unknown [202.181.178.18]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328C34210 for
<samba at samba.org>; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PERCYAPPSVR (gate.ptp-architects.com.hk
[202.181.182.193]) by rex8.aib.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/) with SMTP id
AAA31828 for <samba at samba.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 00:33:47 +0800
X-Authentication-Warning: rex8.aib.net: Host gate.ptp-architects.com.hk
[202.181.182.193] claimed to be PERCYAPPSVR
Message-ID: <001801c0f682$3236afc0$1100580a at win.hk.ptp>
From: "Vincent W.S. Tam" <vincent.tam at aib.net>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Samba 2.0.7 serious problem: file disappear in windows!
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 00:34:21 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Dear all,
We were usd Samba 2.0.7 as a logon server in a Win95/98 clients network and
found that some of the files exist in Linux does not display in Windows
Explorer!
Now Windows 2000 Server took the role and all Win95/98 become Win2k clients
and the files are *still* disappear when browsing with Windows Explorer. We
tried to copy all the files in the directory that contains 'disappeared'
files, and after the copy all files re-appear again. However, seems the
problem didn't reproduce again so far.
What would be the cause of problem?
Please help!! Someone around us are started to worry about the stability of
Samba, thank you very much!!!
Vincent
Return-Path: <pdgtech at kalnet.com.au>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from kalnet.com.au (svr.kalnet.com.au [203.57.128.33]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377EB477C for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 11:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kalnet.com.au (dyn232.kalnet.com.au [203.57.128.232]) by
kalnet.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) with ESMTP id CAA28642;
Sun, 17 Jun 2001 02:25:08 +0800
X-Authentication-Warning: svr.kalnet.com.au: Host dyn232.kalnet.com.au
[203.57.128.232] claimed to be kalnet.com.au
Message-ID: <3B2BA456.BCD3E68A at kalnet.com.au>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 02:24:22 +0800
From: Peter de Groot <pdgtech at kalnet.com.au>
Reply-To: pdgtech at kalnet.com.au
Organization: PDG Technical Services Pty Ltd
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Cc: Marc Blythe <Marc.Blythe at cme.com.au>
Subject: NT4 UN-encrypted passwords
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi guys ............. has there been any progress on
the problem with un-encrypted passwords coming
from an NT 4 machine ??
According to the "gotcha" in the docs directory, and recent
experience.... when clicking on a samba share from an NT4 machine, it
brings up the username password panel.
It only happens once per session, but is a real pain ...
BTW ... I am using username mapping between the NT box
and the samba server ......If this is the case ... why
does the samba server even bother asking for a password ??
Replies please CC me also, thanks
Cheers
Peter
--
______________________________________________________________
PDG Technical Services Pty Ltd
ABN 25077936933
Peter de Groot P.O. Box 10349
08) 90916817 Kalgoorlie 6430
pdgtech at kalnet.com.au Western Australia
______________________________________________________________
Return-Path: <Dietrich.Restemeyer at t-online.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailout00.sul.t-online.de (mailout00.sul.t-online.com
[194.25.134.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411474509
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 14:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fwd04.sul.t-online.de by mailout00.sul.t-online.de with
smtp id 15BNtg-000339-01; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 23:46:24 +0200
Received: from myserver.dens.net (0448692880-0001@[217.87.251.2]) by
fmrl04.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 15BNtb-26ymKeC; Sat, 16 Jun 2001
23:46:19 +0200
Received: from DIDI (didi.dens.net [192.168.3.2]) by myserver.dens.net
(8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with SMTP id f5GLiJc11555 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 23:44:19 +0200
From: "Dietrich Restemeyer" <Dietrich.Restemeyer at t-online.de>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?w2k_client_doesn=B4t_execute_logon_script_=2C_wh
y=3F?=
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 23:44:25 +0200
Message-ID: <FGEHJPOMFKNKPADFHIMECEALCAAA.Dietrich.Restemeyer at t-online.d
e>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-Sender: 0448692880-0001 at t-dialin.net
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hallo,
I've succede to setup my Samba 2.2.0 (Suse7.2) to act as a PDC for
w2k and w98 clients.
but the w2k client doesn't execute the logon script; the w98 client does it.
here are a few lines from my smb.conf:
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
netbios name = SAMBA
netbios aliases = MYSERVER
security = user
os level = 64
domain master = yes
preferred master = yes
local master = yes
domain logons = yes
logon path = \\%N\profiles\%U
logon drive = Y:
logon home = \\%N\profiles\%U
logon script = %U.BAT
dns proxy = no
wins support = true
time server = yes
Where is my mistake ?
Thanks in advance,
Didi
Return-Path: <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5274634 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 16
Jun 2001 22:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as1-223.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.9.223]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2)
with ESMTP id f5H5WMI10735; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:32:26 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root at yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
PAA08393; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:31:56 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet at piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
PAA05083; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:31:49 +1000
Message-ID: <3B2C40C3.A1A407AD at bartlett.house>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:31:47 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bhelms at nicusa.com
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: W2K semaphores revisited
References: <01061308372300.12889 at powder>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
"Benny D. Helms" wrote:
>
> Thanks to Jon Gerdes, I was able to resolve the 10000 files issue. But the
> semaphore timeout issue remains.
>
> Basically, I have users on W2K connecting to a Linux Samba box. They are
> mounting their home folders via drive mapping. What happens is that they log
> off at night, come back the next morning, and when they log in, the drive
> will no longer map. The error is that the semaphores have timed out.
> Restarting the W2K boxes does not help. Oddly, if the user goes into network
> neighborhood, and selects the Samba box, then works his way through the
> shares and folders until he has reached his home folder, he can THEN go and
> map the drive with no errors. Almost as though the computer had to be shown
> the way.
>
> I saw the following in the Samba log for one of my users:
>
> [2001/06/13 00:55:35, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
> write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
> [2001/06/13 00:55:35, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(566)
> write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 6: ERRNO = Broken pipe
> [2001/06/13 00:55:35, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(754)
> Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
This particular error has now been squashed (current SAMBA_2_2 cvs).
Samba will now exit properly at this point, cleaning up the various tdbs
(mostly locking) as it goes. This may or may not have anything to do
with your error, as that can only happen once per smbd. The error in
this case is probably futher up your logfiles.
>
> This error was being logged approximately every 30 minutes. As a result of
> this error set, I surmised that the Samba box was not aware that the user had
> logged off of the network and was trying all night long to reestablish
> communication, and that this was causing the timeout.
Samba shouldn't be starting any connections unless its for browsing,
connections to drive-shares can only be resumed by the client.
> So last night, I asked
> the user to manually reach out and unmap the drive before logging off and
> going home. He did so, and as a result, easily re-mapped the drive this
> morning. However, the log segment above is from last night, AFTER he had
> unmapped the drive AND logged off of the network. So why is Samba trying to
> contact this machine all night long? What is failing to happen here to let
> the Samba server know the user is no longer attempting to access the
> services? And what is truly causing these semaphore timeout errors? Is it
> Samba, or is it W2K?
This looks like a browsing issue to me, or somthing internal to samba.
See if you can get per-pid logs and figure out what this particular smbd
was attempting to do.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
Return-Path: <spawn at rloteck.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from magna.rloteck.com (rloteck.com [66.120.25.60]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921664856 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 00:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SPAWN ([66.120.25.58]) by magna.rloteck.com with SMTP
(Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id
MVB5L722; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 12:08:35 -0700
From: "Rafael Leiva-Ochoa" <spawn at rloteck.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Win2k not letting me Go in the Samba share.....
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 12:08:35 -0700
Message-ID: <LGENLHHKBCCCLPMMPGDMKEAACAAA.spawn at rloteck.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello Samba Team..
I have set up my OSX with Samba and it config it. But i get a
"The account is not authorized to log in for this station" error every time
i try to access the Samba share. Any help will be great..
Rafael.
Return-Path: <dahouet at gmx.net>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF9A44874 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 03:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 17155 invoked by uid 0); 17 Jun 2001 10:15:10 -0000
Received: from adsl-3-12.adsl.easynet.fr (HELO mail.gmx.de)
(212.11.27.12) by mail.gmx.net (mp004-rz3) with SMTP; 17 Jun 2001
10:15:10 -0000
Message-ID: <200106171218030360.0EF7A2DB at mail.gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <LGENLHHKBCCCLPMMPGDMKEAACAAA.spawn at rloteck.com>
References: <LGENLHHKBCCCLPMMPGDMKEAACAAA.spawn at rloteck.com>
X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.20.02.00 (4)
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:18:03 +0200
From: "linux" <dahouet at gmx.net>
To: "Rafael Leiva-Ochoa" <spawn at rloteck.com>, samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Win2k not letting me Go in the Samba share.....
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Le 16/06/2001 ` 12:08 Rafael Leiva-Ochoa a icrit :
>Hello Samba Team..
>
> I have set up my OSX with Samba and it config it. But i get a
>"The account is not authorized to log in for this station" error every time
>i try to access the Samba share. Any help will be great..
i've the same thing once. the only thing to recover i've change was
encrypt password from no to yes...
hope it works
@++
Nicon
Return-Path: <VladutaC at ca-ib.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from vie-cs3.ca-ib.com (mail1.ca-ib.com [212.27.124.49]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95ABB48AC for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 03:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vie-cs3.ca-ib.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <M95362X0>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:44:05 +0200
Message-ID: <F131C3737223D111962300805F0DD08F3CF721 at buh-cs0.ca-ib.com>
From: Vladuta Cristian <VladutaC at ca-ib.com>
To: "'Samba (E-mail)" <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Security = server issue
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:44:01 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Folks,
I guess it's a very simple question for samba experienced people: What is
required to do on the samba box in order to enable a particular NT domain
user to use/modify a share IF Security is SERVER based ? I mean beside the
SMB.conf editing such as valid users =..,bla,bla..
My documentation says mirroring the username at the Unix level and disabling
the /etc/passwd corresponding entry would be enough . Seems like is not. My
NT user is still refused the share access. Likewise there was no such user
on the Unix level.
The reason I try to implement the server based security is that I don't want
to make Samba part of the domain and develop more complications like
profiles, log-on scripts and so-on (maybe later on ).
By the way, guys , I was complaining the other day about how long my NT
users took to map the Samba shares to their local systems. After digging a
bit I found out that simply by telling Samba to first try WINS among
Lmhosts, hosts file, etc. as default name resolution method was the answer.
Just mentioning the WINS ip had not been enough.
Thank you,
Cristian Vladuta
Sys Admin ,CA IB Securities, CA IB Romania
Phone +401 315 20 30
Fax +401 315 20 90
Return-Path: <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1BF4261 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 17
Jun 2001 05:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as5-174.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.14.174]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2)
with ESMTP id f5HCX2I20933; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 22:33:03 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root at yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
WAA10233; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 22:32:36 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet at piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
WAA09212; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 22:32:35 +1000
Message-ID: <3B2CA363.211D29F4 at bartlett.house>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 22:32:35 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Reply-To: abartlet at samba.org
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Vladuta Cristian <VladutaC at ca-ib.com>
Cc: "'Samba (E-mail)" <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Security = server issue
References: <F131C3737223D111962300805F0DD08F3CF721 at buh-cs0.ca-ib.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Vladuta Cristian wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I guess it's a very simple question for samba experienced people: What is
> required to do on the samba box in order to enable a particular NT domain
> user to use/modify a share IF Security is SERVER based ? I mean beside the
> SMB.conf editing such as valid users =..,bla,bla..
>
> My documentation says mirroring the username at the Unix level and disabling
> the /etc/passwd corresponding entry would be enough . Seems like is not. My
> NT user is still refused the share access. Likewise there was no such user
> on the Unix level.
>
> The reason I try to implement the server based security is that I don't want
> to make Samba part of the domain and develop more complications like
> profiles, log-on scripts and so-on (maybe later on ).
Samba interacts in the domains the same way a print-server does. There
are not profiles, log-on scripts or the like in this situation. It just
allows samba to tell the DC over a secure channel that this is the
challange and this is the password. It also free's samba from needing
to keep a connection to the server for the entire length of the session.
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
abartlet at samba.org
Return-Path: <sigrid.belbo at edbteamco.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from bdr-osl-25-005.oslo.telenor.no (BDR-OSL-25-005.telenor.no
[134.47.108.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0F674529
for <samba at samba.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 09:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 134.47.108.96 by bdr-osl-25-005.oslo.telenor.no
(InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Sun, 17 Jun 2001 18:24:06 +0200
Received: by BDR-OSL-24-201 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<M0X37WD1>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 18:24:06 +0200
Message-ID: <59127C898DA6D21184180090271DDA93011AC701 at bdr-bo-24-200.nord
.telenor.no>
From: sigrid.belbo at edbteamco.com
To: samba at samba.org
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 18:24:04 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: (no subject)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I hope someone can help me.....
We are running SAMBA 2.0.7 in a AIX 4.3.3 system.
Have made the share 'Kartdatabase', and use security=user. The users don't
need unix-account and password to get access to the filesystem. They have
only read access.
Is it possible to give some of the users write-access to one particular
directory in the filesystem (share)? How?
mvh
Sigrid Belbo
EDB Teamco, Drift UNIX/NT
Jernbaneveien 69, 8012 BODX
e-mail:sigrid.belbo at edbteamco.com
Tlf:75513413
mob:95028564
Return-Path: <o.six at cahos.net>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from moutvdom01.kundenserver.de (moutvdom01.kundenserver.de
[195.20.224.200]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D772D4409
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 10:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [195.20.224.209] (helo=mrvdom02.schlund.de) by
moutvdom01.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id
15BgtS-00002f-00 for samba at lists.samba.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 20:03:26
+0200
Received: from pd9502693.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.80.38.147]
helo=main.cahos.net) by mrvdom02.schlund.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2)
id 15BgsL-0002z6-00 for samba at lists.samba.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2001
20:02:17 +0200
Received: from work (work.cahos.net [192.168.1.2]) by main.cahos.net
(8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with SMTP id f5HI1mF25821 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 20:01:48 +0200
Message-Id: <SAK.2001.06.17.nbtghlin at work>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 20:01:48 +0200
From: Oliver Six <o.six at cahos.net>
X-Mailer: Mail Warrior
To: samba at lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: FW:Samba under cygwin? (was: Re: (no subject))
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer-Version: v3.57
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On 16.06.01 16:12:47, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>Has anybody actualy tried compiling samba under cygwin? It would be
>kind of neat, and considering the hostile enviroments it already
>compiles in, I would not be that supprised if it actualy worked (at
>least on the client side).
>
>Andrew Bartlett
>
>Barry Smoke wrote:
>>
>> Well actually an ssl enabled smbclient would be really nice
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: samba-admin at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin at lists.samba.org]On
>> Behalf Of Joachim Feise
>> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 9:59 AM
>> To: samba at samba.org
>> Subject: Re: (no subject)
>>
>> Russ Ward wrote:
>> >
>> > Does anyone know of a port of smbclient to windows?
>>
>> What for?
>> SMB is native to Windows, so if you want to copy files, you can
>> just use Explorer or a command prompt, or write a batch file.
>>
>> -Joe
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
>--
>Andrew Bartlett
>abartlet at pcug.org.au
>--
Hi Andrew,
I tried it recently using the 2.0.9 source and cygwin 1.3.2. There are some "bad" messages during ./configure
and I'm not experienced enough to fix/go around it:
checking target system type... Invalid configuration `i386-unknown-cygwin32': system `cygwin32' not
recognized
I think this can be ignored safely. All other tests are running fine until:
ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe
configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config
I think this is relevant for the server side only but I can't find an option to disable server compilation.
Any suggestions?
Ciao Oliver
Return-Path: <monyo at tomoyo.home.monyo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from tigris.allnet.ne.jp (tigris.allnet.ne.jp [210.228.3.47])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A3F4212 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 11:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ganga.home.monyo.com (ganga.home.monyo.com
[192.168.10.37]) by tigris.allnet.ne.jp
(8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W-HOME-MONYO-COM) with ESMTP id EAA02889 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 04:04:30 +0900
Received: from tomoyo.home.monyo.com (tomoyo.home.monyo.com
[192.168.10.36]) by ganga.home.monyo.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id
EAA23351 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 04:04:29 +0900
Received: (qmail 3645 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2001 19:04:27 -0000
Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Jun 2001
19:04:27 -0000
To: tpot at valinux.com
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org, sugj-tech at samba.gr.jp
Subject: Re: limit on the share name to 13 characters?
In-Reply-To: <20010611171238.H23265 at va.samba.org>
References: <3B248CC3.A247FCB5 at farmexim.ro>
<2fhexnufq7.wl at tomoyo.home.monyo.com>
<20010611171238.H23265 at va.samba.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.2 on XEmacs 21.1 (Crater Lake)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20010618040427N.monyo at tomoyo>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 04:04:27 +0900
From: TAKAHASHI Motonobu <monyo at tomoyo.home.monyo.com>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140)
Lines: 40
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
>> We have already found this problem that ...
>>
>> Also a share name with over 12 characters is not available against
>> Windows NT/2000.
I have a mistake. Against Windows 2000, a long share name with 127
characters is available.
But Samba server is not completely same as Windows NT/2000 server.
Against Windows NT/2000 share, Windows 2000 clients can access a
share with 127 characters such as
\\server\<127chars>
Against Samba, Windows 2000 clients can access a share with 127
characters including the server name in UNC such as
\\server\<120chars>.
There are 7 chars in "server\" (we can ignore a '\\'), so only 120
chars share name is allowed.
>This bug is fixed in Samba 2.2. It turns out it is actually a bug in
>the Windows NT handling of ascii smb clients.
>
>Tim.
Is it true?
I tested Samba 2.2.0 and CVS SAMBA_2_2 branch against Windows NT 4.0
Service Pack 6, but they work same as Samba 2.0.9, Windows NT client
cannot access a share with over 13 characters.
-----
TAKAHASHI Motonobu mailto:monyo at samba.gr.jp
Samba Users Group Japan http://www.samba.gr.jp/
Return-Path: <ctooley at amoa.org>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id 3CDE243FE for <samba at samba.org>; Sun, 17 Jun
2001 12:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id
86256A6E.006AB9AB ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 14:25:43 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA
From: ctooley at amoa.org
To: samba at samba.org
Message-ID: <86256A6E.006AB922.00 at amoa.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 14:25:41 -0500
Subject: Printing Migraines
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I'm trying madly to fix a printing related problem and seem to beating my head
against the wall. If someone could help I'd be greatful.
Vitals:
Samba-2.2.0 acting as PDC
LPRng 3.6.26
Windows 9x clients (various versions of Windows 98)
smb.conf and printcap attached
Let me know what else would be helpful.
Chris Tooley
(See attached file: smb.conf)(See attached file: printcap)
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of smb.conf]
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of printcap]
Return-Path: <jan at artstor.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from webstor1.artstor.de (unknown [195.243.248.130]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A210E472C for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 13:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 16764 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2001 21:04:07 -0000
Received: from pd9043fb5.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO gate.strohbehn.de)
(root at 217.4.63.181) by www.artstor.de with SMTP; 17 Jun 2001 21:04:07
-0000
Received: from artstor.de (penguin.artnet-online.de [192.168.1.1]) by
gate.strohbehn.de (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA01424 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 21 Jul 2001 15:47:15 +0200
Message-ID: <3B2D1AEA.2EE12C15 at artstor.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 23:02:34 +0200
From: Jan Strohbehn <jan at artstor.de>
Organization: ArtStor AG
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.18 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: bug reporting
References: <SAK.2001.06.17.nbtghlin at work>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi !!
The last days we were working hard to integrate samba, especially with
acl support (xfs) and winbind. While working on that we found some small
bugs, which could mostly be fixed by ourselves.
We are sure this might be helpful, but we are not sure where we could
report such bugs (and perhaps their fixes ;-)
Can anyone help??
Jan
Return-Path: <richard at sheflug.co.uk>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from zetnet.co.uk (irwell.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.47.48]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D7247FB for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 14:10:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sheflug (man-s179.dialup.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.45.50]) by
zetnet.co.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3/Debian 8.11.2-1) with SMTP id f5HLFSZ31382
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 22:15:28 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Richard Ibbotson <richard at sheflug.co.uk>
Organization: Sheffield Linux User's Group
To: Samba List <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Configuration Problem
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 22:14:56 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01061722145602.01407 at sheflug>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Dear All
Recently a friend asked me to build and install a Samba server for
him. I don't usually do that sort of thing. However, on this
ocassion I thought I'd have a go. I should have know better :) I'm
not good at Samba configuration.
After building and installing the machine I find that five Win98
machines can see the server on the network and all of them can create
and delete files on the server with the help of windows explorer in
the way that the owner of the network wants it. Security is minimal
because there is no internet connection and all users need to view
each others work.
However, when I open a document with Lotus Smartsuite - all of them
have been created with Smartsuite - I get an error message in windows
which explains that the docs are write protected and cannot be saved.
Furthermore, once I have used one Win98 machine to open or save a
document I find that I get other error messages from other Win98
machines until I reboot the complete network. Examples are......
" In use by another program and cannot be opened by Wordpro"
"unable to create"
" Check security privileges over the network drive"
The documents are just copied over to the Samba server from the
windows machine where they were originally. I did try a few
experiments where I did 'chmod 777 /home/docs' and 'chmod 755
/home/docs' but that doesn't produce results either.
Seems to me that something is fundamentally wrong with smb.conf but
because I'm new to this I'm not sure which part to change. I've read
the Samba docs and man pages as well as O'Reilly's Using Samba. Not
much help there.
So..... can anyone tell me what I've done wrong here ? The smb.conf
file can be seen below. Yes, I know all the stored docs on the
server should be under /usr but I chose /home for
convenience...............
# Global parameters
[global]
public = yes
workgroup = workgroup
netbios name = penguin
guest ok = yes
security = user
keepalive = 30
logon script = %U.bat
log file = /var/log/log.m%
log level = 10
domain logons = yes
domain master = yes
os level = 65
wins support = yes
kernel oplocks = no
password level = 8
hosts allow = 192.168.1., 127.
[homes]
comment = home directory
path = /home
create mask = 0775
directory mask = 0755
browseable = yes
writable = yes
locking = no
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /tmp
create mask = 0700
printable = yes
[tmp]
comment = temporary files
path = /tmp
read only = yes
--
Richard
Return-Path: <u13471 at hs-harz.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from steinadler.fh-harz.de (unknown [194.95.16.230]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DCF4214 for
<samba at samba.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hs-harz.de ([194.95.18.55]) by steinadler.fh-harz.de
(Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with ESMTP id AAAE0F98 for
<samba at samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:21:36 +0200
Message-ID: <3B2D2D94.A5A8C26B at hs-harz.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:22:12 +0200
From: "Edgar Soldin" <u13471 at hs-harz.de>
Organization: Hochschule Harz
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: [Fwd: Re: samba with DOMAIN security?]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
U can search for a long time w/o any success. Its not in there.
Unlike a NTbox Server Samba doesn't create this share automatically. You
have to create it manually like any other share. you can use unix
premissions or smb.conf valid user setting to restrict access to.
Refer smb.conf Docs for that ;).
Peace-Ed
Andrew Lyon wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to get samba working with DOMAIN security but I am getting
> nowhere, all I want is for user Administrator in domain Engineering to be
> able to access //LinuxServer/root which is / on the LinuxServer, I've been
> reading the doc's for 2 days and I'm sure ive done most things right, is
> there any more howto's or help available?
>
> Andy
>
> ************************************************************
> Registered Office:
> J.O. Sims Ltd
> Pudding Lane
> Pinchbeck
> Spalding
> Lincs
> PE11 3TJ
> Company reg No: 2084187 Vat reg No: GB 437 4621 47
> Tel: +44 (0) 1775 842100
> Fax: +44 (0) 1775 842101
> Web: www.josims.com
> Email: enquiries at josims.com
>
> ************************************************************
> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential
> and is intended for the addressee only. The contents of
> this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the
> sender's consent. If you are not the intended recipient of
> the message, please notify the sender immediately, and
> delete the message.
>
> The statements and opinions expressed in this message are
> those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those
> of the company. No commitment may be inferred from the
> contents unless explicitly stated. The company does not
> take any responsibility for the personal views of the
> author.
>
> This message has been scanned for viruses before sending,
> but the company does not accept any responsibility for
> infection and recommends that you scan any attachments.
> ************************************************************
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
public class WhoDidIt{ // A comment. I love comments
private static Person sender;
public static void main (String[] foo){
sender = new Student();
sender.setName({"Edgar", "Soldin"});
sender.setCourse("Computerscience for media and art");
Adress address=new Adress();
address.setStreet("Friedrichstr. 57-59 Wh 4.511");
address.setZip(38855);
address.setCity("Wernigerode");
adress.setCountry("Germany");
sender.setAdress(address);
sender.setMobilePhone("+49171-2782880");
sender.setWebSiteUrl(" http://www.soldin.de ");
sender.setEmail(" edgar at soldin.de ");
sender.setGender(true);
System.out.println(sender.toString());
}
}
Return-Path: <ctooley at amoa.org>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id 4828E4542 for <samba at samba.org>; Sun, 17 Jun
2001 15:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id
86256A6E.007C9B66 ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 17:41:02 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA
From: ctooley at amoa.org
To: samba at samba.org
Message-ID: <86256A6E.007C9B53.00 at amoa.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 17:41:00 -0500
Subject: FIXED: Re: Printing Migraines
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Well, I finally found the solution to the problem. However, I'm not sure why it
works now or what got changed on the linux box by making the permissions change
on the NT box. If someone could enlighten me I'd be grateful.
After beating my head against the wall for numerous hours, I finally found a
solution to the problem. I went into the "Permissions" of the printer from an
NT box (I don't use NT Workstation or 2000 Pro on my desktops) and noticed that
"Everyone" was set to Manage Documents. After setting "Everyone" to Print, it
worked. Viola, that was magic. Now, I have no idea what got changed on the
Linux box so if I get into this situation again, I'll again be lost. Also, I
understand the gui Windows tools aren't completely supported at the moment
(adding users to groups for example doesn't work) which doesn't bother me, but
how do I make the setting so all the users have management of the que?
I've been around Samba for quite a while and have always been impressed with
everything I've seen, even when it takes forever to find something minor, so I'm
glad I got this figure out.
Again, if someone who is in the know could enlighten me, I'd appreciate it.
Chris Tooley
ctooley at amoa.org on 06/17/2001 02:25:41 PM
To: samba at samba.org
cc: (bcc: Chris Tooley/AMOA)
Subject Printing Migraines
:
I'm trying madly to fix a printing related problem and seem to beating my head
against the wall. If someone could help I'd be greatful.
Vitals:
Samba-2.2.0 acting as PDC
LPRng 3.6.26
Windows 9x clients (various versions of Windows 98)
smb.conf and printcap attached
Let me know what else would be helpful.
Chris Tooley
(See attached file: smb.conf)(See attached file: printcap)
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a
name of smb.conf]
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a
name of printcap]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <onethumb at onethumb.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from femail2.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail2.sdc1.sfba.home.com
[24.0.95.82]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C7048C2 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vunicorn ([65.3.210.184]) by femail2.sdc1.sfba.home.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id
<20010617224059.CYQF26828.femail2.sdc1.sfba.home.com at vunicorn> for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:40:59 -0700
Message-ID: <013b01c0f77e$94e41750$637ba8c0 at vunicorn>
From: "Don MacAskill" <onethumb at onethumb.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: WindowsXP and samba 2.2
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:40:59 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2486.0000
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I've gotten WinXP and samba 2.2 to work together and thought others might like
to know.
After wrestling with trying to bind my existing WinXP install to a domain,
with absolutely no luck ("Procedure out of range" no matter what I tried), I
decided to install Win2K, bind it to a domain and then upgrade that install to
WinXP.
And it worked great! I can login and use my shared profile and all the rest
of the good stuff.
Hope that helps some of the rest of you...
Don
Return-Path: <urban at teststation.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from fungus.teststation.com (fungus.teststation.com
[212.32.186.211]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3370B48F0
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 16:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cola.teststation.com (tron.teststation.com
[212.32.186.212]) by fungus.teststation.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP
id f5HN5B026845; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 01:05:11 +0200
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 01:05:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: Urban Widmark <urban at teststation.com>
X-Sender: <puw at cola.teststation.com>
To: Oliver Six <o.six at cahos.net>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: FW:Samba under cygwin? (was: Re: (no subject))
In-Reply-To: <SAK.2001.06.17.nbtghlin at work>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106180054380.32736-100000 at cola.teststation.c
om>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Oliver Six wrote:
> I tried it recently using the 2.0.9 source and cygwin 1.3.2. There are some "bad" messages during ./configure
> and I'm not experienced enough to fix/go around it:
>
> checking target system type... Invalid configuration `i386-unknown-cygwin32': system `cygwin32' not
> recognized
>
> I think this can be ignored safely. All other tests are running fine until:
>
> ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe
> configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config
The error is caused by this bit in tests/summary.c:
#if !(defined(HAVE_FCNTL_LOCK) || defined(HAVE_STRUCT_FLOCK64))
printf("ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe\n");
exit(1);
#endif
(from 2.2.0, I'm sure 2.0.9 has the same test)
Either check what sort of locking cygwin really has, and fix configure.in
to detect it (may need to get it to handle 'i386-unknown-cygwin32' ...)
Or just disable this test in tests/summary.c, reconfigure and see if
smbclient works.
/Urban
Return-Path: <tpot at samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id B25B64909;
Sun, 17 Jun 2001 16:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tim Potter <tpot at valinux.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15149.14431.627420.682748 at frungy.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:08:15 +1000 (EST)
To: Jan Strohbehn <jan at artstor.de>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: bug reporting
In-Reply-To: <3B2D1AEA.2EE12C15 at artstor.de>
References: <SAK.2001.06.17.nbtghlin at work>
<3B2D1AEA.2EE12C15 at artstor.de>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Jan Strohbehn writes:
> Hi !!
>
> The last days we were working hard to integrate samba, especially with
> acl support (xfs) and winbind. While working on that we found some small
> bugs, which could mostly be fixed by ourselves.
> We are sure this might be helpful, but we are not sure where we could
> report such bugs (and perhaps their fixes ;-)
> Can anyone help??
Try samba-technical at lists.samba.org if you have patches and
stuff. You may also want to cc: patches to
samba-patches at lists.samba.org so they don't get lost.
Tim.
>
> Jan
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <spawn at rloteck.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from magna.rloteck.com (rloteck.com [66.120.25.60]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770BC420D for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 20:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SPAWN ([66.120.25.58]) by magna.rloteck.com with SMTP
(Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id
NDADW72K; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 08:11:13 -0700
From: "Rafael Leiva-Ochoa" <spawn at rloteck.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Mac OSX with Samba give me no access no matter what user name i
put or password...........
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 08:11:13 -0700
Message-ID: <LGENLHHKBCCCLPMMPGDMIEABCAAA.spawn at rloteck.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello Samba Team.
I have set up my samba server and it working great but one thing,
ever time i try to access the share it asks me for a user name and password.
I tried all the user name on the Win2k box and the Mac OSX Box. I can see
the share in my network but can not access it. What did i do wrong. Here is
the config i put.
[global]
workgroup = rloteck
netbios name = apple
server string = apple.rloteck.com
encrypt passwords = yes
domain admin group = @rloteck <------this is my win2k domain name (rloteck)
os level = 255.
prefered master = yes
domain master = yes
comment apple.rloteck.com
host allow = spawn, magna, magnia
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
log level = 3
syslog = 0
time server = yes
domain logons = yes
security = user
local master = yes
encrypt passwords = yes
passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *changed*
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
logon script = %U.bat
character set = ISO8859-1
client code page = 850
Return-Path: <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5984232 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5I7OOp00155; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:24:24 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id JAA27374; Mon, 18
Jun 2001 09:24:24 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA09914; Mon, 18 Jun
2001 09:24:24 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>, "Rafael Leiva-Ochoa" <spawn at rloteck.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:24:23 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Mac OSX with Samba give me no access no matter what user
name i put or password...........
Message-ID: <3B2DC8C7.22663.14468C at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <LGENLHHKBCCCLPMMPGDMIEABCAAA.spawn at rloteck.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Hello Samba Team.
>
> I have set up my samba server and it working great but one thing,
> ever time i try to access the share it asks me for a user name and password.
> I tried all the user name on the Win2k box and the Mac OSX Box. I can see
> the share in my network but can not access it. What did i do wrong. Here is
> the config i put.
>
> [global]
> workgroup = rloteck
> netbios name = apple
> server string = apple.rloteck.com
> encrypt passwords = yes
You have done all the steps to set them up? smbpasswd is full of user
names and passwords ?
> domain admin group = @rloteck <------this is my win2k domain name (rloteck)
> os level = 255.
no dot,
62 should be enough
> prefered master = yes
> domain master = yes
> comment apple.rloteck.com
comment = apple.rloteck.com ?!
> host allow = spawn, magna, magnia
Do you still get the access denied if you comment this out, restart
samba and try again?
> log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
> log level = 3
What say the logs?
> syslog = 0
> time server = yes
> domain logons = yes
> security = user
> local master = yes
> encrypt passwords = yes
> passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *changed*
> passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
> logon script = %U.bat
> character set = ISO8859-1
> client code page = 850
Any shares defined?
Just some quick thoughts,
Christian
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C953426E for
<samba at samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5I7SYp00585; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:28:34 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id JAA28153; Mon, 18
Jun 2001 09:28:35 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA10168; Mon, 18 Jun
2001 09:28:36 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: samba at samba.org, sigrid.belbo at edbteamco.com
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:28:35 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Message-ID: <3B2DC9C3.13485.181D54 at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <59127C898DA6D21184180090271DDA93011AC701 at bdr-bo-24-200.nor
d .telenor.no>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> I hope someone can help me.....
>
> We are running SAMBA 2.0.7 in a AIX 4.3.3 system.
> Have made the share 'Kartdatabase', and use security=user. The users don't
> need unix-account and password to get access to the filesystem. They have
> only read access.
> Is it possible to give some of the users write-access to one particular
> directory in the filesystem (share)? How?
Unix permissions and "write list = ", but then at least these useres
should need a unix-account and password. The name is needed in any
case to distinguish the users. May be "map to guest = bad user" may
help you there. May be set up one guest share and the same directory
as normal share for the guys that should have wirte access.
Christian
>
>
> mvh
>
> Sigrid Belbo
> EDB Teamco, Drift UNIX/NT
> Jernbaneveien 69, 8012 BODX
> e-mail:sigrid.belbo at edbteamco.com
> Tlf:75513413
> mob:95028564
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6016F4808 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5I7i7p02624; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:44:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id JAA00704; Mon, 18
Jun 2001 09:44:08 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA11113; Mon, 18 Jun
2001 09:44:09 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: Samba List <samba at lists.samba.org>, Richard Ibbotson
<richard at sheflug.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:44:07 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Configuration Problem
Message-ID: <3B2DCD67.14832.2658BB at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <01061722145602.01407 at sheflug>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Dear All
>
> Recently a friend asked me to build and install a Samba server for
> him. I don't usually do that sort of thing. However, on this
> ocassion I thought I'd have a go. I should have know better :) I'm
> not good at Samba configuration.
>
> After building and installing the machine I find that five Win98
> machines can see the server on the network and all of them can create
> and delete files on the server with the help of windows explorer in
> the way that the owner of the network wants it. Security is minimal
> because there is no internet connection and all users need to view
> each others work.
>
> However, when I open a document with Lotus Smartsuite - all of them
> have been created with Smartsuite - I get an error message in windows
> which explains that the docs are write protected and cannot be saved.
>
> Furthermore, once I have used one Win98 machine to open or save a
> document I find that I get other error messages from other Win98
> machines until I reboot the complete network. Examples are......
>
>
> " In use by another program and cannot be opened by Wordpro"
> "unable to create"
> " Check security privileges over the network drive"
This sounds like a locking problem.
But I had similar messages on Win98 when the file transfer was
aborded due to a brocken repeater on the network.
What do the samba logs say?
>
> The documents are just copied over to the Samba server from the
> windows machine where they were originally. I did try a few
> experiments where I did 'chmod 777 /home/docs' and 'chmod 755
> /home/docs' but that doesn't produce results either.
>
> Seems to me that something is fundamentally wrong with smb.conf but
> because I'm new to this I'm not sure which part to change. I've read
> the Samba docs and man pages as well as O'Reilly's Using Samba. Not
> much help there.
>
> So..... can anyone tell me what I've done wrong here ? The smb.conf
> file can be seen below. Yes, I know all the stored docs on the
> server should be under /usr but I chose /home for
> convenience...............
>
>
> # Global parameters
> [global]
> public = yes
> workgroup = workgroup
> netbios name = penguin
> guest ok = yes
> security = user
> keepalive = 30
> logon script = %U.bat
> log file = /var/log/log.m%
> log level = 10
> domain logons = yes
> domain master = yes
> os level = 65
> wins support = yes
> kernel oplocks = no
> password level = 8
> hosts allow = 192.168.1., 127.
>
> [homes]
> comment = home directory
> path = /home
Homes has normaly not a path = line, becaues the path is automaticaly
the users home directory
> create mask = 0775
> directory mask = 0755
You need wirte permissions on the directory to save a new (tmp-)
file, or to delete a file. Try 0777 as a test.
> browseable = yes
> writable = yes
> locking = no
This would have been my proposal for your problem ....
Christian
>
> [printers]
> comment = All Printers
> path = /tmp
> create mask = 0700
> printable = yes
>
> [tmp]
> comment = temporary files
> path = /tmp
> read only = yes
>
>
> --
> Richard
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <famanfo at dymeds.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from dymeds.com (unknown [212.153.3.11]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FB549AA for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18
Jun 2001 01:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from einstein ([212.153.3.4]) by dymeds.com (8.11.0/8.11.0)
with SMTP id f5I7nr212598 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun
2001 09:49:53 +0200
Message-ID: <001201c0f7d3$abe3b140$74fea8c0 at einstein>
Reply-To: "Francis Amanfo" <famanfo at dymeds.com>
From: "Francis Amanfo" <famanfo at dymeds.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: can't find samba server in WIN2K, please help!
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:50:05 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I have had my samba server running smoothly for sometime now until recently
when our internal network configuration was changed. The ip adress of the
server was an officially assigned ip of 212.158.3.97 with netmask
255.255.255.0. All windows cleint had also offcially assigned IP of
212.153.3.x, x<255. Everything did run smoothly until we reconfigured all the
clients reassigning them with a private class C IP numbers, 192.168.254.x,
x<255 and netmask of 255.255.255.0. The samba server did however maintained
its original officially assigned IP number.
How can the windows clients access the samba server in this new network
configurations? Thanks in advance for your help.
Francis.
Return-Path: <riest at franksintl.nl>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from tiny.int.franksintl.nl (goblin.franksintl.nl
[195.193.231.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
C72A7476C for <samba at samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 01:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cp35 (cp35.int.franksintl.nl [192.168.4.249]) by
tiny.int.franksintl.nl (8.11.4/8.11.4/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id
f5I8rQl07283; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:53:26 +0200
From: "Ries van Twisk" <riest at franksintl.nl>
To: cb494 at cyberware.co.uk, samba at samba.org
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:53:17 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Query regarding embedded NT & known bugs with high traffic
volumes
Reply-To: ries at franksintl.nl
Message-ID: <3B2DDD9D.17756.F9E8325 at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <20010615.15561700 at BLUE.>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Dear Sir,
>
> Please accept my apologies in advance, but I wasn't sure who else to
> turn to for advice.
No problem.
>
> I work in the Test & Integration dept. (some companies call such a
> team the "V.V. & T. Dept") of a mobile communications Company based in
> Cambridge, England. To date our base stations and our base site
> controllers run the VxWorks RTOS, and whilst it is far from perfect,
> this RTOS handles the volumes of data thrown at it during testing
> perfectly adequately. Because of a tie up with a foreign firm, our
> System Design team are considering moving across to using Embedded NT
> as the RTOS. This worries me - I have read various articles that
> state that "ordinary" NT cannot cope with large quantities of traffic,
> but I cannot find any definitive statements along the lines of:
That should should worry me to.
> So much traffic of such a packet size at such a rate causes this
> problem or that problem.
>
> I admit I'm biased - I like GNU/Linux & I don't like Microsoft. All
> our in house developed test tools - the real time air interface
> channel monitor, our protocol test tool and its accompanying tool kit
> (s/w MUX, U-Plane gateway, Fibre Optic & Ethernet interface etc.) -
> are all written for GNU/Linux and these tools have proved very robust
> and extremely useful.
>
> I would be very grateful if you would tell me where I should look to
> find one or more detailed bug lists showing the problems people have
> found with NT - preferably embedded NT. Volume & stress & soak
> failures are of particular interest as our kit is used in the public
> safety market and needs to be extremely reliable.
>
Take a look at this site: www.qnx.com
Also read the attachments I've send you privatly (If anybody else need them
please drop a private mail).
After reading the docs I think you know the answer, don't go for NT as a
embedded system, at just was not desgined for it.
On the webside you can download a free version of QNX. It's posible to get a
eval version and try it out. I had a realtime app created and compiled within
30minutes. Hooking a function into a interrupt chain is real easy (calling two
functions) Try this in NT, it's nearly impossible.
QNX runs a Unix like kernel which is capable of doing nearly everything Linux
can do. Also note that the have a file system that is capable of doing fast
recovery from power failures and QNX can be run from ROM.
Ok, I have said to much.....I like QNX :-)
Ries
Return-Path: <oliver at samera.com.py>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from Polaris.Pla.net.PY (polaris.pla.net.py [216.250.196.10])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2AF24784 for
<samba at samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 02:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp at localhost) by Polaris.Pla.net.PY (8.11.2/8.11.2)
with UUCP id f5I1hAx15013; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 05:43:10 +0400
Received: from samera.com.py (sojourner.samera.com [192.168.1.1]) by
samera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA31940; Mon, 18 Jun 2001
05:41:53 -0400
Message-ID: <3B2DCCE3.4070304 at samera.com.py>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 05:41:55 -0400
From: "Oliver Schulze L." <oliver at samera.com.py>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1)
Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-py
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bharani Subramanian <bharanis at ssi-technologies.com>
Cc: samba at samba.org
Subject: Re: Text files
References: <CEDCC58BE65CD511985D00A0C9C8532F2460B6 at MADRAS>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
You have to do it manually.
Try dos2unix or unix2dos.
Also in Windows, open the files with wordpad and all should work fine
Oliver.
Bharani Subramanian wrote:
>Hi,
>i have successfully installed the samba server in our environment. but i
>have problems with text fiels. is there an option like "Text" mode transfer
>available.please help
>
>regards
>
>Bharani
>
--
Oliver Schulze L.
oliver at samera.com.py
Asuncion-Paraguay
Return-Path: <weber at susde.cjb.net>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from susde.cjb.net (pD950AB4F.dip.t-dialin.net
[217.80.171.79]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BBF4465
for <samba at samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 04:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (weber at localhost) by susde.cjb.net
(8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id NAA13462 for
<samba at samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:04:11 +0200
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:04:10 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wendolin Weber <weber at susde.cjb.net>
To: samba at samba.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106181304100.13460-100003 at susde.cjb.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from MULTIPART/MIXED by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Subject: (no subject)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
anbei erhalten Sie drei Seiten, die belegen, wie durch
vorsaetzliche Vorverurteilung,
eine beispiellose Vernichtungsaktion von Menschen,
Kapital, Firmen und Recht in Deutschland betrieben wurde
und wird.
Diese beispiellose Vernichtung u.a. meiner Existenz, wurde
zur Vertuschung staatlicher Uebergriffe mit dem "Argument"
des Mietwuchers begruendet.
Dies war, wie sie selber lesen koennen, nicht nur eine
unzulaessige Vorverurteilung, sondern schlicht weg
eine Luege seitens staatlicher Organe !
In finsterster "Wildwestmanier" wurde Lynchjustiz betrieben
und dies wurde mit Luegen pseudo-legetimiert.
Es wurde dabei jedes Rechtsstaatsprinzip vorsaetzlich
aufgegeben.
Die als Anlage beigefuegten Dokumente sind Chronologisch
absteigend sortiert. Das heisst, das neuste Dokument zuerst
das aelteste zuletzt.
Diese Dokumente wurden mir ueber einen Zeitram von rund sechs Jahren,
nach der Einstellung durch die Staatsanwaltschaft Duesseldorf
vorenthalten, um weiterhin die Vernichtung gaenzlich zuende zu fuehren,
und scheinbar legal ausehen zu lassen.
yours sincerely mit freundlichem Gruss
Wendolin Weber
http://susde.cjb.net http://ChronikderWillkuer.atwork.to
wendolinw at arcormail.de wendolinw at mailcc.com
********************************************************************************
Postanschrift: Weber, Wendolin ! Hausadresse: Weber, Wendolin
Postfach 201402 ! Giesenkirchener Str. 55
41214 Moenchengladbach ! 41238 MOENCHENGLADBACH
! Tel:02166/120128
===============================================================================
e-mail : weber at susde.cjb.net
e-mail : wendolinw at mailcc.com e-mail : wendolinw at arcormail.de
http://regierung.cjb.net
http://susde.cjb.net http://members.nbci.com/sus4050/
http://ChronikderWillkuer.atwork.to http://sus4050.atwork.to/
********************************************************************************
Da ich vom Rechtsweg voellig abgeschnitten wurde,
besteht auch nicht die Moeglichkeit "Recht" schnell wieder Herzustellen.
Hinzu kommt, das alle drei Gewalten ( Judikative, Legislative, Executive)
sich ueber quasi 10 Jahre hinweg als unfaehig und nicht willens gezeigt
haben, den "Rechtsstaat als solchen sicher zu stellen"
Es handelt sich somit, nachweislich in Deutschland um ein Willkuer-
und Unrechtsregieme, in dem nach Auskunft des Verfaasungsschutzes ,
jeder nur an SEINE Pfreunde denkt. (Das Audio des verfassungschutzes steht
Ihnen in vollem Umfang im Internet oder auf CD-ROM zur Verfuegung)
Sollten Sie die gesamte Dokumentation auf CD-ROM wuenschen
so teilen Sie mir dies bitte mit.
Sie sollten in keinem Fall Investitionen in einem Land taetigen,
in dem keine Rechtssicherheit herrscht und in dem Menschen
nach Wildwestmanier gelyncht und Hingerichtet werden.
Es wurde mir unmoeglich gemacht, unversehrt eine Familie zu gruenden.
Meine Eltern wurden um ihre letzten Ersparnisse gebracht,
andere wurde ebenso vorsaetzlich gesachaedigt.
Verfahren und andere staatliche Organe wurden durch diese
staatlichen Organe vorsaetzlich manipuliert.
Und es wurde Genucid betrieben.
Darueber hinaus, haben diese staatlichen Organe alle moralischen
etischen und rechtsstaatlichen Prinzipien aufgegeben.
Zum Zeitpunkt der begonnen Vernichtung war Johannes Rau
oberster Dienstherr der Landesbehoerden Ministerpraesitdent Clement
war Leiter der Staatskanzlei und
Helmuth Kohl der oberste Diensther der Bundesbehoerden,
die diese Vernichtung durchgefuehrt haben.
Sollten Sie noch irgend welche Rueckfragen haben, koennen Sie sich gerne
an mich oder als Vermittler an
HR.R.UFERMANN
DIAKONISCHES WERK D.EV.KIRCHE
EVANGELISCHE KIRCHENGEMEINDE
WILHELM-STRAUSS-STR.20
41236 MOENCHENGLADBACH RHEYDT
02166 - 948651
wenden.!
yours sincerely mit freundlichem Gruss
Wendolin Weber
http://bundesregierung.cjb.net http://www.susd.cjb.net.
wendolinw at arcormail.de wendolinw at mailcc.com wendolinw at mail.flashmail.com
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type IMAGE/jpeg which had a name of filesavd7m.jpg]
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type IMAGE/jpeg which had a name of filecsczv1.jpg]
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type IMAGE/jpeg which had a name of filec6duja.jpg]
Return-Path: <riest at franksintl.nl>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from tiny.int.franksintl.nl (goblin.franksintl.nl
[195.193.231.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
98D9949BE for <samba at samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 04:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cp35 (cp35.int.franksintl.nl [192.168.4.249]) by
tiny.int.franksintl.nl (8.11.4/8.11.4/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id
f5IBVPl08762 for <samba at samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:31:25 +0200
From: "Ries van Twisk" <riest at franksintl.nl>
To: samba at samba.org
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:31:17 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: [OT] TO:cb494 at cyberware.co.uk
Reply-To: ries at franksintl.nl
Message-ID: <3B2E02A5.4127.102F33F6 at localhost>
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I wanted to send you the docs but could not reach you on thje mail address.
cb494 at cyberware.co.uk
Ries
Return-Path: <DavidB at mail.interclean.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from serverdell2200.interclean.com (mail.interclean.com
[152.160.178.23]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE1649D6
for <samba at samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 06:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.interclean.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2650.21) id <NFH9VS2Z>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:12:56 -0400
Message-ID: <0F9D3D919AADD211BE7E00A0C99B8420324381 at mail.interclean.com>
From: David Brodbeck <DavidB at mail.interclean.com>
To: "'samba at samba.org'" <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Can't CVS?
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:12:55 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I'm having trouble getting the Samba source code via CVS.
I enter, as instructed, 'cvs -d :pserver:cvs at pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot
login'
I get: '(Logging in to cvs at pserver.samba.org)
cvs [login aborted]: connect to pserver.samba.org:2401 failed:
Connection refused'
----------
David Brodbeck, System Administrator
InterClean Equipment, Inc.
Ann Arbor, Michigan
davidb at mail.interclean.com
(734) 975-2967 x221
Return-Path: <jferruz at isoco.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mad.isoco.com (unknown [212.9.69.146]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E9F42EB for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18
Jun 2001 06:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from isoco.com (baco.mad.isoco.net [192.168.2.95]) by
mad.isoco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB13358A6 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:48:56 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <3B2E0567.4D462B91 at isoco.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:43:03 +0200
From: Javier Ferruz <jferruz at isoco.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Printer, accounting
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello, my name is Javier. I've installed a printer
server with Linux.
I use the accounting feature. When an user send
a job to the printer the log file said me user, machine
and number of pages printed (only Linux). If windows OS
all users are 'lp'. How can I Know the user and the
host?
My /etc/smb.conf file is
[global]
workgroup = isocomad
guest account = lp
keep alive = 30
os level = 2
kernel oplocks = false
security = user
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
map to guest = Bad User
wins support = no
[homes]
comment = Heimatverzeichnis
browseable = no
read only = no
create mode = 0750
[printers]
path=/var/spool/lpd/samba
print ok=yes
printing = lprng
load printers = yes
guest ok=yes
printcap file=/etc/printcap
print command = /usr/bin/lpr -P%p -r %s
lpq command = /usr/bin/lpr -P%p
lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -P%p %j
lppause command = /usr/sbin/lpc hold %p %j
lpresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc release %p %j
queuepause command = /usr/sbin/lpc -P%p stop
queueresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc -P%p start
Thanks fro advance,
--
Javier Ferruz Rodrmguez
IT Dept. @ iSOCO
Return-Path: <npralle at creativesolutionsunlimited.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from smtp09.phx.gblx.net (smtp09.phx.gblx.net [64.211.219.58])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CA74869 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 06:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from daemon at localhost) by smtp09.phx.gblx.net (8.9.3/8.9.3)
id GAA454770 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 06:43:51
-0700
Received: from 208-50-106-128.nas1.SHF.gblx.net(208.50.106.128),
claiming to be "aristotle.creativesolutionsunlimited.com" via SMTP by
smtp09.phx.gblx.net, id smtpd.c_Paa; Mon Jun 18 06:43:47 2001
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010618084133.04563d00 at creativesolutionsunlimite
d.com>
X-Sender: npralle at creativesolutionsunlimited.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:44:36 -0500
To: samba at lists.samba.org
From: "Nathan E. Pralle" <npralle at creativesolutionsunlimited.com>
Subject: Can't Write Files
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello!
Using samba-current.
I have a share and I can read the files fine on a Winblows machine, but I
can't write to that directory or modify files. Help?
Here is the permissions for the directory. As you can see, they're all 777:
drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 4096 Jun 13 11:00 zip/
Here is the listing of my smb.conf. The share in question is the [Zip
Drive] share.
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from aristotle.csu.com (90.0.0.11)
# Date: 2001/06/13 14:30:37
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = INTERNET
netbios name = ARIES
server string = Aries
interfaces = eth0
security = SHARE
preferred master = False
local master = No
domain master = False
admin users = root, prallena
[Zip Drive]
comment = ZIP Drive on Internet Proxy
path = /zip
writable = yes
browseable = yes
printable = no
public = yes
# root preexec = mount /zip
# root postexec = eject /zip
[Root Partition]
comment = The Whole Hard Drive
path = /
public = yes
read only = yes
browseable = yes
printable = no
[TEMP]
comment = Temp Drive
path = /tmp
public = yes
writable = yes
browseable = yes
---------------------------------------------
Nathan E. Pralle
Research and Development Specialist
Creative Solutions Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 550
203 Gilman St
Sheffield, IA 50475-0550
PH: (641)892-4466
FAX: (641)892-4333
Email: npralle at creativesolutionsunlimited.com
----------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D460A47E1 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5IE8ag24802; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:08:36 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id QAA04566; Mon, 18
Jun 2001 16:08:37 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA01178; Mon, 18 Jun
2001 16:08:42 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: samba at lists.samba.org, Javier Ferruz <jferruz at isoco.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:08:33 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Printer, accounting
Message-ID: <3B2E2781.16812.1864C4A at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <3B2E0567.4D462B91 at isoco.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Hello, my name is Javier. I've installed a printer
> server with Linux.
>
> I use the accounting feature. When an user send
> a job to the printer the log file said me user, machine
> and number of pages printed (only Linux). If windows OS
> all users are 'lp'. How can I Know the user and the
> host?
>
> My /etc/smb.conf file is
>
> [printers]
> path=/var/spool/lpd/samba
> print ok=yes
> printing = lprng
> load printers = yes
> guest ok=yes
One way is to set guest ok = no, then the lpr command is then call
with the uid of the autenticated user. This works for me.
Christian
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <jferruz at isoco.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mad.isoco.com (unknown [212.9.69.146]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BBA4A44 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18
Jun 2001 07:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from isoco.com (baco.mad.isoco.net [192.168.2.95]) by
mad.isoco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19795358A6; Mon, 18 Jun 2001
16:49:49 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <3B2E13AC.6015846 at isoco.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:43:56 +0200
From: Javier Ferruz <jferruz at isoco.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christian Barth <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Printer, accounting
References: <3B2E2781.16812.1864C4A at localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Christian Barth wrote:
>
>
> > [printers]
> > path=/var/spool/lpd/samba
> > print ok=yes
> > printing = lprng
> > load printers = yes
> > guest ok=yes
>
> One way is to set guest ok = no, then the lpr command is then call
> with the uid of the autenticated user. This works for me.
>
If I set 'guest ok = no' then I get error message
in windows. I don't use NIS or any container (like
LDAP) so samba can't autheticated the users.
If anybody has another solution, please said me.
Thanks,
--
Javier Ferruz Rodrmguez
IT Dept. @ iSOCO
Return-Path: <jbenedet at unm.edu>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD0E04400 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 8553 invoked by uid 124); 18 Jun 2001 14:58:52 -0000
Received: from jbenedet at unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with
qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.181982 secs); 18 Jun 2001
14:58:52 -0000
Received: from bldg87-0053.unm.edu (129.24.204.111) by linux06.unm.edu
with SMTP; 18 Jun 2001 14:58:51 -0000
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:55:29 -0600
From: John Benedetto <jbenedet at unm.edu>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Mac OSX with Samba give me no access no matter what user
name i put or password...........
Message-ID: <717083944.992854529 at bldg87-0053.unm.edu>
In-Reply-To: <3B2DC8C7.22663.14468C at localhost>
Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01QEbC2qqoJ0jAqixZV/kuTIOYNFXJdAoD
tQ==
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
--On Monday, June 18, 2001 9:24 AM +0200 Christian Barth
<barth at cck.uni-kl.de> wrote:
>> Hello Samba Team.
>>
>> I have set up my samba server and it working great but one
>> thing, ever time i try to access the share it asks me for a
>> user name and password. I tried all the user name on the Win2k box and
>> the Mac OSX Box. I can see the share in my network but can not access
>> it. What did i do wrong. Here is the config i put.
>>
<SNIP>
>> domain admin group = @rloteck <------this is my win2k domain name
I thought the "@" sign referred to a Unix Group by that name, not anything
on the Windows side. IS there a group called "rloteck" and are you a
member of it?
That shouldn't affect you accessing the share, though. I agree with
Christian's comment... have you defined any shares in the SMB.CONF file?
- john
Return-Path: <mekilroy at risingedge.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C1F4917; Mon, 18 Jun 2001
07:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by
mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5IF4ES98670;
Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:04:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by
wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id
<B0000083423 at wizzard.rising-edge>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:02:00 -0400
Message-ID: <00e701c0f807$a00e11b0$1a00a8c0 at diamondback>
From: "M. Kilroy" <mekilroy at risingedge.com>
To: <grrltalk at linuxchix.org>, <samba at lists.samba.org>,
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Fw: ERRORS
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:01:59 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Can someone please help me with the following errors. I am running winbind
from the HEAD version of samba on RHL7.1. I can successfully get
groups/users from my NT PDC with getent group and wbinfo -u.
"wbinfo -t" returns:
Secret is bad
0xc00000e5
smb.log:
[2001/06/18 10:47:07, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(215)
file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 1014 are
available.
log.winbindd:
[2001/06/18 10:47:26, 0] libsmb/cli_lsarpc.c:cli_lsa_enum_trust_dom(537)
cli_lsa_enum_trust_dom(): out of memory
~Mary
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
- Thomas Alva Edison (1847-1931)
"The girl got reasons. They all got reasons." ~Scott Weiland
Return-Path: <monyo at tomoyo.home.monyo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from tigris.allnet.ne.jp (tigris.allnet.ne.jp [210.228.3.47])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14574A47 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ganga.home.monyo.com (ganga.home.monyo.com
[192.168.10.37]) by tigris.allnet.ne.jp
(8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W-HOME-MONYO-COM) with ESMTP id AAA07283 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 00:21:06 +0900
Received: from tomoyo.home.monyo.com (tomoyo.home.monyo.com
[192.168.10.36]) by ganga.home.monyo.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id
AAA26831 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 00:21:06 +0900
Received: (qmail 7615 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2001 15:21:06 -0000
Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jun 2001
15:21:06 -0000
To: tpot at valinux.com
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org, sugj-tech at samba.gr.jp
Subject: Re: limit on the share name to 13 characters?
From: monyo at samba.gr.jp (Samba-JP TAKAHASHI Motonobu)
In-Reply-To: <20010611171238.H23265 at va.samba.org>
References: <3B248CC3.A247FCB5 at farmexim.ro>
<2fhexnufq7.wl at tomoyo.home.monyo.com>
<20010611171238.H23265 at va.samba.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.2 on XEmacs 21.1 (Crater Lake)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20010619002106W.monyo at tomoyo>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 00:21:06 +0900
X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140)
Lines: 40
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
>> We have already found this problem that ...
>>
>> Also a share name with over 12 characters is not available against
>> Windows NT/2000.
Sorry, I mistook. Against Windows 2000, a long share name with 127
characters is available.
But Samba server is not completely same as Windows NT/2000 server.
Against Windows NT/2000 share, Windows 2000 clients can access a
share with 127 characters such as
\\server\<127chars>
Against Samba, Windows 2000 clients can access a share with 127
characters including the server name in UNC such as
\\server\<120chars>.
There are 7 chars in "server\" (we can ignore a '\\'), so only 120
chars share name is allowed.
>This bug is fixed in Samba 2.2. It turns out it is actually a bug in
>the Windows NT handling of ascii smb clients.
>
>Tim.
Is it really true?
I tested Samba 2.2.0 and CVS SAMBA_2_2 branch against Windows NT 4.0
Service Pack 6, but they work same as Samba 2.0.9, Windows NT client
cannot access a share with over 13 characters.
Now I am making some patches for Samba 2.2.0.
-----
TAKAHASHI Motonobu mailto:monyo at samba.gr.jp
Samba Users Group Japan http://www.samba.gr.jp/
Return-Path: <dragos.delcea at farmexim.ro>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.farmexim.ro (mail.farmexim.ro [193.230.163.129]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 870E94A69 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 17746 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2001 15:32:20 -0000
Received: from dragosd.farmexim.ro (HELO farmexim.ro) (192.168.1.60) by
192.168.1.3 with SMTP; 18 Jun 2001 15:32:20 -0000
Message-ID: <3B2E1F3C.C38E2796 at farmexim.ro>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:33:16 +0300
From: Dragos Delcea <dragos.delcea at farmexim.ro>
Organization: Farmexim SA
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Samba-JP TAKAHASHI Motonobu <monyo at samba.gr.jp>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: limit on the share name to 13 characters?
References: <3B248CC3.A247FCB5 at farmexim.ro>
<2fhexnufq7.wl at tomoyo.home.monyo.com>
<20010611171238.H23265 at va.samba.org> <20010619002106W.monyo at tomoyo>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Samba-JP TAKAHASHI Motonobu wrote:
>
> >> We have already found this problem that ...
> >>
> >> Also a share name with over 12 characters is not available against
> >> Windows NT/2000.
>
> Sorry, I mistook. Against Windows 2000, a long share name with 127
> characters is available.
>
> But Samba server is not completely same as Windows NT/2000 server.
>
> Against Windows NT/2000 share, Windows 2000 clients can access a
> share with 127 characters such as
>
> \\server\<127chars>
>
> Against Samba, Windows 2000 clients can access a share with 127
> characters including the server name in UNC such as
>
> \\server\<120chars>.
>
> There are 7 chars in "server\" (we can ignore a '\\'), so only 120
> chars share name is allowed.
>
> >This bug is fixed in Samba 2.2. It turns out it is actually a bug in
> >the Windows NT handling of ascii smb clients.
> >
> >Tim.
>
> Is it really true?
>
> I tested Samba 2.2.0 and CVS SAMBA_2_2 branch against Windows NT 4.0
> Service Pack 6, but they work same as Samba 2.0.9, Windows NT client
> cannot access a share with over 13 characters.
>
> Now I am making some patches for Samba 2.2.0.
I would be interested also in this patches...if you could
post them on the samba user list, I would be grateful
dragos
Return-Path: <DavidB at mail.interclean.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from serverdell2200.interclean.com (mail.interclean.com
[152.160.178.23]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53F4444F
for <samba at samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.interclean.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2650.21) id <NFH9VSKZ>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:51:32 -0400
Message-ID: <0F9D3D919AADD211BE7E00A0C99B8420324382 at mail.interclean.com>
From: David Brodbeck <DavidB at mail.interclean.com>
To: "'samba at samba.org'" <samba at samba.org>
Subject: RE: Can't CVS?
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:51:31 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Figured it out. The firewall was blocking it. I feel like an idiot for not
figuring that out sooner.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Brodbeck
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 9:13 AM
To: 'samba at samba.org'
Subject: Can't CVS?
I'm having trouble getting the Samba source code via CVS.
I enter, as instructed, 'cvs -d :pserver:cvs at pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot
login'
I get: '(Logging in to cvs at pserver.samba.org)
cvs [login aborted]: connect to pserver.samba.org:2401 failed:
Connection refused'
----------
David Brodbeck, System Administrator
InterClean Equipment, Inc.
Ann Arbor, Michigan
davidb at mail.interclean.com
(734) 975-2967 x221
Return-Path: <milend at ansco.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from westmount.ansco.com (unknown [204.19.16.11]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CBA64210 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sanfrancisco ([192.168.5.44]) by westmount.ansco.com
(8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f5IFxQx31229 for <samba at lists.samba.org>;
Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:59:26 -0400
Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:21:57
-0400
Message-ID: <01C0F7F1.44A5CEF0.milend at ansco.com>
From: Milen <milend at ansco.com>
To: "'samba at lists.samba.org'" <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Samba and RedHat Linux 7.1
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:21:56 -0400
Organization: Ansco
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello All!
I have Samba servers running on Red Hat Linux 7.0 and 6.2.
Now I want to have new samba server running on Red Hat Linux 7.1.
I use the same configuration file "smb.conf" on Linux 7.1 as
it is on 7.0 and 6.2 machines.
I can "see" the new samba server from Windows clients but I can not
browse it and I can not "see" the shared directories.
I get error message:
"\\NewSambaServer is not accessible
The network path was not found."
Once again-my "smb.conf" configuration files are the same for all
samba servers.
What's the difference between samba versions for Linux 6.2, 7.0, 7.1?
Do I need to make some changes in configuration file in order to make it running on
RH Linux 7.1 or the problem is not in the configuration file?
Any sugestions?
Any help will be appreciated !!!
Thank you in advance!
Best regards:
Milen
Return-Path: <don_mccall at hp.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from atlrel1.hp.com (atlrel1.hp.com [156.153.255.210]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D047449A6 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xatlrelay2.atl.hp.com (xatlrelay2.atl.hp.com
[15.45.89.191]) by atlrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DB11993;
Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:22:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xatlbh2.atl.hp.com (xatlbh2.atl.hp.com [15.45.89.187]) by
xatlrelay2.atl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66241F50C; Mon, 18 Jun
2001 12:21:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by xatlbh2.atl.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <MZ6V68DJ>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:22:35 -0400
Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050AD0 at xatl02.atl.hp.com>
From: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>
To: 'Francis Amanfo' <famanfo at dymeds.com>, samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: can't find samba server in WIN2K, please help!
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:22:28 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
You have two issues to resolve:
1. all of your clients will need to have a 'route' to get to the 212.153.2
network;
so each winclient will have to have an entry for its default gateway that
will be able to
reach this network.
2. since your clients and your samba server are on different networks,
netbios broadcast
resolution of netbios names is no longer going to work. You will have to
choose an alternate
netbios name resolution scheme, so the pc's can resolve your samba netbios
name to it's ip address.
Check out Chapter 7 of "Using Samba" (purchase or view online at
http://www.samba/org/samba/oreilly/using_samba ) "Printing and Name
Resolution" for a good discussion and directions on how to do this. (The
name resolution part starts on page 224).
Hope this helps,
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Francis Amanfo [mailto:famanfo at dymeds.com]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 4:50 AM
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: can't find samba server in WIN2K, please help!
Hi,
I have had my samba server running smoothly for sometime now until recently
when our internal network configuration was changed. The ip adress of the
server was an officially assigned ip of 212.158.3.97 with netmask
255.255.255.0. All windows cleint had also offcially assigned IP of
212.153.3.x, x<255. Everything did run smoothly until we reconfigured all
the
clients reassigning them with a private class C IP numbers, 192.168.254.x,
x<255 and netmask of 255.255.255.0. The samba server did however maintained
its original officially assigned IP number.
How can the windows clients access the samba server in this new network
configurations? Thanks in advance for your help.
Francis.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <teg at redhat.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.redhat.com (mail.redhat.com [199.183.24.239]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600964A66 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from halden.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool.corp.redhat.com
[199.183.24.200]) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
f5IGSIb05235; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:28:18 -0400
Received: (from teg at localhost) by halden.devel.redhat.com
(8.11.2/8.11.2) id f5IGTZj02832; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:29:35 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: halden.devel.redhat.com: teg set sender to
teg at redhat.com using -f
To: Milen <milend at ansco.com>
Cc: "'samba at lists.samba.org'" <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Samba and RedHat Linux 7.1
References: <01C0F7F1.44A5CEF0.milend at ansco.com>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
From: teg at redhat.com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
Date: 18 Jun 2001 12:29:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: <01C0F7F1.44A5CEF0.milend at ansco.com>
Message-ID: <xuy8zipah00.fsf at halden.devel.redhat.com>
Lines: 10
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.103
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Milen <milend at ansco.com> writes:
> I have Samba servers running on Red Hat Linux 7.0 and 6.2.
Which version? Do you have the latest errata (samba and other
packages) applied to all of them?
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrxd
Red Hat, Inc.
Return-Path: <Kevin.Whitney at Sun.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from patan.sun.com (patan.Sun.COM [192.18.98.43]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806824A98 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from null.East.Sun.COM ([129.148.9.202]) by patan.sun.com
(8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA06485; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:44:34
-0600 (MDT)
Received: from Sun.com (dhcp-181-166 [129.148.181.166]) by
null.East.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id
MAA27121; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3B2E301E.797364D7 at Sun.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:45:18 -0400
From: Kevin Whitney <Kevin.Whitney at Sun.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?Q?Glomsr=F8d?= <teg at redhat.com>
Cc: Milen <milend at ansco.com>, "'samba at lists.samba.org'"
<samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Samba and RedHat Linux 7.1
References: <01C0F7F1.44A5CEF0.milend at ansco.com>
<xuy8zipah00.fsf at halden.devel.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Make sure you move the smb.conf file
to /etc/samba, instead of /etc.
Kevin
Trond Eivind Glomsrxd wrote:
>
> Milen <milend at ansco.com> writes:
>
> > I have Samba servers running on Red Hat Linux 7.0 and 6.2.
>
> Which version? Do you have the latest errata (samba and other
> packages) applied to all of them?
>
> --
> Trond Eivind Glomsrxd
> Red Hat, Inc.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <jstrohbehn at artstor.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from webstor1.artstor.de (unknown [195.243.248.130]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6691C4A9D for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 24728 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2001 16:46:18 -0000
Received: from zerberus.artstor.de (HELO sokrates.artstor.de)
(195.243.248.115) by www.artstor.de with SMTP; 18 Jun 2001 16:46:18
-0000
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:45:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Strohbehn <jstrohbehn at artstor.de>
X-X-Sender: <jstrohbehn at sokrates.artnet.de>
To: <samba-technical at lists.samba.org>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: acls and W2k
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0106181834510.12355-100000 at sokrates.artnet.de
>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi !!
I have the following problem: When trying to set ACLs from a W2k client, I
get an error message, which says something like "unable to resolve
username" (I'm working with a german version). This happens just when I
try to submit my changes.
But this only happens with user-security and a W2k client. When I try the
same thing in domain-security or from a NT client, everything works
fine.
I'm working on this for several hours now, and the only thing I've found
out is that samba tries to handle my Group "users" as a printer?!?! (I've
attached this part from the logfile).
Please help me !!!!!!!
Thank you,
Jan
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(239)
Opened pipe spoolss with handle 7036 (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831)
Transaction 10 of length 140
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650)
switch message SMBwriteX (pid 12303)
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(952)
search for pipe pnum=7036
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(763)
api_pipe_bind_req: \PIPE\spoolss -> \PIPE\spoolss
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_write_and_X(200)
writeX-IPC pnum=7036 nwritten=72
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831)
Transaction 11 of length 63
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650)
switch message SMBreadX (pid 12303)
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(952)
search for pipe pnum=7036
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_read_and_X(241)
readX-IPC pnum=7036 min=1024 max=1024 nread=68
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831)
Transaction 12 of length 292
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 12303)
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(485)
trans <\PIPE\> data=212 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(336)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(952)
search for pipe pnum=7036
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(298)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "spoolss" (pnum 7036)free_pipe_context:
destroying talloc pool of size 0
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_request(1163)
Doing \PIPE\spoolss
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1188)
api_rpcTNP: api_spoolss_rpc op 0x45 - api_rpcTNP: rpc command:
SPOOLSS_OPENPRINTEREX
checking name: \\SERVER\users
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:create_policy_hnd(130)
Opened policy hnd[1] [000] 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 FA 45 2E
3B ........ .....E.;
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1546)
[010] 0F 30 00 00 .0..
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 3]
rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:set_printer_hnd_printertype(373)
Setting printer type=\\SERVER\users
Printer is a printer
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 4]
rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:set_printer_hnd_name(406)
Setting printer name=\\SERVER\users (len=18)
Printer not found
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 4]
rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:find_policy_by_hnd_internal(150)
Found policy hnd[0] [000] 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 FA 45 2E
3B ........ .....E.;
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1546)
[010] 0F 30 00 00 .0..
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 4]
rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:find_policy_by_hnd_internal(150)
Found policy hnd[0] [000] 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 FA 45 2E
3B ........ .....E.;
[2001/06/18 18:18:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1546)
[010] 0F 30 00 00 .0..
Return-Path: <bdrenni at catholicrelief.org>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from gateway.catholicrelief.org (fw.catholicrelief.org
[209.70.98.114]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBB4C4A9C
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fw.catholicrelief.org [209.70.98.114] (HELO localhost) by
gateway.catholicrelief.org (AltaVista Mail V2.0J/2.0J BL25J listener)
id 0000_01cc_3b2e_316b_1c81; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:50:51 -0400
Received: from somewhere by smtpxd
Message-ID: <F748CB1980A1D111A00300A0C99DBBF0033FF307 at mail1>
From: Drenning Bruce <bdrenni at catholicrelief.org>
To: 'Milen' <milend at ansco.com>
Cc: "'samba at lists.samba.org'" <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Samba and RedHat Linux 7.1
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:52:25 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I've seen this & also have seen other posts regarding this. What I haven't
seen is an answer. Do you also have these other symptoms:
1. win NT can connect
2. win 2000 can't connect by name, but can connect by IP address
Here, win9x clients can connect only if they are on a different subnet than
the Samba server. I have tried 2.0.7 & 2.0.8 on RH 7.1 with the same
results. Everything works fine on our RH 6.1 & 6.2 servers. Might be some
issue between Samba & the 2.4 kernel.
If you have it, try commenting out the hosts allow param. That "fixed" it
for us. Even though my smb.conf looks good through testparam hostname.
-----Original Message-----
From: Milen [mailto:milend at ansco.com]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 12:22 PM
To: 'samba at lists.samba.org'
Subject: Samba and RedHat Linux 7.1
Hello All!
I have Samba servers running on Red Hat Linux 7.0 and 6.2.
Now I want to have new samba server running on Red Hat Linux 7.1.
I use the same configuration file "smb.conf" on Linux 7.1 as
it is on 7.0 and 6.2 machines.
I can "see" the new samba server from Windows clients but I can not
browse it and I can not "see" the shared directories.
I get error message:
"\\NewSambaServer is not accessible
The network path was not found."
Once again-my "smb.conf" configuration files are the same for all
samba servers.
What's the difference between samba versions for Linux 6.2, 7.0, 7.1?
Do I need to make some changes in configuration file in order to make it
running on
RH Linux 7.1 or the problem is not in the configuration file?
Any sugestions?
Any help will be appreciated !!!
Thank you in advance!
Best regards:
Milen
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <mekilroy at risingedge.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDA44AC4; Mon, 18 Jun 2001
09:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by
mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5IH2eS08780;
Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:02:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by
wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id
<B0000083481 at wizzard.rising-edge>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:00:29 -0400
Message-ID: <014601c0f818$2d4f2900$1a00a8c0 at diamondback>
From: "M. Kilroy" <mekilroy at risingedge.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>, <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: wbinfo_check_secret
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:00:28 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have a question about the following code from wbinfo.c.
In the function wbinfo_check_secret, response.data.num_entries is used as the
check for wether or not the secret file is good:
if (response.data.num_entries == 0) {
printf("Secret is good\n");
} else {
printf("Secret is bad\n0x%08x\n",
response.data.num_entries);
}
I get 0xc00000e5 as the response.data.num_entries. I cannot seem to find
where response.data.num_entries gets populated with data. Maybe there's a bug
and that's why I have kooky data? Does anyone know where this field gets his
data???
Thanks in advance.
~Mary
---------------
function below
---------------
static BOOL wbinfo_check_secret(void)
{
struct winbindd_response response;
BOOL result;
ZERO_STRUCT(response);
result = winbindd_request(WINBINDD_CHECK_MACHACC, NULL, &response) ==
NSS_STATUS_SUCCESS;
if (result) {
if (response.data.num_entries == 0) {
printf("Secret is good\n");
} else {
printf("Secret is bad\n0x%08x\n",
response.data.num_entries);
}
return True;
}
return False;
}
Return-Path: <bruce at oec-sys.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from iserver.oec-sys.com (unknown [207.189.131.105]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0E1945AC for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 2512 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2001 17:08:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO bruce) (207.189.131.106) by
iserver.oec-sys.com with SMTP; 18 Jun 2001 17:08:43 -0000
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:07:15 -0700
From: Bruce Sackett <bruce at oec-sys.com>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Personal
Reply-To: Bruce Sackett <bruce at oec-sys.com>
Organization: Office Equipment Company
Message-ID: <69232326507.20010618100715 at oec-sys.com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Slowing down with small files
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
We recently upgraded our linux server from Redhat 6.2 to Redhat 7.0
and added a 70gb SCSI hard drive. We save thousands of very small
files every day to the samba server. Since the upgrade to the O/S and
drive, the system has slowed drastically. Transfer times for approx.
6000 files now takes 8-12 hours, where it used to run in about 3
hours.
I've thought of upgrading to 2.2, but don't want to take the step
without some idea that it may help.
Thank you,
Bruce
mailto:bruce at oec-sys.com
Office Equipment Company
http://www.oec-sys.com
Attachments:
<none>
Return-Path: <chris_winczewski at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from web14203.mail.yahoo.com (web14203.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.172.145]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0C624AFA
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20010618182135.48394.qmail at web14203.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [207.178.217.202] by web14203.mail.yahoo.com; Mon, 18 Jun
2001 11:21:35 PDT
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chris Winczewski <chris_winczewski at yahoo.com>
Subject: gethostbyaddr error
To: samba at lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have Samba 2.0.7 running with about 30 users. Today
I came in and 10 of them can log in but the others
cannot. I checked the syslog and found that the
function "client_name" in the utility file
"util_sock.c" is giving an error:
Gethostbyaddr failed for 192.168 bla bla.
Anyone know why?
Chris
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
http://buzz.yahoo.com/
Return-Path: <cnorloff at norloff.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.toward.com (piglet.toward.com [204.194.180.31]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDF04B05 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:47:03 -0400
Message-Id: <200106181447.AA78709132 at mail.toward.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: "Chris Norloff" <cnorloff at norloff.com>
Reply-To: <cnorloff at norloff.com>
X-Sender: <cnorloff at mail.toward.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: STILL can't login from NT
X-Mailer: <IMail v6.05>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I still can't login from WinNT, even though I've:
-encrypted the passwords
-added the smbpasswd file
I can get in as guest when that's enabled, but I can't get in with any usernames (or root!).
This is using security=user or share. We don't use a PDC, so I just want to authenticate with the Unix server that's running Samba (Solaris 2.6). I'm not very familiar with Unix, but am trying to get away from Windows machines.
I've tried everything I can find, and have hunted through the archives here and the Using Samba book.
Any ideas?
thx
Chris Norloff
Return-Path: <mhkohne at discordia.org>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from techno.discordia.org (techno.discordia.org
[207.8.224.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291644B54
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kohnelap.discordia.org (techno.discordia.org
[207.8.224.10]) by techno.discordia.org (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
f5IJ7Hw30998; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:07:17 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010618150408.00b05e20 at 127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: mhkohne at 127.0.0.1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:05:58 -0400
To: Chris Winczewski <chris_winczewski at yahoo.com>, samba at lists.samba.org
From: Michael Kohne <mhkohne at discordia.org>
Subject: Re: gethostbyaddr error
In-Reply-To: <20010618182135.48394.qmail at web14203.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
At 11:21 AM 6/18/2001 -0700, Chris Winczewski wrote:
>I have Samba 2.0.7 running with about 30 users. Today
>I came in and 10 of them can log in but the others
>cannot. I checked the syslog and found that the
>function "client_name" in the utility file
>"util_sock.c" is giving an error:
>
>Gethostbyaddr failed for 192.168 bla bla.
>
>Anyone know why?
Not sure, but looking at the error you've given and looking at
gethostbyaddr's documentation, I'd guess that you don't have working
reverse DNS for all those addresses.
I could be wrong of course...
>Chris
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
>http://buzz.yahoo.com/
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Michael Kohne mhkohne at discordia.org
3000 lbs of wood, 300 foot per minute - DO NOT get in the way.
Return-Path: <seatoast at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from web9607.mail.yahoo.com (web9607.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.129.186]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 569294B6E
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20010618202353.83016.qmail at web9607.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [207.252.123.213] by web9607.mail.yahoo.com; Mon, 18 Jun
2001 13:23:53 PDT
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: craig secrist <seatoast at yahoo.com>
Subject: Question from a newbie...
To: samba at lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello all,
I'm pretty new to samba-land and I have a few
questions regarding capabilities.
I have a working RedHat 7.1 installation on a 133mhz
IBM pc. (meager)Hardware = 80Meg RAM, 1 Teac CDRW, 1
sony CDROM, 1 Travan 2.0 gig tape drive.
I would like to set up Samba as a PDC and file server.
I would also like to back up Win9x, Linux and Mac
systems to tape, share files and devices(specifically,
the CDRW, as I don't think my printer is supported)
Am I asking too much of my little tiny processor, or
will Samba allow me to do all of this? Will my
performance be gawdawful?
Thanks in advance-
Seatoast
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
http://buzz.yahoo.com/
Return-Path: <gosselinm at netscout.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from nsmail2.netscout.com (unknown [208.159.61.32]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D429E4B70 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Passwords from old version don't work after upgrade
To: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.4 June 8, 2000
Message-ID: <OFC81A16BA.450B3DD7-ON85256A6F.007049BF at netscout.com>
From: "Mark Gosselin" <gosselinm at netscout.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:29:27 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on NSMail2/NetScout(Release 5.0.7
|March 21, 2001) at 06/18/2001 04:30:28 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I just recently upgraded my install from 1.9.18 to 2.0.7 and am seeing some
funny issues with logins.
Some people cannot log in under 2.0.7 that could under 1.9.18, and vice
versa..... I should be checking for
UNIX passwords and all the users are rpesent in the UNIX password file. Has
anyone ever seen this before?
If so, do you know what I need to do to make sure everyone can log in???
Thanks,
Mark Gosselin
NetScout Systems
Return-Path: <chris_winczewski at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from web14204.mail.yahoo.com (web14204.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.172.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E43854B79
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20010618203947.97701.qmail at web14204.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [207.178.217.202] by web14204.mail.yahoo.com; Mon, 18 Jun
2001 13:39:47 PDT
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chris Winczewski <chris_winczewski at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: gethostbyaddr error
To: samba at lists.samba.org
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010618150408.00b05e20 at 127.0.0.1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
--- Michael Kohne <mhkohne at discordia.org> wrote:
> At 11:21 AM 6/18/2001 -0700, Chris Winczewski wrote:
> >I have Samba 2.0.7 running with about 30 users.
> Today
> >I came in and 10 of them can log in but the others
> >cannot. I checked the syslog and found that the
> >function "client_name" in the utility file
> >"util_sock.c" is giving an error:
> >
> >Gethostbyaddr failed for 192.168 bla bla.
> >
> >Anyone know why?
>
> Not sure, but looking at the error you've given and
> looking at
> gethostbyaddr's documentation, I'd guess that you
> don't have working
> reverse DNS for all those addresses.
>
> I could be wrong of course...
>
>
> >Chris
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
> >http://buzz.yahoo.com/
> >--
> >To unsubscribe from this list go to the following
> URL and read the
> >instructions:
> http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
> Michael Kohne mhkohne at discordia.org
> 3000 lbs of wood, 300 foot per minute - DO NOT get
> in the way.
>
Where do I check on reverse DNS?
Chris
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
http://buzz.yahoo.com/
Return-Path: <murugappan at hgsolutions.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from host2.ecsecure.com (host2.ecsecure.com [209.239.38.173])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5A14B39 for
<samba at samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hg04 ([64.64.109.149]) by host2.ecsecure.com
(8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f5IKlNH05276 for <samba at samba.org>; Mon,
18 Jun 2001 16:47:23 -0400
Message-ID: <00ca01c0f83f$deafb8a0$956d4040 at hg04>
From: "Murugappan" <murugappan at hgsolutions.com>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: network path not found in samba
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:44:09 -0500
Organization: Hourglass Solutions Inc.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi everybody
I have installed Red hat Linux 7.1 and installed samba 2.0.7 .
I am in the process of creating my linx machine as a PDC for my Nt
workstations.
I have edited the smb.conf file and started samba.
Now In the network neighbourhood of an Nt machine I am able to see my
samba server appearing. But when I double click to access the shares created
it I am
unable to do and says network not found.
And when I try to change my domain in the NT machine , as what i have
mentioned mentioned in .conf file I am unable to do so
some times it says "unable to locate the domain".
Then i again I go to Linux server and do some research and now..
some times it says "have ur administrator check ur accounts on the
domain"
Is this suggest that I am doing something correct?
Help me out as I am trying this for past 2 days..
P.Murugappan
Return-Path: <Ross.Kennedy at Sun.COM>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9AD34B89 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rowlf.Central.Sun.COM ([129.153.128.28]) by
mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA04340 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from beaker (beaker [129.153.128.23]) by rowlf.Central.Sun.COM
(8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with SMTP id PAA17131 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:55:30 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <200106182055.PAA17131 at rowlf.Central.Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:55:29 -0500 (CDT)
From: Ross Kennedy <Ross.Kennedy at Sun.COM>
Reply-To: Ross Kennedy <Ross.Kennedy at Sun.COM>
Subject: LOCKING Error - Super need to know
To: samba at lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-MD5: PNERFi2dRlwdB6kIPXqNig==
X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hey All,
I am at a dead end and in need of some help. I leave on
business in a week and need to have a samba server set up
before I go. I really hope someone knows the answer to this.
I run the configure script and this is what I get after a
bunch of that other info goes by...anythoughts?
checking if large file support can be enabled
no
checking configure summary
ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe
configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config
Beggingly yours,
ross
Return-Path: <kyle at comanche.rawah.co.larimer.co.us>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from rawah.co.larimer.co.us (unknown [204.133.54.49]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BC54B50 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from comanche.rawah.co.larimer.co.us (comanche
[205.169.12.67]) by rawah.co.larimer.co.us (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with
ESMTP id PAA02577 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001
15:40:26 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from comanche (comanche [205.169.12.67]) by
comanche.rawah.co.larimer.co.us (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id
PAA19942 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:40:25 -0600
(MDT)
Message-Id: <200106182140.PAA19942 at comanche.rawah.co.larimer.co.us>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:40:25 -0600 (MDT)
From: Kyle Freestone <kyle at rawah.co.larimer.co.us>
Reply-To: Kyle Freestone <kyle at rawah.co.larimer.co.us>
Subject: good Samba books
To: samba at lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-MD5: jQ+iC89J5cAFX8oWStUPqA==
X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I realize its hard (and politically incorrect) to endorse one book over another,
but does anybody have some suggestions as to which book would be most beneficial
for somebody running Solaris 7 & 8 servers over a Novell network with M$
9x/NT/W2K clients?
Special Edition, Using Samba by Richard Sharpe, Tim Potter and Jim Morris
is a fairly recent book, but according to an online summary, centers around
Linux
Using Samba, by Robert Eckstein, David Collier-Brown and Peter Kelly
is an O'Reilly book (and I've usually found O'Reilly books to be very good)
but it might be a bit dated i.e. Nov. 1999
any recommendations from the list @ samba.org/samba/books.html or any other
ideas??
Thanks for any input
Kyle
GIS Systems Specialist
Return-Path: <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from infidyne.com (unknown [193.13.9.98]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id 216FE4AD0 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18
Jun 2001 15:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 9841 invoked by uid 1000); 18 Jun 2001 22:55:26 -0000
From: "Peter Schuller" <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 00:55:26 +0200
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Cc: peter.schuller at infidyne.com
Subject: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
Message-ID: <20010619005526.A9769 at infidyne.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
I have a major problem trying to make a Win2K client join a domain served by
Samba 2.2.0.
The situation is this: We have a network of around 25 NT 4.0 clients. Today
the first Win2K client was introduced, so we upgraded to Samba 2.2.0. After
working around the disabled-account bug everything on the existing NT 4.0
clients worked perfectly.
But making the Win2K client join the domain seems impossible. We've created
the machine trust account as usual (add the entry in /etc/passwd, including
the $, and smbpasswd -a -m machinename). When attempting to join the domain,
the Win2K box wants a username and a password (this is different from NT 4.0
which basically just did it automatically). As far as we can tell,
machinename$/machinename is the correct user/password, because it yields a
different error message than what we get with any other combination.
The error message, roughly translated from Swedish, is:
"The follwing error occurred while connecting to the domain
DOMAIN_NAME: You are using a computer account. In order to access
this server you must use your global or local user account."
Which is weird. We've tried entering existing samba accounts, inluding
making the account a domain admin, but to no avail. And in general, how are
we supposed to be logged in to the domain before join:ing it?
I just don't get it. The docs don't seem to mention any of this entering
user/password business, and I get the impression the docs aren't written
with Win2K in mind (or for som reason you are not normally supposed to have
to enter it).
Does anyone have any idea? Any hints would be much appreciated.
Thanks!
--
/ Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB
PGP userID: 0x5584BD98 or 'Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>'
Key retrival: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey at scode.org
E-Mail: peter.schuller at infidyne.com Web: http://scode.org
Return-Path: <don_mccall at hp.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from atlrel1.hp.com (atlrel1.hp.com [156.153.255.210]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE914596 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xatlrelay2.atl.hp.com (xatlrelay2.atl.hp.com
[15.45.89.191]) by atlrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8BF58E;
Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:08:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xatlbh2.atl.hp.com (xatlbh2.atl.hp.com [15.45.89.187]) by
xatlrelay2.atl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCEB1F50B; Mon, 18 Jun
2001 19:07:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by xatlbh2.atl.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <MZ6V8C5C>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:08:38 -0400
Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050AD4 at xatl02.atl.hp.com>
From: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>
To: 'Ross Kennedy' <Ross.Kennedy at Sun.COM>, samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: LOCKING Error - Super need to know
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:08:36 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi Ross,
It's a poor unix implementation indeed that does not support file locking.
In my experience these messages are more often a result of the compiler that
you are using to compile samba; The configure script actually creates and
compiles
some simple little programs to test what functionality exists on your
particular
system, and if these test programs fail to compile or run for some reason,
it APPEARS
that the test itself failed.
I have seen this happen when the compiler you are using isn't ansi standard,
or you
have to add some cc flag to tell the compiler to be ansi compliant; most
people have
been able to pull gcc from the gnu web page and use that successfully...
You can get more info on whats actually failing by looking into the
config.log
file for the tests for fcntl locking, etc and make sure you are not getting
any compiler
errors when building those tests.
For instance you might look for something like:
configure:9456: checking for fcntl locking
configure:9469: cc -o conftest -O +DA1.1 +DS1.1 -DUSING_DOMAINUSER_MAP
-DHAS_HPU
X_POSIX_ACLS -DWITH_SYSLOG -DDEBUG_PASSWORD -Ae -D_HPUX_SOURCE
-D_POSIX_SOURCE
-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE conftest.c -lgen -lsec -lnsl 1>&5
(this is on a HP-UX system); the key is looking for "checking for fcntl
locking"...
Hope this helps,
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Kennedy [mailto:Ross.Kennedy at Sun.COM]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 4:55 PM
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: LOCKING Error - Super need to know
Hey All,
I am at a dead end and in need of some help. I leave on
business in a week and need to have a samba server set up
before I go. I really hope someone knows the answer to this.
I run the configure script and this is what I get after a
bunch of that other info goes by...anythoughts?
checking if large file support can be enabled
no
checking configure summary
ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe
configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config
Beggingly yours,
ross
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <tpot at samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 7C15F46DC;
Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tim Potter <tpot at valinux.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15150.38799.855902.263766 at frungy.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:06:39 +1000 (EST)
To: "M. Kilroy" <mekilroy at risingedge.com>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>, <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: wbinfo_check_secret
In-Reply-To: <014601c0f818$2d4f2900$1a00a8c0 at diamondback>
References: <014601c0f818$2d4f2900$1a00a8c0 at diamondback>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
M. Kilroy writes:
> I have a question about the following code from wbinfo.c.
>
> In the function wbinfo_check_secret, response.data.num_entries is used as the
> check for wether or not the secret file is good:
> if (response.data.num_entries == 0) {
> printf("Secret is good\n");
> } else {
> printf("Secret is bad\n0x%08x\n",
> response.data.num_entries);
> }
>
> I get 0xc00000e5 as the response.data.num_entries. I cannot seem to find
> where response.data.num_entries gets populated with data. Maybe there's a bug
> and that's why I have kooky data? Does anyone know where this field gets his
> data???
It's actually supposed to be the the NT status code returned when
trying to verify that samba is a member of a domain. Look in
include/nterr.h for values. 0xc00000e5 is internal error. (-:
FYI it's filled in in winbindd_misc.c at the end of the
winbindd_check_machine_acct() function.
There are a couple of problem areas with winbindd in head at the
moment. The first is this one (not checking machine account
properly), secondly the pam_winbind module isn't fully working,
and thirdly it doesn't cope with large numbers of users/groups
just yet. This may be the cause of your out of memory error
alluded to in another message.
TIm.
Return-Path: <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net
(falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.74]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id B98B346DC for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18
Jun 2001 17:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elbles (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com
[24.151.19.181]) by falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3)
with SMTP id RAA24265; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <000901c0f853$c4498360$0600a8c0 at elbles>
Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
From: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
To: "Peter Schuller" <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>,
<samba at lists.samba.org>
Cc: <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
References: <20010619005526.A9769 at infidyne.com>
Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:06:57 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Peter,
In order for a Windows 2000 client to join a domain controlled by a Samba
2.2.0 PDC, you must have an entry for root in the smbpasswd file, with a
valid password; this is the account that is to be used when you join a
domain, and it asks you for a password. This _SHOULD_ work with a domain
admin account (at least that's how it works on NT/2000 servers), but, that
functionallity hasn't yet been implemented in Samba. Hope this helps, and
please let me know if it doesn't.
Sean Elble
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Schuller" <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Cc: <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 6:55 PM
Subject: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
> Hello,
>
> I have a major problem trying to make a Win2K client join a domain served
by
> Samba 2.2.0.
>
> The situation is this: We have a network of around 25 NT 4.0 clients.
Today
> the first Win2K client was introduced, so we upgraded to Samba 2.2.0.
After
> working around the disabled-account bug everything on the existing NT 4.0
> clients worked perfectly.
>
> But making the Win2K client join the domain seems impossible. We've
created
> the machine trust account as usual (add the entry in /etc/passwd,
including
> the $, and smbpasswd -a -m machinename). When attempting to join the
domain,
> the Win2K box wants a username and a password (this is different from NT
4.0
> which basically just did it automatically). As far as we can tell,
> machinename$/machinename is the correct user/password, because it yields a
> different error message than what we get with any other combination.
>
> The error message, roughly translated from Swedish, is:
>
> "The follwing error occurred while connecting to the domain
> DOMAIN_NAME: You are using a computer account. In order to access
> this server you must use your global or local user account."
>
> Which is weird. We've tried entering existing samba accounts, inluding
> making the account a domain admin, but to no avail. And in general, how
are
> we supposed to be logged in to the domain before join:ing it?
>
> I just don't get it. The docs don't seem to mention any of this entering
> user/password business, and I get the impression the docs aren't written
> with Win2K in mind (or for som reason you are not normally supposed to
have
> to enter it).
>
> Does anyone have any idea? Any hints would be much appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> --
> / Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB
>
> PGP userID: 0x5584BD98 or 'Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>'
> Key retrival: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey at scode.org
> E-Mail: peter.schuller at infidyne.com Web: http://scode.org
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from infidyne.com (unknown [193.13.9.98]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id 253924411 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18
Jun 2001 17:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 11468 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2001 00:53:28 -0000
Received: from equinox.infidyne.com (HELO 127.0.0.1) (root at 193.13.9.98)
by equinox.infidyne.com with SMTP; 19 Jun 2001 00:53:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 4802 invoked by uid 1000); 19 Jun 2001 00:47:24 -0000
From: "Peter Schuller" <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 02:47:24 +0200
To: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
Cc: Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>, samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
Message-ID: <20010619024724.E635 at prometheus>
References: <20010619005526.A9769 at infidyne.com>
<000901c0f853$c4498360$0600a8c0 at elbles>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <000901c0f853$c4498360$0600a8c0 at elbles>; from
S_Elble at yahoo.com on Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 08:06:57PM -0400
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> In order for a Windows 2000 client to join a domain controlled by a Samba
> 2.2.0 PDC, you must have an entry for root in the smbpasswd file, with a
> valid password; this is the account that is to be used when you join a
> domain, and it asks you for a password. This _SHOULD_ work with a domain
> admin account (at least that's how it works on NT/2000 servers), but, that
> functionallity hasn't yet been implemented in Samba. Hope this helps, and
> please let me know if it doesn't.
Ah, thanks! This crossed my mind, but I never gave it enough thought to
actually try it for some reason. I'll try it ASAP.
Thanks again,
--
/ Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB
PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>'
Key retrival: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey at scode.org
E-Mail: peter.schuller at infidyne.com Web: http://www.scode.org
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
Return-Path: <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net
(avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.50]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id AC853448F for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18
Jun 2001 18:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elbles (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com
[24.151.19.181]) by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3)
with SMTP id SAA27173; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <001401c0f85e$8285e080$0600a8c0 at elbles>
Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
From: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
To: "Peter Schuller" <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
References: <20010619005526.A9769 at infidyne.com>
<000901c0f853$c4498360$0600a8c0 at elbles>
<20010619024724.E635 at prometheus>
Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 21:23:54 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Not a problem. Good luck!
Sean Elble
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Schuller" <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
To: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble at yahoo.com>
Cc: "Peter Schuller" <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>; <samba at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 8:47 PM
Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
> > In order for a Windows 2000 client to join a domain controlled by a
Samba
> > 2.2.0 PDC, you must have an entry for root in the smbpasswd file, with a
> > valid password; this is the account that is to be used when you join a
> > domain, and it asks you for a password. This _SHOULD_ work with a domain
> > admin account (at least that's how it works on NT/2000 servers), but,
that
> > functionallity hasn't yet been implemented in Samba. Hope this helps,
and
> > please let me know if it doesn't.
>
> Ah, thanks! This crossed my mind, but I never gave it enough thought to
> actually try it for some reason. I'll try it ASAP.
>
> Thanks again,
>
> --
> / Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB
>
> PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>'
> Key retrival: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey at scode.org
> E-Mail: peter.schuller at infidyne.com Web: http://www.scode.org
>
> [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <murali at epiphany.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from smto-mail-02.epiphany.com (unknown [208.49.174.40]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1936D4A3F; Mon, 18 Jun 2001
18:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smto-mail-02.epiphany.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <M656Y2PJ>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:53:33 -0700
Message-ID: <38A6C7D1B5A8D4118D5B00508B5E08E3145FA1 at goofy.epiphany.com>
From: murali at epiphany.com
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Samba 2.0.7 & Solaris 8 authenticate against NT PDC
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:53:28 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Greetings Samba Guru's:
Samba 2.0.7 running on Solaris 8 configured to authenticate against our NT
BDC
worked very well for quite some time.
Now, I am getting the following problem. When I tried to connect to this
share
as myself, it asks the password, still I am not able to map this share to my
NT.
Here is the log file: (Somehow, samba thinks my username is nobody)
Invalid username/password for nobody
[2001/06/18 17:57:59, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection(284)
Invalid username/password for nobody
[2001/06/18 17:59:59, 2] param/loadparm.c:do_section(2481)
Processing section "[homes]"
[2001/06/18 17:59:59, 2] lib/interface.c:add_interface(83)
added interface ip=10.3.5.2 bcast=10.3.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0
Here is the smb.conf file:
[global]
workgroup = EPIPHANY
netbios name = ns1
comment = EPNY server
client code page = 437
lock directory = /usr/local/samba/var/locks
log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m
preserve case = Yes
case sensitive = No
security = server
password server = 10.3.1.5
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_KEEPALIVE
wins server = 10.3.1.10
local master = No
load printers = No
kernel oplocks = No
[homes]
comment = None
path = /homes
read list = @eng
write list = @eng
create mask = 0740
directory mask = 0740
map archive = No
Your help & suggenstaions are very much appreciated.
Thanks,
Murali
Return-Path: <rradan at tycoint.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from gate.tycoint.com.au (unknown [202.139.121.81]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0594BE1 for
<samba at samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.1.1.38] by gate.tycoint.com.au for samba at samba.org id
MAA26679; Tue Jun 19 12:01:57 2001
Received: from nswmh3.tycoint.com.au (nswmh3.tycoint.com.au
[10.11.1.29]) by nswmh1.tycoint.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
LAA14997 for <samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:46:12 +1000
Received: from netman (ray.tycoint.com.au [10.11.1.50]) by
nswmh3.tycoint.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA01751 for
<samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:58:47 +1000
Subject: aix configure problem.
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:05:46 +1000
Message-ID: <000e01c0f864$5bda11d0$32010b0a at tycoint.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
To: <samba at samba.org>
From: "Raymond Radan" <rradan at tycoint.com>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
i am new to Samba, and i am not getting very far with the install procedure
(see below), any help would be appreciated.
Thankyou.
- i have downloaded samba-2.2.0 copied to the /usr/local directory for
installation on AIX 4.2 and tried running ./configure with the following
results:
#
# pwd
/usr/local/samba-2.2.0/source
# ./configure
loading cache ./config.cache
checking for gcc... no
checking for cc... no
configure: error: no acceptable cc found in $PATH
# tail config.log
This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
configure:772: checking for gcc
configure:802: checking for cc
#
regards,
Raymond Radan.
Systems Administrator
Tyco Services
( System Support Line - (02) 9414 2442, 7.30am To 7.00pm Mon-Fri.)
Return-Path: <blue at mail.gator.net>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.gator.net (mail.gator.net [209.251.152.21]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCA74BD1 for
<samba at samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (blue at localhost) by mail.gator.net
(Switch-2.0.5/Switch-2.0.5) with ESMTP id f5J2Jjd26603; Mon, 18 Jun
2001 22:19:45 -0400
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 22:19:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: spot the dog <blue at gator.net>
To: Raymond Radan <rradan at tycoint.com>
Cc: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Re: aix configure problem.
In-Reply-To: <000e01c0f864$5bda11d0$32010b0a at tycoint.com.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106182219160.14114-100000 at mail.gator.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Raymond Radan wrote:
> i am new to Samba, and i am not getting very far with the install procedure
> (see below), any help would be appreciated.
install a compiler, or, if you've done that, put it in your path. :)
Return-Path: <murali at epiphany.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from smto-mail-02.epiphany.com (unknown [208.49.174.40]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1024BF4 for
<samba at samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smto-mail-02.epiphany.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <M656Y2SY>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:27:19 -0700
Message-ID: <38A6C7D1B5A8D4118D5B00508B5E08E3145FA4 at goofy.epiphany.com>
From: murali at epiphany.com
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: FW: Samba 2.0.7 & Solaris 8 authenticate against NT PDC
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:27:15 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
-----Original Message-----
From: murali at epiphany.com [mailto:murali at epiphany.com]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 6:53 PM
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Samba 2.0.7 & Solaris 8 authenticate against NT PDC
Greetings Samba Guru's:
Samba 2.0.7 running on Solaris 8 configured to authenticate against our NT
BDC
worked very well for quite some time.
Now, I am getting the following problem. When I tried to connect to this
share
as myself, it asks the password, still I am not able to map this share to my
NT.
Here is the log file: (Somehow, samba thinks my username is nobody)
Invalid username/password for nobody
[2001/06/18 17:57:59, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection(284)
Invalid username/password for nobody
[2001/06/18 17:59:59, 2] param/loadparm.c:do_section(2481)
Processing section "[homes]"
[2001/06/18 17:59:59, 2] lib/interface.c:add_interface(83)
added interface ip=10.3.5.2 bcast=10.3.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0
Here is the smb.conf file:
[global]
workgroup = EPIPHANY
netbios name = ns1
comment = EPNY server
client code page = 437
lock directory = /usr/local/samba/var/locks
log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m
preserve case = Yes
case sensitive = No
security = server
password server = 10.3.1.5
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_KEEPALIVE
wins server = 10.3.1.10
local master = No
load printers = No
kernel oplocks = No
[homes]
comment = None
path = /homes
read list = @eng
write list = @eng
create mask = 0740
directory mask = 0740
map archive = No
Your help & suggenstaions are very much appreciated.
Thanks,
Murali
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <jerome_baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from smtp013.mail.yahoo.com (smtp013.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.173.57]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C97FD4B36
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown (HELO mainpassjerome) (64.120.108.6) by
smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Jun 2001 02:48:45 -0000
X-Apparently-From: <jerome?baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
Message-ID: <017301c0f86a$c8ea8b50$6f01010a at nt.local>
From: "Jerome Baumgarten" <jerome_baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Samba CVS
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:51:47 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I would like to get the last Samba source from the CVS to compile it and I
would like to use it in an existing Win2000 domain. Thus I would like to get
winbind.
Right now I don't have any Samba installation on my machine.
So my question is which one do I need ?
Is it the HEAD or SAMBA_2_2 ?
Is it this command:
cvs -z5 -d :pserver:cvs at pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co samba
or that one ?
cvs -z5 -d :pserver:cvs at pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba
Thanks in advance.
Jerome
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Return-Path: <jerome_baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from smtp014.mail.yahoo.com (smtp014.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.173.58]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A16024BFB
for <samba at samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown (HELO mainpassjerome) (64.120.108.6) by
smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Jun 2001 02:50:04 -0000
X-Apparently-From: <jerome?baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
Message-ID: <018101c0f86a$f8285af0$6f01010a at nt.local>
From: "Jerome Baumgarten" <jerome_baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Samba CVS
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:53:06 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I would like to get the last Samba source from the CVS to compile it and I
would like to use it in an existing Win2000 domain. Thus I would like to get
winbind.
Right now I don't have any Samba installation on my machine.
So my question is which one do I need ?
Is it the HEAD or SAMBA_2_2 ?
Is it this command:
cvs -z5 -d :pserver:cvs at pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co samba
or that one ?
cvs -z5 -d :pserver:cvs at pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba
Thanks in advance.
Jerome
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Return-Path: <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373324C42 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5J6S0g23745; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:28:00 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id IAA21696; Tue, 19
Jun 2001 08:28:00 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA28938; Tue, 19 Jun
2001 08:28:01 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>, <cnorloff at norloff.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:27:59 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: STILL can't login from NT
Message-ID: <3B2F0D0F.10540.F39AC at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <200106181447.AA78709132 at mail.toward.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> I still can't login from WinNT, even though I've:
> -encrypted the passwords
> -added the smbpasswd file
>
> I can get in as guest when that's enabled, but I can't get in with any usernames (or root!).
>
> This is using security=user or share. We don't use a PDC, so I just want to authenticate with the Unix server that's running Samba (Solaris 2.6). I'm not very familiar with Unix, but am trying to get away from Windows machines.
>
> I've tried everything I can find, and have hunted through the archives here and the Using Samba book.
>
> Any ideas?
Can you connect from Win95, Win98? Can you connect using smbclient (-
U user)? Do you have a host allow or a host deny line in smb.conf?
What is the error message you get on NT? What do the samba logs say?
Is the smbpasswd file where it is expected by your binary version of
samba? Have you added the users to the smbpasswd file (smbpasswd -a
user)? Try a smbpasswd -e user after that. An old samba version had
the bug that a new user was disabled by default. Have you looked into
the smbpasswd file with a text editor? Are the permissions correct?
Hops this helps,
Christian
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB374C49 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:42:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5J6kjg25714; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:46:45 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id IAA22778; Tue, 19
Jun 2001 08:46:45 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA29615; Tue, 19 Jun
2001 08:46:46 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: samba at lists.samba.org, craig secrist <seatoast at yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:46:44 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Question from a newbie...
Message-ID: <3B2F1174.6599.20626F at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <20010618202353.83016.qmail at web9607.mail.yahoo.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Hello all,
>
> I'm pretty new to samba-land and I have a few
> questions regarding capabilities.
>
> I have a working RedHat 7.1 installation on a 133mhz
> IBM pc. (meager)Hardware = 80Meg RAM, 1 Teac CDRW, 1
> sony CDROM, 1 Travan 2.0 gig tape drive.
>
> I would like to set up Samba as a PDC and file server.
> I would also like to back up Win9x, Linux and Mac
> systems to tape, share files and devices(specifically,
> the CDRW, as I don't think my printer is supported)
Why do you think so? You can attach any printer to the parralel port
of your linux machine. Most should be supported by ghostscript for
the use form linux. For the use form Windows you don't need that: The
clients have the printer dirver and all samba and linux do is to
spool the port.
> Am I asking too much of my little tiny processor, or
> will Samba allow me to do all of this? Will my
> performance be gawdawful?
I'm pretty sure it will work. How much clients do you have? On a 10
Mbit/s network may be the network will be the bottle neck. It will
probably be good for testing, learning, a small (home) network. If
you need performance you should upgrade your hardware. But for
nightly backups you don't need much performance. We are running a PII
350 with 256 MB RAM as samba, nfs, mail, web server an a 100 Mbit/s
networ for about 15 to 20 clients with no performance or stability
problems (as long as you do not care about big MS access databases on
the server).
How do you want to share the CDRW? Buring on the fly over the network?
Christian
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5DF43F7 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:50:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5J6tPg26596; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:55:25 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id IAA23114; Tue, 19
Jun 2001 08:55:25 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA30159; Tue, 19 Jun
2001 08:55:26 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: samba at lists.samba.org, "Peter Schuller"
<peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:55:24 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
Cc: peter.schuller at infidyne.com
Message-ID: <3B2F137C.8992.285207 at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <20010619005526.A9769 at infidyne.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Hello,
>
> I have a major problem trying to make a Win2K client join a domain served by
> Samba 2.2.0.
>
> The situation is this: We have a network of around 25 NT 4.0 clients. Today
> the first Win2K client was introduced, so we upgraded to Samba 2.2.0. After
> working around the disabled-account bug everything on the existing NT 4.0
> clients worked perfectly.
>
> But making the Win2K client join the domain seems impossible. We've created
> the machine trust account as usual (add the entry in /etc/passwd, including
> the $, and smbpasswd -a -m machinename). When attempting to join the domain,
> the Win2K box wants a username and a password (this is different from NT 4.0
> which basically just did it automatically). As far as we can tell,
> machinename$/machinename is the correct user/password, because it yields a
> different error message than what we get with any other combination.
You have to use root and it's password. For this root must be in
smbpasswd and not as invalied user in [global]. I'm not sure if root
must be in domain admin too. If you have set up the add user
parameter correct the machine account is created on the fly. Do not
install SP2 before you have jonied the domain or use the current cvs
version
Christian
>
> The error message, roughly translated from Swedish, is:
>
> "The follwing error occurred while connecting to the domain
> DOMAIN_NAME: You are using a computer account. In order to access
> this server you must use your global or local user account."
>
> Which is weird. We've tried entering existing samba accounts, inluding
> making the account a domain admin, but to no avail. And in general, how are
> we supposed to be logged in to the domain before join:ing it?
>
> I just don't get it. The docs don't seem to mention any of this entering
> user/password business, and I get the impression the docs aren't written
> with Win2K in mind (or for som reason you are not normally supposed to have
> to enter it).
>
> Does anyone have any idea? Any hints would be much appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> --
> / Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB
>
> PGP userID: 0x5584BD98 or 'Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>'
> Key retrival: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey at scode.org
> E-Mail: peter.schuller at infidyne.com Web: http://scode.org
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <shakir_imran at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from web5103.mail.yahoo.com (web5103.mail.yahoo.com
[216.115.106.73]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E33D04C4B
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20010619065650.15725.qmail at web5103.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [63.100.210.187] by web5103.mail.yahoo.com; Mon, 18 Jun
2001 23:56:50 PDT
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: imran shakir <shakir_imran at yahoo.com>
Subject: Help Me
To: samba at lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
please tell me how can i enable guest account when i
access from windows 98 to the linux running samba i
got a passwd window how can i remove this window
many many thanks to you please help me in this case.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
http://buzz.yahoo.com/
Return-Path: <pronetsz at mail.externet.hu>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from prins.externet.hu (Prins.externet.hu [212.40.96.161]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132264C71 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 00:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from marcigepe (Dial158-56.externet.hu [212.40.102.22]) by
prins.externet.hu (8.9.3+3.2W/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with SMTP id
JAA10418 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:49:18 +0200
Message-ID: <001101c0f894$57b67f00$0100a8c0 at marcigepe>
From: "ProNet Kft" <pronetsz at mail.externet.hu>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: samba config
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:49:04 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
hello,
does anybody know how can i setup my samba to operate on win9x network?
my samba is runing, but i don't see in network.
the linux pc's see all win9x workstations on the network.
the smb.conf is very simple ...
thx
prNET
Return-Path: <Administrator at josims.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from core.josims.com (core.josims.com [195.89.188.194]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431294C4A for
<samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 01:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by CORE with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<MK1ZDKG5>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:28:12 +0100
Message-ID: <C2ADBF38E1F4D3118F9F0060082151A501F689 at CORE>
From: Andrew Lyon <Administrator at josims.com>
To: "'samba at samba.org'" <samba at samba.org>
Subject: AIX 3.2 ?
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:28:10 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
Does anybody have samba 2.2 binarys for AIX 3.2.x ? I have a AIX box here
that is still running a very old beta version, the box does not have a C
compiler installed so I cannot upgrade it :(.
Best Regards
Andrew Lyon
IT Manager
J.O. Sims Ltd
************************************************************
Registered Office:
J.O. Sims Ltd
Pudding Lane
Pinchbeck
Spalding
Lincs
PE11 3TJ
Company reg No: 2084187 Vat reg No: GB 437 4621 47
Tel: +44 (0) 1775 842100
Fax: +44 (0) 1775 842101
Web: www.josims.com
Email: enquiries at josims.com
************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential
and is intended for the addressee only. The contents of
this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the
sender's consent. If you are not the intended recipient of
the message, please notify the sender immediately, and
delete the message.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are
those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those
of the company. No commitment may be inferred from the
contents unless explicitly stated. The company does not
take any responsibility for the personal views of the
author.
This message has been scanned for viruses before sending,
but the company does not accept any responsibility for
infection and recommends that you scan any attachments.
************************************************************
Return-Path: <robert at hoekstra.nu>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from cobalt01.skybernet.nl (unknown [217.17.128.197]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60C44CA4 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 01:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from snws52 ([217.17.139.4]) by cobalt01.skybernet.nl
(8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f5J8TpI29279; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:29:51
+0200
Message-ID: <003601c0f89a$496ee3f0$4801010a at skybernet>
From: "Robert Hoekstra" <robert at hoekstra.nu>
To: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>, <samba at lists.samba.org>,
"Peter Schuller" <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
Cc: <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
References: <3B2F137C.8992.285207 at localhost>
Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:31:49 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Even if you upgrade W2k to SP2 after joining, your account will be
'disabled', rendering the domain useless to Win2k.
----- Original Message -----
From: Christian Barth <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>; Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
Cc: <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a major problem trying to make a Win2K client join a domain
served by
> > Samba 2.2.0.
> >
> > The situation is this: We have a network of around 25 NT 4.0 clients.
Today
> > the first Win2K client was introduced, so we upgraded to Samba 2.2.0.
After
> > working around the disabled-account bug everything on the existing NT
4.0
> > clients worked perfectly.
> >
> > But making the Win2K client join the domain seems impossible. We've
created
> > the machine trust account as usual (add the entry in /etc/passwd,
including
> > the $, and smbpasswd -a -m machinename). When attempting to join the
domain,
> > the Win2K box wants a username and a password (this is different from NT
4.0
> > which basically just did it automatically). As far as we can tell,
> > machinename$/machinename is the correct user/password, because it yields
a
> > different error message than what we get with any other combination.
> You have to use root and it's password. For this root must be in
> smbpasswd and not as invalied user in [global]. I'm not sure if root
> must be in domain admin too. If you have set up the add user
> parameter correct the machine account is created on the fly. Do not
> install SP2 before you have jonied the domain or use the current cvs
> version
>
> Christian
>
>
> >
> > The error message, roughly translated from Swedish, is:
> >
> > "The follwing error occurred while connecting to the domain
> > DOMAIN_NAME: You are using a computer account. In order to access
> > this server you must use your global or local user account."
> >
> > Which is weird. We've tried entering existing samba accounts, inluding
> > making the account a domain admin, but to no avail. And in general, how
are
> > we supposed to be logged in to the domain before join:ing it?
> >
> > I just don't get it. The docs don't seem to mention any of this entering
> > user/password business, and I get the impression the docs aren't written
> > with Win2K in mind (or for som reason you are not normally supposed to
have
> > to enter it).
> >
> > Does anyone have any idea? Any hints would be much appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > --
> > / Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB
> >
> > PGP userID: 0x5584BD98 or 'Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>'
> > Key retrival: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey at scode.org
> > E-Mail: peter.schuller at infidyne.com Web: http://scode.org
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <ygwang at prosten.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from www.uphosting.com.br (unknown [66.70.16.230]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DCFF4CA4 for
<samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 01:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wangyouguo ([210.5.18.79]) by www.uphosting.com.br
(8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5J0e9192490 for <samba at samba.org>; Tue,
19 Jun 2001 00:40:10 GMT (envelope-from ygwang at prosten.com)
Message-ID: <002401c0f89a$20956e90$7a0245a8 at wangyouguo>
From: "Wang Youguo" <ygwang at prosten.com>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Would you please help me?
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:30:39 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Dear my Savior,
I have a big trouble in configuring SAMBA. I am wondering if I could get some help from you. My problem is descripted here:
SAMBA is installed in a RedHat Linux server and is configured, and
The machine can be seen from my WinNT4 client, but I can not login when I want to open the shared folder! I got a 'no right' message every time.
The following steps have been done:
(1) 'encrypt password =yes' is added into /etc/smb.conf
(2) 'smbpasswd -a username' is done and I can see the added user in the file: /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd
I have been confused for 2 days, would you please help me? PLEASE!
By the way, I am not familiar with Linux!
Thanks! Thanks! Thanks!
Best Regards,
Kerry Wang
Return-Path: <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from tm.turbomeca.fr (unknown [156.28.8.1]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DE64C22 for <samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun
2001 02:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bdoisc.turbomeca.fr (unknown [156.28.97.7]) by
tm.turbomeca.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D7B40014 for
<samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:10:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from p3696 (p3696.clients.turbomeca.fr [156.28.109.1]) by
bdoisc.turbomeca.fr (Mirapoint) with SMTP id ABF98946; Tue, 19 Jun
2001 11:10:14 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <000c01c0f89f$a5b847a0$016d1c9c at clients.turbomeca.fr>
From: "Serge Gracia" <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Cc: "Serge Gracia" <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>
Subject: Use of Samba 2.2.0
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:09:02 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
I installed Samba 2.2.0 on a hp9000 / 700; I can use it correctly since PC NT
4; it works; but, I meet several difficulties:
- When I mount directories Unix since the PC under user's name xxxxx, I am
obliged to stop the session NT and to redo the login to be able to mount a
directory under another user's name yyyyy?
- The format of files is not the same between Windows and Unix: I can not read
correctly ,since the PC, a file created under Unix (not use of Unix2dos) and
the opposite as well?
- Samba says that it is better not to use locks?; I would like to avoid that
two persons modify a file at the same time; is this possible?
Thank you if you can read to me and try it more to answer me.
Thank you still.
Goodbye.
serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr
Return-Path: <oliver at samera.com.py>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from Polaris.Pla.net.PY (polaris.pla.net.py [216.250.196.10])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD51442E for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 02:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp at localhost) by Polaris.Pla.net.PY (8.11.2/8.11.2)
with UUCP id f5J1NkK29020; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 05:23:46 +0400
Received: from samera.com.py (sojourner.samera.com [192.168.1.1]) by
samera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA19529; Tue, 19 Jun 2001
05:23:01 -0400
Message-ID: <3B2F19F7.808 at samera.com.py>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 05:23:03 -0400
From: "Oliver Schulze L." <oliver at samera.com.py>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1)
Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-py
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: robert at hoekstra.nu
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
References: <3B2F137C.8992.285207 at localhost>
<003601c0f89a$496ee3f0$4801010a at skybernet>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Will Samba 2.2.1 support Win2k SP2?
Thanks
Oliver
Robert Hoekstra wrote:
>Even if you upgrade W2k to SP2 after joining, your account will be
>'disabled', rendering the domain useless to Win2k.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Christian Barth <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
>To: <samba at lists.samba.org>; Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
>Cc: <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:55 AM
>Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
>
>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>I have a major problem trying to make a Win2K client join a domain
>>>
>served by
>
>>>Samba 2.2.0.
>>>
>>>The situation is this: We have a network of around 25 NT 4.0 clients.
>>>
>Today
>
>>>the first Win2K client was introduced, so we upgraded to Samba 2.2.0.
>>>
>After
>
>>>working around the disabled-account bug everything on the existing NT
>>>
>4.0
>
>>>clients worked perfectly.
>>>
>>>But making the Win2K client join the domain seems impossible. We've
>>>
>created
>
>>>the machine trust account as usual (add the entry in /etc/passwd,
>>>
>including
>
>>>the $, and smbpasswd -a -m machinename). When attempting to join the
>>>
>domain,
>
>>>the Win2K box wants a username and a password (this is different from NT
>>>
>4.0
>
>>>which basically just did it automatically). As far as we can tell,
>>>machinename$/machinename is the correct user/password, because it yields
>>>
>a
>
>>>different error message than what we get with any other combination.
>>>
>>You have to use root and it's password. For this root must be in
>>smbpasswd and not as invalied user in [global]. I'm not sure if root
>>must be in domain admin too. If you have set up the add user
>>parameter correct the machine account is created on the fly. Do not
>>install SP2 before you have jonied the domain or use the current cvs
>>version
>>
>>Christian
>>
>>
>>>The error message, roughly translated from Swedish, is:
>>>
>>> "The follwing error occurred while connecting to the domain
>>> DOMAIN_NAME: You are using a computer account. In order to access
>>> this server you must use your global or local user account."
>>>
>>>Which is weird. We've tried entering existing samba accounts, inluding
>>>making the account a domain admin, but to no avail. And in general, how
>>>
>are
>
>>>we supposed to be logged in to the domain before join:ing it?
>>>
>>>I just don't get it. The docs don't seem to mention any of this entering
>>>user/password business, and I get the impression the docs aren't written
>>>with Win2K in mind (or for som reason you are not normally supposed to
>>>
>have
>
>>>to enter it).
>>>
>>>Does anyone have any idea? Any hints would be much appreciated.
>>>
>>>Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>/ Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB
>>>
>>>PGP userID: 0x5584BD98 or 'Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>'
>>>Key retrival: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey at scode.org
>>>E-Mail: peter.schuller at infidyne.com Web: http://scode.org
>>>--
>>>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>>>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
>>--
>>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>>
--
Oliver Schulze L.
oliver at samera.com.py
Asuncion-Paraguay
Return-Path: <samba at hoekstra.nu>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from cobalt01.skybernet.nl (unknown [217.17.128.197]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA2B4C55 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 02:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from snws52 ([217.17.139.4]) by cobalt01.skybernet.nl
(8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f5J9RxI31686; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:28:01
+0200
Message-ID: <006901c0f8a2$6972de60$4801010a at skybernet>
From: "Robert Hoekstra" <samba at hoekstra.nu>
To: "Oliver Schulze L." <oliver at samera.com.py>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
References: <3B2F137C.8992.285207 at localhost>
<003601c0f89a$496ee3f0$4801010a at skybernet>
<3B2F19F7.808 at samera.com.py>
Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:29:57 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
As stated the current cvs version hsould already support SP2, I haven't
checked though.
Version 2.2.1 of Samba will sure support it.
Grts,
Robert.
----- Original Message -----
From: Oliver Schulze L.
To: robert at hoekstra.nu
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
Will Samba 2.2.1 support Win2k SP2?
Thanks
Oliver
Robert Hoekstra wrote:
Even if you upgrade W2k to SP2 after joining, your account will
be'disabled', rendering the domain useless to Win2k.----- Original
Message -----From: Christian Barth mailto:<barth at cck.uni-kl.deTo:
mailto:<samba at lists.samba.org; Peter Schuller
mailto:<peter.schuller at infidyne.comCc:
mailto:<peter.schuller at infidyne.comSent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:55
AMSubject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
Hello,I have a major problem trying to make a Win2K client join a domain
served by
Samba 2.2.0.The situation is this: We have a network of around 25 NT 4.0
clients.
Today
the first Win2K client was introduced, so we upgraded to Samba 2.2.0.
After
working around the disabled-account bug everything on the existing NT
4.0
clients worked perfectly.But making the Win2K client join the domain seems
impossible. We've
created
the machine trust account as usual (add the entry in /etc/passwd,
including
the $, and smbpasswd -a -m machinename). When attempting to join the
domain,
the Win2K box wants a username and a password (this is different from NT
4.0
which basically just did it automatically). As far as we can
tell,machinename$/machinename is the correct user/password, because it
yields
a
different error message than what we get with any other combination.
You have to use root and it's password. For this root must be insmbpasswd
and not as invalied user in [global]. I'm not sure if rootmust be in domain
admin too. If you have set up the add userparameter correct the machine
account is created on the fly. Do notinstall SP2 before you have jonied the
domain or use the current cvsversionChristian
The error message, roughly translated from Swedish, is: "The follwing
error occurred while connecting to the domain DOMAIN_NAME: You are using a
computer account. In order to access this server you must use your global
or local user account."Which is weird. We've tried entering existing samba
accounts, inludingmaking the account a domain admin, but to no avail. And in
general, how
are
we supposed to be logged in to the domain before join:ing it?I just don't
get it. The docs don't seem to mention any of this enteringuser/password
business, and I get the impression the docs aren't writtenwith Win2K in mind
(or for som reason you are not normally supposed to
have
to enter it).Does anyone have any idea? Any hints would be much
appreciated.Thanks!--/ Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HBPGP userID:
0x5584BD98 or 'Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>'Key retrival:
Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey at scode.orgE-Mail: peter.schuller at infidyne.com
Web: http://scode.org--To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
and read theinstructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
_______________________________________________________________________In a
world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)--To
unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read theinstructions:
http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
Oliver Schulze L.
oliver at samera.com.py
Asuncion-Paraguay
Return-Path: <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5C64CAD for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19
Jun 2001 02:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as1-98.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.9.98]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with
ESMTP id f5J9T5I17911; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:29:14 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root at yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
TAA03790; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:28:38 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet at piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
TAA10635; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:28:37 +1000
Message-ID: <3B2F1B44.3835B031 at bartlett.house>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:28:36 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Reply-To: abartlet at samba.org
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Oliver Schulze L." <oliver at samera.com.py>
Cc: robert at hoekstra.nu, samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
References: <3B2F137C.8992.285207 at localhost>
<003601c0f89a$496ee3f0$4801010a at skybernet>
<3B2F19F7.808 at samera.com.py>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Yes, the code to do support this (and apparently Windows XP as well) is
in current CVS.
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at samba.org
"Oliver Schulze L." wrote:
>
> Will Samba 2.2.1 support Win2k SP2?
>
> Thanks
> Oliver
>
> Robert Hoekstra wrote:
>
> >Even if you upgrade W2k to SP2 after joining, your account will be
> >'disabled', rendering the domain useless to Win2k.
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Christian Barth <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
> >To: <samba at lists.samba.org>; Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
> >Cc: <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
> >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:55 AM
> >Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
> >
> >
> >>>Hello,
> >>>
> >>>I have a major problem trying to make a Win2K client join a domain
> >>>
> >served by
> >
> >>>Samba 2.2.0.
> >>>
> >>>The situation is this: We have a network of around 25 NT 4.0 clients.
> >>>
> >Today
> >
> >>>the first Win2K client was introduced, so we upgraded to Samba 2.2.0.
> >>>
> >After
> >
> >>>working around the disabled-account bug everything on the existing NT
> >>>
> >4.0
> >
> >>>clients worked perfectly.
> >>>
> >>>But making the Win2K client join the domain seems impossible. We've
> >>>
> >created
> >
> >>>the machine trust account as usual (add the entry in /etc/passwd,
> >>>
> >including
> >
> >>>the $, and smbpasswd -a -m machinename). When attempting to join the
> >>>
> >domain,
> >
> >>>the Win2K box wants a username and a password (this is different from NT
> >>>
> >4.0
> >
> >>>which basically just did it automatically). As far as we can tell,
> >>>machinename$/machinename is the correct user/password, because it yields
> >>>
> >a
> >
> >>>different error message than what we get with any other combination.
> >>>
> >>You have to use root and it's password. For this root must be in
> >>smbpasswd and not as invalied user in [global]. I'm not sure if root
> >>must be in domain admin too. If you have set up the add user
> >>parameter correct the machine account is created on the fly. Do not
> >>install SP2 before you have jonied the domain or use the current cvs
> >>version
> >>
> >>Christian
> >>
> >>
> >>>The error message, roughly translated from Swedish, is:
> >>>
> >>> "The follwing error occurred while connecting to the domain
> >>> DOMAIN_NAME: You are using a computer account. In order to access
> >>> this server you must use your global or local user account."
> >>>
> >>>Which is weird. We've tried entering existing samba accounts, inluding
> >>>making the account a domain admin, but to no avail. And in general, how
> >>>
> >are
> >
> >>>we supposed to be logged in to the domain before join:ing it?
> >>>
> >>>I just don't get it. The docs don't seem to mention any of this entering
> >>>user/password business, and I get the impression the docs aren't written
> >>>with Win2K in mind (or for som reason you are not normally supposed to
> >>>
> >have
> >
> >>>to enter it).
> >>>
> >>>Does anyone have any idea? Any hints would be much appreciated.
> >>>
> >>>Thanks!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>/ Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB
> >>>
> >>>PGP userID: 0x5584BD98 or 'Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>'
> >>>Key retrival: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey at scode.org
> >>>E-Mail: peter.schuller at infidyne.com Web: http://scode.org
> >>>--
> >>>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> >>>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >>>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________________________________
> >>In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
> >>--
> >>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> >>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >>
>
> --
> Oliver Schulze L.
> oliver at samera.com.py
> Asuncion-Paraguay
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
abartlet at samba.org
Return-Path: <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3674CD3 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19
Jun 2001 02:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as2-199.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.10.199]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2)
with ESMTP id f5J9uvI20972; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:56:57 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root at yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
TAA04108; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:56:30 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet at piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
TAA12173; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:56:29 +1000
Message-ID: <3B2F21CD.8D294B8E at bartlett.house>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:56:29 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Reply-To: abartlet at samba.org
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eric Boucher <eric_boucher60 at yahoo.com>
Cc: SAMBA <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: security:everybody access home of anybody(re-post
References: <20010606182240.23780.qmail at web9401.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Eric Boucher wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I have posted earlier this problem I have with some
> security and somebody told me to include my "smb.conf"
> description. So here it is. So the problem is this
> one:
>
> I am using samba 2.2.0 and I have only one single
> Win2k client on it. Every user access there home
> directory via this single Win2k box. But everytime a
> user logout and a new user login, this new user has
> access to the home share of the user who whas log
> before.
What are the directory permissions involved?
What can these users access when logged in interactivly to the server
(SSH, telent, console)?
Samba perfers not to second-guess the admin, and unless you specifty
'valid users = %S' (or somthing like that) then its all perfectly valid.
Set the home directories to mode 0700 and try again.
> And if this second use logout and a third user
> log in, he has access to the home share of the two
> other users, and so on. So at the end of the day, if
> everybody has logon at least once, everybody has
> access to anybody home share.
Unfortunetly WinNT (and 2k I presume) keeps profile connections after a
user logs off - using the new users permissions but the same
connection. This is not somthing I have particularly come across as I
don't do many domain logons at my site, and RedHat home dirs are 0700.
> If I HUP all the samba
> servers, the user who is login has only access to his
> home share, but the proccess only begin one more time.
> It's seems like the connection between all the users
> on that single machine stay until I reset the samba
> server. Can somebody help me?
>
> Here's a sample of my "smb.conf" file:
>
> [global]
> debug level = 1
> wins support = NO
> wins server = 57.227.204.4
> os level = 0
> local master = NO
> domain master = NO
> security = domain
> preferred master = NO
> remote announce = 57.227.204.4
> remote browse sync = 57.227.204.4
> hosts allow = 57.227.204.20
> browseable = YES
> workgroup = MDM
> netbios name = server2
> socket options = TCP_NODELAY
> password server = mdmmain
> encrypt passwords = YES
> smb passwd file = /usr/samba/private/smbpasswd
> read only = YES
> printcap name = /etc/printcap
> printing = BSD
> load printers = YES
> print command = lpr -P %p %s; rm %s
> username map = /usr/samba/usermap
> logon script = startup.bat
> max log size = 5000
> max open files = 10000
> browse list = YES
> follow symlinks = YES
> wide links = YES
> panic action = /usr/samba/scripts/panic
> hide dot files = YES
>
> [homes]
> read only = NO
> browseable = NO
> preexec = echo Login : %P : %T : Windows=%U.%G "<==>"
> Unix=%u.%g : sur %m : IP=%I : architecture=%a >>
> /usr/samba/var/login.log
> postexec = echo Logout: %P : %T : Windows=%U.%G
> "<==>" Unix=%u.%g : sur %m : IP=%I : architecture=%a
> >> /usr/samba/var/login.log
>
> [printer]
>
> comment = Imprimante sur le reseau Unix
> print ok = YES
> path = /var/spool/samba
> browseable = NO
>
> [transfer]
> comment = Dossier de partage
> path = /disk1/people/transfer
> browseable = YES
> read only = NO
> create mask = 777
> directory mask = 777
> preexec = echo Login : %P : %T : Windows=%U.%G "<==>"
> Unix=%u.%g : sur %m : IP=%I : architecture=%a >>
> /usr/samba/var/login.log
> postexec = echo Logout: %P : %T : Windows=%U.%G
> "<==>" Unix=%u.%g : sur %m : IP=%I : architecture=%a
> >> /usr/samba/var/login.log
BTW, if your trying to record logins/logouts then configure --with-utmp
and 'utmp = yes', as this works better and does not require
world-writable logs...
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
abartlet at samba.org
Return-Path: <Wolfgang.Kretzschmar at abas.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from gate.abas.de (mail.abas.de [212.86.210.134]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC514CDA for
<samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 02:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gate.abas.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA13195 for samba at samba.org;
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:58:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from localhost) by gate.abas.de (MSCAN) id
2/gate.abas.de/smtp-gw/mscan; Tue Jun 19 11:58:30 2001
Message-ID: <3B2F2262.D69612BE at abas.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:58:58 +0200
From: Wolfgang Kretzschmar <Wolfgang.Kretzschmar at abas.de>
Organization: ABAS Software AG
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: de,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SAMBA <samba at samba.org>
Subject: smbmount/smbpasswd: specify path to smb.conf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by as.abas.de id
LAA01885
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Most samba tools (smbd, smbstatus, ...) have an option -s to use an arbitrary
smb.conf file.
smbmount and smbpasswd do not. Both always use <sambadir>/lib/smb.conf.
So I have to create a symbolic link.
It would be nice to have such an option of smbmount and
smbpasswd.
Wolfgang Kretzschmar
--
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Wolfgang Kretzschmar email: Wolfgang.Kretzschmar at abas.de |
| ABAS Software AG web : http://www.abas.de |
| S|dendstr. 42 |
| 76135 Karlsruhe |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
Return-Path: <francia_a at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from smtp013.mail.yahoo.com (smtp013.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.173.57]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B8D04B54
for <samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 03:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown (HELO goose) (203.167.86.146) by
smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Jun 2001 10:19:13 -0000
X-Apparently-From: <francia?a at yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <000901c0f8aa$32708ea0$8804a8c0 at goose>
From: "Francia Avila" <francia_a at yahoo.com>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Cc: "Francia B Avila" <francia_a at edsamail.com.ph>
Subject: Error messages in Samba 2.2
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:25:40 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello Samba Team,
Samba is great! Thanks.
We are running Samba 2.2 on Red Hat Linux 6.2. The PDC is WinNT 4.0 and
clients are Win98, WinNT4 and Win2000 workstations. They can access files but
I found these in log.smbd. I have already gone though the mail lists but i
can't find anything that would help me fix the error ...
-------
[2001/06/17 04:02:02, 0] smbd/server.c:sig_hup(364)
Got SIGHUP
[2001/06/17 04:02:02, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165)
Failed to set socket option SO_KEEPALIVE (Error Bad file descriptor)
[2001/06/17 04:02:02, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165)
Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY (Error Socket operation on
non-socket)
[2001/06/17 04:02:02, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165)
Failed to set socket option SO_RCVBUF (Error Socket operation on non-socket)
[2001/06/17 04:02:02, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165)
Failed to set socket option SO_SNDBUF (Error Socket operation on non-socket)
[2001/06/18 07:36:45, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1776)
call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented.
[2001/06/18 09:05:45, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1776)
call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented.
[2001/06/18 09:20:09, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1776)
call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented.
-----
Please help.
Thanks again.
Franz Avila
Azeus Systems Philippines, Inc.
Return-Path: <uhe at stahl-groeditz.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from gsw.stahl-groeditz.de (gsw.stahl-groeditz.de
[194.122.13.233]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B504CEB
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 03:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailto.stahl-groeditz.de (ns1.stahl-groeditz.de
[192.168.3.1]) by gsw.stahl-groeditz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id
AC6CBEC983; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:28:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de (lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de
[192.168.0.10]) by mailto.stahl-groeditz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id
AA1A71F5B7; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:34:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id
05E44AFF93; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:28:58 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:28:58 +0000
From: Uwe Hentzschel <uhe at stahl-groeditz.de>
To: Tim Potter <tpot at valinux.com>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: wbinfo_check_secret
Message-ID: <20010619122858.B26102 at lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de>
References: <014601c0f818$2d4f2900$1a00a8c0 at diamondback>
<15150.38799.855902.263766 at frungy.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <15150.38799.855902.263766 at frungy.org>; from
tpot at valinux.com on Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 10:06:39 +1000
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi Tim!
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Tim Potter wrote:
> M. Kilroy writes:
>
> > I have a question about the following code from wbinfo.c.
> There are a couple of problem areas with winbindd in head at the
> moment. The first is this one (not checking machine account
> properly), secondly the pam_winbind module isn't fully working,
> and thirdly it doesn't cope with large numbers of users/groups
> just yet. This may be the cause of your out of memory error
> alluded to in another message.
>
>
> TIm.
i have a question.
I use the winbindd from HEAD ( last sunday ). I my little environment it
seems
to work great ( 1 Citrixserver - NT4-SP6, 2 Domaincontroller - W2K and
1 Samba 2.2 Fileserver ). The testuser ( 5 user ) can authorized through the
DC and get there Shares from the Samba Fileserver.
BBBUUUTTT next week i will use it in an production environment ( 2
Citrixserver
W2K , 2 Domaincontroller - W2K and 1 Samba 2.2 Fileserver ). I think about
100
users should use the server.
Should i use winbindd or not.
Uwe
--
Uwe Hentzschel
Edelstahl Grvditz GmbH
Riesaer Str.
01609 Grvditz
Tel: +49-35263-62551
Fax: +49-35263-62542
Return-Path: <tpot at samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 420384B9C;
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 03:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15151.10554.823735.983658 at frungy.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:28:10 +1000 (EST)
To: Uwe Hentzschel <uhe at stahl-groeditz.de>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: wbinfo_check_secret
In-Reply-To: <20010619122858.B26102 at lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de>
References: <014601c0f818$2d4f2900$1a00a8c0 at diamondback>
<15150.38799.855902.263766 at frungy.org>
<20010619122858.B26102 at lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2
From: Tim Potter <tpot at valinux.com>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Uwe Hentzschel writes:
> i have a question.
> I use the winbindd from HEAD ( last sunday ). I my little environment it seems
> to work great ( 1 Citrixserver - NT4-SP6, 2 Domaincontroller - W2K and
> 1 Samba 2.2 Fileserver ). The testuser ( 5 user ) can authorized through the
> DC and get there Shares from the Samba Fileserver.
> BBBUUUTTT next week i will use it in an production environment ( 2 Citrixserver
> W2K , 2 Domaincontroller - W2K and 1 Samba 2.2 Fileserver ). I think about 100
> users should use the server.
>
> Should i use winbindd or not.
I don't know. Why don't you give it a try? (-:
But seriously, to probe the limit of how many users/groups can be
resolved, try upping the number of users on your test system to a
similar level as your production system.
Tim.
Return-Path: <pronetsz at mail.externet.hu>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from prins.externet.hu (Prins.externet.hu [212.40.96.161]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA28D4CEB for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 03:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from marcigepe (Dial038-56.externet.hu [212.40.107.38]) by
prins.externet.hu (8.9.3+3.2W/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with SMTP id
MAA12765 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:33:34 +0200
Message-ID: <001e01c0f8ab$47ebb6a0$0100a8c0 at marcigepe>
From: "ProNet Kft" <pronetsz at mail.externet.hu>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: samba config
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:33:29 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
hello,
does anybody know how can i setup my samba to operate on win9x network?
my samba is runing, but i don't see the linux pc on the win9x network.
the linux pc's see all win9x workstations on the network.
my smb.conf is very simple ...
thx
prNET
Return-Path: <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CD54466 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19
Jun 2001 03:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as2-199.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.10.199]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2)
with ESMTP id f5JAniI27260; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:49:45 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root at yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
UAA04292; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:49:13 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet at piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
UAA14467; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:49:12 +1000
Message-ID: <3B2F2E28.CA8603E3 at bartlett.house>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:49:12 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Reply-To: abartlet at samba.org
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ProNet Kft <pronetsz at mail.externet.hu>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: samba config
References: <001e01c0f8ab$47ebb6a0$0100a8c0 at marcigepe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
ProNet Kft wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> does anybody know how can i setup my samba to operate on win9x network?
>
> my samba is runing, but i don't see the linux pc on the win9x network.
> the linux pc's see all win9x workstations on the network.
> my smb.conf is very simple ...
Then why wasn't it attached?
Seriously, without some detailed info, there are so many possiblities
and it makes it very hard to answer your questions.
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at samba.org
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
abartlet at samba.org
Return-Path: <shadow at webdev.ines.ro>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from webdev.ines.ro (WebDev.iNES.RO [193.230.220.6]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51EBF4CEA for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 03:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 26688 invoked by uid 501); 19 Jun 2001 10:54:15 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs at 127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP;
19 Jun 2001 10:54:15 -0000
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:54:15 +0300 (EEST)
From: Umbra <shadow at webdev.ines.ro>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
In-Reply-To: <3B2F1B44.3835B031 at bartlett.house>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106191343010.26539-100000 at webdev.ines.ro>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I grabed the latest CVS, using
cvs -z5 -d :pserver:cvs at pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba.
I've installed it and I'm getting some warnings:
[2001/06/19 13:39:43, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(342)
tdb(/opt/samba/var/locks/unexpected.tdb): tdb_oob len -3880 beyond eof at 8192
[2001/06/19 13:39:43, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(342)
tdb(/opt/samba/var/locks/unexpected.tdb): tdb_free: left read failed at 4294963392 (4096)
Anyway, I still cannot join a domain with a win2k sp2 client.
I tell the client to become a member of the domain INTERACTIVE, he asks me
an account name and a password to join the domain, I type them(the account
is shadow, which works from a win98 client).
The windows machine then says:
The following error occurred attempting to join the domain "INTERACTIVE":
The procedure number is out of range.
The logs say(samba was started with -d 1, if you need more, just tell me):
[2001/06/19 13:39:04, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672)
api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO.
[2001/06/19 13:39:04, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_mem_get(441)
prs_mem_get: reading data of size 2 would overrun buffer.
[2001/06/19 13:39:04, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672)
api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO.
[2001/06/19 13:39:04, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215)
api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed.
Is there something I did wrong ?
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Yes, the code to do support this (and apparently Windows XP as well) is
> in current CVS.
>
> Andrew Bartlett
> abartlet at samba.org
>
> "Oliver Schulze L." wrote:
> >
> > Will Samba 2.2.1 support Win2k SP2?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Oliver
> >
> > Robert Hoekstra wrote:
> >
> > >Even if you upgrade W2k to SP2 after joining, your account will be
> > >'disabled', rendering the domain useless to Win2k.
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: Christian Barth <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
> > >To: <samba at lists.samba.org>; Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
> > >Cc: <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
> > >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:55 AM
> > >Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
> > >
> > >
> > >>>Hello,
> > >>>
> > >>>I have a major problem trying to make a Win2K client join a domain
> > >>>
> > >served by
> > >
> > >>>Samba 2.2.0.
> > >>>
> > >>>The situation is this: We have a network of around 25 NT 4.0 clients.
> > >>>
> > >Today
> > >
> > >>>the first Win2K client was introduced, so we upgraded to Samba 2.2.0.
> > >>>
> > >After
> > >
> > >>>working around the disabled-account bug everything on the existing NT
> > >>>
> > >4.0
> > >
> > >>>clients worked perfectly.
> > >>>
> > >>>But making the Win2K client join the domain seems impossible. We've
> > >>>
> > >created
> > >
> > >>>the machine trust account as usual (add the entry in /etc/passwd,
> > >>>
> > >including
> > >
> > >>>the $, and smbpasswd -a -m machinename). When attempting to join the
> > >>>
> > >domain,
> > >
> > >>>the Win2K box wants a username and a password (this is different from NT
> > >>>
> > >4.0
> > >
> > >>>which basically just did it automatically). As far as we can tell,
> > >>>machinename$/machinename is the correct user/password, because it yields
> > >>>
> > >a
> > >
> > >>>different error message than what we get with any other combination.
> > >>>
> > >>You have to use root and it's password. For this root must be in
> > >>smbpasswd and not as invalied user in [global]. I'm not sure if root
> > >>must be in domain admin too. If you have set up the add user
> > >>parameter correct the machine account is created on the fly. Do not
> > >>install SP2 before you have jonied the domain or use the current cvs
> > >>version
> > >>
> > >>Christian
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>The error message, roughly translated from Swedish, is:
> > >>>
> > >>> "The follwing error occurred while connecting to the domain
> > >>> DOMAIN_NAME: You are using a computer account. In order to access
> > >>> this server you must use your global or local user account."
> > >>>
> > >>>Which is weird. We've tried entering existing samba accounts, inluding
> > >>>making the account a domain admin, but to no avail. And in general, how
> > >>>
> > >are
> > >
> > >>>we supposed to be logged in to the domain before join:ing it?
> > >>>
> > >>>I just don't get it. The docs don't seem to mention any of this entering
> > >>>user/password business, and I get the impression the docs aren't written
> > >>>with Win2K in mind (or for som reason you are not normally supposed to
> > >>>
> > >have
> > >
> > >>>to enter it).
> > >>>
> > >>>Does anyone have any idea? Any hints would be much appreciated.
> > >>>
> > >>>Thanks!
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>--
> > >>>/ Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB
> > >>>
> > >>>PGP userID: 0x5584BD98 or 'Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>'
> > >>>Key retrival: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey at scode.org
> > >>>E-Mail: peter.schuller at infidyne.com Web: http://scode.org
> > >>>--
> > >>>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > >>>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>_______________________________________________________________________
> > >>In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
> > >>--
> > >>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > >>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > >>
> >
> > --
> > Oliver Schulze L.
> > oliver at samera.com.py
> > Asuncion-Paraguay
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
>
Return-Path: <shadow at webdev.ines.ro>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from webdev.ines.ro (WebDev.iNES.RO [193.230.220.6]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6198B42F1 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 03:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 26768 invoked by uid 501); 19 Jun 2001 11:03:05 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs at 127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP;
19 Jun 2001 11:03:05 -0000
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:03:05 +0300 (EEST)
From: Umbra <shadow at webdev.ines.ro>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
In-Reply-To: <003601c0f89a$496ee3f0$4801010a at skybernet>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106191401190.26539-100000 at webdev.ines.ro>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I don't understand. I upgraded the w2k to sp2 before joining the domain
anyway. And why would my account be disabled ? I can access shares(like my
home) on the samba server using this account.
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Robert Hoekstra wrote:
> Even if you upgrade W2k to SP2 after joining, your account will be
> 'disabled', rendering the domain useless to Win2k.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Christian Barth <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
> To: <samba at lists.samba.org>; Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
> Cc: <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:55 AM
> Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
>
>
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have a major problem trying to make a Win2K client join a domain
> served by
> > > Samba 2.2.0.
> > >
> > > The situation is this: We have a network of around 25 NT 4.0 clients.
> Today
> > > the first Win2K client was introduced, so we upgraded to Samba 2.2.0.
> After
> > > working around the disabled-account bug everything on the existing NT
> 4.0
> > > clients worked perfectly.
> > >
> > > But making the Win2K client join the domain seems impossible. We've
> created
> > > the machine trust account as usual (add the entry in /etc/passwd,
> including
> > > the $, and smbpasswd -a -m machinename). When attempting to join the
> domain,
> > > the Win2K box wants a username and a password (this is different from NT
> 4.0
> > > which basically just did it automatically). As far as we can tell,
> > > machinename$/machinename is the correct user/password, because it yields
> a
> > > different error message than what we get with any other combination.
> > You have to use root and it's password. For this root must be in
> > smbpasswd and not as invalied user in [global]. I'm not sure if root
> > must be in domain admin too. If you have set up the add user
> > parameter correct the machine account is created on the fly. Do not
> > install SP2 before you have jonied the domain or use the current cvs
> > version
> >
> > Christian
> >
> >
> > >
> > > The error message, roughly translated from Swedish, is:
> > >
> > > "The follwing error occurred while connecting to the domain
> > > DOMAIN_NAME: You are using a computer account. In order to access
> > > this server you must use your global or local user account."
> > >
> > > Which is weird. We've tried entering existing samba accounts, inluding
> > > making the account a domain admin, but to no avail. And in general, how
> are
> > > we supposed to be logged in to the domain before join:ing it?
> > >
> > > I just don't get it. The docs don't seem to mention any of this entering
> > > user/password business, and I get the impression the docs aren't written
> > > with Win2K in mind (or for som reason you are not normally supposed to
> have
> > > to enter it).
> > >
> > > Does anyone have any idea? Any hints would be much appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > / Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB
> > >
> > > PGP userID: 0x5584BD98 or 'Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>'
> > > Key retrival: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey at scode.org
> > > E-Mail: peter.schuller at infidyne.com Web: http://scode.org
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
Return-Path: <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709384403 for
<samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 03:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5JB47u02189; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:04:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id NAA11995; Tue, 19
Jun 2001 13:04:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA15402; Tue, 19 Jun
2001 13:04:10 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: <samba at samba.org>, "Wang Youguo" <ygwang at prosten.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:04:03 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Would you please help me?
Message-ID: <3B2F4DC3.20051.10BF834 at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <002401c0f89a$20956e90$7a0245a8 at wangyouguo>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Dear my Savior,
>
> I have a big trouble in configuring SAMBA. I am wondering if I could get some help from you. My problem is descripted here:
>
> SAMBA is installed in a RedHat Linux server and is configured, and
> The machine can be seen from my WinNT4 client, but I can not login when I want to open the shared folder! I got a 'no right' message every time.
>
> The following steps have been done:
> (1) 'encrypt password =yes' is added into /etc/smb.conf
> (2) 'smbpasswd -a username' is done and I can see the added user in the file: /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd
Have you installed the compailed rpm-version or have you compailed
samba your self? /etc/smb.conf looks like a file location of RedHat,
/usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd like a file location of a self
compailed version. If you have compailed it your self: Have you
deinstalled the samba that ships with RedHat? I suspect you have 2
versions of samba installed: one is configured to use encrypted
passwords, one has the smbpasswd file. BTW: Have you run testparam?
Christian
>
> I have been confused for 2 days, would you please help me? PLEASE!
> By the way, I am not familiar with Linux!
> Thanks! Thanks! Thanks!
>
> Best Regards,
> Kerry Wang
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <robert at hoekstra.nu>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from cobalt01.skybernet.nl (unknown [217.17.128.197]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFA2459B for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 04:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from snws52 ([217.17.139.4]) by cobalt01.skybernet.nl
(8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f5JB7oI03552; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:07:51
+0200
Message-ID: <009701c0f8b0$5baef8a0$4801010a at skybernet>
From: "Robert Hoekstra" <robert at hoekstra.nu>
To: "Umbra" <shadow at webdev.ines.ro>, <samba at lists.samba.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106191343010.26539-100000 at webdev.ines.ro>
Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:09:49 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Thanks, those are my problems as well, including the log file.
I wanted to try with the cvs version... now I see I can postpone that test.
PS: I tried to install the cvs download, but I failed up to now to install
completely.
I did a './configure', 'make' and 'make install' from the samba/sources
directory.. It compiles a whole lot, seemingly without any problems, but
then it put everything under the /usr/local/samba directory..
I try this for the first time.. do I have to finish the installation in one
way? or did I do something else wrong?
A rather newbie question, but it will help me trying the newest version more
often.. :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: Umbra <shadow at webdev.ines.ro>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
> Hi,
> I grabed the latest CVS, using
> cvs -z5 -d :pserver:cvs at pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba.
> I've installed it and I'm getting some warnings:
>
> [2001/06/19 13:39:43, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(342)
> tdb(/opt/samba/var/locks/unexpected.tdb): tdb_oob len -3880 beyond eof
at 8192
> [2001/06/19 13:39:43, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(342)
> tdb(/opt/samba/var/locks/unexpected.tdb): tdb_free: left read failed at
4294963392 (4096)
>
> Anyway, I still cannot join a domain with a win2k sp2 client.
> I tell the client to become a member of the domain INTERACTIVE, he asks me
> an account name and a password to join the domain, I type them(the account
> is shadow, which works from a win98 client).
>
> The windows machine then says:
> The following error occurred attempting to join the domain "INTERACTIVE":
>
> The procedure number is out of range.
>
> The logs say(samba was started with -d 1, if you need more, just tell me):
>
> [2001/06/19 13:39:04, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672)
> api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO.
> [2001/06/19 13:39:04, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_mem_get(441)
> prs_mem_get: reading data of size 2 would overrun buffer.
> [2001/06/19 13:39:04, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672)
> api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO.
> [2001/06/19 13:39:04, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215)
> api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed.
>
> Is there something I did wrong ?
>
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> > Yes, the code to do support this (and apparently Windows XP as well) is
> > in current CVS.
> >
> > Andrew Bartlett
> > abartlet at samba.org
> >
> > "Oliver Schulze L." wrote:
> > >
> > > Will Samba 2.2.1 support Win2k SP2?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Oliver
> > >
> > > Robert Hoekstra wrote:
> > >
> > > >Even if you upgrade W2k to SP2 after joining, your account will be
> > > >'disabled', rendering the domain useless to Win2k.
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: Christian Barth <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
> > > >To: <samba at lists.samba.org>; Peter Schuller
<peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
> > > >Cc: <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>
> > > >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:55 AM
> > > >Subject: Re: Win2K client joinging Samba 2.2.0 domain
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>>Hello,
> > > >>>
> > > >>>I have a major problem trying to make a Win2K client join a domain
> > > >>>
> > > >served by
> > > >
> > > >>>Samba 2.2.0.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>The situation is this: We have a network of around 25 NT 4.0
clients.
> > > >>>
> > > >Today
> > > >
> > > >>>the first Win2K client was introduced, so we upgraded to Samba
2.2.0.
> > > >>>
> > > >After
> > > >
> > > >>>working around the disabled-account bug everything on the existing
NT
> > > >>>
> > > >4.0
> > > >
> > > >>>clients worked perfectly.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>But making the Win2K client join the domain seems impossible. We've
> > > >>>
> > > >created
> > > >
> > > >>>the machine trust account as usual (add the entry in /etc/passwd,
> > > >>>
> > > >including
> > > >
> > > >>>the $, and smbpasswd -a -m machinename). When attempting to join
the
> > > >>>
> > > >domain,
> > > >
> > > >>>the Win2K box wants a username and a password (this is different
from NT
> > > >>>
> > > >4.0
> > > >
> > > >>>which basically just did it automatically). As far as we can tell,
> > > >>>machinename$/machinename is the correct user/password, because it
yields
> > > >>>
> > > >a
> > > >
> > > >>>different error message than what we get with any other
combination.
> > > >>>
> > > >>You have to use root and it's password. For this root must be in
> > > >>smbpasswd and not as invalied user in [global]. I'm not sure if root
> > > >>must be in domain admin too. If you have set up the add user
> > > >>parameter correct the machine account is created on the fly. Do not
> > > >>install SP2 before you have jonied the domain or use the current cvs
> > > >>version
> > > >>
> > > >>Christian
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>The error message, roughly translated from Swedish, is:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> "The follwing error occurred while connecting to the domain
> > > >>> DOMAIN_NAME: You are using a computer account. In order to
access
> > > >>> this server you must use your global or local user account."
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Which is weird. We've tried entering existing samba accounts,
inluding
> > > >>>making the account a domain admin, but to no avail. And in general,
how
> > > >>>
> > > >are
> > > >
> > > >>>we supposed to be logged in to the domain before join:ing it?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>I just don't get it. The docs don't seem to mention any of this
entering
> > > >>>user/password business, and I get the impression the docs aren't
written
> > > >>>with Win2K in mind (or for som reason you are not normally supposed
to
> > > >>>
> > > >have
> > > >
> > > >>>to enter it).
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Does anyone have any idea? Any hints would be much appreciated.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Thanks!
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>--
> > > >>>/ Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB
> > > >>>
> > > >>>PGP userID: 0x5584BD98 or 'Peter Schuller
<peter.schuller at infidyne.com>'
> > > >>>Key retrival: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey at scode.org
> > > >>>E-Mail: peter.schuller at infidyne.com Web: http://scode.org
> > > >>>--
> > > >>>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > >>>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
>>_______________________________________________________________________
> > > >>In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?
(SUN)
> > > >>--
> > > >>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > >>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Oliver Schulze L.
> > > oliver at samera.com.py
> > > Asuncion-Paraguay
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <FLik at NNE.DK>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from srv130.novo.dk (srv130.novo.dk [152.73.7.2]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C74D44D0B for
<samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 04:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 31267 invoked by uid 7794); 19 Jun 2001 11:47:00 -0000
Received: from FLik at NNE.DK by srv130 with scan4virus-0.19p8 (uvscan:
v4.1.20/v4143. iscan: v3.1/v2.062-0402/899/34815. . Clean. Processed
in 0.186288 secs); 19/06/2001 13:47:00
Received: from it3023.research.novo.dk (HELO NNE13.novo.dk)
(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) by xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx with SMTP; 19 Jun 2001 11:47:00
-0000
Received: by NNE13.novo.dk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<NG9SNMX8>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:47:29 +0200
Message-ID: <A181433EEE388E48A8DCA1536CED3A7415FBC7 at NNE25>
From: "FLIK (Frederik Likaj)" <FLik at NNE.DK>
To: "Samba (E-mail)" <samba at samba.org>, "Sambantdom (E-mail)"
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Please help me with samba.
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:47:27 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello.
>
> My w2k joined succesfully with wellcome to "samba" domain but when i tried
> to login after reboot i got the message "The system cannot log you on this
> domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is
> missing or the password on that account is incorrect" and when i
> check samba
> log files i can see that it says "connection to w2k refused"
> I joined the domain as root and gave with smbpasswd -a root a password to
> root different from that on my linux box. (I am running samba tng
> 2.2.0 on a
> RedHat 7.1)
> No matter how i try (even with ny user account in /etc/password and
> smbpasswd -a) i cannot log in to my samba domain.
> Any help will be appreciated.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Frederik Likaj.
>
> p.s. I have tried to mail my question to different samba news
> groups without
> succes.
> It is important to get samba running as i have to replace
> win-servers to my
> work with samba.
> Thank you very much.
Med Venlig Hilsen
Frederik Likaj
Novo Nordisk Engineering A/S
Building, Automation.
dir. tlf. 44 42 46 69
Flik at nne.dk
NNE
Krogshxjvej 55
2880 Bagsvfrd
Return-Path: <tcpdump at techcellent.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from techcellent.com (unknown [207.176.39.66]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415B44417; Tue, 19 Jun 2001
04:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (tcpdump at localhost) by techcellent.com
(8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5JCwBB10209; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:58:11
-0500
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:58:11 -0500 (EST)
From: tcpdump <tcpdump at techcellent.com>
To: "FLIK (Frederik Likaj)" <FLik at NNE.DK>
Cc: "Samba (E-mail)" <samba at samba.org>, "Sambantdom (E-mail)"
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: Please help me with samba.
In-Reply-To: <A181433EEE388E48A8DCA1536CED3A7415FBC7 at NNE25>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106190754300.9959-100000 at techcellent.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I'm having a problem which I fear it being addressed too much on this
mailing list and thence arising flames. I have just joined this mailing
list.
Anyways, I'm having trouble making a win2k box with SP2 to join a domain
where the domain controller is a samba 2.2.0
I understand MS has used new rpc calls in SP2 and XP for joining the
domain, but is there a patch for 2.2.0 which allows for the win2k+sp2 to
join smoothly?
Thanks, in advance.
~tcpdump
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, FLIK (Frederik Likaj) wrote:
> Hello.
> >
> > My w2k joined succesfully with wellcome to "samba" domain but when i tried
> > to login after reboot i got the message "The system cannot log you on this
> > domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is
> > missing or the password on that account is incorrect" and when i
> > check samba
> > log files i can see that it says "connection to w2k refused"
> > I joined the domain as root and gave with smbpasswd -a root a password to
> > root different from that on my linux box. (I am running samba tng
> > 2.2.0 on a
> > RedHat 7.1)
> > No matter how i try (even with ny user account in /etc/password and
> > smbpasswd -a) i cannot log in to my samba domain.
> > Any help will be appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Frederik Likaj.
> >
> > p.s. I have tried to mail my question to different samba news
> > groups without
> > succes.
> > It is important to get samba running as i have to replace
> > win-servers to my
> > work with samba.
> > Thank you very much.
>
>
> Med Venlig Hilsen
>
> Frederik Likaj
> Novo Nordisk Engineering A/S
> Building, Automation.
> dir. tlf. 44 42 46 69
> Flik at nne.dk
>
> NNE
> Krogshxjvej 55
> 2880 Bagsvfrd
>
Return-Path: <samba at hoekstra.nu>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from cobalt01.skybernet.nl (unknown [217.17.128.197]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C804D36; Tue, 19 Jun 2001
05:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from snws52 (SkyberNet [217.17.139.4]) by
cobalt01.skybernet.nl (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f5JC6nI06035; Tue,
19 Jun 2001 14:06:49 +0200
Message-ID: <00ab01c0f8b8$9912a220$4801010a at skybernet>
From: "Robert Hoekstra" <samba at hoekstra.nu>
To: "tcpdump" <tcpdump at techcellent.com>, "FLIK (Frederik Likaj)"
<FLik at NNE.DK>
Cc: "Samba (E-mail)" <samba at samba.org>, "Sambantdom (E-mail)"
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106190754300.9959-100000 at techcellent.com>
Subject: Re: Please help me with samba.
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:08:48 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I asked the same thing just yesterday...
Samba 2.2.0 doesn't support it. The current cvs is told to support it, but
negative reports have told me it doesn't either..
It is to be supported in the 2.2.1 release.
W2k SP1 can join, but SP2 has changes which causes it not to work anymore.
Only advice, have patience... :)
----- Original Message -----
From: tcpdump <tcpdump at techcellent.com>
To: FLIK (Frederik Likaj) <FLik at NNE.DK>
Cc: Samba (E-mail) <samba at samba.org>; Sambantdom (E-mail)
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: Please help me with samba.
> I'm having a problem which I fear it being addressed too much on this
> mailing list and thence arising flames. I have just joined this mailing
> list.
>
> Anyways, I'm having trouble making a win2k box with SP2 to join a domain
> where the domain controller is a samba 2.2.0
>
> I understand MS has used new rpc calls in SP2 and XP for joining the
> domain, but is there a patch for 2.2.0 which allows for the win2k+sp2 to
> join smoothly?
>
>
> Thanks, in advance.
>
> ~tcpdump
>
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, FLIK (Frederik Likaj) wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> > >
> > > My w2k joined succesfully with wellcome to "samba" domain but when i
tried
> > > to login after reboot i got the message "The system cannot log you on
this
> > > domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is
> > > missing or the password on that account is incorrect" and when i
> > > check samba
> > > log files i can see that it says "connection to w2k refused"
> > > I joined the domain as root and gave with smbpasswd -a root a password
to
> > > root different from that on my linux box. (I am running samba tng
> > > 2.2.0 on a
> > > RedHat 7.1)
> > > No matter how i try (even with ny user account in /etc/password and
> > > smbpasswd -a) i cannot log in to my samba domain.
> > > Any help will be appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Frederik Likaj.
> > >
> > > p.s. I have tried to mail my question to different samba news
> > > groups without
> > > succes.
> > > It is important to get samba running as i have to replace
> > > win-servers to my
> > > work with samba.
> > > Thank you very much.
> >
> >
> > Med Venlig Hilsen
> >
> > Frederik Likaj
> > Novo Nordisk Engineering A/S
> > Building, Automation.
> > dir. tlf. 44 42 46 69
> > Flik at nne.dk
> >
> > NNE
> > Krogshxjvej 55
> > 2880 Bagsvfrd
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <cnorloff at norloff.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.toward.com (piglet.toward.com [204.194.180.31]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03CA4D3A for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 05:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:07:00 -0400
Message-Id: <200106190807.AA186581506 at mail.toward.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: "Chris Norloff" <cnorloff at norloff.com>
Reply-To: <cnorloff at norloff.com>
X-Sender: <cnorloff at mail.toward.com>
To: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: STILL can't login from NT
X-Mailer: <IMail v6.05>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Thanks for the ideas!
Chris Norloff
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:27:59 +0200
>> I still can't login from WinNT, even though I've:
>> -encrypted the passwords
>> -added the smbpasswd file
>>
>> I can get in as guest when that's enabled, but I can't get in with any usernames (or root!).
>>
>> This is using security=user or share. We don't use a PDC, so I just want to authenticate with the Unix server that's running Samba (Solaris 2.6). I'm not very familiar with Unix, but am trying to get away from Windows machines.
>>
>> I've tried everything I can find, and have hunted through the archives here and the Using Samba book.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>Can you connect from Win95, Win98? Can you connect using smbclient (-
>U user)? Do you have a host allow or a host deny line in smb.conf?
>What is the error message you get on NT? What do the samba logs say?
>Is the smbpasswd file where it is expected by your binary version of
>samba? Have you added the users to the smbpasswd file (smbpasswd -a
>user)? Try a smbpasswd -e user after that. An old samba version had
>the bug that a new user was disabled by default. Have you looked into
>the smbpasswd file with a text editor? Are the permissions correct?
>
>Hops this helps,
>
>Christian
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
>
Return-Path: <steve at gbnet.org>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from ford.gbnet.org (ford.gbnet.org [192.188.96.10]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0910E4D0E for
<samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 05:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 17038 invoked by uid 100); 19 Jun 2001 12:37:52 -0000
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:37:51 +0100
From: Steve Kennedy <steve at gbnet.org>
To: Robert Hoekstra <samba at hoekstra.nu>
Cc: tcpdump <tcpdump at techcellent.com>, "FLIK (Frederik Likaj)"
<FLik at NNE.DK>, "Samba (E-mail)" <samba at samba.org>, "Sambantdom
(E-mail)" <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: Please help me with samba.
Message-ID: <20010619133751.A17033 at ford.gbnet.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106190754300.9959-100000 at techcellent.com>
<00ab01c0f8b8$9912a220$4801010a at skybernet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <00ab01c0f8b8$9912a220$4801010a at skybernet>; from Robert
Hoekstra <samba at hoekstra.nu> on Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 02:08:48PM +0200
Organisation: NetTek Ltd
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 02:08:48PM +0200, Robert Hoekstra wrote:
> I asked the same thing just yesterday...
> Samba 2.2.0 doesn't support it. The current cvs is told to support it, but
> negative reports have told me it doesn't either..
> It is to be supported in the 2.2.1 release.
> W2k SP1 can join, but SP2 has changes which causes it not to work anymore.
> Only advice, have patience... :)
Current cvs seems to work with Win2K SP2 ...
Steve
--
home steve at gbnet.org * Flat 2, 43 Howitt Road, Belsize Pk, London NW3 4LU
work steve at thus.net * tel +44-(0)207 483 1169 FAX +44-(0)207 483 2455
www http://www.gbnet.net/ * Personal DFAX +44 (0)870 1600 842 (fax to email)
bits steve at gbnet.net * mob +44-(0)7775755503 Epage steve-pager at gbnet.net
Return-Path: <FLik at NNE.DK>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from srv130.novo.dk (srv130.novo.dk [152.73.7.2]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02D264417 for
<samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 05:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 30469 invoked by uid 7794); 19 Jun 2001 12:54:26 -0000
Received: from FLik at NNE.DK by srv130 with scan4virus-0.19p8 (uvscan:
v4.1.20/v4143. iscan: v3.1/v2.062-0402/899/34815. . Clean. Processed
in 0.200215 secs); 19/06/2001 14:54:26
Received: from it3023.research.novo.dk (HELO NNE13.novo.dk)
(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) by xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx with SMTP; 19 Jun 2001 12:54:26
-0000
Received: by NNE13.novo.dk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<NG9SNNLC>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:54:55 +0200
Message-ID: <A181433EEE388E48A8DCA1536CED3A7415FBCA at NNE25>
From: "FLIK (Frederik Likaj)" <FLik at NNE.DK>
To: "Samba (E-mail)" <samba at samba.org>, "Sambantdom (E-mail)"
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: FW: Please help me with samba.
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:54:55 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I am running samba 2.2.0 on redhat 7.1 and my w3k have no SP2 installed.
Med Venlig Hilsen
Frederik Likaj
Novo Nordisk Engineering A/S
Building, Automation.
dir. tlf. 44 42 46 69
Flik at nne.dk
NNE
Krogshxjvej 55
2880 Bagsvfrd
> -----Original Message-----
> From: FLIK (Frederik Likaj)
> Sent: 19. juni 2001 13:47
> To: Samba (E-mail); Sambantdom (E-mail)
> Subject: Please help me with samba.
>
> Hello.
> >
> > My w2k joined succesfully with wellcome to "samba" domain but when i
> tried
> > to login after reboot i got the message "The system cannot log you on
> this
> > domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is
> > missing or the password on that account is incorrect" and when i
> > check samba
> > log files i can see that it says "connection to w2k refused"
> > I joined the domain as root and gave with smbpasswd -a root a password
> to
> > root different from that on my linux box. (I am running samba tng
> > 2.2.0 on a
> > RedHat 7.1)
> > No matter how i try (even with ny user account in /etc/password and
> > smbpasswd -a) i cannot log in to my samba domain.
> > Any help will be appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Frederik Likaj.
> >
> > p.s. I have tried to mail my question to different samba news
> > groups without
> > succes.
> > It is important to get samba running as i have to replace
> > win-servers to my
> > work with samba.
> > Thank you very much.
>
>
> Med Venlig Hilsen
>
> Frederik Likaj
> Novo Nordisk Engineering A/S
> Building, Automation.
> dir. tlf. 44 42 46 69
> Flik at nne.dk
>
> NNE
> Krogshxjvej 55
> 2880 Bagsvfrd
>
>
Return-Path: <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 871A24DA7 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19
Jun 2001 05:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as2-199.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.10.199]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2)
with ESMTP id f5JD4FI12549; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:04:15 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root at yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
XAA04743; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:03:48 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet at piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
XAA15474; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:03:46 +1000
Message-ID: <3B2F4DB2.231D4AF9 at bartlett.house>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:03:46 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: AHYDLE at thq.com
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: A couple of questions
References: <44EAA1FB4AB8D411B03C00508B6D6E28012AF2AF at MAIL>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
AHYDLE at thq.com wrote:
>
> 1.) We are currently implementing some new security features on our network
> and I think I may have found an interesting use for smbmount and samba. We
> are moving our FTP server (NT Server) on to the DMZ of our network.
> Unfortunately users still are going to be accessing the folder through
> network neighborhood on there desktops, so if the users are still going to
> access it that way we will need to open all kinds of ports to the DMZ for
> wins and all the other garbage M$ requires. Now the idea we had was to use
> smbmount and mount the share to a linux box on the internal network and then
> share it out with samba from there. It looks like it will work but when a
> new file is created or a user accesses a file it is using sambas permissions
> and not the NT servers. Do you think if I upgraded to samba 2.2 and added
> ACL support I could get this to work? Or am I wasting my time?
>
> 2.) I am trying to configure apache with ntlm security authenticating to an
> NT domain. I have no problem authenticating but it is still prompting for a
> user name and password. Where NTLM should be pass-through authentication.
> Has anyone been able to get mod-ntlm to work? Or is there a better way to do
> pass-through authentication for apache?
>
Both of these sound suspiciously like my own setup.
1). I just have my main server in a service network, with the WINS
server on the firewall/proxy. There isn't actualy that much that needs
to go back out, particlularly if you turn off 'enhanced browsing'. I
basicly allowd connections in, but no connections out (node status
requests excluded, ie port 138 UDP - I think).
2). mod_ntlm works (mod_ntlm.sf.net) but it not particularly well
implemented. Its on my (rather long) todo list to clean it up and
intergrate it with winbind. I use pam_smb and mod_auth_pam for my
plain-text clients, only over HTTPS.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
abartlet at samba.org
Return-Path: <mekilroy at risingedge.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCB544A0; Tue, 19 Jun 2001
06:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by
mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5JDvfS51980;
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:57:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by
wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id
<B0000083823 at wizzard.rising-edge>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:55:34 -0400
Message-ID: <036601c0f8c7$827749d0$1a00a8c0 at diamondback>
From: "M. Kilroy" <mekilroy at risingedge.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>, <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: *working* winbindd
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:55:33 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Does anyone out there with winbind *working* and authenticating from an NT PDC
mind telling me what version of samba/winbind they are running? The latest
head has probs with winbindd, and I need to get something running very soon.
THANKS!
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
- Thomas Alva Edison (1847-1931)
"The girl got reasons. They all got reasons." ~Scott Weiland
Return-Path: <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935AD4BD5 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 06:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5JDwDu27020; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:58:13 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id PAA21813; Tue, 19
Jun 2001 15:58:13 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA28297; Tue, 19 Jun
2001 15:58:17 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: "Wang Youguo" <ygwang at prosten.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:58:07 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Would you please help me?
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Message-ID: <3B2F768F.20836.1AB5449 at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <000701c0f8bd$04c52430$7a0245a8 at wangyouguo>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Dear Mr. Barth,
>
> It is very kind of you to give me the answer.
Please answer to the list as well, so that other can help you too.
> I download the Samba file(samba-2.2.0.tar.gz), decompressed, compiled and installed it step by step according to the docs in directory \docs\htmldocs\using_samba, all by myself. And there is no any problem in the case.
Good approach.
Have you specified any compaile time options wicht /.configure? If
not, /etc/smb.conf should be left from the RedHat-Install (Or has
this changed with 2.2???) and your smb.conf must be in
/usr/local/samba/lib. Make install doesn't create one by default.
Move your /etc/smb.conf to /usr/local/samba/lib and try again.
> Yes, the RedHat is shipped with samba, but the samba shipped seemed not running. I have not uninstalled the old one, but when I run the testparm, the results displayed seemed right. I run linuxconf to see the samba server configuration, it also seems right.
>
> I am not farmiliar with linux. I am wondering if it is relevant to the privilege of the user account i used.
You must be root to start samba and to add a user to smbpasswd. But
there should be errors if you are not.
Christian
> Would you please give me more suggestion? Thanks.
>
> Best Regards,
> Kerry Wang
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Christian Barth <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
> To: <samba at samba.org>; Wang Youguo <ygwang at prosten.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 7:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Would you please help me?
>
>
> > > Dear my Savior,
> > >
> > > I have a big trouble in configuring SAMBA. I am wondering if I could get some help from you. My problem is descripted here:
> > >
> > > SAMBA is installed in a RedHat Linux server and is configured, and
> > > The machine can be seen from my WinNT4 client, but I can not login when I want to open the shared folder! I got a 'no right' message every time.
> > >
> > > The following steps have been done:
> > > (1) 'encrypt password =yes' is added into /etc/smb.conf
> > > (2) 'smbpasswd -a username' is done and I can see the added user in the file: /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd
> > Have you installed the compailed rpm-version or have you compailed
> > samba your self? /etc/smb.conf looks like a file location of RedHat,
> > /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd like a file location of a self
> > compailed version. If you have compailed it your self: Have you
> > deinstalled the samba that ships with RedHat? I suspect you have 2
> > versions of samba installed: one is configured to use encrypted
> > passwords, one has the smbpasswd file. BTW: Have you run testparam?
> >
> > Christian
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I have been confused for 2 days, would you please help me? PLEASE!
> > > By the way, I am not familiar with Linux!
> > > Thanks! Thanks! Thanks!
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Kerry Wang
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
> >
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <robert at hoekstra.nu>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from cobalt01.skybernet.nl (unknown [217.17.128.197]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B504C78; Tue, 19 Jun 2001
07:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from snws52 (SkyberNet [217.17.139.4]) by
cobalt01.skybernet.nl (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f5JE65I11029; Tue,
19 Jun 2001 16:06:05 +0200
Message-ID: <00e901c0f8c9$42cf4a10$4801010a at skybernet>
From: "Robert Hoekstra" <robert at hoekstra.nu>
To: "FLIK (Frederik Likaj)" <FLik at NNE.DK>, "Samba (E-mail)"
<samba at samba.org>, "Sambantdom (E-mail)" <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
References: <A181433EEE388E48A8DCA1536CED3A7415FBCA at NNE25>
Subject: Re: Please help me with samba.
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:08:05 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Have you added your machine to unix as wel ass the smb password files?
adduser -g machines ws$
(make a seperate group for machines and the machine with trailing $-sign)
smbpasswd -a -m ws$
and of course your user accounts..
Just a guess...?
----- Original Message -----
From: FLIK (Frederik Likaj) <FLik at NNE.DK>
To: Samba (E-mail) <samba at samba.org>; Sambantdom (E-mail)
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 2:54 PM
Subject: FW: Please help me with samba.
> I am running samba 2.2.0 on redhat 7.1 and my w3k have no SP2 installed.
> Med Venlig Hilsen
>
> Frederik Likaj
> Novo Nordisk Engineering A/S
> Building, Automation.
> dir. tlf. 44 42 46 69
> Flik at nne.dk
>
> NNE
> Krogshxjvej 55
> 2880 Bagsvfrd
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: FLIK (Frederik Likaj)
> > Sent: 19. juni 2001 13:47
> > To: Samba (E-mail); Sambantdom (E-mail)
> > Subject: Please help me with samba.
> >
> > Hello.
> > >
> > > My w2k joined succesfully with wellcome to "samba" domain but when i
> > tried
> > > to login after reboot i got the message "The system cannot log you on
> > this
> > > domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is
> > > missing or the password on that account is incorrect" and when i
> > > check samba
> > > log files i can see that it says "connection to w2k refused"
> > > I joined the domain as root and gave with smbpasswd -a root a password
> > to
> > > root different from that on my linux box. (I am running samba tng
> > > 2.2.0 on a
> > > RedHat 7.1)
> > > No matter how i try (even with ny user account in /etc/password and
> > > smbpasswd -a) i cannot log in to my samba domain.
> > > Any help will be appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Frederik Likaj.
> > >
> > > p.s. I have tried to mail my question to different samba news
> > > groups without
> > > succes.
> > > It is important to get samba running as i have to replace
> > > win-servers to my
> > > work with samba.
> > > Thank you very much.
> >
> >
> > Med Venlig Hilsen
> >
> > Frederik Likaj
> > Novo Nordisk Engineering A/S
> > Building, Automation.
> > dir. tlf. 44 42 46 69
> > Flik at nne.dk
> >
> > NNE
> > Krogshxjvej 55
> > 2880 Bagsvfrd
> >
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <rshields at customcolor.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from customcolor.com (customcolor.com [216.122.237.241]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EEC4659 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leedo ([209.248.198.166]) by customcolor.com
(8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f5JEFfj21250 for <samba at lists.samba.org>;
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:15:41 GMT (envelope-from rshields at customcolor.com)
From: "Richard Shields" <rshields at customcolor.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Ownership privileges
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:19:12 -0500
Message-ID: <NFBBKMHCKLFBEHOPKPMAOEELCAAA.rshields at customcolor.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I am running Samba 2.0.7 on a Macintosh OSX server ver 1.2 A file created,
copied or otherwise altered by a Windows client on this server is
unalterable by the Macintosh clients. Is there a way to fix this? A file
created, ETC by a Mac client can be altered by anyone... I have only limited
Unix/Linux exp so feel free to email me in person if the answer is too wordy
for the list server. Thank you for your help in advance...
Richard L. Shields
rshields at customcolor.com
Custom Color Corp.
300 W. 19th Terr.
K.C., MO 64108
ph. 816-474-3200
fx. 816-842-4909
http://www.customcolor.com
Return-Path: <eric_boucher60 at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from web9405.mail.yahoo.com (web9405.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.129.111]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D1804D7D
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20010619142433.47809.qmail at web9405.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [207.164.184.163] by web9405.mail.yahoo.com; Tue, 19 Jun
2001 07:24:33 PDT
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:24:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Boucher <eric_boucher60 at yahoo.com>
Subject: No Master Browser in Samba
To: SAMBA <samba at lists.samba.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi everyone,
I am using samba 2.2.0 on an IRIX machine. Our clients
are windows box. I am on an domain with windows NT as
our PDC. In all the documentation that I read, they
always said to let windows be the master browser if
there is a windows PDC on the network. So I put all
the parameter to tell samba to not be the Master
Browser, that is:
os level = 0
local master = NO
domain master = NO
security = domain
But when I try to check which one is the master
browser with the help of the "smbclient -NL
server_name", there is no name under the "MASTER"
section. Even with the command "nmblookup -M -" it
didn't find nothing (the message it gave me is:
name_query failed to find name __MSBROWSE__#01). So I
was wandering if I can let samba be the master browser
by putting "os level = 65" if windows don't want to be
it or if I can do something to tell windows (my PDC)
to be the master browser?
Thanks
Eric
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
http://buzz.yahoo.com/
Return-Path: <don_mccall at hp.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from palrel2.hp.com (palrel2.hp.com [156.153.255.234]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED024D7D for
<samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xparelay1.corp.hp.com (unknown [15.58.136.173]) by
palrel2.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBBB829; Tue, 19 Jun 2001
07:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xpabh3.corp.hp.com (xpabh3.corp.hp.com [15.58.136.223])
by xparelay1.corp.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DB51F507; Tue, 19
Jun 2001 00:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by xpabh3.corp.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <NG4XSRML>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:25:34 -0700
Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050AD8 at xatl02.atl.hp.com>
From: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>
To: 'Serge Gracia' <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>, samba at samba.org
Subject: RE: Use of Samba 2.2.0
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:25:33 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello Serge,
In answer to your questions,
1. Nt 4.0 only allows you to have one set of credentials (username/password)
when attached
to a particular server at a time. So if you are accessing a share using
user1, then you cannot attach to another share on the same server as user2.
You can 'fool' NT 4.0 by making the second attachment with the IP address
instead, and then you could use user2; for instance
net use f: \\server1\share1 password1 /user:user1
net use g: \\ip.of.server1\share2 password2 /user:user2
You can also use netbios aliases (see chapter 4, section "virtual servers"
in "Using Samba" for details) and connect to different netbios names for the
same server as different users
to overcome this limitation of NT 4.0.
2. Windows uses cr/lf as a line terminator for ascii files, Unix uses just
lf. Samba does
not do any translation of this for you; this discussion has been had many
times on this list, and this is not ever likely to change. If you don't
want to use dos2ux/ux2dos to do the conversion, then you will have to use an
editor on the pc that can deal with files whose
lines are terminated with just a lf, like microsoft word, or microsoft
write, etc.
3. Locking in samba is non-trivial; many people seem to have problems with
locks turned on,
and the various permutations of oplocks, strict locking, etc. I can only
suggest that you read up on the various smb.conf parameters dealing with
this subject, and customize samba
to do locking only on the files/shares that you really NEED locking on.
Again the "Using Samba" from O'Reilly, or the "Special Edition Using Samba"
from QUE are excellent references for this subject - there are other books
as well, but these are the ones I am most familiar with.
I hope this helps,
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Serge Gracia [mailto:serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 5:09 AM
To: samba at samba.org
Cc: Serge Gracia
Subject: Use of Samba 2.2.0
Hello,
I installed Samba 2.2.0 on a hp9000 / 700; I can use it correctly since PC
NT
4; it works; but, I meet several difficulties:
- When I mount directories Unix since the PC under user's name xxxxx, I am
obliged to stop the session NT and to redo the login to be able to mount a
directory under another user's name yyyyy?
- The format of files is not the same between Windows and Unix: I can not
read
correctly ,since the PC, a file created under Unix (not use of Unix2dos) and
the opposite as well?
- Samba says that it is better not to use locks?; I would like to avoid that
two persons modify a file at the same time; is this possible?
Thank you if you can read to me and try it more to answer me.
Thank you still.
Goodbye.
serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <tcpdump at techcellent.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from techcellent.com (unknown [207.176.39.66]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85ED3421F; Tue, 19 Jun 2001
07:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (tcpdump at localhost) by techcellent.com
(8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5JFax602475; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:36:59
-0500
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:36:59 -0500 (EST)
From: tcpdump <tcpdump at techcellent.com>
To: "FLIK (Frederik Likaj)" <FLik at NNE.DK>
Cc: "Samba (E-mail)" <samba at samba.org>, "Sambantdom (E-mail)"
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: Please help me with samba.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106190754300.9959-100000 at techcellent.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106191033380.2399-100000 at techcellent.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Ok, now im getting a wierd error with the latest cvstree pull
when i try to join the domain with a win2k+sp2 box it tells me:
"The following error has occured while trying to join the domain
"NAMEOFDOMAIN". The account you are used is a computer account, please use
a local user account or a global user account to access this server."
Whats going on? am I doing something wrong?
Return-Path: <amacherv at musc.edu>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from revere3.musc.edu (revere3.musc.edu [128.23.203.10]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8653845D2 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from musc.edu (aqua.rutledge.musc.edu [128.23.113.22]) by
revere3.musc.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA24645 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:02:01 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3B2F6A64.A60CAD42 at musc.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:06:12 -0400
From: "Vincent B. Amacher" <amacherv at musc.edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Win2k login to Samba domain
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I too am having problems logging into a Samba 2.2.0 domain with a Win2K
machine. I added the root account to the smbpasswd file. Now the error
is "Your computer could not be joined to the domain because the
following error has occured No Mapping between account names and
security IDs was done"
Thanks -
Vince Amacher
MUSC, Dept of Pediatrics
Return-Path: <MMcAtee at philamuseum.org>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailhost.philamuseum.org (unknown [38.155.38.22]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D420C4ACF for
<samba at lists.samba.org.>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by MAILHOST with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<MNKSP9B7>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:15:40 -0400
Message-ID: <3CB23A9F8C3DD511BC2500508BC741332AA83E at MAILHOST>
From: "McAtee, Malcolm" <MMcAtee at philamuseum.org>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: writeable permissions?
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:15:40 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Please excuse the newbie questions.
I am pretty new to Linux and Samba.
I have recently installed Linux 7.0 and Samba.
I have been able to successfully connect and browse my linux machine from my
windows 2000 workstation.
I am unable create or add files and directorys however.
I have setup my share in the smb.conf file as follows:
[website]
comment = website directory
path = /var/www
public = no
writeable = yes
write list = @website
printable = no
I am setup as a superuser on the Linux system do I need to make myself part
of the website group?
Are the permissions (creation permissions = 700) setup for the website group
sufficient?
Do I need to add myself to the smbusers file?
Help please!
TIA Malcolm
Return-Path: <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9580A444F for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5JFidu13204; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:44:39 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA00377; Tue, 19
Jun 2001 17:44:39 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA02037; Tue, 19 Jun
2001 17:44:45 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: samba at lists.samba.org, "McAtee, Malcolm" <MMcAtee at philamuseum.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:44:33 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: writeable permissions?
Message-ID: <3B2F8F81.18725.20CC483 at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <3CB23A9F8C3DD511BC2500508BC741332AA83E at MAILHOST>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Please excuse the newbie questions.
> I am pretty new to Linux and Samba.
> I have recently installed Linux 7.0 and Samba.
> I have been able to successfully connect and browse my linux machine from my
> windows 2000 workstation.
> I am unable create or add files and directorys however.
>
> I have setup my share in the smb.conf file as follows:
>
> [website]
> comment = website directory
> path = /var/www
> public = no
> writeable = yes
> write list = @website
> printable = no
>
>
> I am setup as a superuser on the Linux system do I need to make myself part
> of the website group?
> Are the permissions (creation permissions = 700) setup for the website group
> sufficient?
With this perimissions only the owner of the file can read and write
it. Who is the owner?
-- Begin "off topic"
Hopfully your web-server is not running as root or ordanary user!
Normaly permissions in web directories are
-rw-rw-r-- or -rw-r--r-- with the web server running as nobody or
better as httpd (or what special user you like). Owner of the files
is the human that maintains the web site.
-- End "off topic"
Can you read the files? Connet as the owner of the files and try
again. Make the files group read/writable with website as group, put
you self into website. Try again. You say you can connet, so this
should work. (If the connection is refused we have to look at
different things.) Take care that the permissions are maintened in
the share (stick-bit, inherit permissions, create mode, ....)
> Do I need to add myself to the smbusers file?
If your unix and Windows user names are equel you do not need the
file.
Christian
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <sravikumar at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from web9603.mail.yahoo.com (web9603.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.129.182]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF76D4AE4
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20010619154608.68169.qmail at web9603.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [12.105.65.6] by web9603.mail.yahoo.com; Tue, 19 Jun 2001
08:46:08 PDT
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:46:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ravi Kumar <sravikumar at yahoo.com>
Subject: Newbie question on browse server
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Cc: sravikumar at yahoo.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have the following question on Samba and would
appreciate any feedback on this.
My scenario is as follows:
LAN WAN
Home -----> Samba -----------> CIFS NAS
LAN Server
- Home PCs and Samba Server are on the same workgroup.
I want to acheive the following. Samba server should
tell the Home PCs the list of shares and the url to
access them.
Thanks.
=====
-- ravi
sravikumar at yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
http://buzz.yahoo.com/
Return-Path: <rshields at customcolor.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from customcolor.com (customcolor.com [216.122.237.241]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E454B89 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leedo ([209.248.198.166]) by customcolor.com
(8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f5JFoJj44790 for <samba at lists.samba.org>;
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:50:19 GMT (envelope-from rshields at customcolor.com)
From: "Richard Shields" <rshields at customcolor.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Ownership privileges
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:53:48 -0500
Message-ID: <NFBBKMHCKLFBEHOPKPMAAEEOCAAA.rshields at customcolor.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I am running Samba 2.0.7 on a Macintosh OSX server ver 1.2 A file created,
copied or otherwise altered by a Windows client on this server is
unalterable by the Macintosh clients. Is there a way to fix this? A file
created, ETC by a Mac client can be altered by anyone... I have only limited
Unix/Linux exp so feel free to email me in person if the answer is too wordy
for the list server. Thank you for your help in advance...
Richard L. Shields
rshields at customcolor.com
Custom Color Corp.
300 W. 19th Terr.
K.C., MO 64108
ph. 816-474-3200
fx. 816-842-4909
http://www.customcolor.com
Return-Path: <jerome_baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from smtp017.mail.yahoo.com (smtp017.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.174.114]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7873F4E50
for <samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown (HELO mainpassjerome) (64.120.108.6) by
smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Jun 2001 16:46:20 -0000
X-Apparently-From: <jerome?baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
Message-ID: <01f301c0f8df$cc048e60$6f01010a at nt.local>
From: "Jerome Baumgarten" <jerome_baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Samba CVS, which one ?
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:49:23 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
As far I did not get any response that could help me I post again my
question.
Hi,
I would like to get the last Samba source from the CVS to compile it and I
would like to use it in an existing Win2000 domain. Thus I would like to get
winbind.
Right now I don't have any Samba installation on my machine.
So my question is which one do I need ?
Is it the HEAD or SAMBA_2_2 ?
Is it this command:
cvs -z5 -d :pserver:cvs at pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co samba
or that one ?
cvs -z5 -d :pserver:cvs at pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba
Thanks in advance.
Jerome
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Return-Path: <mekilroy at risingedge.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4104E49 for
<samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by
mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5JGwIS68030
for <samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:58:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by
wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id
<B0000083899 at wizzard.rising-edge>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:56:19 -0400
Message-ID: <041601c0f8e0$c26e38a0$1a00a8c0 at diamondback>
From: "M. Kilroy" <mekilroy at risingedge.com>
To: "Jerome Baumgarten" <jerome_baumgarten at yahoo.fr>, <samba at samba.org>
References: <01f301c0f8df$cc048e60$6f01010a at nt.local>
Subject: Re: Samba CVS, which one ?
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:56:18 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
http://samba.org/samba/cvs.html will give you all the CVS info for
downloading.
As far as which one you need, you may want to just pick one and try it. :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jerome Baumgarten" <jerome_baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 12:49 PM
Subject: Samba CVS, which one ?
As far I did not get any response that could help me I post again my
question.
Hi,
I would like to get the last Samba source from the CVS to compile it and I
would like to use it in an existing Win2000 domain. Thus I would like to get
winbind.
Right now I don't have any Samba installation on my machine.
So my question is which one do I need ?
Is it the HEAD or SAMBA_2_2 ?
Is it this command:
cvs -z5 -d :pserver:cvs at pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co samba
or that one ?
cvs -z5 -d :pserver:cvs at pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba
Thanks in advance.
Jerome
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <DavidB at mail.interclean.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from serverdell2200.interclean.com (mail.interclean.com
[152.160.178.23]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94DD4410
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:04:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.interclean.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2650.21) id <NFH9VS5W>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:08:45 -0400
Message-ID: <0F9D3D919AADD211BE7E00A0C99B842032438F at mail.interclean.com>
From: David Brodbeck <DavidB at mail.interclean.com>
To: "'M. Kilroy'" <mekilroy at risingedge.com>, samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: *working* winbindd
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:08:43 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
It worked for me using the version that was in the samba-appliance-0.5-1
rpm. Unfortunately that's now been taken down as obsolete. I'm not sure
what's been done since to break it, but the version in the current HEAD CVS
sure doesn't work. Kinda seems like one step forward and two back
sometimes, doesn't it?
-----Original Message-----
From: M. Kilroy [mailto:mekilroy at risingedge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:56 AM
To: samba at lists.samba.org; samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: *working* winbindd
Does anyone out there with winbind *working* and authenticating from an NT
PDC
mind telling me what version of samba/winbind they are running? The latest
head has probs with winbindd, and I need to get something running very soon.
THANKS!
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
- Thomas Alva Edison (1847-1931)
"The girl got reasons. They all got reasons." ~Scott Weiland
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <JVergara at equinox.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from notes.EQUINOX.COM (notes.equinox.com [63.80.92.4]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B424242 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Samba log errors
To: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.6a January 17, 2001
Message-ID: <OF4197630C.1DB39627-ON85256A70.005B36C9 at EQUINOX.COM>
From: JVergara at equinox.com
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:02:29 -0700
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes.EQUINOX.COM/EQNX(Release 5.0.5
|September 22, 2000) at 06/19/2001 01:02:34 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have been using samba 2.0.7 and lprng with linux redhat 6.2 for a
while witth a windows multiuser database application that runs from a
share volume in the samba server. The problem is that lately the
users are complaining of computer lock ups when trying to insert a
record , or they complain that they entered a record and later on the
record dissapeared from the database. Also I have linksys
printservers attached to the network so when a user sends a job from
the windows app. , it goes to the samba/lprng server that handles the
printer queues to send the jobs to the Linksys printservers. This is
suppossed to free the windows clients from spooling jobs directly to
the printers and get stuck with the async. communication
computer/printer with the known slowdown of the Microsoft windows
computers. The thing is that if several printer jobs (let's say 20)
are sent from the same computer to the same printer queue (shared from
samba), the computer gets frozen from the app. and afterwards the
whole computer gets frozen. The user does not have other choice but
resetting the computer and to login again (obviously from the same ip
address) - samba does not clear the first connection and first locks
to the database files and shows a second brand new connection for the
same user. This user opens the database app. and files and begins to
work. Suddenly if somebody else tries to create records on the same
database files opened by the client with two conections on smbstatus -
they get lock up and they can not do anything until manually
somebody checks smbstatus and kills the older conection of the person
(ip address) with two connections to the shared folders.
How can we fix the two problems described before?
- computer gets lock up when printing several jobs to printer shared
by samba.
- Samba does not clear connection when computer is reset, allowing
more than one connection to the same folder from one computer (ip
address).
Below, I show different errors from the samba logs for different
users. I don't know if those errors are harmless, or potentially
desastrous for a database integrity and multiuser set up.
thanks in advance for any recommendations in this matter,
Juan Vergara
----------
log.freddy:84: write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
log.freddy:86: write_socket: Error writing 206 bytes to socket 9:
ERRNO = Broke
n pipe
log.freddy:88: Error writing 206 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
log.kathy.1.1:251: read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = No
route to ho
st
log.kathy.1.1:253: receive_smb error (No route to host) exiting
log.lorenzo:36: write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
log.lorenzo:38: write_socket: Error writing 206 bytes to socket 9:
ERRNO = Brok
en pipe
log.lorenzo:40: Error writing 206 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
log.lorenzo:60: write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
log.lorenzo:62: write_socket: Error writing 206 bytes to socket 9:
ERRNO = Brok
en pipe
log.lorenzo:64: Error writing 206 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
log.lorenzo.1.1:437: read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error =
Connection r
eset by peer
log.lorenzo.1.1:529: write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken
pipe
log.lorenzo.1.1:531: write_socket: Error writing 206 bytes to socket
9: ERRNO =
Broken pipe
log.lorenzo.1.1:533: Error writing 206 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
log.lorenzo.1.1:535: write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken
pipe
log.lorenzo.1.1:537: write_socket: Error writing 206 bytes to socket
9: ERRNO =
Broken pipe
log.lorenzo.1.1:539: Error writing 206 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
log.ruben.1:4: read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error =
Connection reset b
y peer
log.smb.1.1.1:114: Failed to set socket option SO_KEEPALIVE (Error
Bad file des
criptor)
log.smb.1.1.1:116: Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY (Error Bad
file desc
riptor)
log.smb.1.1.1:118: Failed to set socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY (Error
Bad file d
escriptor)
log.zenaida.1.1:1410: read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error =
Connection
reset by peer
Return-Path: <gtouron at intrasoft.com.uy>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.intrasoft.com.uy (r200-40-84-134.adinet.com.uy
[200.40.84.134]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356184242
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from apache at localhost) by mail.intrasoft.com.uy
(8.11.2/8.11.2) id f5JIJuV09273 for samba at lists.samba.org; Tue, 19 Jun
2001 15:19:56 -0300
From: Gaston Touron <gtouron at intrasoft.com.uy>
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.intrasoft.com.uy: apache set sender to
gtouron at intrasoft.com.uy using -f
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Installation problem
Message-ID: <992974796.3b2f97cc87eb8 at mail.intrasoft.com.uy>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:19:56 -0300 (UYT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.4
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have a Red Hat 7.0 installed, I have just downloaded the samba.latest.tar.gz
form us1.samba.org, issued the command tar -xzf, and everythings seems to be
ok.
When I issue the command "./configure" as I read in documentation
Linux gaves
to me the following error :
loading cache ./config.cache
checking for gcc... no
checking for cc... no
configure: error: no acceptable cc found in $PATH
Could anyone help me with that ?
Thanks a lot !!!
Gaston
Return-Path: <mmortens at co.weber.ut.us>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from screamer.co.weber.ut.us (unknown [168.180.151.69]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D075B4E6D for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co.weber.ut.us (thag.co.weber.ut.us [168.180.145.64]) by
screamer.co.weber.ut.us with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail
Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id NFRAQJWN; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:35:46
-0600
Message-ID: <3B2F9A0C.8AF39BCD at co.weber.ut.us>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:29:32 -0600
From: Matt Mortensen <mmortens at co.weber.ut.us>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Samba list <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Server freeze after upgrade to Redhat 7.1 and Samba 2.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have had three sever lockups after upgrading from RH6.0 & samba 2.0.7
to RH7.1 and samba 2.2. This server is a dual xeon 700mhz w/(I think)
256k cache and 512M of RAM. What appears to be happening is that smbd
processes eat up all of the memory. This server only runs samba is a
time server for windows clients. On average there are 80 samba
connection concurrently. Any help in diagnosing is appreciated and
needed. Before the upgrade this server had run for over 300 day strait.
--
Matt Mortensen
Network Administrator
Weber County Information Technology
(801)399-8629 Office (801)399-8864 Fax
Return-Path: <ctooley at amoa.org>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id 1E9244E94 for <samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun
2001 11:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id
86256A70.00669A42 ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:40:41 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA
From: ctooley at amoa.org
To: samba at samba.org
Message-ID: <86256A70.006698D3.00 at amoa.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:40:36 -0500
Subject: Force User:Group
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Is there a way to force writes to a specific directory to write the file as a
different User or Group that the person writing to it. The reason I ask is...
My Director of Finance and Administration is in the following groups:
ADMINISTRATION, ACCOUNTING, DIRECTORS. The ADMINISTRATION group is her default
group. But, whenever she edits a file in the ACCOUNTING department's folder it
gets written with a user:group of her username and ADMINISTRATION. Since most
of the accounting department is not in the ADMINISTRATION group they can no
longer open the files after she has saved changes to them.
Chris Tooley
Return-Path: <ctooley at amoa.org>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id C825C4E9C for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19
Jun 2001 11:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id
86256A70.0066AA23 ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:41:22 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA
From: ctooley at amoa.org
To: Gaston Touron <gtouron at intrasoft.com.uy>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Message-ID: <86256A70.0066AA11.00 at amoa.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:41:20 -0500
Subject: Re: Installation problem
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
If you type cc at the command line what happens?
Chris
Gaston Touron <gtouron at intrasoft.com.uy> on 06/19/2001 01:19:56 PM
To: samba at lists.samba.org
cc: (bcc: Chris Tooley/AMOA)
Subject Installation problem
:
I have a Red Hat 7.0 installed, I have just downloaded the samba.latest.tar.gz
form us1.samba.org, issued the command tar -xzf, and everythings seems to be
ok.
When I issue the command "./configure" as I read in documentation
Linux gaves
to me the following error :
loading cache ./config.cache
checking for gcc... no
checking for cc... no
configure: error: no acceptable cc found in $PATH
Could anyone help me with that ?
Thanks a lot !!!
Gaston
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <cjay at engr.colostate.edu>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from goku.engr.colostate.edu (goku.engr.colostate.edu
[129.82.224.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CEF44E4
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wrigley_field.engr.colostate.edu
(wrigley_field.engr.colostate.edu [129.82.224.14]) by
goku.engr.colostate.edu (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with ESMTP id
f5JJKnQ3005476 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:20:49
-0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010619131820.00a4b390 at mail>
X-Sender: cjay at mail
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:19:09 -0600
To: samba at lists.samba.org
From: "C. J. Keist" <cjay at engr.colostate.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Subject: (no subject)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
confirm 768502
Return-Path: <Ross.Kennedy at Sun.COM>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D709C4EEC for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rowlf.Central.Sun.COM ([129.153.128.28]) by
mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA26876 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from beaker (beaker [129.153.128.23]) by rowlf.Central.Sun.COM
(8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with SMTP id f5JJcZK25378 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:38:35 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <200106191938.f5JJcZK25378 at rowlf.Central.Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:38:34 -0500 (CDT)
From: Ross Kennedy <Ross.Kennedy at Sun.COM>
Reply-To: Ross Kennedy <Ross.Kennedy at Sun.COM>
Subject: CHECK_FOR_MASTER_BROWSER_FAILED? Um...err...ok?
To: samba at lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-MD5: sHmi60+BGMHAqvaAIOGDYA==
X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hey All,
I'm not having very good success getting this bad boy up.
I ran the smbclient thingy and it didn't spit out what I
was hoping to see:
bash-2.03# ./smbclient -U% -L localhost
added interface ip=129.153.130.138 bcast=129.153.130.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
session request to LOCALHOST failed (Not listening for calling name)
session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Not listening for calling name)
bash-2.03#
So I checked the logs and they say something about:
[2001/06/18 10:03:18, 0] nmbd/nmbd_elections.c:check_for_master_browser_fail(96)
check_for_master_browser_fail: Unable to find workgroup AUSTINCAMPUS.CE on subnet 129.153.130.138.=
The first thing I noted was that the workgroup name shoudln't be AUSTINCAMPUS.CE?
Cheers,
Ross Kennedy
Return-Path: <cjay at engr.colostate.edu>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from goku.engr.colostate.edu (goku.engr.colostate.edu
[129.82.224.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFAC44F39
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunray (sunray.engr.colostate.edu [129.82.224.65]) by
goku.engr.colostate.edu (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with ESMTP id
f5JJuhQ3007727 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:56:43
-0600 (MDT)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:56:32 -0600 (MDT)
From: "Christopher \"C.J.\" Keist" <cjay at engr.colostate.edu>
X-Sender: cjay at sunray
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Log files
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10106191342350.21040-100000 at sunray>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
I just installed Samba 2.2 on RH7.1. Everything is running fine,
except for one small detail. That is, samba is not creating any log files
when clients connect to the shares. I specified my log file to point to
/var/log/samba/log/log.%m. But no log files are being created. Following
is the Global sections from the smb.conf file:
[global]
workgroup = ENGR_DOM
server string = Samba Server
security = SERVER
password server = stout bock
username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
password level = 8
log file = /var/log/samba/log/log.%m
max log size = 50
socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_KEEPALIVE
SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
load printers = No
os level = 0
dns proxy = No
wins server = 129.82.224.21
kernel oplocks = No
remote announce = 129.82.224.21
guest account = guest
hosts allow = 129.82. 127.
printing = lprng
oplocks = No
I have double checked the path, I have also permissions on the log
directory to wide open (chmod 777), and still no log files are being
created. What am I missing here?
Thanks...
C. J. Keist Email: cjay at engr.colostate.edu
UNIX/Network Manager Phone: 970-491-0630
Engineering Network Services Fax: 970-491-2465
College of Engineering, CSU
Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301
Return-Path: <mike at rosco.ecc.engr.uky.edu>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from rosco.ecc.engr.uky.edu (rosco.ecc.engr.uky.edu
[128.163.145.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAF64EF9
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mike by rosco.ecc.engr.uky.edu with local (Exim 3.22 #1
(Debian)) id 15CS3Y-0000Ag-00 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun
2001 16:25:00 -0400
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:24:59 -0400
From: Mike Brancato <mike at engr.uky.edu>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Multiple PDCs, one box ?
Message-ID: <20010619162459.A642 at rosco.ecc.engr.uky.edu>
Reply-To: mike at engr.uky.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
X-Operating-System: Linux rosco 2.4.2-XFS
X-Disclaimer: I am not responsible for anything I say.
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Is it possible to have samba control 2 domains? I'm running
2.2.0 and have it as a PDC right now, but we want multiple groups
to use this one machine, can we have 2 or 3 domains controlled by
samba? If not, would is be possible to add ?
--
Michael Brancato Engineering Computing Services
e: mike at engr.uky.edu Unix System Administration
p: (859) 257-3489 280 Anderson Hall
f: (859) 323-3848 University of Kentucky
Return-Path: <don_mccall at hp.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from palrel1.hp.com (palrel1.hp.com [156.153.255.242]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38284240 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xparelay1.corp.hp.com (unknown [15.58.136.173]) by
palrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7338B94E; Tue, 19 Jun 2001
13:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xpabh3.corp.hp.com (xpabh3.corp.hp.com [15.58.136.223])
by xparelay1.corp.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B41E1F509; Tue, 19
Jun 2001 06:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by xpabh3.corp.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <NG4XTSVT>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:33:57 -0700
Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050ADB at xatl02.atl.hp.com>
From: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>
To: 'Ross Kennedy' <Ross.Kennedy at Sun.COM>, "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)"
<don_mccall at hp.com>
Cc: "'samba at lists.samba.org'" <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: LOCKING Error - Super need to know
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:33:56 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi Ross,
when you run .configure, it SHOULD create a Makefile in the same
directory where the .configure script is; at least thats what it
does for me...
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Kennedy [mailto:Ross.Kennedy at Sun.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:21 AM
To: don_mccall at hp.com
Subject: RE: LOCKING Error - Super need to know
Don,
First I would like to thank you for the info. You hit it right on
the head. I set my PATH to look at another compiler we have on our
network (ANSI standard) and PRESTO! It worked beautifully.
I don't suppose you would know why it now isn't allowing me to
'make' anything? The only Makefile that appears in the source dir
is Makefile.in...do you get these same issues running it on HP?
I don't suppose you are in the Sacramento campus for HP? I'll be
visiting that one at the end of this month.
Cheers,
Ross Kennedy
> From: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>
> To: "'Ross Kennedy'" <Ross.Kennedy at Sun.COM>, samba at lists.samba.org
> Subject: RE: LOCKING Error - Super need to know
> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:08:36 -0400
>
> Hi Ross,
> It's a poor unix implementation indeed that does not support file locking.
> In my experience these messages are more often a result of the compiler
that
>
> you are using to compile samba; The configure script actually creates and
> compiles
> some simple little programs to test what functionality exists on your
> particular
> system, and if these test programs fail to compile or run for some reason,
> it APPEARS
> that the test itself failed.
> I have seen this happen when the compiler you are using isn't ansi
standard,
> or you
> have to add some cc flag to tell the compiler to be ansi compliant; most
> people have
> been able to pull gcc from the gnu web page and use that successfully...
>
> You can get more info on whats actually failing by looking into the
> config.log
> file for the tests for fcntl locking, etc and make sure you are not
getting
> any compiler
> errors when building those tests.
> For instance you might look for something like:
>
> configure:9456: checking for fcntl locking
> configure:9469: cc -o conftest -O +DA1.1 +DS1.1 -DUSING_DOMAINUSER_MAP
> -DHAS_HPU
> X_POSIX_ACLS -DWITH_SYSLOG -DDEBUG_PASSWORD -Ae -D_HPUX_SOURCE
> -D_POSIX_SOURCE
> -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE conftest.c -lgen -lsec -lnsl 1>&5
>
> (this is on a HP-UX system); the key is looking for "checking for fcntl
> locking"...
> Hope this helps,
> Don
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Kennedy [mailto:Ross.Kennedy at Sun.COM]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 4:55 PM
> To: samba at lists.samba.org
> Subject: LOCKING Error - Super need to know
>
>
> Hey All,
>
> I am at a dead end and in need of some help. I leave on
> business in a week and need to have a samba server set up
> before I go. I really hope someone knows the answer to this.
> I run the configure script and this is what I get after a
> bunch of that other info goes by...anythoughts?
>
> checking if large file support can be enabled
> no
> checking configure summary
> ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe
> configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config
>
> Beggingly yours,
> ross
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Cheers,
Ross Kennedy
Return-Path: <ctooley at amoa.org>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id 76B8F4F16 for <samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun
2001 13:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id
86256A70.00711B1F ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:35:25 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA
From: ctooley at amoa.org
To: samba at samba.org
Message-ID: <86256A70.00711998.00 at amoa.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:35:20 -0500
Subject: Re:Force User:Group
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I need to be able to specify directories within a share, as some of the
directories have different user:group owners than others. I think this may have
to be done at the filesystem level... is that possible?
Chris Tooley
Bill Grzanich <organix4 at mindspring.com> on 06/19/2001 03:15:57 PM
To: Chris Tooley/AMOA at AMOA
cc:
Subject Re:Force User:Group
:
Hi, Chris!
Original message from: ctooley at amoa.org
>Is there a way to force writes to a specific directory to write the file as a
>different User or Group that the person writing to it. The reason I ask is...
>
<snip>
Yep... add "force user = [some name]" to your share definition. For example:
[cmplianc]
comment = Compliance share
path=/home/groups/cmplianc
valid users = @cmplianc, @it
public = No
writable = Yes
printable = No
force user = cmplianc
Hope this helps.
-Bill Grzanich
IT Manager
ORGANICS/LaGrange, Inc.
Return-Path: <urban at teststation.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from fungus.teststation.com (fungus.teststation.com
[212.32.186.211]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C49242A5
for <samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cola.teststation.com (tron.teststation.com
[212.32.186.212]) by fungus.teststation.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP
id f5JKeC007786; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 22:40:12 +0200
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 22:40:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: Urban Widmark <urban at teststation.com>
X-Sender: <puw at cola.teststation.com>
To: Wolfgang Kretzschmar <Wolfgang.Kretzschmar at abas.de>
Cc: SAMBA <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Re: smbmount/smbpasswd: specify path to smb.conf
In-Reply-To: <3B2F2262.D69612BE at abas.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106192231510.3239-100000 at cola.teststation.co
m>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Wolfgang Kretzschmar wrote:
> Most samba tools (smbd, smbstatus, ...) have an option -s to use an arbitrary
> smb.conf file.
>
> smbmount and smbpasswd do not. Both always use <sambadir>/lib/smb.conf.
smbmount can't accept -s, it has the syntax it has to be callable by
mount. So the only place to pass that option is in the -o list.
The problem is that if you parse the configfile after other options then
you may loose settings given on the commandline.
One idea is to try and read the configfile first, but not give an error if
it isn't found. And then if someone does:
mount -t smbfs -o cfg=/some/path.cfg,username=puw,workgroup=X ...
it will quietly fail to read /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf and then read
/some/path.cfg while parsing the options.
That has the ugly effect that this commandline is totally different from
the one above, as the workgroup option is lost to whatever /some/path.cfg
has for workgroup.
mount -t smbfs -o workgroup=X,cfg=/some/path.cfg,username=puw ...
/Urban
Return-Path: <dan.tappin at orourke-eng.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com
(h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com [207.228.121.48]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85D8842A5; Tue, 19 Jun 2001
13:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 192.168.0.27 by h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com; Tue,
19 Jun 2001 15:00:35 -0600
Reply-To: <dan.tappin at orourke-eng.com>
From: "Dan Tappin" <dan.tappin at orourke-eng.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>, <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Newbie SAMBA Help...
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:01:07 -0600
Message-ID: <NEBBJHEDELJOHGLFBBFFIELLCGAA.dan.tappin at orourke-eng.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <20010619190200.BD9D94EDC at lists.samba.org>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
First Off... I am a total Linux Newbie. Lots of command line stuff will get
me lost very fast. Think of explaining this to your parents via e-mail
(unless your parents taught you UNIX!). I don't mind if you take it slow
and go step by step.
Here is my situation:
Our company has purchased a Dell file server with Red Hat 7 pre-installed.
I have finally gotten Samba up and running after a Red Hat tech support call
but I am a bit lost when it comes to the SWAT utility.
Here is what I would like to accomplish:
I would like to have individual users login and be given specific
privileges. For example:
Administrative Users
- file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Engineering
directories
- file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Administrative
directories
- file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Secretarial
directories
Secretarial Users
- file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Engineering
directories
- file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Secretarial
directories
Engineering Users
- file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Engineering
directories
- read only access to specific administrative and secretarial directories
- write access (drop box) to specific administrative and secretarial
directories
Home Accounts
- a home account for each user to store limited personal items
Here is how it would look to the root user...
Home
User A (User A access only)
User B (User B access only)
User C (User C access only)
User N (User N access only etc...)
Secretarial
In Box (Shared - write access for all)
Projects (All Access for Secretarial and Admin users read-only for
others)
Administration
In Box (Shared - write access for all)
Projects (All Access for Admin users read-only for others)
Engineering
Projects
Project A
Project B
Project C
Now I can live with simple shares if the NT Domain controller in SAMBA is
beyond what I am trying to do here. Ideally each user would login and the
shared they are allowed would show up in the NN.
Also I have been playing around with SAMBA and I set it up with the local
group that we have used here by default which is 'OROURKE' (our company
name). Perhaps I am wrong here but do all my shares appear in the network
neighborhood under //FILESERVER/ADMIN/ or //FILESERVER/HOME/USER A/ etc. or
do they appear as //ADMIN/ and //HOME/ (for USER X)???
Thanks in advance,
Dan
Return-Path: <ctooley at amoa.org>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id CF1A04F4E for <samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun
2001 13:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id
86256A70.0073B1B6 ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:03:41 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA
From: ctooley at amoa.org
To: samba at samba.org
Message-ID: <86256A70.0073B0FE.00 at amoa.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:03:38 -0500
Subject: Re:Force User:Group
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
The problem with this is that everyone is supposed to have read access to
everything and only people in the correct groups have write access. If I create
a different share for each department, not only am I going to have to map each
share to everyone's computer, I'm going to have to teach all those people what
each of those drive letters are for. Plus, there aren't enough drive letters to
go around.
Chris Tooley
Bill Grzanich <organix4 at mindspring.com> on 06/19/2001 03:56:47 PM
To: Chris Tooley/AMOA at AMOA
cc:
Subject Re:Force User:Group
:
Hi, Chris.
>I need to be able to specify directories within a share, as some of the
>directories have different user:group owners than others. I think this may
have
>to be done at the filesystem level... is that possible?
Yes. Samba cannot grant privileges beyond what the file system has, so you do
have to pay attention to that.
However, you can create shares at each directory, and force different users at
each. In my case, all users
belong to the Linux/UNIX user group called, appropriately, "users". The shared
area of my server, /home,
contains all the user shared areas. Within /home, I created a directory called
groups to contain the
departmental shares. Some examples can help make a lot of this clearer:
Each of the user home directories, /home/bill for example, have privileges like
this:
drwxrwxr-x 21 bill users 4096 Jun 19 13:02 bill
So, at the Linux/UNIX level, all users have read/write/execute privileges.
Samba, however, can restrict
access, so Beth's home directory in smb.conf is defined like this:
[Beth]
comment = Beth's files
path = /home/beth
valid users = beth, laurel, bud
public = No
writable = Yes
printable = No
Here, Beth's home directory may also be accessed by laurel and bud, but no one
else. If only Beth should have
access, I could either eliminate the share entry entirely, and let Samba default
it, or simply remove the
other names from the valid users list.
For departments, like Quality Control, a number of people need access. I have
this:
[quality]
comment = Quality share
path=/home/groups/quality
valid users = @quality, @it
public = No
writable = Yes
printable = No
force user = quality
Here, only members of the Linux/UNIX groups "quality" and "it" have access.
Further, any files created will
be owned by a user called "quality". That means, of course, that in addition to
the user groups "quality"
and "it", I also had to create a Linux/UNIX user called "quality". Since this
user never logs in, the entry
in /etc/passwd looks like this:
quality:x:575:100:Quality Group:/dev/null:/dev/null
So the home directory and logon shell are set to /dev/null. The permissions on
/home/groups/quality look like
this:
drwxrwxr-x 21 quality quality 4096 Jun 19 08:52 /home/groups/quality
I hope this helps clear things up.
Best regards,
-Bill
>
>Chris Tooley
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Bill Grzanich <organix4 at mindspring.com> on 06/19/2001 03:15:57 PM
>
>
>
> To: Chris Tooley/AMOA at AMOA
>
> cc:
>
>
>
> Subject Re:Force User:Group
> :
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi, Chris!
>
>Original message from: ctooley at amoa.org
>>Is there a way to force writes to a specific directory to write the file as a
>>different User or Group that the person writing to it. The reason I ask is...
>>
><snip>
>
>Yep... add "force user = [some name]" to your share definition. For example:
>
>[cmplianc]
> comment = Compliance share
> path=/home/groups/cmplianc
> valid users = @cmplianc, @it
> public = No
> writable = Yes
> printable = No
> force user = cmplianc
>
>Hope this helps.
>
>-Bill Grzanich
>IT Manager
>ORGANICS/LaGrange, Inc.
Return-Path: <ctooley at amoa.org>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id 89BF74F66 for <samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun
2001 14:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id
86256A70.007441AD ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:09:49 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA
From: ctooley at amoa.org
To: samba at samba.org
Message-ID: <86256A70.0074404C.00 at amoa.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:09:45 -0500
Subject: Member Server User Accounts
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have an NT Server that a couple of apps are hosted on. I joined the server to
the domain, all was well. However, after the server joined the domain, no one
could access things on the server that required authenticating (ie getting at
shared directories). I switch back to just being a standalone server not part
of the domain and all is well. Any suggestions?
Return-Path: <don_mccall at hp.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from atlrel2.hp.com (atlrel2.hp.com [156.153.255.202]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E76453A for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xatlrelay2.atl.hp.com (xatlrelay2.atl.hp.com
[15.45.89.191]) by atlrel2.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060AEC96;
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:32:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xatlbh1.atl.hp.com (xatlbh1.atl.hp.com [15.45.89.186]) by
xatlrelay2.atl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5251F50B; Tue, 19 Jun
2001 17:31:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by xatlbh1.atl.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <NFNNQTWT>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:32:07 -0400
Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050ADC at xatl02.atl.hp.com>
From: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>
To: "'Christopher \"C.J.\" Keist'" <cjay at engr.colostate.edu>,
samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: Log files
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:32:05 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi Chris,
You need
log level = #
in your global section, where # is 0-10, the higher the number the more
debug
statements will be written to the log...
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher "C.J." Keist [mailto:cjay at engr.colostate.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 3:57 PM
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Log files
Hello,
I just installed Samba 2.2 on RH7.1. Everything is running fine,
except for one small detail. That is, samba is not creating any log files
when clients connect to the shares. I specified my log file to point to
/var/log/samba/log/log.%m. But no log files are being created. Following
is the Global sections from the smb.conf file:
[global]
workgroup = ENGR_DOM
server string = Samba Server
security = SERVER
password server = stout bock
username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
password level = 8
log file = /var/log/samba/log/log.%m
max log size = 50
socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_KEEPALIVE
SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
load printers = No
os level = 0
dns proxy = No
wins server = 129.82.224.21
kernel oplocks = No
remote announce = 129.82.224.21
guest account = guest
hosts allow = 129.82. 127.
printing = lprng
oplocks = No
I have double checked the path, I have also permissions on the log
directory to wide open (chmod 777), and still no log files are being
created. What am I missing here?
Thanks...
C. J. Keist Email: cjay at engr.colostate.edu
UNIX/Network Manager Phone: 970-491-0630
Engineering Network Services Fax: 970-491-2465
College of Engineering, CSU
Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <don_mccall at hp.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from atlrel6.hp.com (atlrel6.hp.com [192.151.27.8]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24EC84F38 for
<samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xatlrelay2.atl.hp.com (xatlrelay2.atl.hp.com
[15.45.89.191]) by atlrel6.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3581FA07;
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:51:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xatlbh1.atl.hp.com (xatlbh1.atl.hp.com [15.45.89.186]) by
xatlrelay2.atl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBB91F515; Tue, 19 Jun
2001 17:50:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by xatlbh1.atl.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <NFNNQVHB>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:51:16 -0400
Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050ADD at xatl02.atl.hp.com>
From: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>
To: 'Wang Youguo' <ygwang at prosten.com>, samba at samba.org
Subject: RE: Would you please help me?
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:51:14 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I see that you added the user to the smbpasswd file,
but did you add the user of the same name to your /etc/passwd file as well
(or is there already a linux user in the /etc/passwd file with the same
name?)
Hope this helps,
don
-----Original Message-----
From: Wang Youguo [mailto:ygwang at prosten.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 4:31 AM
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: Would you please help me?
Dear my Savior,
I have a big trouble in configuring SAMBA. I am wondering if I could get
some help from you. My problem is descripted here:
SAMBA is installed in a RedHat Linux server and is configured, and
The machine can be seen from my WinNT4 client, but I can not login when I
want to open the shared folder! I got a 'no right' message every time.
The following steps have been done:
(1) 'encrypt password =yes' is added into /etc/smb.conf
(2) 'smbpasswd -a username' is done and I can see the added user in the
file: /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd
I have been confused for 2 days, would you please help me? PLEASE!
By the way, I am not familiar with Linux!
Thanks! Thanks! Thanks!
Best Regards,
Kerry Wang
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <cjay at engr.colostate.edu>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from goku.engr.colostate.edu (goku.engr.colostate.edu
[129.82.224.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3224F51
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wrigley_field.engr.colostate.edu
(wrigley_field.engr.colostate.edu [129.82.224.14]) by
goku.engr.colostate.edu (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with ESMTP id
f5JLsoQ3017204; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:54:50 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010619155241.00a4ca10 at mail>
X-Sender: cjay at mail
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:53:08 -0600
To: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>, samba at lists.samba.org
From: "C. J. Keist" <cjay at engr.colostate.edu>
Subject: RE: Log files
In-Reply-To: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050ADC at xatl02.atl.hp.com
>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Thanks!!! That did it.
At 05:32 PM 6/19/01 -0400, MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>You need
>log level = #
>in your global section, where # is 0-10, the higher the number the more
>debug
>statements will be written to the log...
>Don
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Christopher "C.J." Keist [mailto:cjay at engr.colostate.edu]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 3:57 PM
>To: samba at lists.samba.org
>Subject: Log files
>
>
>Hello,
> I just installed Samba 2.2 on RH7.1. Everything is running fine,
>except for one small detail. That is, samba is not creating any log files
>when clients connect to the shares. I specified my log file to point to
>/var/log/samba/log/log.%m. But no log files are being created. Following
>is the Global sections from the smb.conf file:
>
>[global]
> workgroup = ENGR_DOM
> server string = Samba Server
> security = SERVER
> password server = stout bock
> username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
> password level = 8
> log file = /var/log/samba/log/log.%m
> max log size = 50
> socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_KEEPALIVE
>SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
> load printers = No
> os level = 0
> dns proxy = No
> wins server = 129.82.224.21
> kernel oplocks = No
> remote announce = 129.82.224.21
> guest account = guest
> hosts allow = 129.82. 127.
> printing = lprng
> oplocks = No
>
>I have double checked the path, I have also permissions on the log
>directory to wide open (chmod 777), and still no log files are being
>created. What am I missing here?
>
>Thanks...
>
> C. J. Keist Email: cjay at engr.colostate.edu
>UNIX/Network Manager Phone: 970-491-0630
>Engineering Network Services Fax: 970-491-2465
>College of Engineering, CSU
>Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
C. J. Keist Email: cjay at engr.colostate.edu
UNIX/Network Manager Phone: 970-491-0630
Engineering Network Services Fax: 970-491-5569
College of Engineering, CSU
Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301
Return-Path: <dahouet at gmx.net>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B18442A5 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 8863 invoked by uid 0); 19 Jun 2001 21:42:20 -0000
Received: from adsl-4-105.adsl.easynet.fr (HELO mail.gmx.de)
(195.114.94.105) by mail.gmx.net (mail06) with SMTP; 19 Jun 2001
21:42:20 -0000
Message-ID: <200106192341500238.1BB66018 at mail.gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10106191342350.21040-100000 at sunray>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10106191342350.21040-100000 at sunray>
X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.20.02.00 (4)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:41:50 +0200
From: "linux" <dahouet at gmx.net>
To: "Christopher Keist" <C.J.cjay at engr.colostate.edu>,
samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Log files
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
i think your problem is that the samba 2.2 log everything to syslog
by default
so you have to put syslog=0 in your smb.conf to log to a log file
hope it helps !
@++
nico
Le 19/06/2001 ` 13:56 Christopher \ Keist a icrit :
>Hello,
> I just installed Samba 2.2 on RH7.1. Everything is running fine,
>except for one small detail. That is, samba is not creating any log files
>when clients connect to the shares. I specified my log file to point to
>/var/log/samba/log/log.%m. But no log files are being created. Following
>is the Global sections from the smb.conf file:
>
>[global]
> workgroup = ENGR_DOM
> server string = Samba Server
> security = SERVER
> password server = stout bock
> username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
> password level = 8
> log file = /var/log/samba/log/log.%m
> max log size = 50
> socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_KEEPALIVE
>SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
> load printers = No
> os level = 0
> dns proxy = No
> wins server = 129.82.224.21
> kernel oplocks = No
> remote announce = 129.82.224.21
> guest account = guest
> hosts allow = 129.82. 127.
> printing = lprng
> oplocks = No
>
>I have double checked the path, I have also permissions on the log
>directory to wide open (chmod 777), and still no log files are being
>created. What am I missing here?
>
>Thanks...
>
> C. J. Keist Email: cjay at engr.colostate.edu
>UNIX/Network Manager Phone: 970-491-0630
>Engineering Network Services Fax: 970-491-2465
>College of Engineering, CSU
>Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <bcaudle at hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from hotmail.com (oe44.law10.hotmail.com [64.4.14.16]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3CD42A5 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:10:57 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [64.192.118.189]
From: "Brandon Caudle" <bcaudle at hotmail.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106180054380.32736-100000 at cola.teststation.c
om>
Subject: Remote Domain Logons?
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:13:33 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
Message-ID: <OE44DsiIWeTlhxvzSoB0000b0bf at hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jun 2001 22:10:57.0608 (UTC)
FILETIME=[B7457480:01C0F90C]
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have set up a samba server at work where we have a dsl (telocity) and i
have a dsl at home (telocity) and i run windows 2000 at home is there any
way i can logon to the domain at work? If so how?
Brandon Caudle
Return-Path: <abeyn at monrovia.datadirectnet.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.monrovia.datadirectnet.com (unknown
[64.213.193.140]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F714D69
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 17538 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2001 21:07:48 -0000
Received: from guess.monrovia.datadirectnet.com (HELO
monrovia.datadirectnet.com) (10.123.1.106) by
dante.monrovia.datadirectnet.com with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 19 Jun
2001 21:07:48 -0000
Message-ID: <3B2FCF16.2910156F at monrovia.datadirectnet.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:15:50 -0700
From: Alexander Beyn <abeyn at monrovia.datadirectnet.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Cc: abeyn at monrovia.datadirectnet.com
Subject: samba 2.2 hang + 100% cpu usage
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I'm in the process of setting up a file/print server using samba 2.2,
and i've ran into a problem. Logging in as guest and making a copy of a
file or a directory on a samba share causes the smbd process servicing
the request to use up 100% cpu usage and not return to the client.
Server: samba 2.2.0, compiled from Debian 2.2.0-2 package
Linux 2.4.5 + XFS patch
P3 600, 512MB ram
Client: Win2k Pro SP2
Procedure: locate samba server in My Network Places
rightclick+drag directory to make a copy in the same share
explorer will hang now, until it times out, and then reestablishes the
connection
the "Copy of.." directory will be created, but the contents will not
have been copied.
Files: http://www.geocities.com/alexbeyn/smb.conf.txt
http://www.geocities.com/alexbeyn/log.smbd.txt
http://www.geocities.com/alexbeyn/ifconfig.log.txt
I'll be happy to provide more info.
Please cc me any reponses as I'm not subscribed to the list
Thanks,
Alexander
Return-Path: <mgahagan at redhat.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from phoenix.support.redhat.com (nat-pool-meridian.redhat.com
[199.183.24.200]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2F44442
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (mgahagan at localhost) by
phoenix.support.redhat.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5JMVg502916
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:31:42 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: phoenix.support.redhat.com: mgahagan owned
process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:31:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mike Gahagan <mgahagan at redhat.com>
X-X-Sender: <mgahagan at phoenix.support.redhat.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Slow write performance with Win 98 and Samba
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106191830420.1527-100000 at phoenix.support.red
hat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have been researching a problem with Windows 98 and Samba. The problem
is a significant slowdown in certain types of files transfers. This
appears to be a problem specific to a Windows 98 client uploading a file
to a Samba server which is in "server" security mode.
Problem Description
When the transfer is viewed with a network packet analyzer, two different
protocol modes are seen. Normally, Windows 98 will upload files using
large file chunks, of about 64K bytes in size. There are sent with either
an SMBwrite or an SMBwriteraw packet, followed by enough continuation
messages to transfer the 64K chunk. Windows 98 is free to send all 64K
without waiting for a reply. This is what I will call fast transfer mode.
The slow transfer mode is characterized by a small SMBwrite of only 1536
or fewer bytes, followed by an SMBflush command. There are two reasons
this is slow. The small packet size is all that Windows 98 can send before
having to wait for a reply. The flush command causes the remote file
system to write the bytes to disk before the flush reply can be sent back.
The Windows 98 client has to wait for both requests to travel the net and
be replied to before the next small chunk of the file can be sent.
Characterization
There are six conditions which must be in place in order for this problem
to occur:
1. The client must be Windows 98 (not Windows NT).
2. The server must be Samba (not Windows NT).
3. The Samba server must be in "security = server" mode (not share or
domain mode)
4. The file being transferred must be uploaded (not downloaded).
5. The file must be transferred by the Windows explorer (not a command
line copy).
6. The drive must have been mapped by name (not by IP address).
Using the six conditions, the problem is produced 100% of the time. If any
one of the conditions are changed, the problem is not produced. If any of
these six conditions are not met (are replaced by their alternative), then
Windows 98 will choose fast transfer mode. In condition two, Samba is
specified as the server. This is because we haven't tested with any other
type of server which is not participating in the Microsoft Networking
Domain as Windows NT would. Also, I did not mention Windows 98 in
condition two, because I have not tested with Windows 98 as the server.
Samba is certainly always affected by this, so it makes a good test
platform for reproducing the problem.
I have noticed during packet tracing that name resolution causes Windows
98 to open a session with the Samba server directly. If the IP address of
the Samba server is used instead, the name resolution system fails, and
Windows 98 resorts to doing an NBSTAT request to the Samba server itself.
This returns the full list of names the server has registered, which
Windows 98 then uses to open a direct session. When the latter name
resolution method is used, Windows 98 always chooses fast transfer mode in
any uploads to the drive being mapped. If the same drive is mapped by name
(even at the same time), all file uploads are in slow mode.
Putting the Samba server into domain mode was also tested. Named mapping
caused Windows 98 to choose fast transfer mode. The packet traces of a
server mode versus a domain mode name lookup, drive mapping, and file
transfer were compared, and no significant differences were found. What
was different was the name of the Samba server (two were used), the
session ID, the session key, the encrypted password, the multiplex ID, and
the TCP port, acknowledgement, and sequence numbers.
Test Data
I used the following minimal smb.conf files to produce this problem. The
tests were done on a Samba server running version 2.0.7, but I have
reports that this same problem can be demonstrated on later releases of
Samba. The Windows domain "CENTRAL" PDC, and the WINS server are the same
machine: A Windows NT server at 10.240.27.29. The use "tester" is a
valid user in the domain, and on the Samba server.
Here is the share mode smb.conf, which causes fast transfers no matter how
the drive is mapped:
[global]
workgroup = CENTRAL
security = share
interfaces = eth0
[test]
path = /test
writable = yes
guest ok = yes
guest only = yes
;end_of_section -- Tag line do not remove
Here is the server mode smb.conf I used. This configuration goes fast with
IP address mapped drives, and slow with name mapped drives:
[global]
workgroup = CENTRAL
security = server
encrypt passwords = yes
username level = 20
interfaces = eth0
password server = 10.240.27.29
[test]
path = /test
writable = yes
valid users = "tester"
;end_of_section -- Tag line do not remove
I have captured two packet traces using a third host which is attached to
the same 10baseT hub as the Windows 98 client. The first one shows a chunk
of a file being transferred in fast mode. This was captured with the
"security = server" smb.conf file in effect, with the drive mapped using
its IP address. One write raw packet is shown (with the large buffer size)
followed by one of the many continuation packets that are needed to write
the remaining bytes up to 64K. I can post the packet traces here if
needed.
This seems to be a problem with Windows 98 forcing the use of the small
block size, possibly because it doesn't think that the Samba server is an
authenicated member of the domain. Is there any workaround for this that
would force the client to always use the 64k block size through Windows
Explorer?
Thanks in advance...
Mike
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Gahagan, RHCE | Red Hat Inc.
Commercial Services Group | Meridian Office
mikeg at redhat.com | Durham, NC
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <kyoshida at mesco.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from front1.mail.megapathdsl.net (front1.mail.megapathdsl.net
[66.80.60.31]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0E24FAB
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [64.32.131.46] (HELO hydro.mesco.com) by
front1.mail.megapathdsl.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.7) with SMTP id
675997 for samba at lists.samba.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:37:27 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Kohei Yoshida <kyoshida at mesco.com>
Organization: Municipal Engineering Services Co., P.A.
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Slow write performance with Win 98 and Samba
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:38:36 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106191830420.1527-100000 at phoenix.support.red
hat.com>
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CPine=2ELNX=2E4=2E33=2E0106191830420=2E1527-100
000=40phoenix=2Esupport=2Ered?==?utf-8?q?
Message-ID: <auto-000000675997 at front1.mail.megapathdsl.net>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
=20=20hat=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01061918383603.18220 at hydro.mesco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Did you try this patch? I don't know if it's related to your problem thou.
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q236/9/26.asp
Kohei
On Tuesday 19 June 2001 18:31, you wrote:
> I have been researching a problem with Windows 98 and Samba. The problem
> is a significant slowdown in certain types of files transfers. This
> appears to be a problem specific to a Windows 98 client uploading a file
> to a Samba server which is in "server" security mode.
>
> Problem Description
>
> When the transfer is viewed with a network packet analyzer, two different
> protocol modes are seen. Normally, Windows 98 will upload files using
> large file chunks, of about 64K bytes in size. There are sent with either
> an SMBwrite or an SMBwriteraw packet, followed by enough continuation
> messages to transfer the 64K chunk. Windows 98 is free to send all 64K
> without waiting for a reply. This is what I will call fast transfer mode.
>
> The slow transfer mode is characterized by a small SMBwrite of only 1536
> or fewer bytes, followed by an SMBflush command. There are two reasons
> this is slow. The small packet size is all that Windows 98 can send before
> having to wait for a reply. The flush command causes the remote file
> system to write the bytes to disk before the flush reply can be sent back.
> The Windows 98 client has to wait for both requests to travel the net and
> be replied to before the next small chunk of the file can be sent.
>
> Characterization
>
> There are six conditions which must be in place in order for this problem
> to occur:
> 1. The client must be Windows 98 (not Windows NT).
> 2. The server must be Samba (not Windows NT).
> 3. The Samba server must be in "security = server" mode (not share or
> domain mode)
> 4. The file being transferred must be uploaded (not downloaded).
> 5. The file must be transferred by the Windows explorer (not a command
> line copy).
> 6. The drive must have been mapped by name (not by IP address).
>
> Using the six conditions, the problem is produced 100% of the time. If any
> one of the conditions are changed, the problem is not produced. If any of
> these six conditions are not met (are replaced by their alternative), then
> Windows 98 will choose fast transfer mode. In condition two, Samba is
> specified as the server. This is because we haven't tested with any other
> type of server which is not participating in the Microsoft Networking
> Domain as Windows NT would. Also, I did not mention Windows 98 in
> condition two, because I have not tested with Windows 98 as the server.
> Samba is certainly always affected by this, so it makes a good test
> platform for reproducing the problem.
>
> I have noticed during packet tracing that name resolution causes Windows
> 98 to open a session with the Samba server directly. If the IP address of
> the Samba server is used instead, the name resolution system fails, and
> Windows 98 resorts to doing an NBSTAT request to the Samba server itself.
> This returns the full list of names the server has registered, which
> Windows 98 then uses to open a direct session. When the latter name
> resolution method is used, Windows 98 always chooses fast transfer mode in
> any uploads to the drive being mapped. If the same drive is mapped by name
> (even at the same time), all file uploads are in slow mode.
>
> Putting the Samba server into domain mode was also tested. Named mapping
> caused Windows 98 to choose fast transfer mode. The packet traces of a
> server mode versus a domain mode name lookup, drive mapping, and file
> transfer were compared, and no significant differences were found. What
> was different was the name of the Samba server (two were used), the
> session ID, the session key, the encrypted password, the multiplex ID, and
> the TCP port, acknowledgement, and sequence numbers.
>
> Test Data
>
> I used the following minimal smb.conf files to produce this problem. The
> tests were done on a Samba server running version 2.0.7, but I have
> reports that this same problem can be demonstrated on later releases of
> Samba. The Windows domain "CENTRAL" PDC, and the WINS server are the same
> machine: A Windows NT server at 10.240.27.29. The use "tester" is a
> valid user in the domain, and on the Samba server.
>
> Here is the share mode smb.conf, which causes fast transfers no matter how
> the drive is mapped:
>
> [global]
> workgroup = CENTRAL
> security = share
>
> interfaces = eth0
>
> [test]
> path = /test
> writable = yes
> guest ok = yes
> guest only = yes
> ;end_of_section -- Tag line do not remove
>
> Here is the server mode smb.conf I used. This configuration goes fast with
> IP address mapped drives, and slow with name mapped drives:
>
> [global]
> workgroup = CENTRAL
> security = server
>
> encrypt passwords = yes
> username level = 20
> interfaces = eth0
> password server = 10.240.27.29
>
> [test]
> path = /test
> writable = yes
> valid users = "tester"
> ;end_of_section -- Tag line do not remove
>
>
> I have captured two packet traces using a third host which is attached to
> the same 10baseT hub as the Windows 98 client. The first one shows a chunk
> of a file being transferred in fast mode. This was captured with the
> "security = server" smb.conf file in effect, with the drive mapped using
> its IP address. One write raw packet is shown (with the large buffer size)
> followed by one of the many continuation packets that are needed to write
> the remaining bytes up to 64K. I can post the packet traces here if
> needed.
>
> This seems to be a problem with Windows 98 forcing the use of the small
> block size, possibly because it doesn't think that the Samba server is an
> authenicated member of the domain. Is there any workaround for this that
> would force the client to always use the 64k block size through Windows
> Explorer?
>
>
> Thanks in advance...
>
> Mike
Return-Path: <drankin at cox-internet.com>
Delivered-To: samba at us5.samba.org
Received: from europa.cox-internet.com (unknown [208.180.118.40]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B176242A5 for
<samba at us5.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cox-internet.com ([66.76.41.210]) by
europa.cox-internet.com (InterMail vK.4.02.00.10 201-232-116-110
license dd72657b95c070b1853187e4f5a0d6a7) with ESMTP id
<20010619224637.PJV1750.europa at cox-internet.com>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001
17:46:37 -0500
Message-ID: <3B2FD7AD.733E30E7 at cox-internet.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:52:29 -0500
From: David Rankin <drankin at cox-internet.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brandon Caudle <bcaudle at hotmail.com>
Cc: samba <samba at us5.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Remote Domain Logons?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106180054380.32736-100000 at cola.teststation.c
om> <OE44DsiIWeTlhxvzSoB0000b0bf at hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Brandon Caudle wrote:
> I have set up a samba server at work where we have a dsl (telocity) and i
> have a dsl at home (telocity) and i run windows 2000 at home is there any
> way i can logon to the domain at work? If so how?
>
> Brandon Caudle
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
I'm not an expert on this, but I have a samba server at work with cable
access and Win98 at home also with cable access. I use the pptpd daemon that
is part of the poptop VPN package available at poptop.lineo.com to do domain
logins from home using CHAP authentication. From home, I can browse the
network at work with Windows explorer just as if I was at the office. Works
great! Only problem so far is dhcp times out after 1hr. on the VPN connection
(sometimes sooner) and won't automatically re-authenticate which means
(reboot Windows) to re-establish the VPN connection. I haven't had time to
solve this, but I am generally not logged in for more than an hour anyway.
Visually, my poptop VPN setup is as follows:
Office <==> Linux <==> Linksys <==> [internet] <==> Win98 at home
Lan Samba Cable/DSL
Server Router
It takes a little tinkering to get it going, but works once configured. The
documentation is par for the state of development of the package. Give it a
look. Benefit -- It requires 1 less computer than IPSEC
--
David C. Rankin
Nacogdoches, Texas
Return-Path: <drankin at cox-internet.com>
Delivered-To: samba at us5.samba.org
Received: from europa.cox-internet.com (unknown [208.180.118.40]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5498A4F92 for
<samba at us5.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cox-internet.com ([66.76.41.210]) by
europa.cox-internet.com (InterMail vK.4.02.00.10 201-232-116-110
license dd72657b95c070b1853187e4f5a0d6a7) with ESMTP id
<20010619230108.VDE1750.europa at cox-internet.com>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001
18:01:08 -0500
Message-ID: <3B2FDB14.534FFF8A at cox-internet.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:07:00 -0500
From: David Rankin <drankin at cox-internet.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Gahagan <mgahagan at redhat.com>
Cc: samba <samba at us5.samba.org>, rbpllc at cox-internet.com
Subject: Re: Slow write performance with Win 98 and Samba
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106191830420.1527-100000 at phoenix.support.red
hat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have posted this same problem numerous times but I have never been able to
provide the detailed info Make has.
This is a real problem and it affects Win95 as well as Win98 (haven't tried
WinME). What is even stranger is that this problem comes and goes. (I don't know
what you have seen Mike, but I have cussed this problem for hours just to try the
transfer the next day and have it dissapear? - go figure)
I have generally experienced this problem trying to transfer files larger than
500K from within Windows Explorer to the Samba box. Like Mike says the Samba Box
to Windows transfer doesn't appear to be affected. I however have experienced this
problem while in user level security.
Mike Gahagan wrote:
> I have been researching a problem with Windows 98 and Samba. The problem
> is a significant slowdown in certain types of files transfers. This
> appears to be a problem specific to a Windows 98 client uploading a file
> to a Samba server which is in "server" security mode.
>
> Problem Description
>
> When the transfer is viewed with a network packet analyzer, two different
> protocol modes are seen. Normally, Windows 98 will upload files using
> large file chunks, of about 64K bytes in size. There are sent with either
> an SMBwrite or an SMBwriteraw packet, followed by enough continuation
> messages to transfer the 64K chunk. Windows 98 is free to send all 64K
> without waiting for a reply. This is what I will call fast transfer mode.
>
> The slow transfer mode is characterized by a small SMBwrite of only 1536
> or fewer bytes, followed by an SMBflush command. There are two reasons
> this is slow. The small packet size is all that Windows 98 can send before
> having to wait for a reply. The flush command causes the remote file
> system to write the bytes to disk before the flush reply can be sent back.
> The Windows 98 client has to wait for both requests to travel the net and
> be replied to before the next small chunk of the file can be sent.
>
> Characterization
>
> There are six conditions which must be in place in order for this problem
> to occur:
> 1. The client must be Windows 98 (not Windows NT).
> 2. The server must be Samba (not Windows NT).
> 3. The Samba server must be in "security = server" mode (not share or
> domain mode)
> 4. The file being transferred must be uploaded (not downloaded).
> 5. The file must be transferred by the Windows explorer (not a command
> line copy).
> 6. The drive must have been mapped by name (not by IP address).
>
> Using the six conditions, the problem is produced 100% of the time. If any
> one of the conditions are changed, the problem is not produced. If any of
> these six conditions are not met (are replaced by their alternative), then
> Windows 98 will choose fast transfer mode. In condition two, Samba is
> specified as the server. This is because we haven't tested with any other
> type of server which is not participating in the Microsoft Networking
> Domain as Windows NT would. Also, I did not mention Windows 98 in
> condition two, because I have not tested with Windows 98 as the server.
> Samba is certainly always affected by this, so it makes a good test
> platform for reproducing the problem.
>
> I have noticed during packet tracing that name resolution causes Windows
> 98 to open a session with the Samba server directly. If the IP address of
> the Samba server is used instead, the name resolution system fails, and
> Windows 98 resorts to doing an NBSTAT request to the Samba server itself.
> This returns the full list of names the server has registered, which
> Windows 98 then uses to open a direct session. When the latter name
> resolution method is used, Windows 98 always chooses fast transfer mode in
> any uploads to the drive being mapped. If the same drive is mapped by name
> (even at the same time), all file uploads are in slow mode.
>
> Putting the Samba server into domain mode was also tested. Named mapping
> caused Windows 98 to choose fast transfer mode. The packet traces of a
> server mode versus a domain mode name lookup, drive mapping, and file
> transfer were compared, and no significant differences were found. What
> was different was the name of the Samba server (two were used), the
> session ID, the session key, the encrypted password, the multiplex ID, and
> the TCP port, acknowledgement, and sequence numbers.
>
> Test Data
>
> I used the following minimal smb.conf files to produce this problem. The
> tests were done on a Samba server running version 2.0.7, but I have
> reports that this same problem can be demonstrated on later releases of
> Samba. The Windows domain "CENTRAL" PDC, and the WINS server are the same
> machine: A Windows NT server at 10.240.27.29. The use "tester" is a
> valid user in the domain, and on the Samba server.
>
> Here is the share mode smb.conf, which causes fast transfers no matter how
> the drive is mapped:
>
> [global]
> workgroup = CENTRAL
> security = share
>
> interfaces = eth0
>
> [test]
> path = /test
> writable = yes
> guest ok = yes
> guest only = yes
> ;end_of_section -- Tag line do not remove
>
> Here is the server mode smb.conf I used. This configuration goes fast with
> IP address mapped drives, and slow with name mapped drives:
>
> [global]
> workgroup = CENTRAL
> security = server
>
> encrypt passwords = yes
> username level = 20
> interfaces = eth0
> password server = 10.240.27.29
>
> [test]
> path = /test
> writable = yes
> valid users = "tester"
> ;end_of_section -- Tag line do not remove
>
> I have captured two packet traces using a third host which is attached to
> the same 10baseT hub as the Windows 98 client. The first one shows a chunk
> of a file being transferred in fast mode. This was captured with the
> "security = server" smb.conf file in effect, with the drive mapped using
> its IP address. One write raw packet is shown (with the large buffer size)
> followed by one of the many continuation packets that are needed to write
> the remaining bytes up to 64K. I can post the packet traces here if
> needed.
>
> This seems to be a problem with Windows 98 forcing the use of the small
> block size, possibly because it doesn't think that the Samba server is an
> authenicated member of the domain. Is there any workaround for this that
> would force the client to always use the 64k block size through Windows
> Explorer?
>
> Thanks in advance...
>
> Mike
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Mike Gahagan, RHCE | Red Hat Inc.
> Commercial Services Group | Meridian Office
> mikeg at redhat.com | Durham, NC
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
David C. Rankin
Nacogdoches, Texas
Return-Path: <tpot at samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 9224B4FBF;
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tim Potter <tpot at valinux.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15151.58590.185873.562159 at frungy.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:48:46 +1000 (EST)
To: David Brodbeck <DavidB at mail.interclean.com>
Cc: "'M. Kilroy'" <mekilroy at risingedge.com>, samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: *working* winbindd
In-Reply-To: <0F9D3D919AADD211BE7E00A0C99B842032438F at mail.interclean.com
>
References: <0F9D3D919AADD211BE7E00A0C99B842032438F at mail.interclean.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
David Brodbeck writes:
> It worked for me using the version that was in the samba-appliance-0.5-1
> rpm. Unfortunately that's now been taken down as obsolete. I'm not sure
> what's been done since to break it, but the version in the current HEAD CVS
> sure doesn't work. Kinda seems like one step forward and two back
> sometimes, doesn't it?
OK - I've reinstated the 0.5-1 rpms due to popular demand. (-:
Tim.
Return-Path: <blue at mail.gator.net>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.gator.net (mail.gator.net [209.251.152.21]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B4B4FD7 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (blue at localhost) by mail.gator.net
(Switch-2.0.5/Switch-2.0.5) with ESMTP id f5K0Vgd27877; Tue, 19 Jun
2001 20:31:42 -0400
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:31:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: spot the dog <blue at gator.net>
To: Alexander Beyn <abeyn at monrovia.datadirectnet.com>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: samba 2.2 hang + 100% cpu usage
In-Reply-To: <3B2FCF16.2910156F at monrovia.datadirectnet.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106192027320.11692-100000 at mail.gator.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Alexander Beyn wrote:
> I'm in the process of setting up a file/print server using samba 2.2,
> and i've ran into a problem. Logging in as guest and making a copy of a
> file or a directory on a samba share causes the smbd process servicing
> the request to use up 100% cpu usage and not return to the client.
if it makes you feel any better, i had the same behavior under stock
redhat 7.1. i solved it by upgrading to 2.0.8. :) i was using 2.2
downloaded from CVS yesterday, RH7.1 on a pIII 800, 100GB software RAID0
w/ext2.
> Procedure: locate samba server in My Network Places
> rightclick+drag directory to make a copy in the same
> share
> explorer will hang now, until it times out, and then
> reestablishes the connection
> the "Copy of.." directory will be created, but the
> contents will not have been copied.
oh, actually, mine was different.. i was deleting a couple GB of files and
closed explorer in the middle of the operation. samba went to 100% and sat
there. i already had 2.0.8 installed, so i just shut 2.2 down and switched
it over.
(emergency server build, didn't have time to play with it, sorry for the
half-assed bug report.)
--
blue
Return-Path: <ygwang at prosten.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from www.uphosting.com.br (unknown [66.70.16.230]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43288421F for
<samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wangyouguo ([210.5.18.79]) by www.uphosting.com.br
(8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5JI5YM05043; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:05:34
GMT (envelope-from ygwang at prosten.com)
Message-ID: <000b01c0f92c$2a7ee390$7a0245a8 at wangyouguo>
From: "Wang Youguo" <ygwang at prosten.com>
To: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>, <samba at samba.org>
References: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050ADD at xatl02.atl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: Would you please help me?
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:55:59 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
It is very kind of you to give me the answer.
The steps I have done list below:
(1) Download samba-2.2.0.tar.gz and decompress it
(2) Compile and install samba step by step according to the docs in directory \docs\htmldocs\using_samba, and everything is OK
(3) Add 'encrypt password = yes' to /etc/smb.conf
(4) Run adduser to add a Linix user, then run smbpasswd to add the same user to smbpasswd. It seemed OK.
(5) Edit /etc/smb.conf to share one directory, run testparm, the result is ok
(6) At Winnt4 client, the shared samba machine can be seen, but when I want to open the folder, I always got the 'no right to login' message.
So, my big trouble is I can see the beautiful apple but I can not eat it!
Would you please give me more suggestion?Thanks.
Best Regards,
Kerry Wang
----- Original Message -----
From: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) <don_mccall at hp.com>
To: 'Wang Youguo' <ygwang at prosten.com>; <samba at samba.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 5:51 AM
Subject: RE: Would you please help me?
> Hi,
> I see that you added the user to the smbpasswd file,
> but did you add the user of the same name to your /etc/passwd file as well
> (or is there already a linux user in the /etc/passwd file with the same
> name?)
> Hope this helps,
> don
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang Youguo [mailto:ygwang at prosten.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 4:31 AM
> To: samba at samba.org
> Subject: Would you please help me?
>
>
> Dear my Savior,
>
> I have a big trouble in configuring SAMBA. I am wondering if I could get
> some help from you. My problem is descripted here:
>
> SAMBA is installed in a RedHat Linux server and is configured, and
> The machine can be seen from my WinNT4 client, but I can not login when I
> want to open the shared folder! I got a 'no right' message every time.
>
> The following steps have been done:
> (1) 'encrypt password =yes' is added into /etc/smb.conf
> (2) 'smbpasswd -a username' is done and I can see the added user in the
> file: /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd
>
> I have been confused for 2 days, would you please help me? PLEASE!
> By the way, I am not familiar with Linux!
> Thanks! Thanks! Thanks!
>
> Best Regards,
> Kerry Wang
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
Return-Path: <ygwang at prosten.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from www.uphosting.com.br (unknown [66.70.16.230]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE16C440D for
<samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wangyouguo ([210.5.18.79]) by www.uphosting.com.br
(8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5JIPpM05159; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:25:52
GMT (envelope-from ygwang at prosten.com)
Message-ID: <001701c0f92e$ffeb81d0$7a0245a8 at wangyouguo>
From: "Wang Youguo" <ygwang at prosten.com>
To: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>, <samba at samba.org>
References: <3B2F768F.20836.1AB5449 at localhost>
Subject: Re: Would you please help me?
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:16:20 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
Thanks for your answer.
I have not specified any option when I ran ./configure.
You said that the smb.conf used by samba is in /usr/local/samba/lib directory?! But I found that it used the one in /etc directory! When I deleted /etc/smb.conf, the testparm did not run and samba server in linuxconf could not be configured!
So, perhaps this is the point. But how could I solve this problem?
Best Regards,
Kerry Wang
----- Original Message -----
From: Christian Barth <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: Wang Youguo <ygwang at prosten.com>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: Would you please help me?
> > Dear Mr. Barth,
> >
> > It is very kind of you to give me the answer.
> Please answer to the list as well, so that other can help you too.
>
> > I download the Samba file(samba-2.2.0.tar.gz), decompressed, compiled and installed it step by step according to the docs in directory \docs\htmldocs\using_samba, all by myself. And there is no any problem in the case.
> Good approach.
> Have you specified any compaile time options wicht /.configure? If
> not, /etc/smb.conf should be left from the RedHat-Install (Or has
> this changed with 2.2???) and your smb.conf must be in
> /usr/local/samba/lib. Make install doesn't create one by default.
> Move your /etc/smb.conf to /usr/local/samba/lib and try again.
>
> > Yes, the RedHat is shipped with samba, but the samba shipped seemed not running. I have not uninstalled the old one, but when I run the testparm, the results displayed seemed right. I run linuxconf to see the samba server configuration, it also seems right.
> >
> > I am not farmiliar with linux. I am wondering if it is relevant to the privilege of the user account i used.
> You must be root to start samba and to add a user to smbpasswd. But
> there should be errors if you are not.
>
> Christian
>
> > Would you please give me more suggestion? Thanks.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Kerry Wang
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Christian Barth <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
> > To: <samba at samba.org>; Wang Youguo <ygwang at prosten.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 7:04 PM
> > Subject: Re: Would you please help me?
> >
> >
> > > > Dear my Savior,
> > > >
> > > > I have a big trouble in configuring SAMBA. I am wondering if I could get some help from you. My problem is descripted here:
> > > >
> > > > SAMBA is installed in a RedHat Linux server and is configured, and
> > > > The machine can be seen from my WinNT4 client, but I can not login when I want to open the shared folder! I got a 'no right' message every time.
> > > >
> > > > The following steps have been done:
> > > > (1) 'encrypt password =yes' is added into /etc/smb.conf
> > > > (2) 'smbpasswd -a username' is done and I can see the added user in the file: /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd
> > > Have you installed the compailed rpm-version or have you compailed
> > > samba your self? /etc/smb.conf looks like a file location of RedHat,
> > > /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd like a file location of a self
> > > compailed version. If you have compailed it your self: Have you
> > > deinstalled the samba that ships with RedHat? I suspect you have 2
> > > versions of samba installed: one is configured to use encrypted
> > > passwords, one has the smbpasswd file. BTW: Have you run testparam?
> > >
> > > Christian
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I have been confused for 2 days, would you please help me? PLEASE!
> > > > By the way, I am not familiar with Linux!
> > > > Thanks! Thanks! Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Kerry Wang
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
> > >
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
>
Return-Path: <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A99421F for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19
Jun 2001 19:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as5-89.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.14.89]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2)
with ESMTP id f5K2KtI12596; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:20:56 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root at yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
MAA08612; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:20:28 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet at piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
MAA04194; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:20:27 +1000
Message-ID: <3B30086B.504E42BE at bartlett.house>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:20:27 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Reply-To: abartlet at samba.org
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: JVergara at equinox.com
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Samba log errors
References: <OF4197630C.1DB39627-ON85256A70.005B36C9 at EQUINOX.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
JVergara at equinox.com wrote:
>
> I have been using samba 2.0.7 and lprng with linux redhat 6.2 for a
> while witth a windows multiuser database application that runs from a
> share volume in the samba server. The problem is that lately the
> users are complaining of computer lock ups when trying to insert a
> record , or they complain that they entered a record and later on the
> record dissapeared from the database.
I would need your smb.conf file to comment any futher, as samba has a
plethora of locking options available. What database app is it? MS
Access?
Snip printing problems.
> The user does not have other choice but
> resetting the computer and to login again (obviously from the same ip
> address) - samba does not clear the first connection and first locks
> to the database files and shows a second brand new connection for the
> same user. This user opens the database app. and files and begins to
> work. Suddenly if somebody else tries to create records on the same
> database files opened by the client with two conections on smbstatus -
> they get lock up and they can not do anything until manually
> somebody checks smbstatus and kills the older conection of the person
> (ip address) with two connections to the shared folders.
>
> How can we fix the two problems described before?
> - computer gets lock up when printing several jobs to printer shared
> by samba.
Can't help you here, but one of the big things with Samba 2.2 was
sorting out printing, so you might give it a shot.
> - Samba does not clear connection when computer is reset, allowing
> more than one connection to the same folder from one computer (ip
> address).
This is fixed is current CVS, with samba doing a better job of cleaning
up when it is forced to shutdown (broken pipes and the like) and with
samba doing a better job of cleaning up after other dead smbds.
> Below, I show different errors from the samba logs for different
> users. I don't know if those errors are harmless, or potentially
> desastrous for a database integrity and multiuser set up.
The latter, unfotunetly. Data won't get lost, but users won't get any
work done either.
I understand that Andrew Tridgell is doing some work on Oplocks at the
moment, so the underlying cause should be sorted out pretty soon.
(Apparently we are actualy pretty broken at the moment, becouse we
didn't have any tests for it. He is fixing that...)
I would suggest that you run 2.2.1 when it comes out, as it looks like
it will have knocked off many of these issues. Samba 2.2.0 was meant to
fix many of these things, and introduced support for kenel oplocks with
2.4 kernels, but there have been mixed experiences amoungst others on
the list - so while it might be worth a try, keep a close eye on it.
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at samba.org
>
> log.freddy:84: write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
> log.freddy:86: write_socket: Error writing 206 bytes to socket 9:
> ERRNO = Broke
> n pipe
> log.freddy:88: Error writing 206 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
> log.kathy.1.1:251: read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = No
> route to ho
> st
> log.kathy.1.1:253: receive_smb error (No route to host) exiting
> log.lorenzo:36: write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
> log.lorenzo:38: write_socket: Error writing 206 bytes to socket 9:
> ERRNO = Brok
> en pipe
> log.lorenzo:40: Error writing 206 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
> log.lorenzo:60: write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
> log.lorenzo:62: write_socket: Error writing 206 bytes to socket 9:
> ERRNO = Brok
> en pipe
> log.lorenzo:64: Error writing 206 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
> log.lorenzo.1.1:437: read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error =
> Connection r
> eset by peer
> log.lorenzo.1.1:529: write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken
> pipe
> log.lorenzo.1.1:531: write_socket: Error writing 206 bytes to socket
> 9: ERRNO =
> Broken pipe
> log.lorenzo.1.1:533: Error writing 206 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
> log.lorenzo.1.1:535: write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken
> pipe
> log.lorenzo.1.1:537: write_socket: Error writing 206 bytes to socket
> 9: ERRNO =
> Broken pipe
> log.lorenzo.1.1:539: Error writing 206 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
> log.ruben.1:4: read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error =
> Connection reset b
> y peer
> log.smb.1.1.1:114: Failed to set socket option SO_KEEPALIVE (Error
> Bad file des
> criptor)
> log.smb.1.1.1:116: Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY (Error Bad
> file desc
> riptor)
> log.smb.1.1.1:118: Failed to set socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY (Error
> Bad file d
> escriptor)
> log.zenaida.1.1:1410: read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error =
> Connection
> reset by peer
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
abartlet at samba.org
Return-Path: <Makis.Marmaridis at learnnow.com.au>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from exchange.angusknight.com.au (unknown [203.111.32.252]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C33421C for
<samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from akln01 (203.111.32.252 [203.111.32.252]) by
exchange.angusknight.com.au with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet
Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id N1T1M480; Wed, 20 Jun 2001
12:32:18 +1000
From: "Makis Marmaridis" <Makis.Marmaridis at learnnow.com.au>
To: <ctooley at amoa.org>
Cc: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: RE: Force User:Group
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:35:03 +1000
Message-ID: <000801c0f931$9ce4d4d0$943c0a0a at akln01>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <86256A70.00711998.00 at amoa.org>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Yes, this is very possible!
You can certainly have directories inside a share and using the permissions
on the filesystem you can then set appropriate permissions for users and/or
groups for either entire directories or files within them.
Say you have in your file system
/common
/dir1
/dir2
/dir3
you can share "common" so when people connect to this share they'll
effectively see the three directories inside it. Then depending on the
filesystem permissions you set on the directories they will or won't be able
to access them.
HTH,
Cheers,
Makis.
-----Original Message-----
From: samba-admin at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin at lists.samba.org]On
Behalf Of ctooley at amoa.org
Sent: Wednesday, 20 June 2001 6:35 AM
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: Re:Force User:Group
I need to be able to specify directories within a share, as some of the
directories have different user:group owners than others. I think this may
have
to be done at the filesystem level... is that possible?
Chris Tooley
Bill Grzanich <organix4 at mindspring.com> on 06/19/2001 03:15:57 PM
To: Chris Tooley/AMOA at AMOA
cc:
Subject Re:Force User:Group
:
Hi, Chris!
Original message from: ctooley at amoa.org
>Is there a way to force writes to a specific directory to write the file as
a
>different User or Group that the person writing to it. The reason I ask
is...
>
<snip>
Yep... add "force user = [some name]" to your share definition. For
example:
[cmplianc]
comment = Compliance share
path=/home/groups/cmplianc
valid users = @cmplianc, @it
public = No
writable = Yes
printable = No
force user = cmplianc
Hope this helps.
-Bill Grzanich
IT Manager
ORGANICS/LaGrange, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <bcaudle at hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba at us5.samba.org
Received: from hotmail.com (oe23.law10.hotmail.com [64.4.14.80]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B44421C for
<samba at us5.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:52:57 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [64.192.118.189]
From: "Brandon Caudle" <bcaudle at hotmail.com>
To: <samba at us5.samba.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106180054380.32736-100000 at cola.teststation.c
om> <OE44DsiIWeTlhxvzSoB0000b0bf at hotmail.com>
<3B2FD7AD.733E30E7 at cox-internet.com>
Subject: Re: Remote Domain Logons?
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 22:55:34 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
Message-ID: <OE23DUWpcOGoMPqXQGW0000b37e at hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jun 2001 02:52:57.0844 (UTC)
FILETIME=[1C849340:01C0F934]
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
If we do not use dhcp does it matter?
Brandon Caudle
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Rankin" <drankin at cox-internet.com>
To: "Brandon Caudle" <bcaudle at hotmail.com>
Cc: "samba" <samba at us5.samba.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: Remote Domain Logons?
> Brandon Caudle wrote:
>
> > I have set up a samba server at work where we have a dsl (telocity) and
i
> > have a dsl at home (telocity) and i run windows 2000 at home is there
any
> > way i can logon to the domain at work? If so how?
> >
> > Brandon Caudle
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
> I'm not an expert on this, but I have a samba server at work with cable
> access and Win98 at home also with cable access. I use the pptpd daemon
that
> is part of the poptop VPN package available at poptop.lineo.com to do
domain
> logins from home using CHAP authentication. From home, I can browse the
> network at work with Windows explorer just as if I was at the office.
Works
> great! Only problem so far is dhcp times out after 1hr. on the VPN
connection
> (sometimes sooner) and won't automatically re-authenticate which means
> (reboot Windows) to re-establish the VPN connection. I haven't had time to
> solve this, but I am generally not logged in for more than an hour anyway.
> Visually, my poptop VPN setup is as follows:
>
> Office <==> Linux <==> Linksys <==> [internet] <==> Win98 at home
> Lan Samba Cable/DSL
> Server Router
>
> It takes a little tinkering to get it going, but works once configured.
The
> documentation is par for the state of development of the package. Give it
a
> look. Benefit -- It requires 1 less computer than IPSEC
>
> --
> David C. Rankin
> Nacogdoches, Texas
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
Return-Path: <bcaudle at hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba at us5.samba.org
Received: from hotmail.com (oe31.law10.hotmail.com [64.4.14.88]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62C24411 for
<samba at us5.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:53:49 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [64.192.118.189]
From: "Brandon Caudle" <bcaudle at hotmail.com>
To: <samba at us5.samba.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106180054380.32736-100000 at cola.teststation.c
om> <OE44DsiIWeTlhxvzSoB0000b0bf at hotmail.com>
<3B2FD7AD.733E30E7 at cox-internet.com>
Subject: Re: Remote Domain Logons?
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 22:56:27 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
Message-ID: <OE31X4SKJ0XgixKVVgx00001ce1 at hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jun 2001 02:53:49.0435 (UTC)
FILETIME=[3B44BCB0:01C0F934]
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Sorry But i will also be using windows 2000 pro/server
Brandon
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Rankin" <drankin at cox-internet.com>
To: "Brandon Caudle" <bcaudle at hotmail.com>
Cc: "samba" <samba at us5.samba.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: Remote Domain Logons?
> Brandon Caudle wrote:
>
> > I have set up a samba server at work where we have a dsl (telocity) and
i
> > have a dsl at home (telocity) and i run windows 2000 at home is there
any
> > way i can logon to the domain at work? If so how?
> >
> > Brandon Caudle
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
> I'm not an expert on this, but I have a samba server at work with cable
> access and Win98 at home also with cable access. I use the pptpd daemon
that
> is part of the poptop VPN package available at poptop.lineo.com to do
domain
> logins from home using CHAP authentication. From home, I can browse the
> network at work with Windows explorer just as if I was at the office.
Works
> great! Only problem so far is dhcp times out after 1hr. on the VPN
connection
> (sometimes sooner) and won't automatically re-authenticate which means
> (reboot Windows) to re-establish the VPN connection. I haven't had time to
> solve this, but I am generally not logged in for more than an hour anyway.
> Visually, my poptop VPN setup is as follows:
>
> Office <==> Linux <==> Linksys <==> [internet] <==> Win98 at home
> Lan Samba Cable/DSL
> Server Router
>
> It takes a little tinkering to get it going, but works once configured.
The
> documentation is par for the state of development of the package. Give it
a
> look. Benefit -- It requires 1 less computer than IPSEC
>
> --
> David C. Rankin
> Nacogdoches, Texas
>
>
>
Return-Path: <gcarter at valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7139342FF; Tue, 19 Jun 2001
21:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (root at ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by
Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA14106; Tue, 19 Jun 2001
23:31:00 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:34:03 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter at pogo.plainjoe.org>
To: Patrick Goetz <pgoetz at mail.ma.utexas.edu>
Cc: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Re: Making Samba printers available to All Domain Users
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0104252034470.18395-100000 at linux97.ma.utexas
.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106192214240.1834-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
OK. Here is the low down from all my experience over the past
couple of months.
In Samba 2.0 all printers were installed as local printers
on NT clients because we did not support the SPOOLSS set of
MSRPCs. Windows NT/2000 views local printers as available
for all users. However "printer connections" are available for
the user who installed it.
This explains the new behavior people are seeing with Samba 2.2
when using the "point & print" features. The interesting thing
is that Win NT 4.0 did it the same way as Win2k, it's just that
Samba only support lanman printing and so these "local printers"
on the Nt clients were seem by all users who logged in.
If you want a printer to be vieable for all users, it must be
installed on the NT/2000 client as a local printer.
Now the bad news, a design flaw in 2.2.0 prevents you from
installing a local printer driver of your choice for a Samba
printer. This has been fixed for 2.2.1 and you will be able
to install these as "local" printers. The fix was
literally one line of code. :-) This solution is not
pretty, nor is it without shortcomings, but it will get the
job done.
Apparently what is happening is that Samba print servers allow
us to do things which a Windows NT print server will not allow
(like sharing a printer which has not printer driver assigned
to it). Of course, you can get the same behavior with Windows
NT if you connect to an NT print server of one arch (e.g. i386)
from a client of another arch (e.g. alpha) and try to connect to
a printer which doesn't have a driver for the client arch
installed. But I digress....
Cheers, jerry
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Patrick Goetz wrote:
> Progress Report:
>
> I've done a little more research on this issue, trolling the Microsoft
> support database and deja.com. Apparently setting up network printers
> on W2K machines so that they are available to any domain user who logs
> in on the machine is not at all straight forward, and requires one to
> invoke bizarre and convoluted logon script commands - see, for example
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q189/1/05.ASP
>
>
> If anyone knows a simpler way to do this, I'd love to hear about it.
> Apparently the idea that everyone who uses a particular machine might
> want to have a particular printer availalble to them never occurred to
> Microsoft. Well, at least Active Directory Services are simple and
> elegant. >;-)
>
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <jordan at digital6.net>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail4.mmcable.com (fe4.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.163.51]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3CF4247 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 21:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mango ([65.26.221.78]) by mail4.mmcable.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:53:34 -0500
From: "Jordan Snyder" <jordan at digital6.net>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: weird problem
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:55:01 -0500
Message-ID: <NFBBKDFEOLCOLAGANIAEIEIICAAA.jordan at digital6.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
I'm connecting from a win98 box at home, to my Unix server that is colocated
with a different ISP. So, our IPs aren't on the same subnet.
Anyway, I'm running the nmbd and smbd on the Unix server, and I created
shares in my smb.conf file, and I'm trying to connect from my win98 machine
at home. I added the file c:\windows\Lmhosts and put
$ipOfServer wwwServer #PRE
in that file.
then I try to map a drive letter to
\\wwwServer\www
It sometimes asks for a password for that share, sometimes it will say
"Network is busy" and exit.
If it does happen to ask for a password, it will accept the password and
wait a while and then say "The computer or share name could not be found.
Please check that you typed it correctly and try again."
Sometimes it will give this message without even asking me for a password!!
So, to me, it's impossible to find out what's going on. I don't know if I
missed something on the Windows side, Unix side, or if the problem arises
from the fact that the boxes are across the Internet from each other. In
any case, I would greatly appreciate any help anyone has to offer. I've had
my share of TFM, that's why I'm here. (:
Thanks,
Jordan Snyder
Return-Path: <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF884210 for
<samba at samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 22:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5K5kVu19793; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:46:31 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id HAA16226; Wed, 20
Jun 2001 07:46:29 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA15020; Wed, 20 Jun
2001 07:46:29 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: <ctooley at amoa.org>, "Makis Marmaridis"
<Makis.Marmaridis at learnnow.com.au>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:46:27 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: RE: Force User:Group
Cc: <samba at samba.org>
Message-ID: <3B3054D3.26881.E2D5B at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <000801c0f931$9ce4d4d0$943c0a0a at akln01>
References: <86256A70.00711998.00 at amoa.org>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Yes, this is very possible!
>
> You can certainly have directories inside a share and using the permissions
> on the filesystem you can then set appropriate permissions for users and/or
> groups for either entire directories or files within them.
>
> Say you have in your file system
>
> /common
> /dir1
> /dir2
> /dir3
>
> you can share "common" so when people connect to this share they'll
> effectively see the three directories inside it. Then depending on the
> filesystem permissions you set on the directories they will or won't be able
> to access them.
And for the new files to get the group you want, do a "chgrp newgroup
directory" and then a chmod g+s directory. This stick-bit forces new
files to get the group auf the directory and not the primary group of
the creator on the unix level. Unfortunatly this is only respected by
samba with "inherit permissions = yes" in smb.conf. But this is a
cool thing, too, which conforms to NT standard.
Christian
>
> HTH,
>
> Cheers,
> Makis.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: samba-admin at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin at lists.samba.org]On
> Behalf Of ctooley at amoa.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 June 2001 6:35 AM
> To: samba at samba.org
> Subject: Re:Force User:Group
>
>
> I need to be able to specify directories within a share, as some of the
> directories have different user:group owners than others. I think this may
> have
> to be done at the filesystem level... is that possible?
>
> Chris Tooley
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Bill Grzanich <organix4 at mindspring.com> on 06/19/2001 03:15:57 PM
>
>
>
> To: Chris Tooley/AMOA at AMOA
>
> cc:
>
>
>
> Subject Re:Force User:Group
> :
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi, Chris!
>
> Original message from: ctooley at amoa.org
> >Is there a way to force writes to a specific directory to write the file as
> a
> >different User or Group that the person writing to it. The reason I ask
> is...
> >
> <snip>
>
> Yep... add "force user = [some name]" to your share definition. For
> example:
>
> [cmplianc]
> comment = Compliance share
> path=/home/groups/cmplianc
> valid users = @cmplianc, @it
> public = No
> writable = Yes
> printable = No
> force user = cmplianc
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> -Bill Grzanich
> IT Manager
> ORGANICS/LaGrange, Inc.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <omega at temple-baptist.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail3.aracnet.com (mail3.aracnet.com [216.99.193.38]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC924C23 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alpha.temple-baptist.com (temple-baptist.com
[216.99.217.68]) by mail3.aracnet.com (8.11.4/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5K6Df612253; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:13:42 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
alpha.temple-baptist.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f5K6E2l02070;
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:14:02 -0700
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Erik Walthinsen <omega at temple-baptist.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Cc: Paul Flood <paul at temple-baptist.com>, Gregory Leblanc
<gleblanc at cu-portland.edu>
Subject: Extremely slow transfers into Windoze clients
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106192236020.29339-100000 at alpha.temple-bapti
st.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have a network that consists of about a half-dozen Windoze clients, all
Win98SE except one (that one is getting upgraded soon), and a Linux
server/masquerading gateway. We're not using Samba much on the server
yet, but people in the office are starting to realize that when the
secretary shuts off her computer at night, the 'database' goes away <g>
The network has a D-Link 24-port 100Mbps switch at the center, with cat5
to the machines (run in the last couple months), and Netgear FA-310TX
boards in most of the machine (eepro100 in the linux box). Transfer
speeds from linux to linux over ttcp and ftp and such are just fine.
Transfering files from the Windoze box to the Linux box via FTP (initiated
on the Windoze box obviously) are also reasonably fast.
The problem comes when the Windoze machine tries to copy a file from an
SMB share, whether it's on the Linux machine or any of the Windoze
machines. I timed several transfers from the Linux machine at almost
exactly 128Kbps. Switch obviously won't let me snoop windoze->windoze
traffic, but it seems to take about the same time. Copying from the
Windoze box to any other machine is lightning fast, like all other
transfers.
Using smbclient to push files onto the Windoze machine I think takes
forever, but I can't remember at this instant. I'll test it tomorrow when
some of the machines are back on. For reference, two Win95 machines on
the network function perfectly, getting 500KB and 2MB/sec for 10Mbps and
100Mbps-connected machines, resp.
IPX/SPX was installed on two of the Windoze machines as a test, and the
transfers suddenly sped up to full speed, both directions. However,
that's not going to be a solution when we start using the Linux machine
more as a heavy file server.
I've searched all over the net and through the archives, and I've found
some similar situations, but mostly with the speed problem the other way,
typically caused by some socket option issue on the Samba side. Several
mentioned switching from full to half duplex, but this only affects SMB IP
traffic going one way.
I've also heard rumors of Microsoft intentionally crippling Windoze
clients in the absense of a WindozeNT server, but I can't find information
on that on the web at the moment.
I could use some pointers here as to what to check out. I've messed with
all the normal parameters in the samba config, but I'm pretty sure it's
not a samba-releted problem, per se. I should try powering down the Linux
machine for a few minutes and see if there's any change in the behavior of
the Windoze machines... I can try that tomorrow some time.
Attached is my current smb.conf. Please send replies directly, as I'm not
on the list (on enough lists as it is <g>).
TIA,
Omega
Erik Walthinsen <omega at temple-baptist.com> - System Administrator
__
/ \ GStreamer - The only way to stream!
| | M E G A ***** http://gstreamer.net/ *****
_\ /_
Return-Path: <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53901425E for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5K6g7u24486; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:42:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id IAA17594; Wed, 20
Jun 2001 08:42:06 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA16701; Wed, 20 Jun
2001 08:42:07 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>, Mike Gahagan <mgahagan at redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:42:05 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Slow write performance with Win 98 and Samba
Cc: allesysadmins at cck.uni-kl.de
Message-ID: <3B3061DD.28119.411904 at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106191830420.1527-100000 at phoenix.support.re
d hat.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Good work Mike!
The big performance difference between mapping to name or to IP
address happens as well with some file transfers (by applications,
not by copying) from samba 2.0.7 to NT4 SP6a (5?) on a quite fast 100
Mbit network.
Christian
P.S. (for my colleagues):
Beim kopieren beobachte ich es nicht, aber bei unserem tesatast-
Programm ld_t es sich sehr gut zeigen. Kann jemand bitte mal Access
ausprobieren?
> I have been researching a problem with Windows 98 and Samba. The problem
> is a significant slowdown in certain types of files transfers. This
> appears to be a problem specific to a Windows 98 client uploading a file
> to a Samba server which is in "server" security mode.
>
> Problem Description
>
> When the transfer is viewed with a network packet analyzer, two different
> protocol modes are seen. Normally, Windows 98 will upload files using
> large file chunks, of about 64K bytes in size. There are sent with either
> an SMBwrite or an SMBwriteraw packet, followed by enough continuation
> messages to transfer the 64K chunk. Windows 98 is free to send all 64K
> without waiting for a reply. This is what I will call fast transfer mode.
>
> The slow transfer mode is characterized by a small SMBwrite of only 1536
> or fewer bytes, followed by an SMBflush command. There are two reasons
> this is slow. The small packet size is all that Windows 98 can send before
> having to wait for a reply. The flush command causes the remote file
> system to write the bytes to disk before the flush reply can be sent back.
> The Windows 98 client has to wait for both requests to travel the net and
> be replied to before the next small chunk of the file can be sent.
>
> Characterization
>
> There are six conditions which must be in place in order for this problem
> to occur:
> 1. The client must be Windows 98 (not Windows NT).
> 2. The server must be Samba (not Windows NT).
> 3. The Samba server must be in "security = server" mode (not share or
> domain mode)
> 4. The file being transferred must be uploaded (not downloaded).
> 5. The file must be transferred by the Windows explorer (not a command
> line copy).
> 6. The drive must have been mapped by name (not by IP address).
>
> Using the six conditions, the problem is produced 100% of the time. If any
> one of the conditions are changed, the problem is not produced. If any of
> these six conditions are not met (are replaced by their alternative), then
> Windows 98 will choose fast transfer mode. In condition two, Samba is
> specified as the server. This is because we haven't tested with any other
> type of server which is not participating in the Microsoft Networking
> Domain as Windows NT would. Also, I did not mention Windows 98 in
> condition two, because I have not tested with Windows 98 as the server.
> Samba is certainly always affected by this, so it makes a good test
> platform for reproducing the problem.
>
> I have noticed during packet tracing that name resolution causes Windows
> 98 to open a session with the Samba server directly. If the IP address of
> the Samba server is used instead, the name resolution system fails, and
> Windows 98 resorts to doing an NBSTAT request to the Samba server itself.
> This returns the full list of names the server has registered, which
> Windows 98 then uses to open a direct session. When the latter name
> resolution method is used, Windows 98 always chooses fast transfer mode in
> any uploads to the drive being mapped. If the same drive is mapped by name
> (even at the same time), all file uploads are in slow mode.
>
> Putting the Samba server into domain mode was also tested. Named mapping
> caused Windows 98 to choose fast transfer mode. The packet traces of a
> server mode versus a domain mode name lookup, drive mapping, and file
> transfer were compared, and no significant differences were found. What
> was different was the name of the Samba server (two were used), the
> session ID, the session key, the encrypted password, the multiplex ID, and
> the TCP port, acknowledgement, and sequence numbers.
>
> Test Data
>
> I used the following minimal smb.conf files to produce this problem. The
> tests were done on a Samba server running version 2.0.7, but I have
> reports that this same problem can be demonstrated on later releases of
> Samba. The Windows domain "CENTRAL" PDC, and the WINS server are the same
> machine: A Windows NT server at 10.240.27.29. The use "tester" is a
> valid user in the domain, and on the Samba server.
>
> Here is the share mode smb.conf, which causes fast transfers no matter how
> the drive is mapped:
>
> [global]
> workgroup = CENTRAL
> security = share
>
> interfaces = eth0
>
> [test]
> path = /test
> writable = yes
> guest ok = yes
> guest only = yes
> ;end_of_section -- Tag line do not remove
>
> Here is the server mode smb.conf I used. This configuration goes fast with
> IP address mapped drives, and slow with name mapped drives:
>
> [global]
> workgroup = CENTRAL
> security = server
>
> encrypt passwords = yes
> username level = 20
> interfaces = eth0
> password server = 10.240.27.29
>
> [test]
> path = /test
> writable = yes
> valid users = "tester"
> ;end_of_section -- Tag line do not remove
>
>
> I have captured two packet traces using a third host which is attached to
> the same 10baseT hub as the Windows 98 client. The first one shows a chunk
> of a file being transferred in fast mode. This was captured with the
> "security = server" smb.conf file in effect, with the drive mapped using
> its IP address. One write raw packet is shown (with the large buffer size)
> followed by one of the many continuation packets that are needed to write
> the remaining bytes up to 64K. I can post the packet traces here if
> needed.
>
> This seems to be a problem with Windows 98 forcing the use of the small
> block size, possibly because it doesn't think that the Samba server is an
> authenicated member of the domain. Is there any workaround for this that
> would force the client to always use the 64k block size through Windows
> Explorer?
>
>
> Thanks in advance...
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> --
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> Mike Gahagan, RHCE | Red Hat Inc.
> Commercial Services Group | Meridian Office
> mikeg at redhat.com | Durham, NC
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <peter.foster at motorcharge.com.au>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from postoffice.motorcharge.com.au (unknown [203.48.28.130])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D3644CC for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 00:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by POSTOFFICE with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<NHFL2BKS>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:00:12 +0800
Message-ID: <ED10D084B1C1D41182BA00508BB1E131272F69 at POSTOFFICE>
From: "Foster, Peter" <peter.foster at motorcharge.com.au>
To: "'samba at samba.org'" <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Is this a problem?
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 15:58:22 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I have just downloaded the latest SAMBA version 2.2.0. I am using it on a
COMPAQ AlphaServer 4000 and a DS10. The default compiler is "cc". In both
cases the OS is COMPAQ Tru64 v5.1. I've done all the usual (gunzip and tar)
to extract the SAMBA-2.2.0 directory, ran "./configure" and then "make" from
the "source" subdirectory. A warning appears in the compiler output. It
doesn't seem to affect SAMBA at all, but I thought that I would report it
anyway.
Please find attached a screen capture of the warning inserted in a MS Word
document. I've wrapped the screen shot in a MS Word document just in case
your e-mail system can't handle bitmap attachments.
Regards,
Peter Foster
Manager Information Technology
Motorcharge Limited
Telephone: (08) 9202 4080
Facsimile: (08) 9242 2756
Mobile: 0417 932 042
Switch: (08) 9202 4000
E-mail: peter.foster at motorcharge.com.au
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/msword which had a name of SAMBA compiler warning.doc]
Return-Path: <lcorr at katamail.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mta3.alephint.it (unknown [194.153.172.219]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93DA4C87 for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 01:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [194.153.172.197] by mta3.alephint.it with SMTP id
<20010620083651.HOOW14622.mta3@[194.153.172.197]> for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:36:51 +0200
From: <lcorr at katamail.com>
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: Problem with winbind
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:39:47 CEST
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20010620083651.HOOW14622.mta3@[194.153.172.197]>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Dear Sirs,
I am writing because I have a problem with winbind.
I am using RedHat 7.1 with Linux ACLs. I have compiled
Samba 3.0 with the option "--with-acl-support".
When I try to connect to the samba server from
a Win client winbindd sends the following message for
each group in my domain:
Could not lookup domain group MYDOMAIN\MYGROUP
cli_pipe: return critical error. Error was ERRDOS - ERRpipebusy
(All instances of the requested pipe are busy)
It looks like as winbindd could read the list of the group but that
it cannot look at the list of users in each group.
Can you hekp me?
Thank you very much,
Lorenzo Corradini.
Return-Path: <jferruz at isoco.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mad.isoco.com (unknown [212.9.69.146]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A1E4C58 for <samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun
2001 01:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from isoco.com (baco.mad.isoco.net [192.168.2.95]) by
mad.isoco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38EC4358A7 for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:59:55 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <3B3064A6.45A27C8E at isoco.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:53:58 +0200
From: Javier Ferruz <jferruz at isoco.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: samba y ldap
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I use Suse 7.0 and I've installed openldap y samba
packages which are in the distribution.
I would like to Know if samba was compiled with
--with-ldap. How could I know it?
Thanks,
--
Javier Ferruz Rodrmguez
IT Dept. @ iSOCO
Return-Path: <edv at rauheshaus.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mgate.lantana.net (unknown [194.175.202.6]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF0D4578 for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 01:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.rnb.de (unverified) by mgate.lantana.net (Content
Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id
<Tc2afca065441e9746b at mgate.lantana.net> for <samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20
Jun 2001 11:04:31 +0200
Received: from mailgate1.rnb.de ([194.49.51.139]) by mail.rnb.de (Lotus
SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2 10-16-1998)) with SMTP id 41256A71.0032C6B9;
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:14:36 +0100
Received: from win2000-srv.rauheshaus.de ([192.168.252.106]) by
mailgate1.rnb.de (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.2 (693.3 8-11-1998)) with SMTP
id 41256A71.00361120; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:50:33 +0100
Subject: taking ownership
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:07:04 +0200
Message-ID: <6A48864DC7CCF14E9500D91451458952C78B at WIN2000-SRV.WIN2000.ra
uheshaus.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Topic: taking ownership
Thread-Index: AcD5aF+nlWomMPYTT8W1qSuRrQZHRA==
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
From: "Jan Strohbehn" <edv at rauheshaus.de>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi !!
I just tried to take the ownership of a file. It worked neither from a
NT nor from a W2K client, although I saw that the set_nt_acl function
was called when using W2k. Isn't this yet implemented or is it my fault
????
Thanks,
Jan
Return-Path: <riest at franksintl.nl>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from tiny.int.franksintl.nl (goblin.franksintl.nl
[195.193.231.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
B498E4399 for <samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 02:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cp35 (cp35.int.franksintl.nl [192.168.4.249]) by
tiny.int.franksintl.nl (8.11.4/8.11.4/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id
f5K9IoK05101 for <samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:18:50 +0200
From: "Ries van Twisk" <riest at franksintl.nl>
To: samba at samba.org
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:15:27 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: samba y ldap
Reply-To: ries at franksintl.nl
Message-ID: <3B3085CF.822.796B24 at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <3B3064A6.45A27C8E at isoco.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi
Samba and Ldap is work in progress. I think it's even not stable in CVS.
We have to wait....
Ries
On 20 Jun 2001, at 10:53, Javier Ferruz wrote:
> I use Suse 7.0 and I've installed openldap y samba
> packages which are in the distribution.
>
> I would like to Know if samba was compiled with
> --with-ldap. How could I know it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Javier Ferruz Rodrmguez
> IT Dept. @ iSOCO
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
Return-Path: <jferruz at isoco.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mad.isoco.com (unknown [212.9.69.146]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECE94264 for <samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun
2001 02:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from isoco.com (baco.mad.isoco.net [192.168.2.95]) by
mad.isoco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D381B358A8; Wed, 20 Jun 2001
11:42:30 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <3B306EA1.F0019CFA at isoco.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:36:33 +0200
From: Javier Ferruz <jferruz at isoco.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ries at franksintl.nl
Cc: samba at samba.org
Subject: Re: samba y ldap
References: <3B3085CF.822.796B24 at localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Ries van Twisk wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Samba and Ldap is work in progress. I think it's even not stable in CVS.
> We have to wait....
>
So I suppose my samba doesn't --with-ldap option.
Did anybody download sources CVS and use LDAP?
Thanks,
--
Javier Ferruz Rodrmguez
IT Dept. @ iSOCO
Return-Path: <petr.adamek at antek.cz>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from saturnin.antek.cz (antek-cs.customer.vol.cz
[195.250.137.143]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB9B3450C
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 03:18:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 26804 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2001 10:22:40 -0000
Received: from petr.antek.cz (HELO petr) (195.250.137.237) by
saturnin.antek.cz with SMTP; 20 Jun 2001 10:22:40 -0000
From: "AdaMcPetr" <petr.adamek at antek.cz>
Organization: ANTEK CS
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:22:40 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: samba 2.2.0 vs. removable media
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b)
Message-Id: <20010620101816.EB9B3450C at lists.samba.org>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have a small problem with using samba 2.2.0 and zip. The smbd
daemon which handles the connection with /mnt/zip keeps its
current directory at the zip, so zip cannot be unmounted and
therefore subsequently ejected. The daemon dies withing some
minutes after connection have been closed. I am not able to find
any directive to be placed into smb.conf to disable such a
behaviour.
The only solution in my mind is to run, via root postexec, script
which will wait till there (/mnt/zip) is only current directory of smbd
(using fuser in cycle) and then kill that smbd. But it seems to me
to be a little bit brutal:-))
AdaMcPetr
petr.adamek at antek.cz
http://www.antek.cz
Return-Path: <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776BC4DB1 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 03:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5KAqdC27333; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:52:39 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id MAA04436; Wed, 20
Jun 2001 12:52:40 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA02455; Wed, 20 Jun
2001 12:52:43 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: samba at lists.samba.org, "AdaMcPetr" <petr.adamek at antek.cz>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:52:36 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: samba 2.2.0 vs. removable media
Message-ID: <3B309C94.17525.1267598 at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <20010620101816.EB9B3450C at lists.samba.org>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> I have a small problem with using samba 2.2.0 and zip. The smbd
> daemon which handles the connection with /mnt/zip keeps its
> current directory at the zip, so zip cannot be unmounted and
> therefore subsequently ejected. The daemon dies withing some
> minutes after connection have been closed. I am not able to find
> any directive to be placed into smb.conf to disable such a
> behaviour.
> The only solution in my mind is to run, via root postexec, script
> which will wait till there (/mnt/zip) is only current directory of smbd
> (using fuser in cycle) and then kill that smbd. But it seems to me
> to be a little bit brutal:-))
What happens if you put " cd / ; mount /mnt/zip " in the postexec
script? I Havn't tried it, besause I don't need it with my CD's.
Christian
> AdaMcPetr
> petr.adamek at antek.cz
> http://www.antek.cz
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1114F0C for <samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun
2001 04:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as3-99.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.11.99]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2)
with ESMTP id f5KBJcI23476; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 21:19:42 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root at yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
VAA10419; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 21:18:13 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet at piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
VAA13629; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 21:18:08 +1000
Message-ID: <3B308670.736C7736 at bartlett.house>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 21:18:08 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Reply-To: abartlet at samba.org
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Foster, Peter" <peter.foster at motorcharge.com.au>
Cc: "'samba at samba.org'" <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Re: Is this a problem?
References: <ED10D084B1C1D41182BA00508BB1E131272F69 at POSTOFFICE>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
"Foster, Peter" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have just downloaded the latest SAMBA version 2.2.0. I am using it on a
> COMPAQ AlphaServer 4000 and a DS10. The default compiler is "cc". In both
> cases the OS is COMPAQ Tru64 v5.1. I've done all the usual (gunzip and tar)
> to extract the SAMBA-2.2.0 directory, ran "./configure" and then "make" from
> the "source" subdirectory. A warning appears in the compiler output. It
> doesn't seem to affect SAMBA at all, but I thought that I would report it
> anyway.
>
> Please find attached a screen capture of the warning inserted in a MS Word
> document. I've wrapped the screen shot in a MS Word document just in case
> your e-mail system can't handle bitmap attachments.
It dislikes any form of binary attachment. Send it as plain text.
The Samba team uses a 'build farm' to attempt to keep on top of these
issues, at build.samba.org. If your error matches the output of this
URL:
http://build.samba.org:80/build.pl?function=View+Build&host=usf-cf-alpha-tru64-1&tree=samba_2_2&compiler=cc
Then at least in theory the samba team knows about it...
(Whether they pay any attention to it is another matter). If it
differs, then replying with it in plain text might be helpful to
somebody familiar with that particular section of code.
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at samba.org
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
abartlet at samba.org
Return-Path: <jakob.reuter at wimmex.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from moutvdom01.kundenserver.de (moutvdom01.kundenserver.de
[195.20.224.200]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAF5439A
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 04:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [195.20.224.219] (helo=mrvdom03.kundenserver.de) by
moutvdom01.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id
15CgKs-0000PF-00 for samba at lists.samba.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:39:50
+0200
Received: from pc19f6c19.dip.t-dialin.net ([193.159.108.25] helo=bri) by
mrvdom03.kundenserver.de with smtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15CgK5-00061D-00
for samba at lists.samba.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:39:01 +0200
Reply-To: <jakob.reuter at wimmex.com>
From: "Jakob Reuter Wimmex AG" <jakob.reuter at wimmex.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: just an conclusion
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:47:40 +0200
Message-ID: <000c01c0f97e$cf3c3980$034da8c0 at net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi folks,
i had problems with samba 2.0.5a and 2.0.7 running on SUSE 7.1 and 6.3.
log.smb said something like,
broken_pipe...
and the clients couldnt connect to shares. It solved the problem to remove
the "host allow = 10.0.0./24",
not an good thing for a server which is online.
After some cups of tee(black and with lot of sugar), i found out that my
"hosts" was messie. It mapped not local ip-addresses on local users. This
worked as long as the server was online, but didnt when my isp crashed.
What i dont understand is that the "resolve order" didnt mention "hosts",
just lmhost which is ok.
jakob
Return-Path: <aaa at netman.dk>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from teapot.netman.dk (teapot.netman.dk [193.88.72.6]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87EAA44AC for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 05:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netman.dk (manpc64.netman.dk [193.88.72.75]) by
teapot.netman.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA07261 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:22:32 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <3B3094F7.9A68B663 at netman.dk>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:20:07 +0200
From: Alaa AlAmood <aaa at netman.dk>
Organization: NetMan A/S
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Unsubcribe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Return-Path: <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3304499 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20
Jun 2001 05:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as3-99.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.11.99]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2)
with ESMTP id f5KCXcI01948; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 22:33:39 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root at yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
WAA10612; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 22:33:11 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet at piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
WAA14114; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 22:33:11 +1000
Message-ID: <3B309805.65DCB691 at bartlett.house>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 22:33:09 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Reply-To: abartlet at samba.org
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jakob.reuter at wimmex.com
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: just an conclusion
References: <000c01c0f97e$cf3c3980$034da8c0 at net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Jakob Reuter Wimmex AG wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
> i had problems with samba 2.0.5a and 2.0.7 running on SUSE 7.1 and 6.3.
> log.smb said something like,
>
> broken_pipe...
>
> and the clients couldnt connect to shares. It solved the problem to remove
> the "host allow = 10.0.0./24",
> not an good thing for a server which is online.
>
> After some cups of tee(black and with lot of sugar), i found out that my
> "hosts" was messie. It mapped not local ip-addresses on local users. This
> worked as long as the server was online, but didnt when my isp crashed.
> What i dont understand is that the "resolve order" didnt mention "hosts",
> just lmhost which is ok.
While this is probably not very well documented, the 'resolve order'
refers only to samba's activites as a client (be that in smbd itself or
in things like smbclient) and not to its activies as a server.
Server side names are resolved by the standard gethostbyname()
interface, controlled by /etc/nsswitch.conf and /etc/resolv.conf.
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at samba.org
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
abartlet at samba.org
Return-Path: <ctooley at amoa.org>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id 87D4B4514 for <samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun
2001 05:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id
86256A71.0046B6F2 ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:52:23 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA
From: ctooley at amoa.org
To: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Cc: "Makis Marmaridis" <Makis.Marmaridis at learnnow.com.au>,
samba at samba.org
Message-ID: <86256A71.0046B5A1.00 at amoa.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:52:19 -0500
Subject: RE: Force User:Group
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Great, this is exactly what I was looking for.
Chris
"Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de> on 06/20/2001 12:46:27 AM
To: Chris Tooley/AMOA at AMOA, "Makis Marmaridis"
<Makis.Marmaridis at learnnow.com.au>
cc: samba at samba.org
Subject RE: Force User:Group
:
> Yes, this is very possible!
>
> You can certainly have directories inside a share and using the permissions
> on the filesystem you can then set appropriate permissions for users and/or
> groups for either entire directories or files within them.
>
> Say you have in your file system
>
> /common
> /dir1
> /dir2
> /dir3
>
> you can share "common" so when people connect to this share they'll
> effectively see the three directories inside it. Then depending on the
> filesystem permissions you set on the directories they will or won't be able
> to access them.
And for the new files to get the group you want, do a "chgrp newgroup
directory" and then a chmod g+s directory. This stick-bit forces new
files to get the group auf the directory and not the primary group of
the creator on the unix level. Unfortunatly this is only respected by
samba with "inherit permissions = yes" in smb.conf. But this is a
cool thing, too, which conforms to NT standard.
Christian
>
> HTH,
>
> Cheers,
> Makis.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: samba-admin at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin at lists.samba.org]On
> Behalf Of ctooley at amoa.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 June 2001 6:35 AM
> To: samba at samba.org
> Subject: Re:Force User:Group
>
>
> I need to be able to specify directories within a share, as some of the
> directories have different user:group owners than others. I think this may
> have
> to be done at the filesystem level... is that possible?
>
> Chris Tooley
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Bill Grzanich <organix4 at mindspring.com> on 06/19/2001 03:15:57 PM
>
>
>
> To: Chris Tooley/AMOA at AMOA
>
> cc:
>
>
>
> Subject Re:Force User:Group
> :
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi, Chris!
>
> Original message from: ctooley at amoa.org
> >Is there a way to force writes to a specific directory to write the file as
> a
> >different User or Group that the person writing to it. The reason I ask
> is...
> >
> <snip>
>
> Yep... add "force user = [some name]" to your share definition. For
> example:
>
> [cmplianc]
> comment = Compliance share
> path=/home/groups/cmplianc
> valid users = @cmplianc, @it
> public = No
> writable = Yes
> printable = No
> force user = cmplianc
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> -Bill Grzanich
> IT Manager
> ORGANICS/LaGrange, Inc.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <DavidB at mail.interclean.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from serverdell2200.interclean.com (mail.interclean.com
[152.160.178.23]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA86F4480
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 06:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.interclean.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2650.21) id <NFH9VTB0>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:11:56 -0400
Message-ID: <0F9D3D919AADD211BE7E00A0C99B8420324398 at mail.interclean.com>
From: David Brodbeck <DavidB at mail.interclean.com>
To: 'Tim Potter' <tpot at valinux.com>, David Brodbeck
<DavidB at mail.interclean.com>
Cc: "'M. Kilroy'" <mekilroy at risingedge.com>, samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: *working* winbindd
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:11:54 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
<grin> Thanks, though I'd really rather see it working again in the latest
version.
(Yeah, yeah, I know. It's open source, fix it yourself.) ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Potter [mailto:tpot at valinux.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 7:49 PM
To: David Brodbeck
Cc: 'M. Kilroy'; samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: *working* winbindd
David Brodbeck writes:
> It worked for me using the version that was in the samba-appliance-0.5-1
> rpm. Unfortunately that's now been taken down as obsolete. I'm not sure
> what's been done since to break it, but the version in the current HEAD
CVS
> sure doesn't work. Kinda seems like one step forward and two back
> sometimes, doesn't it?
OK - I've reinstated the 0.5-1 rpms due to popular demand. (-:
Tim.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <palme at uni-wuppertal.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.urz.uni-wuppertal.de (mail.urz.uni-wuppertal.de
[132.195.64.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9AE45DB
for <samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 06:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de (wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de
[132.195.20.7]) by mail.urz.uni-wuppertal.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP
id PAA347927250; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 15:12:30 +0200 (MDT)
Received: (from palme at localhost) by wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de
(8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id PAA29259; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 15:12:30
+0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15152.41197.376623.575325 at wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 15:11:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: palme at uni-wuppertal.de (Hubert Palme)
To: debian-user at lists.debian.org, Samba Liste <samba at samba.org>,
debian-user-de at lehmanns.de
Cc: Hubert Palme <palme at uni-wuppertal.de>
Subject: Samba: Can't Rename the Log File
X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 10) "Capitol Reef" XEmacs Lucid
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hmm..., I'll try it once more because I can't beleive that nobody can
give me a hint...
Received: (from palme at localhost) by wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de
(8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id OAA05903; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:26:42
+0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID: <15140.47352.452773.624270 at wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de>
X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 10) "Capitol Reef" XEmacs Lucid
From: palme at uni-wuppertal.de (Hubert Palme)
To: debian-user at lists.debian.org, Samba Liste <samba at samba.org>
Cc: Hubert Palme <palme>
Subject: Samba: Problem mit check_log_size
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:26:32 +0200 (CEST)
Hi,
in the syslog file I repeatedly find the following messages:
Jun 8 08:19:40 wrpc3 smbd[8296]: [2001/06/08 08:19:40, 0] lib/debug.c:check_log_size(311)
Jun 8 08:19:40 wrpc3 smbd[8296]: check_log_size: open of debug file /var/log/smb failed - using console.
The file /var/log/smb has the following attributes:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1024067 Jun 6 12:14 smb
(Thus being writable for smbd!?)
The concerning entry in smb.conf is:
max log size = 1000
(obviously just exceeded)
I run Debian Potato with
ii samba 2.0.7-3.3 A LanManager like file and printer server fo
ii samba-common 2.0.7-3.3 Samba common files used by both the server a
ii samba-doc 2.0.7-3.3 Samba documentation.
ii swat 2.0.7-3.3 Samba Web Administration Tool
Samba runs as a daemon, not via inetd -- could there be a coherence?
Waiting for a hint...
Thanks in advance,
--
======================================================================
Hubert Palme Bergische Universitaet-Gesamthochschule Wuppertal
Computing Center
D-42097 Wuppertal
E-Mail: palme at uni-wuppertal.de (Germany)
http://www.hrz.uni-wuppertal.de/hrz/personen/h_palme.html
- can someone explain me the mechanism how smbd/nmbd rename their
files?
- How else can I interpret the error message? (The permits of the file
seem to be OK)
- What if I run smnd/nmbd via inetd? Are the files ever renamed then?
- Could there be a bug that smbd keeps the file open and thus cannot
"re"open it? And how to ship around then?
That's all very strange...
Thanks in advance,
--
======================================================================
Hubert Palme Bergische Universitaet-Gesamthochschule Wuppertal
Computing Center
D-42097 Wuppertal
E-Mail: palme at uni-wuppertal.de (Germany)
http://www.hrz.uni-wuppertal.de/hrz/personen/h_palme.html
Return-Path: <DavidB at mail.interclean.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from serverdell2200.interclean.com (mail.interclean.com
[152.160.178.23]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7284E54
for <samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 06:09:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.interclean.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2650.21) id <NFH9VTCC>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:13:26 -0400
Message-ID: <0F9D3D919AADD211BE7E00A0C99B8420324399 at mail.interclean.com>
From: David Brodbeck <DavidB at mail.interclean.com>
To: "'lcorr at katamail.com'" <lcorr at katamail.com>, samba at samba.org
Subject: RE: Problem with winbind
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:13:21 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
It does that to me, too. I think the consensus is that winbind is currently
broken.
-----Original Message-----
From: lcorr at katamail.com [mailto:lcorr at katamail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 6:40 AM
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: Problem with winbind
Dear Sirs,
I am writing because I have a problem with winbind.
I am using RedHat 7.1 with Linux ACLs. I have compiled
Samba 3.0 with the option "--with-acl-support".
When I try to connect to the samba server from
a Win client winbindd sends the following message for
each group in my domain:
Could not lookup domain group MYDOMAIN\MYGROUP
cli_pipe: return critical error. Error was ERRDOS - ERRpipebusy
(All instances of the requested pipe are busy)
It looks like as winbindd could read the list of the group but that
it cannot look at the list of users in each group.
Can you hekp me?
Thank you very much,
Lorenzo Corradini.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <gcarter at valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F038044AC for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 06:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (root at ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by
Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA05361; Wed, 20 Jun 2001
08:18:11 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:21:13 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter at pogo.plainjoe.org>
To: Jan Strohbehn <edv at rauheshaus.de>
Cc: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Re: taking ownership
In-Reply-To: <6A48864DC7CCF14E9500D91451458952C78B at WIN2000-SRV.WIN2000.r
a uheshaus.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106200820120.1006-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Jan Strohbehn wrote:
> Hi !!
>
> I just tried to take the ownership of a file. It worked neither from a
> NT nor from a W2K client, although I saw that the set_nt_acl function
> was called when using W2k. Isn't this yet implemented or is it my fault
> ????
Only root can take/set ownership of a file in UNIX. were you
connected as root? I thought we had this working.
Cheers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <gcarter at valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6CD4ED1; Wed, 20 Jun 2001
06:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (root at ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by
Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA07088; Wed, 20 Jun 2001
08:38:20 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:41:22 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter at pogo.plainjoe.org>
To: <samba-technical at samba.org>
Cc: <crh at samba.org>, Mike Gahagan <mgahagan at redhat.com>
Subject: Slow write performance with Win 98 and Samba (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106200840100.1006-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
[moved to samba-technica...]
Chris,
This looks like the problem you were working on. Any progress?
cheers, jerry
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:31:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mike Gahagan <mgahagan at redhat.com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Slow write performance with Win 98 and Samba
I have been researching a problem with Windows 98 and Samba. The problem
is a significant slowdown in certain types of files transfers. This
appears to be a problem specific to a Windows 98 client uploading a file
to a Samba server which is in "server" security mode.
Problem Description
When the transfer is viewed with a network packet analyzer, two different
protocol modes are seen. Normally, Windows 98 will upload files using
large file chunks, of about 64K bytes in size. There are sent with either
an SMBwrite or an SMBwriteraw packet, followed by enough continuation
messages to transfer the 64K chunk. Windows 98 is free to send all 64K
without waiting for a reply. This is what I will call fast transfer mode.
The slow transfer mode is characterized by a small SMBwrite of only 1536
or fewer bytes, followed by an SMBflush command. There are two reasons
this is slow. The small packet size is all that Windows 98 can send before
having to wait for a reply. The flush command causes the remote file
system to write the bytes to disk before the flush reply can be sent back.
The Windows 98 client has to wait for both requests to travel the net and
be replied to before the next small chunk of the file can be sent.
Characterization
There are six conditions which must be in place in order for this problem
to occur:
1. The client must be Windows 98 (not Windows NT).
2. The server must be Samba (not Windows NT).
3. The Samba server must be in "security = server" mode (not share or
domain mode)
4. The file being transferred must be uploaded (not downloaded).
5. The file must be transferred by the Windows explorer (not a command
line copy).
6. The drive must have been mapped by name (not by IP address).
Using the six conditions, the problem is produced 100% of the time. If any
one of the conditions are changed, the problem is not produced. If any of
these six conditions are not met (are replaced by their alternative), then
Windows 98 will choose fast transfer mode. In condition two, Samba is
specified as the server. This is because we haven't tested with any other
type of server which is not participating in the Microsoft Networking
Domain as Windows NT would. Also, I did not mention Windows 98 in
condition two, because I have not tested with Windows 98 as the server.
Samba is certainly always affected by this, so it makes a good test
platform for reproducing the problem.
I have noticed during packet tracing that name resolution causes Windows
98 to open a session with the Samba server directly. If the IP address of
the Samba server is used instead, the name resolution system fails, and
Windows 98 resorts to doing an NBSTAT request to the Samba server itself.
This returns the full list of names the server has registered, which
Windows 98 then uses to open a direct session. When the latter name
resolution method is used, Windows 98 always chooses fast transfer mode in
any uploads to the drive being mapped. If the same drive is mapped by name
(even at the same time), all file uploads are in slow mode.
Putting the Samba server into domain mode was also tested. Named mapping
caused Windows 98 to choose fast transfer mode. The packet traces of a
server mode versus a domain mode name lookup, drive mapping, and file
transfer were compared, and no significant differences were found. What
was different was the name of the Samba server (two were used), the
session ID, the session key, the encrypted password, the multiplex ID, and
the TCP port, acknowledgement, and sequence numbers.
Test Data
I used the following minimal smb.conf files to produce this problem. The
tests were done on a Samba server running version 2.0.7, but I have
reports that this same problem can be demonstrated on later releases of
Samba. The Windows domain "CENTRAL" PDC, and the WINS server are the same
machine: A Windows NT server at 10.240.27.29. The use "tester" is a
valid user in the domain, and on the Samba server.
Here is the share mode smb.conf, which causes fast transfers no matter how
the drive is mapped:
[global]
workgroup = CENTRAL
security = share
interfaces = eth0
[test]
path = /test
writable = yes
guest ok = yes
guest only = yes
;end_of_section -- Tag line do not remove
Here is the server mode smb.conf I used. This configuration goes fast with
IP address mapped drives, and slow with name mapped drives:
[global]
workgroup = CENTRAL
security = server
encrypt passwords = yes
username level = 20
interfaces = eth0
password server = 10.240.27.29
[test]
path = /test
writable = yes
valid users = "tester"
;end_of_section -- Tag line do not remove
I have captured two packet traces using a third host which is attached to
the same 10baseT hub as the Windows 98 client. The first one shows a chunk
of a file being transferred in fast mode. This was captured with the
"security = server" smb.conf file in effect, with the drive mapped using
its IP address. One write raw packet is shown (with the large buffer size)
followed by one of the many continuation packets that are needed to write
the remaining bytes up to 64K. I can post the packet traces here if
needed.
This seems to be a problem with Windows 98 forcing the use of the small
block size, possibly because it doesn't think that the Samba server is an
authenicated member of the domain. Is there any workaround for this that
would force the client to always use the 64k block size through Windows
Explorer?
Thanks in advance...
Mike
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Gahagan, RHCE | Red Hat Inc.
Commercial Services Group | Meridian Office
mikeg at redhat.com | Durham, NC
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <gcarter at valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF454EDD for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 06:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (root at ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by
Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA08141; Wed, 20 Jun 2001
08:47:31 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:50:33 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter at pogo.plainjoe.org>
To: Mark Gosselin <gosselinm at netscout.com>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Passwords from old version don't work after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <OFC81A16BA.450B3DD7-ON85256A6F.007049BF at netscout.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106200850000.1006-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Mark Gosselin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just recently upgraded my install from 1.9.18 to 2.0.7 and am seeing
> some funny issues with logins. Some people cannot log in under 2.0.7
> that could under 1.9.18, and vice versa..... I should be checking for
> UNIX passwords and all the users are rpesent in the UNIX password
> file. Has anyone ever seen this before? If so, do you know what I need
> to do to make sure everyone can log in???
The default value for 'security' changed from share to user between 1.9
and 2.0. Does this affect your setup?
jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <gcarter at valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDF54FD2 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (root at ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by
Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA10841; Wed, 20 Jun 2001
09:09:46 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:12:48 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter at pogo.plainjoe.org>
To: <phil.hardern at bt.com>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Problem running ./configure on a HP-UX 11.0 system.
In-Reply-To: <851244722352D21180550000F8EFA23C040800E4 at melds1nt01.nor.bt
. com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106200912220.1006-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 phil.hardern at bt.com wrote:
> I am getting the following message when running the ./configure
> script on a HP-UX 11.0 system.
>
> checking configure summary
> WARNING: No automated network interface determination
> ERROR: no seteuid method available
Did you run the configure script as root?
CHeers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <Emmanuel.Ferey at cdc.u-cergy.fr>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from berlin.cdc.u-cergy.fr (berlin.cdc.u-cergy.fr
[193.54.113.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2482C4FE9
for <samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cdc.u-cergy.fr (lima.cdc.u-cergy.fr [193.54.113.19]) by
berlin.cdc.u-cergy.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3F1427E for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:15:02 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <3B30AFE5.336E64C4 at cdc.u-cergy.fr>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:15:01 +0200
From: Emmanuel Ferey <Emmanuel.Ferey at cdc.u-cergy.fr>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-21mdk i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: Accentuated characters in filename badly translated under HEAD
3.0?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
If I try to rename a non-accentuated name file with an e-acute, I get
instead a U-acute.
For instance, "newdocument.txt" -> "sis.txt" gives "sUs.txt", on Linux
and NT.
But "sis.txt" created on Linux is seen as "sis.txt" on NT client.
All goes as if it was translating from 0x82 to 0x00e9 #LATIN SMALL
LETTER E WITH ACUTE,
then once more from 0xe9 to 0x00da #LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH ACUTE.
With 2.07, I didn't have this problem.
In smb.conf :
client code page = 850
character set = ISO8859-1
Obviously, I need some help, so ..
Thanks,
ef
PS : some logs
############ HEAD 3.0
>>
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
smb_bcc=69
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1477)
[000] 04 5C 00 4E 00 6F 00 75 00 76 00 65 00 61 00 75 .\.N.o.u
.v.e.a.u
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1485)
[010] 00 20 00 44 00 6F 00 63 00 75 00 6D 00 65 00 6E . .D.o.c
.u.m.e.n
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1485)
[020] 00 74 00 20 00 74 00 65 00 78 00 74 00 65 00 2E .t. .t.e
.x.t.e..
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1485)
[030] 00 74 00 78 00 74 00 00 00 04 00 5C 00 73 00 E9 .t.x.t..
...\.s..
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1485)
[040] 00 73 00 00 00 .s...
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650)
switch message SMBmv (pid 9195)
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 0] smbd/process.c:smb_dump(603)
created /tmp/SMBmv.11.req len 110
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_mv(3922)
reply_mv : \Nouveau Document texte.txt -> \sis
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(146)
unix_convert called on file "\Nouveau Document texte.txt"
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403)
unix_clean_name [/Nouveau Document texte.txt]
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(216)
conversion finished Nouveau Document texte.txt -> Nouveau Document
texte.txt
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(146)
unix_convert called on file "\sis"
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403)
unix_clean_name [/sis]
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(222)
unix_convert begin: name = sis, dirpath = , start = sis
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 5] smbd/mangle.c:is_8_3(338)
Checking Nouveau Document texte.txt for 8.3
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3765)
rename_internals: case_sensitive = 1, case_preserve = 1, short case
preserve = 1, directory = ./Nouveau Document texte.txt, newname = ./sis,
newname_last_component = sis, is_8_3 = 0
[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3824)
rename_internals: succeeded doing rename on ./Nouveau Document
texte.txt -> ./sis[
>>
############ SAMBA 2.07
>>
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(618)
Transaction 65 of length 86
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(430)
size=82
smb_com=0x7
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=24
smb_flg2=3
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(436)
smb_tid=1
smb_pid=51966
smb_uid=100
smb_mid=3904
smt_wct=1
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(441)
smb_vwv[0]=22 (0x16)
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(446)
smb_bcc=45
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(2918)
[000] 04 5C 74 65 6D 70 5C 4E 6F 75 76 65 61 75 20 44 .\temp\N
ouveau D
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(2926)
[010] 6F 63 75 6D 65 6E 74 20 74 65 78 74 65 2E 74 78 ocument
texte.tx
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(2926)
[020] 74 00 04 5C 74 65 6D 70 5C 73 82 73 00 t..\temp \s.s.
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448)
switch message SMBmv (pid 1374)
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_mv(3699)
reply_mv : \temp\Nouveau Document texte.txt -> \temp\s,s
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(329)
unix_convert called on file "\temp\Nouveau Document texte.txt"
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(522)
unix_clean_name [/temp/Nouveau Document texte.txt]
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(429)
conversion finished temp/Nouveau Document texte.txt -> temp/Nouveau
Document texte.txt
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(329)
unix_convert called on file "\temp\s,s"
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(522)
unix_clean_name [/temp/s,s]
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(436)
unix_convert begin: name = temp/s,s, dirpath = , start = temp/s,s
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] smbd/mangle.c:is_8_3(338)
Checking Nouveau Document texte.txt for 8.3
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3558)
rename_internals: case_sensitive = 1, case_preserve = 1, short case
preserve = 1, directory = temp/Nouveau Document texte.txt, newname =
temp/s,s, newname_last_component = s,s, is_8_3 = 0
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_get_share_modes(120)
get_share_modes hash bucket 1 empty
[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3613)
rename_internals: succeeded doing rename on temp/Nouveau Document
texte.txt -> temp/s,s[
>>
dump_data shows UNICODE in the former and DOS 850 CP in the latter?
Return-Path: <gcarter at valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE8E4FE6 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (root at ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by
Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA12107; Wed, 20 Jun 2001
09:20:08 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:23:10 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter at pogo.plainjoe.org>
To: Christian Barth <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>, Jeff Riegel <riegel at almaden.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Win2k Terminal Server: SMB uid's
In-Reply-To: <3B28C161.30861.42C9A1 at localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106200920450.1006-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Christian Barth wrote:
> May be apply the follwing registry key, found in the docs-directory
> of the samba distributions:
>
> REGEDIT4
>
> ;Subject: Registry file to force multiple NT terminal server
> users to have their own connections.
>
> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Rdr\Parameters]
> "MultipleUsersOnConnection"=dword:00000001
This doesn't work with Win2k TSE. There is no known workaround
for running all connections over a single tcp connection
with Win2k TSE.
> > I have been experimenting with the Win2k terminal server and have
> > noticed some strange behavior with SMB: Win2k seems to use the same
> > UID for different login sessions. I logged in from the terminal server
> > machine's console and browsed a share via network neighborhood, and it
> > demanded a password before I could view the contents. Next, I logged into
> > the terminal server from another machine and did the same thing; this
> > time, I could view the contents of the share with no password required.
> > It appears to be using the same UID for both users, so authentication
> > was only needed the first time.
Same connection to IPC$. Only a single tcp session is used and the
SMB session UID is multiplexed on the wire. I would have to look
at our code to refresh my memory what this does to us internally, but
IIRC it is not good :-(
cheers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <rshields at customcolor.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from customcolor.com (customcolor.com [216.122.237.241]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190F744A4 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leedo ([209.248.198.166]) by customcolor.com
(8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f5KENXj41227 for <samba at lists.samba.org>;
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:23:33 GMT (envelope-from rshields at customcolor.com)
From: "Richard Shields" <rshields at customcolor.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Second Post same question...Ownership privileges
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:27:19 -0500
Message-ID: <NFBBKMHCKLFBEHOPKPMAGEFHCAAA.rshields at customcolor.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I am running Samba 2.0.7 on a Macintosh OSX server ver 1.2 A file created,
copied or otherwise altered by a Windows client on this server is
unalterable by the Macintosh clients. Is there a way to fix this? A file
created, ETC by a Mac client can be altered by anyone... I have only limited
Unix/Linux exp so feel free to email me in person if the answer is too wordy
for the list server. Thank you for your help in advance...
Richard L. Shields
rshields at customcolor.com
Custom Color Corp.
300 W. 19th Terr.
K.C., MO 64108
ph. 816-474-3200
fx. 816-842-4909
http://www.customcolor.com
Return-Path: <jstrohbehn at artstor.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from webstor1.artstor.de (unknown [195.243.248.130]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C3D74FFE for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 23258 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2001 14:32:43 -0000
Received: from zerberus.artstor.de (HELO sokrates.artstor.de)
(195.243.248.115) by www.artstor.de with SMTP; 20 Jun 2001 14:32:43
-0000
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:32:18 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Strohbehn <jstrohbehn at artstor.de>
X-X-Sender: <jstrohbehn at sokrates.artnet.de>
To: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
Cc: Jan Strohbehn <edv at rauheshaus.de>, <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Re: taking ownership
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106200820120.1006-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0106201629480.2595-100000 at sokrates.artnet.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> > I just tried to take the ownership of a file. It worked neither from a
> > NT nor from a W2K client, although I saw that the set_nt_acl function
> > was called when using W2k. Isn't this yet implemented or is it my fault
> > ????
>
> Only root can take/set ownership of a file in UNIX. were you
> connected as root? I thought we had this working.
>
Hi !!
I just tried it again as a member of "admin users", and it worked.
But it only works if samba is a domain member and only from W2k clients.
There is still no chance to get it working from NT :-(
Any ideas???
Thanks,
Jan
Return-Path: <gosselinm at netscout.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from nsmail4.netscout.com (unknown [208.159.61.34]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B975005 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Passwords from old version don't work after upgrade
To: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.4 June 8, 2000
Message-ID: <OF859B7581.95C4B585-ON85256A71.004F26AD at netscout.com>
From: "Mark Gosselin" <gosselinm at netscout.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:26:30 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on NSMail4/NetScout(Release 5.0.7
|March 21, 2001) at 06/20/2001 10:27:30 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Jerry,
Thanks for the reply. It doesn't appear that this is the issue as we were
using user for security anyway.
The particular machine that was having the problem began working once we
upgrade the Service Pack
from Microsoft from SP6 to SP6a.......
Thanks,
Mark Gosselin
Gerald Carter
<gcarter at vali To: Mark Gosselin <gosselinm at netscout.com>
nux.com> cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Passwords from old version don't work after upgrade
06/20/01
09:50 AM
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Mark Gosselin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just recently upgraded my install from 1.9.18 to 2.0.7 and am seeing
> some funny issues with logins. Some people cannot log in under 2.0.7
> that could under 1.9.18, and vice versa..... I should be checking for
> UNIX passwords and all the users are rpesent in the UNIX password
> file. Has anyone ever seen this before? If so, do you know what I need
> to do to make sure everyone can log in???
The default value for 'security' changed from share to user between 1.9
and 2.0. Does this affect your setup?
jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <gcarter at valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125175006 for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (root at ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by
Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA13587; Wed, 20 Jun 2001
09:33:52 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:36:54 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter at pogo.plainjoe.org>
To: Jan Strohbehn <jstrohbehn at artstor.de>
Cc: Jan Strohbehn <edv at rauheshaus.de>, <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Re: taking ownership
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0106201629480.2595-100000 at sokrates.artnet.de
>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106200936390.1006-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Jan Strohbehn wrote:
> > > I just tried to take the ownership of a file. It worked neither from a
> > > NT nor from a W2K client, although I saw that the set_nt_acl function
> > > was called when using W2k. Isn't this yet implemented or is it my fault
> > > ????
> >
> > Only root can take/set ownership of a file in UNIX. were you
> > connected as root? I thought we had this working.
> >
>
> Hi !!
>
> I just tried it again as a member of "admin users", and it worked. But
> it only works if samba is a domain member and only from W2k clients.
> There is still no chance to get it working from NT :-( Any ideas???
Maybe. We'll look into it.
Cheers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <robert.meiners at gonicus.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail1.dinet.de (mail1.dinet.de [212.8.0.3]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C100F500D for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 9286 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2001 13:30:53 -0000
Received: from relay-1.dinet.de (HELO ots-1) (@212.8.0.36) by
mail1.dinet.de with SMTP; 20 Jun 2001 13:30:53 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Robert Meiners <robert.meiners at gonicus.de>
To: jferruz at isoco.com
Subject: Re: samba y ldap
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:36:28 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
Cc: samba at samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01062016362801.21371 at ots-1>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
we use Samba2.2 and RedHat 7.1 with LDAP 1.2.
You only have to insert the pam-modules in the
pam.d/samba
But then you have to disable the cypted
authentication on the Windows-clients
and the Account managing is no longer
possible via SWAT.
Greeting
Robert
>Message: 36
>Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:53:58 +0200
>From: Javier Ferruz <jferruz at isoco.com>
>To: samba at samba.org
>Subject: samba y ldap
>
> I use Suse 7.0 and I've installed openldap y samba
> packages which are in the distribution.
>
> I would like to Know if samba was compiled with
> --with-ldap. How could I know it?
>
> Thanks,
- --
Besuchen Sie uns auf dem LINUXTAG in Stuttgart vom 5.-8.7.2001.
Halle 5.0, Stand 5.0.213
* Dipl.-Inf. R. Meiners <meiners at gonicus.de> Consulting
* Gonicus GmbH * Moehnestr. 11-17 * 59755 Arnsberg
* Tel.: +492932 916-0 * Fax.: +492932 916-255
* http://www.gonicus.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7MLTswozIcziS6EIRArLKAKDfECb4T3fBfcuoo+5zu94QGOkweACg0mfh
w9PXHpGgHNoxh5f+hhllVYI=
=GrHd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return-Path: <pierre.metrailler at epfl.ch>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail0.epfl.ch (mail0.epfl.ch [128.178.50.57]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73B3C45C3 for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 21224 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2001 14:58:23 -0000
Received: from shockfishpc19.epfl.ch (128.179.48.21) by mail0.epfl.ch
with SMTP; 20 Jun 2001 14:58:23 -0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010620165655.026b9e18 at imap.epfl.ch>
X-Sender: pimetrai at imap.epfl.ch
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:57:08 +0200
To: samba at samba.org
From: Pierre Metrailler <pierre.metrailler at epfl.ch>
Subject: Re: Accentuated characters in filename badly translated under
HEAD 3.0?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
This issue is weird but I solved it the following way : (i assume samba
HEAD is installed in /usr/local/sambahead)
1) in smb.conf, be sure to COMMENT the lines client code page =... and
character set =
2) in /usr/local/sambahead/lib/codepages, remove all the files
and afterward it worked.
Has anybody else another fix ?
Regards,
Pierre
At 16:15 20.06.2001 +0200, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>If I try to rename a non-accentuated name file with an e-acute, I get
>instead a U-acute.
>
>For instance, "newdocument.txt" -> "sis.txt" gives "sUs.txt", on Linux
>and NT.
>But "sis.txt" created on Linux is seen as "sis.txt" on NT client.
>
>All goes as if it was translating from 0x82 to 0x00e9 #LATIN SMALL
>LETTER E WITH ACUTE,
>then once more from 0xe9 to 0x00da #LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH ACUTE.
>
>With 2.07, I didn't have this problem.
>
>In smb.conf :
> client code page = 850
> character set = ISO8859-1
>
>Obviously, I need some help, so ..
>
>Thanks,
>ef
>
>
>
>PS : some logs
>
>############ HEAD 3.0
> >>
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
> smb_bcc=69
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1477)
> [000] 04 5C 00 4E 00 6F 00 75 00 76 00 65 00 61 00 75 .\.N.o.u
>.v.e.a.u
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1485)
> [010] 00 20 00 44 00 6F 00 63 00 75 00 6D 00 65 00 6E . .D.o.c
>.u.m.e.n
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1485)
> [020] 00 74 00 20 00 74 00 65 00 78 00 74 00 65 00 2E .t. .t.e
>.x.t.e..
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1485)
> [030] 00 74 00 78 00 74 00 00 00 04 00 5C 00 73 00 E9 .t.x.t..
>...\.s..
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1485)
> [040] 00 73 00 00 00 .s...
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650)
> switch message SMBmv (pid 9195)
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 0] smbd/process.c:smb_dump(603)
> created /tmp/SMBmv.11.req len 110
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119)
> Skipping become_user - already user
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_mv(3922)
> reply_mv : \Nouveau Document texte.txt -> \sis
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(146)
> unix_convert called on file "\Nouveau Document texte.txt"
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403)
> unix_clean_name [/Nouveau Document texte.txt]
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(216)
> conversion finished Nouveau Document texte.txt -> Nouveau Document
>texte.txt
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(146)
> unix_convert called on file "\sis"
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403)
> unix_clean_name [/sis]
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(222)
> unix_convert begin: name = sis, dirpath = , start = sis
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 5] smbd/mangle.c:is_8_3(338)
> Checking Nouveau Document texte.txt for 8.3
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3765)
> rename_internals: case_sensitive = 1, case_preserve = 1, short case
>preserve = 1, directory = ./Nouveau Document texte.txt, newname = ./sis,
>newname_last_component = sis, is_8_3 = 0
>[2001/06/20 15:05:54, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3824)
> rename_internals: succeeded doing rename on ./Nouveau Document
>texte.txt -> ./sis[
> >>
>
>
>############ SAMBA 2.07
> >>
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(618)
> Transaction 65 of length 86
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(430)
> size=82
> smb_com=0x7
> smb_rcls=0
> smb_reh=0
> smb_err=0
> smb_flg=24
> smb_flg2=3
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(436)
> smb_tid=1
> smb_pid=51966
> smb_uid=100
> smb_mid=3904
> smt_wct=1
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(441)
> smb_vwv[0]=22 (0x16)
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(446)
> smb_bcc=45
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(2918)
> [000] 04 5C 74 65 6D 70 5C 4E 6F 75 76 65 61 75 20 44 .\temp\N
>ouveau D
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(2926)
> [010] 6F 63 75 6D 65 6E 74 20 74 65 78 74 65 2E 74 78 ocument
>texte.tx
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(2926)
> [020] 74 00 04 5C 74 65 6D 70 5C 73 82 73 00 t..\temp \s.s.
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448)
> switch message SMBmv (pid 1374)
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
> Skipping become_user - already user
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_mv(3699)
> reply_mv : \temp\Nouveau Document texte.txt -> \temp\s,s
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(329)
> unix_convert called on file "\temp\Nouveau Document texte.txt"
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(522)
> unix_clean_name [/temp/Nouveau Document texte.txt]
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(429)
> conversion finished temp/Nouveau Document texte.txt -> temp/Nouveau
>Document texte.txt
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(329)
> unix_convert called on file "\temp\s,s"
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(522)
> unix_clean_name [/temp/s,s]
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(436)
> unix_convert begin: name = temp/s,s, dirpath = , start = temp/s,s
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] smbd/mangle.c:is_8_3(338)
> Checking Nouveau Document texte.txt for 8.3
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3558)
> rename_internals: case_sensitive = 1, case_preserve = 1, short case
>preserve = 1, directory = temp/Nouveau Document texte.txt, newname =
>temp/s,s, newname_last_component = s,s, is_8_3 = 0
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 5] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_get_share_modes(120)
> get_share_modes hash bucket 1 empty
>[2001/06/20 14:53:09, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3613)
> rename_internals: succeeded doing rename on temp/Nouveau Document
>texte.txt -> temp/s,s[
> >>
>
>
>dump_data shows UNICODE in the former and DOS 850 CP in the latter?
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <JVergara at equinox.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from notes.EQUINOX.COM (notes.equinox.com [63.80.92.4]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578CA4FF4 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Samba log errors
To: abartlet at samba.org
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.6a January 17, 2001
Message-ID: <OF86B1872D.D9C8FFA3-ON85256A71.004D5520 at EQUINOX.COM>
From: JVergara at equinox.com
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:47:57 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes.EQUINOX.COM/EQNX(Release 5.0.5
|September 22, 2000) at 06/20/2001 10:48:04 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Thanks, for the answers to my letter. Even though they are not very
positive so I have to fix these problems a.s.a.p.
Here I am sending my smb.conf so you can check it. The database
applicattion is written in Clarion (www.softvelocity.com) (not Access
! ,God forbid) , and it has very strong multiuser orientation and also
manipulates a lot of different database formats - I've been working
with that software for a lot of years, with multiple deployments in
windows environments with no lockups problems unless you select to
lock a table completely as oppossed of locking a table record.
One thing that I noticed was that - everything was running fine at
least for a year with samba except that the printing jobs sometimes
would take minutes to come out plus other printing problems - so I
decided to upgrade LPRng to the latest version. I have to say that
the printing problems went away but now I am getting the problems
described before at least twice a day with the consequent nightmare
of having to support something that I did not have to support as
frecuently before.
I don't know but I don't trust lprng anymore -the creator is being
gone for a while from his support list - so I guess nobody is fixing
problems with this software. I strongly think that Linux needs
something like Novell printing being ported so it can become a viable
platform to replace NT servers. Do you have any other stable
alternative to run print services from Linux?
The smb.conf is attached here:
(See attached file: smb.conf)
Thanks in advance for any comments,
Juan Carlos Vergara
Andrew
Bartlett To: JVergara at equinox.com
<abartlet at pcu cc: samba at lists.samba.org
g.org.au> Subject: Re: Samba log errors
Sent by:
abartlet at pcug
.org.au
06/19/01
07:20 PM
Please
respond to
abartlet
JVergara at equinox.com wrote:
>
> I have been using samba 2.0.7 and lprng with linux redhat 6.2 for a
> while witth a windows multiuser database application that runs from
a
> share volume in the samba server. The problem is that lately the
> users are complaining of computer lock ups when trying to insert a
> record , or they complain that they entered a record and later on
the
> record dissapeared from the database.
I would need your smb.conf file to comment any futher, as samba has a
plethora of locking options available. What database app is it? MS
Access?
Snip printing problems.
> The user does not have other choice but
> resetting the computer and to login again (obviously from the same
ip
> address) - samba does not clear the first connection and first locks
> to the database files and shows a second brand new connection for
the
> same user. This user opens the database app. and files and begins
to
> work. Suddenly if somebody else tries to create records on the same
> database files opened by the client with two conections on smbstatus
-
> they get lock up and they can not do anything until manually
> somebody checks smbstatus and kills the older conection of the
person
> (ip address) with two connections to the shared folders.
>
> How can we fix the two problems described before?
> - computer gets lock up when printing several jobs to printer shared
> by samba.
Can't help you here, but one of the big things with Samba 2.2 was
sorting out printing, so you might give it a shot.
> - Samba does not clear connection when computer is reset, allowing
> more than one connection to the same folder from one computer
(ip
> address).
This is fixed is current CVS, with samba doing a better job of
cleaning
up when it is forced to shutdown (broken pipes and the like) and with
samba doing a better job of cleaning up after other dead smbds.
> Below, I show different errors from the samba logs for different
> users. I don't know if those errors are harmless, or potentially
> desastrous for a database integrity and multiuser set up.
The latter, unfotunetly. Data won't get lost, but users won't get any
work done either.
I understand that Andrew Tridgell is doing some work on Oplocks at the
moment, so the underlying cause should be sorted out pretty soon.
(Apparently we are actualy pretty broken at the moment, becouse we
didn't have any tests for it. He is fixing that...)
I would suggest that you run 2.2.1 when it comes out, as it looks like
it will have knocked off many of these issues. Samba 2.2.0 was meant
to
fix many of these things, and introduced support for kenel oplocks
with
2.4 kernels, but there have been mixed experiences amoungst others on
the list - so while it might be worth a try, keep a close eye on it.
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at samba.org
>
> log.freddy:84: write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken
pipe
> log.freddy:86: write_socket: Error writing 206 bytes to socket 9:
> ERRNO = Broke
> n pipe
> log.freddy:88: Error writing 206 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
> log.kathy.1.1:251: read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = No
> route to ho
> st
> log.kathy.1.1:253: receive_smb error (No route to host) exiting
> log.lorenzo:36: write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken
pipe
> log.lorenzo:38: write_socket: Error writing 206 bytes to socket 9:
> ERRNO = Brok
> en pipe
> log.lorenzo:40: Error writing 206 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
> log.lorenzo:60: write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken
pipe
> log.lorenzo:62: write_socket: Error writing 206 bytes to socket 9:
> ERRNO = Brok
> en pipe
> log.lorenzo:64: Error writing 206 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
> log.lorenzo.1.1:437: read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error =
> Connection r
> eset by peer
> log.lorenzo.1.1:529: write_socket_data: write failure. Error =
Broken
> pipe
> log.lorenzo.1.1:531: write_socket: Error writing 206 bytes to
socket
> 9: ERRNO =
> Broken pipe
> log.lorenzo.1.1:533: Error writing 206 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
> log.lorenzo.1.1:535: write_socket_data: write failure. Error =
Broken
> pipe
> log.lorenzo.1.1:537: write_socket: Error writing 206 bytes to
socket
> 9: ERRNO =
> Broken pipe
> log.lorenzo.1.1:539: Error writing 206 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
> log.ruben.1:4: read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error =
> Connection reset b
> y peer
> log.smb.1.1.1:114: Failed to set socket option SO_KEEPALIVE (Error
> Bad file des
> criptor)
> log.smb.1.1.1:116: Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY (Error
Bad
> file desc
> riptor)
> log.smb.1.1.1:118: Failed to set socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY
(Error
> Bad file d
> escriptor)
> log.zenaida.1.1:1410: read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error =
> Connection
> reset by peer
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
abartlet at samba.org
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of smb.conf]
Return-Path: <dan.tappin at orourke-eng.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com
(h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com [207.228.121.48]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9ACBB501A; Wed, 20 Jun 2001
08:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 192.168.0.27 by h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com; Wed,
20 Jun 2001 09:19:41 -0600
Reply-To: <dan.tappin at orourke-eng.com>
From: "Dan Tappin" <dan.tappin at orourke-eng.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>, <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Users & Password Problems
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:20:11 -0600
Message-ID: <NEBBJHEDELJOHGLFBBFFKELOCGAA.dan.tappin at orourke-eng.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <20010619190200.BD9D94EDC at lists.samba.org>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have Samba up and running on Red Hat 7 and I am having some trouble
understanding the steps I need to do to get Win9X clients to have their
individual user accounts to show up when they login.
I have run 'userconf' in root to add a few test accounts as well as
'sambapasswd' to set the samba passwords.
For example: I have myself setup as a user (tappind) and I created a user
in 'userconf' and 'sambapasswd'. I logged on my Win98 client using the
username and password that I set and the 'FILE SERVER' shows up in the NN as
expected. If I try to open the 'FILE SERVER' in the NN I get a password
prompt 'Resource:\\FILE SERVER\IPC$'. None of the passwords I have used
(including blank) works.
Any ideas?? I think I am missing a step. Does my Win98 client need to
configured for this??
Thanks,
Dan
Return-Path: <Trans_la_tion_ at mailru.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from hhter (unknown [195.215.29.187]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id 4F30A47B1 for <samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun
2001 08:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2344320016320144255771 at mailru.com>
X-EM-Version: 5, 0, 0, 21
X-EM-Registration: #01B0530810E603002D00
From: "TRANSLATION" <Trans_la_tion_ at mailru.com>
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: =?windows-1251?Q?=CF=E5=F0=E5=E2=EE=E4=FB?=
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 18:42:55 +0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
OEPEBND[ ~phdhweqjhu, }jnmnlhweqjhu, reumhweqjhu rejqrnb, reumhweqjhu
nohq`mhi, WEB-q`irnb q `mckhiqjncn, melevjncn, hr`k|mqjncn, tp`mvsgqjncn h
psqqjncn g{jnb.
Slepemm{e p`qvemjh, jb`khthvhpnb`mm{e oepebndwhjh, ank|xni no{r p`anr{.
J`weqrbn oepebnd` jnmrpnkhpserq ped`jrnpnl. Qrnhlnqr| oepebnd` ndmni
qr`md`prmni qrp`mhv{ (1680 gm`jnb) q hmnqrp`mmncn m` psqqjhi g{j 7 s.e., q
psqqjncn m` hmnqrp`mm{i 11 s.e. Nok`r` onqke b{onkmemh p`anr{.
Reketnm/t`jq: (095) 452-3640, (095) 136-0517, (095) 747-7780
Op`iq-khqr b{q{k`erq on g`opnqs.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSLATION of business and technical documents, instructions, manuals,
Web-pages from/into English, German, Italian, French, Russian.
Translation of one standard page (1680 characters) from foreign into Russian
$7, from Russian into foreign $11.
Phone/fax: (095) 452-3640, (095) 136-0517, (095) 747-7780
Price-list available upon request.
Return-Path: <anna.arbit at micromuse.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from aquaman.sfo.micromuse.com (unknown [208.241.174.70]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B094F23 for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jukka (xcdfdd481.ip.ggn.net [205.253.212.129]) by
aquaman.sfo.micromuse.com (Switch-2.1.0/Switch-2.1.0) with SMTP id
f5KFmn421853 for <samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:48:49 -0700
(PDT)
From: "Anna Arbit" <anna.arbit at micromuse.com>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: spooling
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:51:41 -0400
Message-ID: <FMEFJHLCJAEAPIBKPECAIEOOCCAA.anna.arbit at micromuse.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
hello all,
i just set up samba 2.2.0 with redhat 7.0 and using CUPS for printing
i have everything working... shares and printing..
however, what i'm not sure about is spooling... i have 7 servers setup thru
samba... does each one of them have a different spool file? do i have to
specify the spool file in the smb.conf? how does it work?
this is my printers config..
[global]
.....
printer admin = anna
load printers = yes
printing = cups
[print$]
comment = Driverdownload
path = /usr/local/samba/printer
guest ok = yes
browseable = yes
read only = yes
write list = anna
|-W32X86 ; "Windows NT x86"
|-WIN40 ; "Windows 96/98"
printer admin = anna
[printers]
path = /usr/local/samba/printer
how do i deal with spooling?
Thanks in advance,
anna
Return-Path: <coreyu at sympatico.ca>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mx1.q9.com (mx1.q9.com [216.220.35.254]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8492429F for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cheetah.zoo.q9networks.com (225.35.220-216.q9.net
[216.220.35.225]) by mx1.q9.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9125F2AF94 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:01:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from barracuda ([10.220.34.150]) by cheetah.zoo.q9networks.com
with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version
5.5.2650.21) id MTRVPBV2; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:01:17 -0400
From: "Corey" <coreyu at sympatico.ca>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Constant Log Errors.
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:01:15 -0400
Message-ID: <05924A4A9DEDAD46A21EE3C8C64B090D1D1C81 at cheetah.zoo.q9networ
ks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I keep receiving the same log errors and have check the smb.conf and for
many reasons I don't know why I'm getting them.
The log error is...
[2001/06/18 09:46:52, 0] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(831)
rejected invalid user samba
At first glance I see it says invalid user samba so in an attempt to resolve
this I created a linux user "samba" and an 2000 user "samba". I then from
shell ran smbadduser and add a user named "samba:samba". The passwords match
for all and I still get the error.
I then looked at the smb.conf and don't even know why it's trying to use the
guest account as I have guest set to "no" on globals and all shares.
I have a 2000 machine running backups off the samba server and this makes
for some huge log files that contain nothing but this error.
Corey Ursu
Q9 NETWORKS
4163657488
http://www.Q9.com/
Return-Path: <scott.steagall at tekelec.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from domino2.nc.tekelec.com (unknown [198.89.40.41]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49581504D for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by domino2.nc.tekelec.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2
10-16-1998)) id 85256A71.0057C80B ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:58:48 -0400
X-Lotus-FromDomain: TEKELEC
From: "Scott Steagall" <scott.steagall at tekelec.com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Message-ID: <85256A71.0057C576.00 at domino2.nc.tekelec.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:59:04 -0400
Subject: mapping printers with netbios aliases
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
When attaching to a shared printer via browsing or UNC name in the Add Printer
Wizard .... using a netbios alias
as the server name .... the connection reverts back to the main netbios name of
the server.
server is running samba 2.2.0
smb.conf:
netbios name = SMBSRV1
netbios alias = PRTSRV1
Connecting to HP_1 on PRTSRV1 using nt4/2000 [again by browsing or UNC in Add
Printer Wizard using server \\PRTSRV1]
I get
HP_1 on SMBSRV1
I would expect (and what I see on my existing 2.0.6 and 2.0.7 samba print
servers)
HP_1 on PRTSRV1
Has anyone else seen this ??? Or anyone know of any work around ???
Thanks
Scott
Return-Path: <torriem at cs.byu.edu>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.cs.byu.edu (mail.cs.byu.edu [128.187.2.20]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792294660 for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from verdi.cs.byu.edu (IDENT:torriem at verdi.cs.byu.edu
[128.187.101.86]) by mail.cs.byu.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5KGICP08012 for <samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:18:12 -0600
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:18:12 -0600 (MDT)
From: Michael L Torrie <torriem at cs.byu.edu>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Re: samba y ldap
In-Reply-To: <3B306EA1.F0019CFA at isoco.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106201015520.21103-100000 at verdi.cs.byu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Javier Ferruz wrote:
> So I suppose my samba doesn't --with-ldap option.
>
> Did anybody download sources CVS and use LDAP?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Javier Ferruz Rodrmguez
> IT Dept. @ iSOCO
>
I've found a good solution is to use a dual-headed samba-tng/samba 2.2
system. The samba-tng is configured to store user account information in
LDAP and samba 2.2 is set to use the tng server as a password server.
Works pretty well. Have to use ip aliases, though, to keep the two from
claiming the same ports on the same interface.
This lets me use LDAP and the PDC capabilities of Samba-TNG with the
faster file-serving of samba 2.2. There is a link on www.samba-tng.org
explaining how to do this.
Michael
Return-Path: <rebus at seznam.cz>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from email.seznam.cz (omx.seznam.cz [195.119.180.41]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A29B24441 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 4697 invoked by uid 0); 20 Jun 2001 16:29:31 -0000
Received: from [195.250.147.254] by email.seznam.cz with HTTP; Wed, 20
Jun 2001 18:29:29 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 18:29:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Michal=20Ambroz?= <rebus at seznam.cz>
Reply-To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Michal=20Ambroz?= <rebus at seznam.cz>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: =?iso-8859-2?Q?smbmount=20=2D=20HP=5FUNIX?=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <3117.9729-9700-2115064249-993054569 at seznam.cz>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Please is it posible to mount SMB shares to fileszstem tree under
HP UNIX or is this feature (to mount smbfs) special to Linux ?
thank you
Michal Ambroz (O_O)
______________________________________________________________________
Neverite vyzkumum, protoze Vas se nikdo nepta? Stante se clenem
OnlinePanelu a Vase nazory budou slyset. http://www.onlinepanel.cz
Return-Path: <jan.struyfs at alcatel.be>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from relay1.alcatel.be (alc119.alcatel.be [195.207.101.119])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59733422F for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bt02e0.god.bel.alcatel.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
relay1.alcatel.be (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f5KGcZ206210 for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 18:38:35 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from alcatel.be (bt01lx.god.bel.alcatel.be [138.203.144.20])
by bt02e0.god.bel.alcatel.be (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/1.1) with ESMTP id
SAA16302 for <samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 18:38:23 +0200 (MET
DST)
Message-ID: <3B30D1A2.7B97FBF8 at alcatel.be>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 18:38:58 +0200
From: Jan Struyfs <jan.struyfs at alcatel.be>
Organization: IBM
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en, pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: odd behaviour
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
We have samba 2.0.6 running on a SUN Solaris 2.6.
Since a few days we have problems with a share called multimedia.
----------
[multimedia]
comment = Multimedia Server
path = /tools/ltools4/shared/multimedia
valid users = @mmedia
force user = quartien
force group = mmedia
read only = No
create mask = 0775
exec = /usr/bin/logger -p auth.debug
--------
As you can see the 'valid user' are members of the UNIX group mmedia.
We also user the 'force user' and force the group to mmedia.
PROBLEM:
With the above-mentioned configuration, the members of the group mmedia
cannot map the multimedia share (they can map
other shares so authentication is OK!?) The error is: incorrect password
or unknown username and the user is prompted for a username and
password.
WORKAROUND:
If I change the name of the UNIX group (in the NIS group-file) mmedia to
mmedia2 and accordingly change the smb.conf
(valid users = @mmedia2) than the mapping succeeds.
Has anyone seen this before?
Maybe someone has a sollution or a possible explanation for this
behaviour?
Thanks!
Return-Path: <ffrank at rz.uni-potsdam.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.64.1])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D98421A for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de
[141.89.68.1]) by hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id
f5KH40Y00155; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:04:00 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de
(pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.201.37]) by
persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f5KH3xU21594;
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:03:59 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]
helo=pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de ident=frank) by
pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de with smtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id
15ClOa-0000i4-00; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:04:00 +0200
To: debian-user at lists.debian.org
Cc: Samba Liste <samba at samba.org>, debian-user-de at lehmanns.de
Subject: Re: [Debian] Samba: Can't Rename the Log File
References: <15152.41197.376623.575325 at wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de>
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
From: ffrank at rz.uni-potsdam.de (Frank =?iso-8859-1?q?F=FCrst?=)
In-Reply-To: <15152.41197.376623.575325 at wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de>
Date: 20 Jun 2001 19:03:59 +0200
Message-ID: <87u21b6q2o.fsf at pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de>
Lines: 43
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
palme at uni-wuppertal.de (Hubert Palme) writes:
> Hmm..., I'll try it once more because I can't beleive that nobody can
> give me a hint...
[...]
>
> in the syslog file I repeatedly find the following messages:
>
> Jun 8 08:19:40 wrpc3 smbd[8296]: [2001/06/08 08:19:40, 0] lib/debug.c:check_log_size(311)
> Jun 8 08:19:40 wrpc3 smbd[8296]: check_log_size: open of debug file /var/log/smb failed - using console.
>
> The file /var/log/smb has the following attributes:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1024067 Jun 6 12:14 smb
>
[...]
>
> I run Debian Potato with
>
> ii samba 2.0.7-3.3 A LanManager like file and printer server fo
> ii samba-common 2.0.7-3.3 Samba common files used by both the server a
> ii samba-doc 2.0.7-3.3 Samba documentation.
> ii swat 2.0.7-3.3 Samba Web Administration Tool
>
> Samba runs as a daemon, not via inetd -- could there be a coherence?
[...]
>
> - Could there be a bug that smbd keeps the file open and thus cannot
> "re"open it? And how to ship around then?
No, I don't think there's a bug. At least with log files created with
"log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log" there's no problem with
renaming. /var/log/smb is still used, but it doesn't get big. My setup
is essentially the same as yours, only I don't run swat (and I've
upgraded to samba 2.0.9 due to the known bugs recently).
Have you tried to once rename the file by hand and look wether the
problem is reproducible when it comes to renaming the file again? You
should perhaps create a big file so that you needn't wait for weeks...
Bye, Frank
P.S. I only read debian-user-de.
Return-Path: <mekilroy at risingedge.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA68421A for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by
mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5KHINS49146
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:18:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by
wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id
<B0000084352 at wizzard.rising-edge>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:16:13 -0400
Message-ID: <06db01c0f9ac$b3a32ac0$1a00a8c0 at diamondback>
From: "M. Kilroy" <mekilroy at risingedge.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
References: <0F9D3D919AADD211BE7E00A0C99B8420324398 at mail.interclean.com>
Subject: 0.5-1 & HEAD
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:16:10 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Thanks to everyone who's been so patiently helping me!
Here's yet another question for anyone who can please lend me a hand.
I installed 0.5-1 and removed HEAD due to the winbindd probs. But now I
cannot successfully grab users/groups from the PDC, whereas I could with
HEAD. My winbindd log has "ncacn_np_use_add: connection failed" and earlier
I got "cannot connect to PDC" errors, though the latter error has
disappeared.
Could this be due to some conf file in the wrong folder or something
similar? Or maybe a conflict with the newer version I previously had on my
machine? Perhaps i'm not wiping everything clean before the 0.5-1 install?
Any help is truly appreciated!
----- Original Message -----
OK - I've reinstated the 0.5-1 rpms due to popular demand. (-:
Tim.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <jerome_baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from smtp010.mail.yahoo.com (smtp010.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.173.30]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D88C4FB6
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown (HELO mainpassjerome) (64.120.108.6) by
smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Jun 2001 17:24:05 -0000
X-Apparently-From: <jerome?baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
Message-ID: <02f701c0f9ae$3e3af1d0$6f01010a at nt.local>
From: "Jerome Baumgarten" <jerome_baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106200920450.1006-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
Subject: Re: Win2k Terminal Server: SMB uid's
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:27:07 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
You mean there that it is not a good idea to use Samba with Microsoft
Terminal Services, right ?
Jerome
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerald Carter" <gcarter at valinux.com>
To: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>; "Jeff Riegel" <riegel at almaden.ibm.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: Win2k Terminal Server: SMB uid's
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Christian Barth wrote:
>
> > May be apply the follwing registry key, found in the docs-directory
> > of the samba distributions:
> >
> > REGEDIT4
> >
> > ;Subject: Registry file to force multiple NT terminal server
> > users to have their own connections.
> >
> > [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Rdr\Parameters]
> > "MultipleUsersOnConnection"=dword:00000001
>
> This doesn't work with Win2k TSE. There is no known workaround
> for running all connections over a single tcp connection
> with Win2k TSE.
>
>
>
> > > I have been experimenting with the Win2k terminal server and have
> > > noticed some strange behavior with SMB: Win2k seems to use the same
> > > UID for different login sessions. I logged in from the terminal
server
> > > machine's console and browsed a share via network neighborhood, and it
> > > demanded a password before I could view the contents. Next, I logged
into
> > > the terminal server from another machine and did the same thing; this
> > > time, I could view the contents of the share with no password
required.
> > > It appears to be using the same UID for both users, so authentication
> > > was only needed the first time.
>
> Same connection to IPC$. Only a single tcp session is used and the
> SMB session UID is multiplexed on the wire. I would have to look
> at our code to refresh my memory what this does to us internally, but
> IIRC it is not good :-(
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> cheers, jerry
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
> \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
> http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
> http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
>
> "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
> - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Return-Path: <becker at lufa-sp.vdlufa.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailer.lufa-sp.vdlufa.de (pD955D9E1.dip.t-dialin.net
[217.85.217.225]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419CB4F08
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from becker (becker.lufa-sp.vdlufa.de [192.168.3.20]) by
mailer.lufa-sp.vdlufa.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA25924 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:39:36 +0200
Reply-To: <becker at lufa-sp.vdlufa.de>
From: "Stefan Becker" <becker at lufa-sp.vdlufa.de>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: PCD Login scripts (Win95 v NT) with %USER%
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:40:10 +0200
Message-ID: <NDBBJPAJIMDMPCDAAODMGEMEFOAA.becker at lufa-sp.vdlufa.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
What am I doing wrong!
I am having a bit of trouble getting this right and at the moment
have no idea where to look for help.
This is what I've taken out of the documentation:
and is run for the domain "winnt".
The script will work just fine with a NT or W2000 logon,
but the Varable %USERNAME% doesn't expand for a W95 Client!
Maybe someone knows what's wrong. Or just post a "working"
example of a good script to place on the domain.
here's what I am doing!
-------------------------
@echo off
if %OS%.==Windows_NT. goto WinNT
:Win95
echo "script for Windows95 "
net use f: \\linux\%USERNAME%
net use p: \\linux\pub
goto end
:WinNT
echo "script for NON Windows95 "
net use f: \\linux\%USERNAME% /persistent:no
net use p: \\linux\pub /persistent:no
:end
path=p:\public;%PATH%
P.S: another thing that doesn't work!
Is it posible to create a new PATH from within the
script? How would this be done. My example above
doesn't do it :-(
my regards to you all,
Stefan Becker
LUFA Speyer (EDV)
email: becker at lufa-sp.vdlufa.de
tel : +49 (0)6232-629542
fax : +49 (0)6232-629544
http://www.lufa-speyer.de/
Return-Path: <gcarter at valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E522B453E for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (root at ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by
Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA10068; Wed, 20 Jun 2001
13:29:50 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:32:51 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter at pogo.plainjoe.org>
To: Jerome Baumgarten <jerome_baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Win2k Terminal Server: SMB uid's
In-Reply-To: <02f701c0f9ae$3e3af1d0$6f01010a at nt.local>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106201331580.22114-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Jerome Baumgarten wrote:
> You mean there that it is not a good idea to use Samba with Microsoft
> Terminal Services, right ?
I like to same it is not a good idea to use Win2k TSE with Samba.:)
You can still use this registry setting on WinNT4 TSE
cheers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <Bill.Nolf at itt.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from gate1.itt.com (gate1.itt.com [151.190.254.100]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F10E64E85 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from no.name.available by gate1.itt.com via smtpd (for
[198.186.203.85]) with SMTP; 20 Jun 2001 18:47:42 UT
Received: from 151.190.173.214 by fwdcwall.de.ittind.com (InterScan
E-Mail VirusWall NT); Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:47:36 -0500
Received: from pikachu (151.190.55.219 [151.190.55.219]) by
FWDCMAIL2.de.ittind.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail
Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id NJVN2MZN; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:45:09
-0500
Reply-To: "Bill Nolf" <Bill.Nolf at itt.com>
From: "Bill Nolf" <Bill.Nolf at itt.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Help - samba and Windows 2000
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:47:30 -0400
Message-ID: <01c0f9b9$75620d00$97be37db at pikachu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express Unix 5.00.2013.1312
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I'm trying to set up a unix file server using samba for Windows 2000/NT
users.
Samba server 2.0.0
Windows 2000 and unix userids are different.
It is ok to prompt for unix user id and passwd.
What do I need to do to get this to work?
thanks, Bill
------------------------------------------------------
William "Bill" Nolf Bill.Nolf at itt.com
ITT Industries - Advanced Engineering & Sciences
1761 Business Center Dr.
Reston, VA 20190 USA
Phone: 703-438-3274 Fax: 703-438-8112
Return-Path: <jeremy at valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02F65090; Wed, 20 Jun 2001
12:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from legion.engr.valinux.com ([10.12.1.31] helo=valinux.com)
by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.30
#1 (Debian)) id 15CnE5-0003cS-00; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:01:17 -0700
Message-ID: <3B30F42C.27EF91C8 at valinux.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:06:20 -0700
From: Jeremy Allison <jeremy at valinux.com>
Organization: VA Linux Systems
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-beta1va3.10 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Samba NTDOM <samba-ntdom at samba.org>, Samba list <samba at samba.org>,
Samba technical <samba-technical at samba.org>, jeremy at valinux.com
Subject: Supported Samba on Solaris (finally :-).
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Since VERITAS is too shy to announce it on this list (I think
they don't want to spam people with commercials) I thought
I'd mention it for them :-).
For everyone who has wanted an officially supported Samba
on Solaris solution, supported by Sun, check out the VERITAS
whitepaper at :
http://www.veritas.com/us/article/article-061901.html
Yes, it's Samba based (currently 2.0.9). VERITAS is working
with us to add new stuff like MS-DFS and MMC support to 2.2
as well.
The reason I'm so pleased is that I've been trying to get
Sun to officially support Samba for some time now (with
the valliant attempts of Dave Collier-Brown and Don DeVitt
at Sun) and now, with this joint announcement, they've
done it !
Thanks to everyone at VERITAS and Sun who made this (finally :-)
happen ! Now people have a good business and technical
response to doubts about running Samba on Solaris.
Regards,
Jeremy Allison,
Samba Team.
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Buying an operating system without source is like buying
a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions.
--------------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <jeremy at valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B304636; Wed, 20 Jun 2001
12:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from legion.engr.valinux.com ([10.12.1.31] helo=valinux.com)
by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.30
#1 (Debian)) id 15CnOi-0004qV-00; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:12:16 -0700
Message-ID: <3B30F6C2.F8C4D8F0 at valinux.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:17:22 -0700
From: Jeremy Allison <jeremy at valinux.com>
Organization: VA Linux Systems
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-beta1va3.10 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Samba NTDOM <samba-ntdom at samba.org>, Samba list <samba at samba.org>,
Samba technical <samba-technical at samba.org>, jeremy at valinux.com
Subject: Re: Supported Samba on Solaris (finally :-).
References: <3B30F42C.27EF91C8 at valinux.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Jeremy Allison wrote:
> Thanks to everyone at VERITAS and Sun who made this (finally :-)
> happen !
Oops. Forgot to mention the particular people at VERITAS -
thanks to Tamir Ram and Shirish Kalele at VERITAS !
Jeremy.
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Buying an operating system without source is like buying
a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions.
--------------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <jerome_baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from smtp012.mail.yahoo.com (smtp012.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.173.32]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C33F4667
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown (HELO mainpassjerome) (64.120.108.6) by
smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Jun 2001 19:23:53 -0000
X-Apparently-From: <jerome?baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
Message-ID: <030701c0f9be$faff6d40$6f01010a at nt.local>
From: "Jerome Baumgarten" <jerome_baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106201331580.22114-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
Subject: Re: Win2k Terminal Server: SMB uid's
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:27:00 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Thanks but my problem is that I already have Windows 2000 TS and I am not
sure I can go backward.
When you say it uses the same SMB uid, does it mean that it corresponds to
the sam use on the Samba server ?
Jerome
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerald Carter" <gcarter at valinux.com>
To: "Jerome Baumgarten" <jerome_baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: Win2k Terminal Server: SMB uid's
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Jerome Baumgarten wrote:
>
> > You mean there that it is not a good idea to use Samba with Microsoft
> > Terminal Services, right ?
>
> I like to same it is not a good idea to use Win2k TSE with Samba.:)
> You can still use this registry setting on WinNT4 TSE
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> cheers, jerry
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
> \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
> http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
> http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
>
> "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
> - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Return-Path: <urban at teststation.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from fungus.teststation.com (fungus.teststation.com
[212.32.186.211]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B284253
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cola.teststation.com (tron.teststation.com
[212.32.186.212]) by fungus.teststation.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP
id f5KJv6014860; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 21:57:06 +0200
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 21:57:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: Urban Widmark <urban at teststation.com>
X-Sender: <puw at cola.teststation.com>
To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Michal=20Ambroz?= <rebus at seznam.cz>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-2?Q?smbmount=20=2D=20HP=5FUNIX?=
In-Reply-To: <3117.9729-9700-2115064249-993054569 at seznam.cz>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106202153441.4769-100000 at cola.teststation.co
m>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, [iso-8859-2] Michal Ambroz wrote:
> Please is it posible to mount SMB shares to fileszstem tree under
> HP UNIX or is this feature (to mount smbfs) special to Linux ?
No, Linux only (there is a BSD version too. No relation)
Try looking at sharity (-light) and/or smbwrapper/smbsh.
(I think there is a third alternative I'm supposed to mention ... anyone?)
This is getting to be a FAQ, and if you search the mailing list archive,
I'm sure you could find it.
/Urban
Return-Path: <awesome-dave1 at juno.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from m12.boston.juno.com (m12.boston.juno.com [64.136.24.75])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0009C427C for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cookie.juno.com by cookie.juno.com for
<"8acBbvM7uHVHcGTugSU3tekGacJe56W4W/+F3ftokeQWDjyOa+1iAg==">
Received: (from awesome-dave1 at juno.com) by m12.boston.juno.com
(queuemail) id F8EG84FY; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:01:05 EDT
To: samba at samba.org
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:51:46 -0400
Subject: %L not expanding.
Message-ID: <20010620.165147.-2091369.0.awesome-dave1 at juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 4.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Juno-Att: 0
X-Juno-RefParts: 0
From: awesome-dave1 at juno.com
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
I'm having this problem under both 2.07 and samba tng. I've got a samba
server that uses encrypted passwords. I need to be able to hook up to it
with lan manager network boot disks for imaging purposes. They use
non-encrypted passwords. I've given my machine a netbios alias server1,
which I'm hopeful will be the machine to connect to. I've got an include
file smb-server1 which has the encrypt passwords option set to no in it.
Yet when I try to include it like this:
include <path/smb-%L.conf
I get the error when running testparm:
can not find include file /path/smb-.conf
Anyone know why the %L isn't expanding?
Thanks.
Dave.
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
Return-Path: <herb at chomps.engr.sgi.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 892DE50E5 for <samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun
2001 14:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2])
by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not
authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for
unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id OAA02331;
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:09:18 -0700 (PDT) mail_from
(herb at chomps.engr.sgi.com)
Received: from chomps.engr.sgi.com (chomps.engr.sgi.com [163.154.35.63])
by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA83658; Wed,
20 Jun 2001 14:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chomps.engr.sgi.com (chomps.engr.sgi.com [163.154.35.63])
by chomps.engr.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA07287; Wed,
20 Jun 2001 14:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3B3110FD.B2256543 at chomps.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:09:17 -0700
From: Herb Lewis <herb at chomps.engr.sgi.com>
Organization: Silicon Graphics Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP22)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: awesome-dave1 at juno.com
Cc: samba at samba.org
Subject: Re: %L not expanding.
References: <20010620.165147.-2091369.0.awesome-dave1 at juno.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
awesome-dave1 at juno.com wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm having this problem under both 2.07 and samba tng. I've got a samba
> server that uses encrypted passwords. I need to be able to hook up to it
> with lan manager network boot disks for imaging purposes. They use
> non-encrypted passwords. I've given my machine a netbios alias server1,
> which I'm hopeful will be the machine to connect to. I've got an include
> file smb-server1 which has the encrypt passwords option set to no in it.
> Yet when I try to include it like this:
> include <path/smb-%L.conf
> I get the error when running testparm:
> can not find include file /path/smb-.conf
> Anyone know why the %L isn't expanding?
> Thanks.
> Dave.
>
Testparm does not get a connection from a client with the information.
Use testparm -L <servername> to test for what would be defined for
a connection to a particular server name.
--
======================================================================
Herb Lewis Silicon Graphics
Networking Engineer 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy MS-510
Strategic Software Organization Mountain View, CA 94043-1351
herb at sgi.com Tel: 650-933-2177
http://www.sgi.com Fax: 650-932-2177
======================================================================
Return-Path: <awesome-dave1 at juno.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from m12.boston.juno.com (m12.boston.juno.com [64.136.24.75])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072705094 for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cookie.juno.com by cookie.juno.com for
<"8acBbvM7uHVHcGTugSU3tekGacJe56W4J8bcC8VCgTXXTnIDsK+aMQ==">
Received: (from awesome-dave1 at juno.com) by m12.boston.juno.com
(queuemail) id F8EJ9DCF; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:36:11 EDT
To: herb at chomps.engr.sgi.com
Cc: samba at samba.org
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:26:09 -0400
Subject: Re: %L not expanding.
Message-ID: <20010620.172643.-1990125.0.awesome-dave1 at juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 4.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Juno-Att: 0
X-Juno-RefParts: 0
From: awesome-dave1 at juno.com
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
Using
testparm -L
still gave me an include file can't find error, but this time the file
was different:
smb-smb-server1.conf.conf
Dave.
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:09:17 -0700 Herb Lewis <herb at chomps.engr.sgi.com>
writes:
> awesome-dave1 at juno.com wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > I'm having this problem under both 2.07 and samba tng.
> I've got a samba
> > server that uses encrypted passwords. I need to be able to hook up
> to it
> > with lan manager network boot disks for imaging purposes. They use
> > non-encrypted passwords. I've given my machine a netbios alias
> server1,
> > which I'm hopeful will be the machine to connect to. I've got an
> include
> > file smb-server1 which has the encrypt passwords option set to no
> in it.
> > Yet when I try to include it like this:
> > include <path/smb-%L.conf
> > I get the error when running testparm:
> > can not find include file /path/smb-.conf
> > Anyone know why the %L isn't expanding?
> > Thanks.
> > Dave.
> >
>
> Testparm does not get a connection from a client with the
> information.
> Use testparm -L <servername> to test for what would be defined for
> a connection to a particular server name.
>
> --
> ======================================================================
> Herb Lewis Silicon Graphics
> Networking Engineer 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy
> MS-510
> Strategic Software Organization Mountain View, CA
> 94043-1351
> herb at sgi.com Tel: 650-933-2177
> http://www.sgi.com Fax: 650-932-2177
> ======================================================================
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
Return-Path: <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 898614461 for <samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun
2001 16:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as2-206.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.10.206]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2)
with ESMTP id f5KNgDI12757; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:42:14 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root at yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
BAA12199; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 01:06:02 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet at piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
BAA15216; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 01:06:02 +1000
Message-ID: <3B30BBDA.7BE5E70 at bartlett.house>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 01:06:02 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Reply-To: abartlet at samba.org
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
Cc: Jan Strohbehn <edv at rauheshaus.de>, samba at samba.org
Subject: Re: taking ownership
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106200820120.1006-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Gerald Carter wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Jan Strohbehn wrote:
>
> > Hi !!
> >
> > I just tried to take the ownership of a file. It worked neither from a
> > NT nor from a W2K client, although I saw that the set_nt_acl function
> > was called when using W2k. Isn't this yet implemented or is it my fault
> > ????
>
> Only root can take/set ownership of a file in UNIX. were you
> connected as root? I thought we had this working.
>
I presume implementing this as a copy/delete/move operation is out of
the quesiton?
And yes, I know exactly how ugly this looks. :-)
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at samba.org
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
abartlet at samba.org
Return-Path: <dan.tappin at orourke-eng.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com
(h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com [207.228.121.48]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 623C44249 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 192.168.0.27 by h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com; Wed,
20 Jun 2001 18:02:50 -0600
Reply-To: <dan.tappin at orourke-eng.com>
From: "Dan Tappin" <dan.tappin at orourke-eng.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Samba Set-up Troubles [Newbie]
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 18:03:13 -0600
Message-ID: <NEBBJHEDELJOHGLFBBFFIEMJCGAA.dan.tappin at orourke-eng.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <20010619190200.BD9D94EDC at lists.samba.org>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Attached is my smb.conf file. I figure this will help those of you that
actually understand it.
I would like to work on 'baby-steps' here.
I would like to logon to the NN at start-up in Windows 9X and have a home
directory available for me to use on the Linux box. I would like to have
additional users that logon and have their own home directory. I would also
like to set-up a basic share that all users can access. How do I go about
that??
I am new to Linux so I would prefer to use SWAT is possilbe. I will venture
into command line but be patient :^)
As it stands now FILESERVER shows up in the NN but it is inaccessible. I
get a 'Resource:\\FILESERVER\IPC$' password prompt. No passwords work for
this.
My intuition makes me think it has to do with the way my Linux box is
configured for the home directories. I have tries 'userconf' and
'smbpasswd' and set usernames and password for the users I wish to grant
home directories.
What about password encryption? I am reading conflicting reports on how
this should be set on Samba and Windows clients.
I think I am missing some basic step here. My inexperience at Linux isn't
helping either :^)
FileServer:
- Linux 7.0
- Samba 2.0.7
Thanks in advance,
Dan
---------------------------------------------------
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1)
# Date: 2001/06/20 17:44:05
# Global parameters
[global]
coding system =
client code page = 850
workgroup = OROURKE
netbios name = FILESERVER
netbios aliases =
netbios scope =
server string = OEL File Server
interfaces =
bind interfaces only = No
security = USER
encrypt passwords = No
update encrypted = No
allow trusted domains = Yes
hosts equiv =
min password length = 5
map to guest = Never
null passwords = No
password server =
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
root directory = /
passwd program = /bin/passwd
passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *changed*
passwd chat debug = No
username map =
password level = 0
username level = 0
unix password sync = No
restrict anonymous = No
use rhosts = No
ssl = No
ssl hosts =
ssl hosts resign =
ssl CA certDir =
ssl CA certFile =
ssl server cert =
ssl server key =
ssl client cert =
ssl client key =
ssl require clientcert = No
ssl require servercert = No
ssl ciphers =
ssl version = ssl2or3
ssl compatibility = No
debug level = 1
syslog = 1
syslog only = No
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 0
debug timestamp = Yes
debug hires timestamp = No
debug pid = No
debug uid = No
protocol = NT1
read bmpx = No
read raw = Yes
write raw = Yes
nt smb support = Yes
nt pipe support = Yes
nt acl support = Yes
announce version = 4.2
announce as = NT
max mux = 50
max xmit = 65535
name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast
max ttl = 259200
max wins ttl = 518400
min wins ttl = 21600
time server = No
change notify timeout = 60
deadtime = 0
getwd cache = Yes
keepalive = 300
lpq cache time = 10
max disk size = 0
max open files = 10000
read prediction = No
read size = 16384
shared mem size = 1048576
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
stat cache size = 50
load printers = Yes
printcap name = /etc/printcap
printer driver file = /etc/samba/printers.def
strip dot = No
character set =
mangled stack = 50
stat cache = Yes
domain groups =
domain admin group =
domain guest group =
domain admin users =
domain guest users =
machine password timeout = 604800
add user script =
delete user script =
logon script =
logon path = \\%N\%U\profile
logon drive =
logon home = \\%N\%U
domain logons = No
os level = 20
lm announce = Auto
lm interval = 60
preferred master = No
local master = Yes
domain master = No
browse list = Yes
dns proxy = No
wins proxy = No
wins server =
wins support = No
wins hook =
kernel oplocks = Yes
ole locking compatibility = Yes
oplock break wait time = 10
smbrun = /usr/bin/smbrun
config file =
auto services =
lock directory = /var/lock/samba
default service =
message command =
dfree command =
valid chars =
remote announce =
remote browse sync =
socket address = 0.0.0.0
homedir map = auto.home
time offset = 0
unix realname = No
NIS homedir = No
source environment =
panic action =
comment =
path =
revalidate = No
username =
guest account = nobody
invalid users =
valid users =
admin users =
read list =
write list =
force user =
force group =
writeable = No
create mask = 0744
force create mode = 00
security mask = -1
force security mode = -1
directory mask = 0755
force directory mode = 00
directory security mask = -1
force directory security mode = -1
inherit permissions = No
guest only = No
guest ok = No
only user = No
hosts allow =
hosts deny =
status = Yes
max connections = 0
min print space = 0
strict sync = No
sync always = No
write cache size = 0
printable = No
postscript = No
printing = lprng
print command = lpr -r -P%p %s
lpq command = lpq -P%p
lprm command = lprm -P%p %j
lppause command =
lpresume command =
queuepause command =
queueresume command =
printer =
printer driver = NULL
printer driver location =
default case = lower
case sensitive = No
preserve case = Yes
short preserve case = Yes
mangle case = No
mangling char = ~
hide dot files = Yes
delete veto files = No
veto files =
hide files =
veto oplock files =
map system = No
map hidden = No
map archive = Yes
mangled names = Yes
mangled map =
browseable = Yes
blocking locks = Yes
fake oplocks = No
locking = Yes
oplocks = Yes
level2 oplocks = No
oplock contention limit = 2
strict locking = No
share modes = Yes
copy =
include =
preexec =
preexec close = No
postexec =
root preexec =
root preexec close = No
root postexec =
available = Yes
volume =
fstype = NTFS
set directory = No
wide links = Yes
follow symlinks = Yes
dont descend =
magic script =
magic output =
delete readonly = No
dos filetimes = No
dos filetime resolution = No
fake directory create times = No
[homes]
writeable = Yes
browseable = No
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
printable = Yes
browseable = No
Return-Path: <on at cs.ait.ac.th>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A493421A for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 18:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (on at banyan.cs.ait.ac.th
[192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.11.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
f5L1App22092 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:10:51
+0700 (ICT)
Received: (from on at localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.8.5/8.8.5) id
IAA04048; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:10:35 +0700 (ICT)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:10:35 +0700 (ICT)
Message-Id: <200106210110.IAA04048 at banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
X-Authentication-Warning: banyan.cs.ait.ac.th: on set sender to
on at banyan.cs.ait.ac.th using -f
From: Olivier Nicole <on at cs.ait.ac.th>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: sbmclient returned 1
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
I am using Samba in my lab to serve about 50 Winwods machines, as well
as the combination Amanda/smbclient for back-up facilities.
Yesterday the back-up gave me the abose error message, saying that
smbclient returned with error 1.
The command that triggered the error is:
smbclient \\multimedia\d -U -E -d0 -Tqca -
On previous and subsequent run of the back-up, there were no
error. The machine multimedia was up and running, as other shares got
backed-up.
I wonder what may have caused sbmcient to return with exit code of 1.
Thank you,
Olivier
Return-Path: <ygwang at prosten.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from www.uphosting.com.br (unknown [66.70.16.230]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306E84210 for
<samba at samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 18:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wangyouguo ([210.5.18.79]) by www.uphosting.com.br
(8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5KI8ZM18829; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 18:08:36
GMT (envelope-from ygwang at prosten.com)
Message-ID: <001201c0f9f5$c2eed670$7a0245a8 at wangyouguo>
From: "Wang Youguo" <ygwang at prosten.com>
To: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>, "Christopher Travers"
<einhverfr at hotmail.com>, "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>,
<samba at samba.org>
Subject: Sincere Appreciation
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:58:57 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Dear friends,
Thanks for you help! My Samba is running well now.
I think I can not make it without your help, so I must express my sincere appreciation to all who help me to solve my problem.
THANK YOU!
Best Regards,
Kerry Wang
Return-Path: <axelseaa at amadmax.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from socrates.thinkhost.com (socrates.thinkhost.com
[209.61.189.124]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DEE4711
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aaron (24-240-98-22.hsacorp.net [24.240.98.22]) by
socrates.thinkhost.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5L27P121415 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 02:07:25 GMT (envelope-from
axelseaa at amadmax.com)
From: "Aaron Axelsen" <axelseaa at amadmax.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: FW: Samba Question
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 21:06:37 -0500
Message-ID: <IBEPKELDEEHCFHIGOCCEIEEFCBAA.axelseaa at amadmax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
---
Aaron Axelsen
AIM: AAAK2
ICQ: 12378336
URL: http://www.amadmax.com
EMAIL: axelseaa at amadmax.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Potter [mailto:tpot at valinux.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 8:39 PM
To: Aaron Axelsen
Subject: Re: Samba Question
Aaron Axelsen writes:
> Hello,
>
> When i try to mount shares on my win2000 professional machine i get this
> error:
>
>
> [root at mmax /mnt]# mount -o username=password -t smbfs //aaron/d
/mnt/aarond
> Connection to aaron failed
> SMB connection failed
> mount: backgrounding "//aaron/d"
> [root at mmax /mnt]# Connection to aaron failed
> SMB connection failed
>
> Any Suggestions?
>
>
> ---
> Aaron Axelsen
> AIM: AAAK2
> ICQ: 12378336
> URL: http://www.amadmax.com
> EMAIL: axelseaa at amadmax.com
>
You should send your mail to lists at lists.samba.org, not
mailman-admin at lists.samba.org.
Regards,
Tim.
Return-Path: <on at cs.ait.ac.th>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF22F511C for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (on at banyan.cs.ait.ac.th
[192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.11.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
f5L2Dvp22367; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:13:57 +0700 (ICT)
Received: (from on at localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.8.5/8.8.5) id
JAA04118; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:13:41 +0700 (ICT)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:13:41 +0700 (ICT)
Message-Id: <200106210213.JAA04118 at banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
X-Authentication-Warning: banyan.cs.ait.ac.th: on set sender to
on at banyan.cs.ait.ac.th using -f
From: Olivier Nicole <on at cs.ait.ac.th>
To: axelseaa at amadmax.com
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
In-reply-to: <IBEPKELDEEHCFHIGOCCEIEEFCBAA.axelseaa at amadmax.com>
Subject: Re: FW: Samba Question
References: <IBEPKELDEEHCFHIGOCCEIEEFCBAA.axelseaa at amadmax.com>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> [root at mmax /mnt]# mount -o username=password -t smbfs //aaron/d
/mnt/aarond
> Connection to aaron failed
> SMB connection failed
> mount: backgrounding "//aaron/d"
> [root at mmax /mnt]# Connection to aaron failed
> SMB connection failed
Winth win2000, I found that using a domain name (or is that a work
group name) helps a lot. The argument -W in smbclient
Olivier
Return-Path: <skreien at wcnet.org>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from accesstoledo.com (unknown [208.16.180.97]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A85644F9 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scot.wcnet.org (unverified [207.12.173.235]) by
accesstoledo.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 4.5.4) with ESMTP id
<B0000725498 at accesstoledo.com> for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20
Jun 2001 22:24:32 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010620221215.02891b80 at mcewen.wcnet.org>
X-Sender: skmail at mcewen.wcnet.org
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 22:17:38 -0400
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
From: Scot Kreienkamp <skreien at wcnet.org>
Subject: Re: Win2k Terminal Server: SMB uid's
In-Reply-To: <030701c0f9be$faff6d40$6f01010a at nt.local>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106201331580.22114-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I definitely cannot go backwards. I have 2.0.7 installed right now, and
2000 TSE. They don't use it as a TSE right now, but will begin in about 2
months or so. Hopefully 2.2.1 will be out by then, including this fix. :)
At 03:27 PM Wednesday 6/20/01, Jerome Baumgarten wrote:
>Thanks but my problem is that I already have Windows 2000 TS and I am not
>sure I can go backward.
>When you say it uses the same SMB uid, does it mean that it corresponds to
>the sam use on the Samba server ?
>
>Jerome
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Gerald Carter" <gcarter at valinux.com>
>To: "Jerome Baumgarten" <jerome_baumgarten at yahoo.fr>
>Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 11:32 AM
>Subject: Re: Win2k Terminal Server: SMB uid's
>
>
> > On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Jerome Baumgarten wrote:
> >
> > > You mean there that it is not a good idea to use Samba with Microsoft
> > > Terminal Services, right ?
> >
> > I like to same it is not a good idea to use Win2k TSE with Samba.:)
> > You can still use this registry setting on WinNT4 TSE
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > cheers, jerry
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
> > \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
> > http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
> > http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
> >
> > "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
> > - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
>
>_________________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <halflife at meteng.on.ca>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from meteng.on.ca (meteng.on.ca [216.129.13.49]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D646424C for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 22:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from meteng.on.ca (cr643746-a.ym1.on.wave.home.com
[24.43.78.105]) by meteng.on.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA23608
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 01:22:21 -0400
Message-ID: <3B3033AE.5529DF3E at meteng.on.ca>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 01:25:02 -0400
From: lejer <halflife at meteng.on.ca>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Samba log errors
References: <OF86B1872D.D9C8FFA3-ON85256A71.004D5520 at EQUINOX.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello all. Being new to the list I thought I'd start with what should
be a simple question.
For the last 180+ days I've had a samba server running as a file server
in a small office. The first problem being the naming conventions on
the log files themselves. Seldom do the logs contain any info. There
are just hundreds and hundreds of them with stupid .1.1.1.1.1.1.1
after them.
For example:
/dev/pts/0 root at lkms /var/log/samba # dir
total 292
drwx------ 2 root root 12288 Jun 17 04:02 .
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jun 17 04:02 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 33454 Jun 20 09:24 log.nmb
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun 17 04:02 log.nmb.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun 17 04:02 log.nmb.1.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun 17 04:02 log.nmb.1.1.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun 17 04:02 log.nmb.1.1.1.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun 17 04:02
log.nmb.1.1.1.1.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun 17 04:02
log.nmb.1.1.1.1.1.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun 17 04:02
log.nmb.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
etc, etc. I've had discussions with colleagues in the past about
exactly what causes this behavior. Sure its harmless enough,
however the machine is 500km away and I must administer it remotely.
As such, I have cron email me a report of various system info
including the sate of the log files. This pyramid of log file
names gets very very annoying after a while. I believe it has
something to do with the log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log command.
Any suggestions would be appreciated
I'm running samba 2.0.7 on RHL 6.2
Regards,
LeJer
Return-Path: <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3A4427C for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20
Jun 2001 22:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as1-3.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.9.3]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with
ESMTP id f5L5WxI00774; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:33:00 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root at yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
PAA14904; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:32:32 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet at piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
PAA24328; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:32:31 +1000
Message-ID: <3B3186EF.1FCB797B at bartlett.house>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:32:31 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Reply-To: abartlet at samba.org
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lejer <halflife at meteng.on.ca>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Samba log errors
References: <OF86B1872D.D9C8FFA3-ON85256A71.004D5520 at EQUINOX.COM>
<3B3033AE.5529DF3E at meteng.on.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
lejer wrote:
>
> Hello all. Being new to the list I thought I'd start with what should
> be a simple question.
>
> For the last 180+ days I've had a samba server running as a file server
> in a small office. The first problem being the naming conventions on
> the log files themselves. Seldom do the logs contain any info. There
> are just hundreds and hundreds of them with stupid .1.1.1.1.1.1.1
> after them.
>
> For example:
>
> /dev/pts/0 root at lkms /var/log/samba # dir
> total 292
> drwx------ 2 root root 12288 Jun 17 04:02 .
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jun 17 04:02 ..
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 33454 Jun 20 09:24 log.nmb
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun 17 04:02 log.nmb.1
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun 17 04:02 log.nmb.1.1
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun 17 04:02 log.nmb.1.1.1
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun 17 04:02 log.nmb.1.1.1.1
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun 17 04:02
> log.nmb.1.1.1.1.1
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun 17 04:02
> log.nmb.1.1.1.1.1.1
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun 17 04:02
> log.nmb.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
>
> etc, etc. I've had discussions with colleagues in the past about
> exactly what causes this behavior. Sure its harmless enough,
> however the machine is 500km away and I must administer it remotely.
> As such, I have cron email me a report of various system info
> including the sate of the log files. This pyramid of log file
> names gets very very annoying after a while. I believe it has
> something to do with the log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log command.
>
> Any suggestions would be appreciated
>
> I'm running samba 2.0.7 on RHL 6.2
>
Redhat jiggered up their packaging. They rotate all the files that
match /var/log/samba/log.*, which naturally enough includes all the
previously rotated logfiles. Change this to /var/log/samba/*.log and
use log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log to fix it.
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at samba.org
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
abartlet at samba.org
Return-Path: <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AD74269 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 22:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5L5wcC18517; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:58:38 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id HAA03509; Thu, 21
Jun 2001 07:58:38 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA01512; Thu, 21 Jun
2001 07:58:38 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>, <dan.tappin at orourke-eng.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:58:37 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Samba Set-up Troubles [Newbie]
Message-ID: <3B31A92D.32328.2302F7 at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <NEBBJHEDELJOHGLFBBFFIEMJCGAA.dan.tappin at orourke-eng.com>
References: <20010619190200.BD9D94EDC at lists.samba.org>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Attached is my smb.conf file. I figure this will help those of you that
> actually understand it.
>
> I would like to work on 'baby-steps' here.
>
> I would like to logon to the NN at start-up in Windows 9X and have a home
> directory available for me to use on the Linux box. I would like to have
> additional users that logon and have their own home directory. I would also
> like to set-up a basic share that all users can access. How do I go about
> that??
>
> I am new to Linux so I would prefer to use SWAT is possilbe. I will venture
> into command line but be patient :^)
>
> As it stands now FILESERVER shows up in the NN but it is inaccessible. I
> get a 'Resource:\\FILESERVER\IPC$' password prompt. No passwords work for
> this.
>
> My intuition makes me think it has to do with the way my Linux box is
> configured for the home directories. I have tries 'userconf' and
> 'smbpasswd' and set usernames and password for the users I wish to grant
> home directories.
>
> What about password encryption? I am reading conflicting reports on how
> this should be set on Samba and Windows clients.
If you want to use encrypted passwords, you have to change nothing in
Windows, but configure samba to use them and maintain the smbpasswd
file. You have to use them if you want to set up a PDC for NT.
If you do not want to use encrypted passwords, the samba side is
easy: You have to change nothing. But in this case you have to tell
windows to use plaintext passwords with this registry-keys found in
the docs-directory of the samba source:
Win98:
REGEDIT4
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\VxD\VNETSUP]
"EnablePlainTextPassword"=dword:00000001
Win95:
REGEDIT4
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\VxD\VNETSUP]
"EnablePlainTextPassword"=dword:00000001
For the start I propose to use plaintext passwords. Once this is
running you can change to encrypted passwords if you want or need.
One problem with Win9x is to supply the right user name for the
connection to the server. You can not enter it when you connect. The
user name is the one you enter when Win9x comes up. For the start:
keep unix and windows user names the same.
Christian
>
> I think I am missing some basic step here. My inexperience at Linux isn't
> helping either :^)
>
> FileServer:
> - Linux 7.0
> - Samba 2.0.7
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Dan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> # Samba config file created using SWAT
> # from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1)
> # Date: 2001/06/20 17:44:05
>
> # Global parameters
> [global]
> coding system =
> client code page = 850
> workgroup = OROURKE
> netbios name = FILESERVER
> netbios aliases =
> netbios scope =
> server string = OEL File Server
> interfaces =
> bind interfaces only = No
> security = USER
> encrypt passwords = No
Yes or No, see the remarks above.
> update encrypted = No
> allow trusted domains = Yes
> hosts equiv =
> min password length = 5
> map to guest = Never
> null passwords = No
> password server =
> smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
> root directory = /
> passwd program = /bin/passwd
> passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *changed*
> passwd chat debug = No
> username map =
> password level = 0
> username level = 0
> unix password sync = No
> restrict anonymous = No
> use rhosts = No
> ssl = No
> ssl hosts =
> ssl hosts resign =
> ssl CA certDir =
> ssl CA certFile =
> ssl server cert =
> ssl server key =
> ssl client cert =
> ssl client key =
> ssl require clientcert = No
> ssl require servercert = No
> ssl ciphers =
> ssl version = ssl2or3
> ssl compatibility = No
> debug level = 1
> syslog = 1
> syslog only = No
> log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
> max log size = 0
> debug timestamp = Yes
> debug hires timestamp = No
> debug pid = No
> debug uid = No
> protocol = NT1
> read bmpx = No
> read raw = Yes
> write raw = Yes
> nt smb support = Yes
> nt pipe support = Yes
> nt acl support = Yes
> announce version = 4.2
> announce as = NT
> max mux = 50
> max xmit = 65535
> name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast
> max ttl = 259200
> max wins ttl = 518400
> min wins ttl = 21600
> time server = No
> change notify timeout = 60
> deadtime = 0
> getwd cache = Yes
> keepalive = 300
> lpq cache time = 10
> max disk size = 0
> max open files = 10000
> read prediction = No
> read size = 16384
> shared mem size = 1048576
> socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
> stat cache size = 50
> load printers = Yes
> printcap name = /etc/printcap
> printer driver file = /etc/samba/printers.def
> strip dot = No
> character set =
> mangled stack = 50
> stat cache = Yes
> domain groups =
> domain admin group =
> domain guest group =
> domain admin users =
> domain guest users =
> machine password timeout = 604800
> add user script =
> delete user script =
> logon script =
> logon path = \\%N\%U\profile
> logon drive =
> logon home = \\%N\%U
> domain logons = No
> os level = 20
> lm announce = Auto
> lm interval = 60
> preferred master = No
> local master = Yes
> domain master = No
> browse list = Yes
> dns proxy = No
> wins proxy = No
> wins server =
> wins support = No
> wins hook =
> kernel oplocks = Yes
> ole locking compatibility = Yes
> oplock break wait time = 10
> smbrun = /usr/bin/smbrun
> config file =
> auto services =
> lock directory = /var/lock/samba
> default service =
> message command =
> dfree command =
> valid chars =
> remote announce =
> remote browse sync =
> socket address = 0.0.0.0
> homedir map = auto.home
> time offset = 0
> unix realname = No
> NIS homedir = No
> source environment =
> panic action =
> comment =
> path =
> revalidate = No
> username =
> guest account = nobody
> invalid users =
> valid users =
> admin users =
> read list =
> write list =
> force user =
> force group =
> writeable = No
> create mask = 0744
> force create mode = 00
> security mask = -1
> force security mode = -1
> directory mask = 0755
> force directory mode = 00
> directory security mask = -1
> force directory security mode = -1
> inherit permissions = No
> guest only = No
> guest ok = No
> only user = No
> hosts allow =
> hosts deny =
> status = Yes
> max connections = 0
> min print space = 0
> strict sync = No
> sync always = No
> write cache size = 0
> printable = No
> postscript = No
> printing = lprng
> print command = lpr -r -P%p %s
> lpq command = lpq -P%p
> lprm command = lprm -P%p %j
> lppause command =
> lpresume command =
> queuepause command =
> queueresume command =
> printer =
> printer driver = NULL
> printer driver location =
> default case = lower
> case sensitive = No
> preserve case = Yes
> short preserve case = Yes
> mangle case = No
> mangling char = ~
> hide dot files = Yes
> delete veto files = No
> veto files =
> hide files =
> veto oplock files =
> map system = No
> map hidden = No
> map archive = Yes
> mangled names = Yes
> mangled map =
> browseable = Yes
> blocking locks = Yes
> fake oplocks = No
> locking = Yes
> oplocks = Yes
> level2 oplocks = No
> oplock contention limit = 2
> strict locking = No
> share modes = Yes
> copy =
> include =
> preexec =
> preexec close = No
> postexec =
> root preexec =
> root preexec close = No
> root postexec =
> available = Yes
> volume =
> fstype = NTFS
> set directory = No
> wide links = Yes
> follow symlinks = Yes
> dont descend =
> magic script =
> magic output =
> delete readonly = No
> dos filetimes = No
> dos filetime resolution = No
> fake directory create times = No
>
> [homes]
> writeable = Yes
> browseable = No
>
> [printers]
> comment = All Printers
> path = /var/spool/samba
> printable = Yes
> browseable = No
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <Nikola.Milutinovic at ev.co.yu>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from Firewall.ev.co.yu (gateway.ev.co.yu [194.247.214.130]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A549447E for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 00:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by Firewall.ev.co.yu; (5.65v4.0/1.3/10May95) id AA28542; Mon,
21 Jun 1999 09:20:35 +0200
Received: from brigitte (Brigitte.ev.co.yu [192.168.61.110]) by
Uprava.ev.co.yu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA11731 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:19:09 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <010501c0fa22$348e58b0$6e3da8c0 at ev.co.yu>
From: "Nikola Milutinovic" <Nikola.Milutinovic at ev.co.yu>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Samba and SSL problem
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:17:18 +0200
Organization: EPS Elektrovojvodina
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi all.
I'm trying to compile: Samba on my Tru64 UNIX with SSL, but I get an error message that makes me feel uneasy:
Compiling smbd/ssl.c
cc: Warning: smbd/ssl.c, line 160: In this statement, the referenced type of
the
pointer value "ssl_temp_rsa_cb" is "function (pointer to struct ssl_st, int)
returning pointer to struct rsa_st", which is not compatible with "function
(pointer to struct ssl_st, int, int) returning pointer to struct rsa_st".
(ptrmismatch)
SSL_CTX_set_tmp_rsa_callback(sslContext, ssl_temp_rsa_cb);
---------------------------------------------^
These are the versions:
SMB: Samba 2.2.0
SSL: OpenSSL 0.9.6a
OS: Tru64 UNIX 4.0F (Digital UNIX or DEC OSF/1)
CC: DEC CC native compiler
I have read in the docs that Samba supports SSLeay or OpenSSL. This error (warning) message indicates that there is a serious function missmatch. I fear that enabling SSL on this binary will crash the server.
Am I supposed to use OpenSSL 0.9.5 instead of 0.9.6a ?
Nix.
Return-Path: <edv at rauheshaus.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mgate.lantana.net (unknown [194.175.202.6]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF66439C for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 02:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.rnb.de (unverified) by mgate.lantana.net (Content
Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id
<Tc2afca065447160f1c at mgate.lantana.net> for <samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21
Jun 2001 11:11:20 +0200
Received: from mailgate1.rnb.de ([194.49.51.139]) by mail.rnb.de (Lotus
SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2 10-16-1998)) with SMTP id 41256A72.00336B22;
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:21:39 +0100
Received: from win2000-srv.rauheshaus.de ([192.168.252.106]) by
mailgate1.rnb.de (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.2 (693.3 8-11-1998)) with SMTP
id 41256A72.0036B4F5; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:57:32 +0100
Subject: Re: taking ownership
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:14:04 +0200
Message-ID: <6A48864DC7CCF14E9500D91451458952C78C at WIN2000-SRV.WIN2000.ra
uheshaus.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Topic: taking ownership
Thread-Index: AcD5mcdX9veDej4ATgG8uiW7bUaTDgAltoow
From: "Jan Strohbehn" <edv at rauheshaus.de>
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
To: "Gerald Carter" <gcarter at valinux.com>, "Jan Strohbehn"
<jstrohbehn at artstor.de>
Cc: <samba at samba.org>
Reply-To: <jan at artstor.de>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> > > > I just tried to take the ownership of a file. It worked
> neither from
> a
> > > > NT nor from a W2K client, although I saw that the
> set_nt_acl function
> > > > was called when using W2k. Isn't this yet implemented
> or is it my
> fault
> > > > ????
> > >
> > > Only root can take/set ownership of a file in UNIX. were you
> > > connected as root? I thought we had this working.
> > >
> >
> > Hi !!
> >
> > I just tried it again as a member of "admin users", and it
> worked. But
> > it only works if samba is a domain member and only from W2k clients.
> > There is still no chance to get it working from NT :-( Any ideas???
>
> Maybe. We'll look into it.
Great!!!
I dont't know if this helps, but I've seen in the log, that the request
from W2k ends up in "call_nt_transact_set_security_desc", while the
request from NT doesn't.
Thank you,
Jan
Return-Path: <shadow at webdev.ines.ro>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from webdev.ines.ro (WebDev.iNES.RO [193.230.220.6]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3072344C2 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 02:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 14831 invoked by uid 501); 21 Jun 2001 09:29:31 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs at 127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP;
21 Jun 2001 09:29:31 -0000
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:29:31 +0300 (EEST)
From: Umbra <shadow at webdev.ines.ro>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Cannot join a domain with a win2k sp2 client
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106211206070.3046-100000 at webdev.ines.ro>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
I'm using the latest CVS Samba_2_2 as a PDC and I'm trying to join this
domain with a win2k sp2 client.
I have a user with the name of the machine on the server
hate$:x:516:100::/dev/null:/bin/false
and in smbpasswd:
hate$:516:15C7870873EA0892AAD3B435B51404EE:8846FFAD771AAD560BCB93F956895997:[W ]:LCT-3B2E2ABA:
I also have a user which I use to join the domain:
shadow:x:501:501:Umbra:/home/shadow:/bin/bash
and the corresponding smbpasswd entry
shadow:501:5A7FA8406203B3A1AAD3B435B51404EE:2CF4020E126A3314482E5E87A3F39508:[U ]:LCT-3AF80EF4:
The client is a member of a workgroup(a non existing one).
I configure it to be a member of a domain, I type in the domain
(INTERACTIVE), and he asks me an account with the permission to join the
domain. I use the account shadow, type in the password, but an error
occures:
The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials.
I've read the howto and saw what it says, but doesn't help(the machine
account was created from the server, and the client isn't a member of a
workgroup with the same name of the domain(there are other clients,
running win98 which are members of the workgroup INTERACTIVE, waiting to
become members of the domain, but I don't know if it has anything to do
with the win2k client).
The logs say:
[2001/06/21 12:20:16, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
[2001/06/21 12:20:16, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
[2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
[2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
[2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
[2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
[2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x7
If you need more details, please tell me, and I'll be glad to provide
them.
I would realy appreciate you help.
Another question:
Is samba(the latest cvs) able to export a list of users ?
(For using user-level access control for shares on the clients).
If I try to get a list of users from a win98 client, the client says it
can't get the list. Does samba need some special configuration for that
to work ?
Here is the config file:
[global]
workgroup = INTERACTIVE
server string = Webdev
client code page = 852
character set = ISO8859-2
printcap name = lpstat
load printers = yes
printing = cups
guest account = nobody
log file = /opt/samba/var/log.%m
max log size = 50
security = user
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
username map = /etc/smbusers
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
interfaces = 192.168.14.1
local master = yes
os level = 255
domain master = yes
preferred master = yes
domain logons = yes
logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u
logon drive = H:
logon home = \\homeserver\%u
wins support = yes
#============================ Share Definitions
==============================
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = no
writable = yes
# Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain
Logons
[netlogon]
comment = Network Logon Service
path = /opt/samba/lib/netlogon
guest ok = yes
writable = no
share modes = no
write list = administrator
[profiles]
path = /opt/samba/lib/profile
writeable = yes
create mask = 0600
directory mask = 0700
Return-Path: <palme at uni-wuppertal.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.urz.uni-wuppertal.de (mail.urz.uni-wuppertal.de
[132.195.64.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7EBB4215
for <samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 03:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de (wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de
[132.195.20.7]) by mail.urz.uni-wuppertal.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP
id MAA358245672; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:20:54 +0200 (MDT)
Received: (from palme at localhost) by wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de
(8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id MAA08633; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:20:54
+0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15153.51844.687901.467080 at wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:20:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: palme at uni-wuppertal.de (Hubert Palme)
To: ffrank at rz.uni-potsdam.de (Frank =?iso-8859-1?q?F=FCrst?=)
Cc: debian-user at lists.debian.org, Samba Liste <samba at samba.org>,
debian-user-de at lehmanns.de
Subject: Re: [Debian] Samba: Can't Rename the Log File
In-Reply-To: <87u21b6q2o.fsf at pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de>
References: <15152.41197.376623.575325 at wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de>
<87u21b6q2o.fsf at pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de>
X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 10) "Capitol Reef" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
>>>>> "f" == Frank =?iso-8859-1?q?F=FCrst?= <ffrank at rz.uni-potsdam.de> writes:
>> - Could there be a bug that smbd keeps the file open and thus cannot
>> "re"open it? And how to ship around then?
f> No, I don't think there's a bug. At least with log files created with
f> "log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log" there's no problem with
f> renaming. /var/log/smb is still used, but it doesn't get big. My setup
f> is essentially the same as yours, only I don't run swat (and I've
f> upgraded to samba 2.0.9 due to the known bugs recently).
f> Have you tried to once rename the file by hand and look wether the
f> problem is reproducible when it comes to renaming the file again? You
f> should perhaps create a big file so that you needn't wait for weeks...
I was allready considering it -- even when I can't solve the
problem...
--
======================================================================
Hubert Palme Bergische Universitaet-Gesamthochschule Wuppertal
Computing Center
D-42097 Wuppertal
E-Mail: palme at uni-wuppertal.de (Germany)
http://www.hrz.uni-wuppertal.de/hrz/personen/h_palme.html
Return-Path: <oliver at samera.com.py>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from Polaris.Pla.net.PY (polaris.pla.net.py [216.250.196.10])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917AF4451 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 03:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp at localhost) by Polaris.Pla.net.PY (8.11.2/8.11.2)
with UUCP id f5L2bCK25958; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:37:12 +0400
Received: from samera.com.py (sojourner.samera.com [192.168.1.1]) by
samera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA19060; Thu, 21 Jun 2001
06:34:57 -0400
Message-ID: <3B31CDD1.2000000 at samera.com.py>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:34:57 -0400
From: "Oliver Schulze L." <oliver at samera.com.py>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1)
Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-py
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Umbra <shadow at webdev.ines.ro>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Cannot join a domain with a win2k sp2 client
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106211206070.3046-100000 at webdev.ines.ro>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Do you have any network drives attached?
Oliver
Umbra wrote:
>Hello,
>I'm using the latest CVS Samba_2_2 as a PDC and I'm trying to join this
>domain with a win2k sp2 client.
>
>I have a user with the name of the machine on the server
>hate$:x:516:100::/dev/null:/bin/false
>
>and in smbpasswd:
>hate$:516:15C7870873EA0892AAD3B435B51404EE:8846FFAD771AAD560BCB93F956895997:[W ]:LCT-3B2E2ABA:
>
>I also have a user which I use to join the domain:
>shadow:x:501:501:Umbra:/home/shadow:/bin/bash
>
>and the corresponding smbpasswd entry
>
>shadow:501:5A7FA8406203B3A1AAD3B435B51404EE:2CF4020E126A3314482E5E87A3F39508:[U ]:LCT-3AF80EF4:
>
>The client is a member of a workgroup(a non existing one).
>I configure it to be a member of a domain, I type in the domain
>(INTERACTIVE), and he asks me an account with the permission to join the
>domain. I use the account shadow, type in the password, but an error
>occures:
>
>The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials.
>
>I've read the howto and saw what it says, but doesn't help(the machine
>account was created from the server, and the client isn't a member of a
>workgroup with the same name of the domain(there are other clients,
>running win98 which are members of the workgroup INTERACTIVE, waiting to
>become members of the domain, but I don't know if it has anything to do
>with the win2k client).
>
>The logs say:
>
>[2001/06/21 12:20:16, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
>[2001/06/21 12:20:16, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
>[2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
>[2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
>[2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
>[2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
>[2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x7
>
>If you need more details, please tell me, and I'll be glad to provide
>them.
>
>I would realy appreciate you help.
>
>Another question:
>Is samba(the latest cvs) able to export a list of users ?
>(For using user-level access control for shares on the clients).
>If I try to get a list of users from a win98 client, the client says it
>can't get the list. Does samba need some special configuration for that
>to work ?
>
>
>Here is the config file:
>[global]
> workgroup = INTERACTIVE
> server string = Webdev
> client code page = 852
> character set = ISO8859-2
> printcap name = lpstat
> load printers = yes
> printing = cups
> guest account = nobody
> log file = /opt/samba/var/log.%m
> max log size = 50
> security = user
> encrypt passwords = yes
> smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
> username map = /etc/smbusers
> socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
> interfaces = 192.168.14.1
> local master = yes
> os level = 255
> domain master = yes
> preferred master = yes
> domain logons = yes
> logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u
> logon drive = H:
> logon home = \\homeserver\%u
> wins support = yes
>#============================ Share Definitions
>==============================
>[homes]
> comment = Home Directories
> browseable = no
> writable = yes
>
># Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain
>Logons
> [netlogon]
> comment = Network Logon Service
> path = /opt/samba/lib/netlogon
> guest ok = yes
> writable = no
> share modes = no
> write list = administrator
> [profiles]
> path = /opt/samba/lib/profile
> writeable = yes
> create mask = 0600
> directory mask = 0700
>
--
Oliver Schulze L.
oliver at samera.com.py
Asuncion-Paraguay
Return-Path: <raj at maya.co.uk>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from relay1.cerbernet.co.uk (relay1.cerbernet.co.uk
[213.253.136.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA344481
for <samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 03:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from local (mail.maya.co.uk [213.253.144.181]) by
relay1.cerbernet.co.uk (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5LBdnZ04496 for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:39:50 GMT
Received: from maauser [10.0.0.10] by local (FTGate 2, 2, 1, 0); Thu, 21
Jun 01 11:42:31 +0100
Reply-To: <raj at maya.co.uk>
From: "Raj" <raj at maya.co.uk>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: OPPORTUNITIES IN SWEDEN
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:47:48 +0100
Message-ID: <005901c0fa3f$9d0afac0$0a00000a at maya.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/related by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was multipart/alternative
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Just a quick email to ascertain available people for Security work for a
major client of mine in Sweden
Please reply to this email if interested
rgds
Raj Parmar
European Consultant
Mayan International
Recruitment Agency
2-3 Golden Square
London, W1F 9HR
raj at maya.co.uk
http://www.maya.co.uk
Tel: 0207 4372947
Mob:0771 8722210
Fax: 0207 4373744
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/bmp which had a name of Outlook.bmp]
Return-Path: <robert at hoekstra.nu>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from cobalt01.skybernet.nl (unknown [217.17.128.197]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02144389 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 03:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from snws52 (SkyberNet [217.17.139.4]) by
cobalt01.skybernet.nl (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f5LAsgH24753; Thu,
21 Jun 2001 12:54:42 +0200
Message-ID: <009101c0fa40$dc57b3c0$4801010a at skybernet>
From: "Robert Hoekstra" <robert at hoekstra.nu>
To: "Umbra" <shadow at webdev.ines.ro>, <samba at lists.samba.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106211206070.3046-100000 at webdev.ines.ro>
Subject: Re: Cannot join a domain with a win2k sp2 client
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:56:43 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Don't you have to join using the root user anymore, in the current cvs?
furthermore, make sure that after starting your client which has to join,
doesn't try to contact the server for any reason (opening shares,
initializing printers, etc). Because as soon as w2k does that is opens
communications according to cached credentials, which don't match the
credentials you supply to join... hence the reaction.
I had to figure it out myself also.. rather nasty of w2k.. but okay..
----- Original Message -----
From: Umbra <shadow at webdev.ines.ro>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 11:29 AM
Subject: Cannot join a domain with a win2k sp2 client
> Hello,
> I'm using the latest CVS Samba_2_2 as a PDC and I'm trying to join this
> domain with a win2k sp2 client.
>
> I have a user with the name of the machine on the server
> hate$:x:516:100::/dev/null:/bin/false
>
> and in smbpasswd:
>
hate$:516:15C7870873EA0892AAD3B435B51404EE:8846FFAD771AAD560BCB93F956895997:
[W ]:LCT-3B2E2ABA:
>
> I also have a user which I use to join the domain:
> shadow:x:501:501:Umbra:/home/shadow:/bin/bash
>
> and the corresponding smbpasswd entry
>
>
shadow:501:5A7FA8406203B3A1AAD3B435B51404EE:2CF4020E126A3314482E5E87A3F39508
:[U ]:LCT-3AF80EF4:
>
> The client is a member of a workgroup(a non existing one).
> I configure it to be a member of a domain, I type in the domain
> (INTERACTIVE), and he asks me an account with the permission to join the
> domain. I use the account shadow, type in the password, but an error
> occures:
>
> The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials.
>
> I've read the howto and saw what it says, but doesn't help(the machine
> account was created from the server, and the client isn't a member of a
> workgroup with the same name of the domain(there are other clients,
> running win98 which are members of the workgroup INTERACTIVE, waiting to
> become members of the domain, but I don't know if it has anything to do
> with the win2k client).
>
> The logs say:
>
> [2001/06/21 12:20:16, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
> [2001/06/21 12:20:16, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
> [2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
> [2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
> [2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
> [2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
> [2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x7
>
> If you need more details, please tell me, and I'll be glad to provide
> them.
>
> I would realy appreciate you help.
>
> Another question:
> Is samba(the latest cvs) able to export a list of users ?
> (For using user-level access control for shares on the clients).
> If I try to get a list of users from a win98 client, the client says it
> can't get the list. Does samba need some special configuration for that
> to work ?
>
>
> Here is the config file:
> [global]
> workgroup = INTERACTIVE
> server string = Webdev
> client code page = 852
> character set = ISO8859-2
> printcap name = lpstat
> load printers = yes
> printing = cups
> guest account = nobody
> log file = /opt/samba/var/log.%m
> max log size = 50
> security = user
> encrypt passwords = yes
> smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
> username map = /etc/smbusers
> socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
> interfaces = 192.168.14.1
> local master = yes
> os level = 255
> domain master = yes
> preferred master = yes
> domain logons = yes
> logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u
> logon drive = H:
> logon home = \\homeserver\%u
> wins support = yes
> #============================ Share Definitions
> ==============================
> [homes]
> comment = Home Directories
> browseable = no
> writable = yes
>
> # Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain
> Logons
> [netlogon]
> comment = Network Logon Service
> path = /opt/samba/lib/netlogon
> guest ok = yes
> writable = no
> share modes = no
> write list = administrator
> [profiles]
> path = /opt/samba/lib/profile
> writeable = yes
> create mask = 0600
> directory mask = 0700
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <kosala at sjp.ac.lk>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mayura.sjp.ac.lk (mayura.sjp.ac.lk [192.248.32.3]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA1E4512 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 04:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mayura.sjp.ac.lk (Postfix, from userid 99) id F0CFD4EC8E;
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:21:44 +0600 (LKT)
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: problem with samba PDC
Message-ID: <993122504.3b31d8c8e799e at mayura.sjp.ac.lk>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:21:44 +0600 (LKT)
From: Kosala Atapattu <kosala at sjp.ac.lk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.4
X-Originating-IP: 192.248.32.225
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
hi there,
I couldn't connect to a samba PDC domain with Win2k or NT4 machines. smbd
debug log says that a codepage file and a unicodefile are missing. I hope U
can help me with this problem...
kosala atapattu
______________________________________________________________________________
Kosala Atapattu,
Undergraduate,
University of Sri Jayewardenepura,
Gangodavila,
Nugegoda.
Return-Path: <shadow at webdev.ines.ro>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from webdev.ines.ro (WebDev.iNES.RO [193.230.220.6]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C062E453F for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 04:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 16537 invoked by uid 501); 21 Jun 2001 11:23:22 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs at 127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP;
21 Jun 2001 11:23:22 -0000
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:23:22 +0300 (EEST)
From: Umbra <shadow at webdev.ines.ro>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Cannot join a domain with a win2k sp2 client
In-Reply-To: <009101c0fa40$dc57b3c0$4801010a at skybernet>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106211421450.16516-100000 at webdev.ines.ro>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
That worked, thanks.
I rebooted and maked sure it doesn't try to contact the server and
I used root for the account to join the domain(I didn't know that part).
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Robert Hoekstra wrote:
> Don't you have to join using the root user anymore, in the current cvs?
>
> furthermore, make sure that after starting your client which has to join,
> doesn't try to contact the server for any reason (opening shares,
> initializing printers, etc). Because as soon as w2k does that is opens
> communications according to cached credentials, which don't match the
> credentials you supply to join... hence the reaction.
>
> I had to figure it out myself also.. rather nasty of w2k.. but okay..
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Umbra <shadow at webdev.ines.ro>
> To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 11:29 AM
> Subject: Cannot join a domain with a win2k sp2 client
>
>
> > Hello,
> > I'm using the latest CVS Samba_2_2 as a PDC and I'm trying to join this
> > domain with a win2k sp2 client.
> >
> > I have a user with the name of the machine on the server
> > hate$:x:516:100::/dev/null:/bin/false
> >
> > and in smbpasswd:
> >
> hate$:516:15C7870873EA0892AAD3B435B51404EE:8846FFAD771AAD560BCB93F956895997:
> [W ]:LCT-3B2E2ABA:
> >
> > I also have a user which I use to join the domain:
> > shadow:x:501:501:Umbra:/home/shadow:/bin/bash
> >
> > and the corresponding smbpasswd entry
> >
> >
> shadow:501:5A7FA8406203B3A1AAD3B435B51404EE:2CF4020E126A3314482E5E87A3F39508
> :[U ]:LCT-3AF80EF4:
> >
> > The client is a member of a workgroup(a non existing one).
> > I configure it to be a member of a domain, I type in the domain
> > (INTERACTIVE), and he asks me an account with the permission to join the
> > domain. I use the account shadow, type in the password, but an error
> > occures:
> >
> > The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials.
> >
> > I've read the howto and saw what it says, but doesn't help(the machine
> > account was created from the server, and the client isn't a member of a
> > workgroup with the same name of the domain(there are other clients,
> > running win98 which are members of the workgroup INTERACTIVE, waiting to
> > become members of the domain, but I don't know if it has anything to do
> > with the win2k client).
> >
> > The logs say:
> >
> > [2001/06/21 12:20:16, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> > process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
> > [2001/06/21 12:20:16, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> > process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
> > [2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> > process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
> > [2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> > process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
> > [2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> > process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
> > [2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> > process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x12
> > [2001/06/21 12:20:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
> > process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.14.4: code = 0x7
> >
> > If you need more details, please tell me, and I'll be glad to provide
> > them.
> >
> > I would realy appreciate you help.
> >
> > Another question:
> > Is samba(the latest cvs) able to export a list of users ?
> > (For using user-level access control for shares on the clients).
> > If I try to get a list of users from a win98 client, the client says it
> > can't get the list. Does samba need some special configuration for that
> > to work ?
> >
> >
> > Here is the config file:
> > [global]
> > workgroup = INTERACTIVE
> > server string = Webdev
> > client code page = 852
> > character set = ISO8859-2
> > printcap name = lpstat
> > load printers = yes
> > printing = cups
> > guest account = nobody
> > log file = /opt/samba/var/log.%m
> > max log size = 50
> > security = user
> > encrypt passwords = yes
> > smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
> > username map = /etc/smbusers
> > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
> > interfaces = 192.168.14.1
> > local master = yes
> > os level = 255
> > domain master = yes
> > preferred master = yes
> > domain logons = yes
> > logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u
> > logon drive = H:
> > logon home = \\homeserver\%u
> > wins support = yes
> > #============================ Share Definitions
> > ==============================
> > [homes]
> > comment = Home Directories
> > browseable = no
> > writable = yes
> >
> > # Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain
> > Logons
> > [netlogon]
> > comment = Network Logon Service
> > path = /opt/samba/lib/netlogon
> > guest ok = yes
> > writable = no
> > share modes = no
> > write list = administrator
> > [profiles]
> > path = /opt/samba/lib/profile
> > writeable = yes
> > create mask = 0600
> > directory mask = 0700
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
>
Return-Path: <rworwood at orchestream.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail2.orchestream.com (mail2.orchestream.com
[195.153.64.126]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB31D4541
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 04:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rimmer.orchestream.com (rimmer.orchestream.com) by
mail2.orchestream.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP
id <Tc0a83ffa544763012a at mail2.orchestream.com> for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:35:23 +0100
Received: from s1000.orchestream.com (s1000.orchestream.com
[192.168.0.16]) by rimmer.orchestream.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
MAA06883 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:34:27 +0100
Received: by s1000.orchestream.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <M78NJ6C6>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:29:45 +0100
Message-ID: <CB1E59E84CE5D3118E5C00508B6D755501125B4A at s1000.orchestream.
com>
From: "Worwood, Richard" <rworwood at orchestream.com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Problem connection to domain authentication samba server
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:29:40 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I keep getting the following error message when trying to map a drive to a
sambe box that exists inside a nat which a static translation. I can ftp or
telnet to the ip below so the connection works ok.
H:\>net use * \\192.168.64.43\apps /user:ovlab\rworwood
System error 64 has occurred.
The specified network name is no longer available.
However it works fine when on the local segment.
Richard Worwood
___________________________________________________________________________
Support Engineer
T: +44 (0)20 7348 1608 M: +44 (0)7771 662 880 US M: +1 703 963 2042
Orchestream
Avon House, Kensington Village, Avonmore Road, London W14 8TS
T: +44 (0)20 7348 1500 F: +44 (0)20 7348 1501
www.orchestream.com
--
This communication contains confidential information intended solely for the use of the individual/s and/or entity or entities to whom it was intended to be addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this transmission is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately, delete this communication from your system, and do not disclose its contents to any third party, or use its contents. Any opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Orchestream Ltd or its group of companies unless otherwise specifically stated.
Return-Path: <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from tm.turbomeca.fr (unknown [156.28.8.1]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D9E45B9 for <samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun
2001 04:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bdoisc.turbomeca.fr (unknown [156.28.97.7]) by
tm.turbomeca.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFCF40036; Thu, 21 Jun 2001
14:03:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from p3696 (p3696.clients.turbomeca.fr [156.28.109.1]) by
bdoisc.turbomeca.fr (Mirapoint) with SMTP id ABI07523; Thu, 21 Jun
2001 14:03:26 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <000c01c0fa4a$2dcce320$016d1c9c at clients.turbomeca.fr>
From: "Serge Gracia" <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>
To: <samba at samba.org>, "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>
Cc: "Serge Gracia" <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>
References: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050AD8 at xatl02.atl.hp.com>
Subject: Use of Samba 2.2.0
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:03:25 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello Don,
I thank you for your speed for answering me and for the precision of your
answers; it is really sympathique; I simply thought of thanking you; but I
have another question to put you:
- I start samba by the process " inetd "; I was able to connect only 3 users
(I looked at the number of processes " smbd "; it has had three there); it
was necessary that I create a supplementary process " smbd " by the "
smbd -D " command so that the fourth user can connect.
Why has daemons " smbd " not launched automatically? What is what in every
connection of a new user: there is creation of a supplementary " smbd "
daemon?
Please, know you an answer?
Really thank you still.
Bye...
serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr
----- Original Message -----
From: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) <don_mccall at hp.com>
To: 'Serge Gracia' <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>; <samba at samba.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 4:25 PM
Subject: RE: Use of Samba 2.2.0
> Hello Serge,
> In answer to your questions,
> 1. Nt 4.0 only allows you to have one set of credentials
(username/password)
> when attached
> to a particular server at a time. So if you are accessing a share using
> user1, then you cannot attach to another share on the same server as
user2.
> You can 'fool' NT 4.0 by making the second attachment with the IP address
> instead, and then you could use user2; for instance
> net use f: \\server1\share1 password1 /user:user1
> net use g: \\ip.of.server1\share2 password2 /user:user2
>
> You can also use netbios aliases (see chapter 4, section "virtual servers"
> in "Using Samba" for details) and connect to different netbios names for
the
> same server as different users
> to overcome this limitation of NT 4.0.
>
> 2. Windows uses cr/lf as a line terminator for ascii files, Unix uses just
> lf. Samba does
> not do any translation of this for you; this discussion has been had many
> times on this list, and this is not ever likely to change. If you don't
> want to use dos2ux/ux2dos to do the conversion, then you will have to use
an
> editor on the pc that can deal with files whose
> lines are terminated with just a lf, like microsoft word, or microsoft
> write, etc.
>
> 3. Locking in samba is non-trivial; many people seem to have problems with
> locks turned on,
> and the various permutations of oplocks, strict locking, etc. I can only
> suggest that you read up on the various smb.conf parameters dealing with
> this subject, and customize samba
> to do locking only on the files/shares that you really NEED locking on.
> Again the "Using Samba" from O'Reilly, or the "Special Edition Using
Samba"
> from QUE are excellent references for this subject - there are other books
> as well, but these are the ones I am most familiar with.
>
> I hope this helps,
> Don
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serge Gracia [mailto:serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 5:09 AM
> To: samba at samba.org
> Cc: Serge Gracia
> Subject: Use of Samba 2.2.0
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I installed Samba 2.2.0 on a hp9000 / 700; I can use it correctly since PC
> NT
> 4; it works; but, I meet several difficulties:
>
> - When I mount directories Unix since the PC under user's name xxxxx, I am
> obliged to stop the session NT and to redo the login to be able to mount a
> directory under another user's name yyyyy?
> - The format of files is not the same between Windows and Unix: I can not
> read
> correctly ,since the PC, a file created under Unix (not use of Unix2dos)
and
> the opposite as well?
> - Samba says that it is better not to use locks?; I would like to avoid
that
> two persons modify a file at the same time; is this possible?
>
> Thank you if you can read to me and try it more to answer me.
>
> Thank you still.
>
> Goodbye.
>
> serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
Return-Path: <lkcl at angua.rince.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from angua.rince.de (angua.rince.de [194.120.0.21]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C83B45DA; Thu, 21 Jun 2001
05:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by angua.rince.de (Postfix, from userid 1011) id 6E37E2A435;
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:06:52 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:06:52 +0200
From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at samba-tng.org>
To: samba at samba.org, samba-technical at samba.org, samba-ntdom at samba.org
Subject: web page
Message-ID: <20010621140652.F25402 at angua.rince.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
http://us1.samba.org/samba/team.html
please take me off this page.
i do not want your 'credit' nor your thanks, and you -
the authors of this page - do not deserve to use or to
continue to use my code without due recognition.
a 'credit' on a web page is pitiful recognition, so
take it off. now.
luke
Return-Path: <mgerdts at aur.alcatel.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from aurms0.aur.alcatel.com (hostr41.alcatel.com
[143.209.4.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA80461F;
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 05:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aursea.aur.alcatel.com (aursea [143.209.6.105]) by
aurms0.aur.alcatel.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f5LCAVJ25832;
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:10:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mgerdts at localhost) by aursea.aur.alcatel.com
(8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id IAA29751; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:10:31 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:10:31 -0400
From: Michael Gerdts <Michael.Gerdts at usa.alcatel.com>
To: Jeremy Allison <jeremy at valinux.com>
Cc: Samba NTDOM <samba-ntdom at samba.org>, Samba list <samba at samba.org>,
Samba technical <samba-technical at samba.org>
Subject: Re: Supported Samba on Solaris (finally :-).
Message-ID: <20010621081031.A29664 at aur.alcatel.com>
References: <3B30F42C.27EF91C8 at valinux.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3B30F42C.27EF91C8 at valinux.com>; from jeremy at valinux.com on
Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:06:20PM -0700
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:06:20PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> Yes, it's Samba based (currently 2.0.9). VERITAS is working
> with us to add new stuff like MS-DFS and MMC support to 2.2
> as well.
The early access version that I looked at yesterday at in integrator was
2.0.7, at least according to smbd -V. :( It supposedly does have ACL
support, though.
> The reason I'm so pleased is that I've been trying to get
> Sun to officially support Samba for some time now (with
> the valliant attempts of Dave Collier-Brown and Don DeVitt
> at Sun) and now, with this joint announcement, they've
> done it !
>
> Thanks to everyone at VERITAS and Sun who made this (finally :-)
> happen ! Now people have a good business and technical
> response to doubts about running Samba on Solaris.
I am quite happy that this is happening. I am sorry, however, that they
feel the need to bundle it together with VxVM, VxFS, PointInTimeCopy (TM),
and a very weak GUI.
I was very pleased with their claims that they will support all of their
release of Samba, not just the options that are presented by the GUI. One
thing to watch out for, though, is the possibility that when you have
troubles with ACL's on a UFS or NFS file system, they will say "Sorry,
that's not VxFS."
Although the press release does not state this, the software is available
without buying new hardware. Also, the next target platform is Linux (Red
Hat, I think).
Mike
Return-Path: <murugappan at hgsolutions.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from host2.ecsecure.com (host2.ecsecure.com [209.239.38.173])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4417645EF for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hg04 ([64.64.109.149]) by host2.ecsecure.com
(8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f5LDBta32261 for <samba at samba.org>; Thu,
21 Jun 2001 09:11:55 -0400
Message-ID: <007301c0fa5b$b9f47eb0$956d4040 at hg04>
From: "Murugappan" <murugappan at hgsolutions.com>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: what is wrong
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:09:03 -0500
Organization: Hourglass Solutions Inc.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi
I have installed and uninstalled samba many times in my RH 7.1 Linux.
But today I tried installing it
rpm -i 2.2.xxxxx.rpm
it said
error in dependencies
libread...so.....is needed.
libncurses ......is needed
How to solve this problem
P.Murugappan
Return-Path: <Administrator at josims.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from core.josims.com (core.josims.com [195.89.188.194]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1684621 for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by CORE with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<NHFLN4B7>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:15:14 +0100
Message-ID: <C2ADBF38E1F4D3118F9F0060082151A501F6C8 at CORE>
From: Andrew Lyon <Administrator at josims.com>
To: 'Murugappan' <murugappan at hgsolutions.com>
Cc: "'samba at samba.org'" <samba at samba.org>
Subject: RE: what is wrong
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:15:11 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Wrong RPM, get the one from the 7.1 directory
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Murugappan [mailto:murugappan at hgsolutions.com]
Sent: 21 June 2001 15:09
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: what is wrong
Hi
I have installed and uninstalled samba many times in my RH 7.1 Linux.
But today I tried installing it
rpm -i 2.2.xxxxx.rpm
it said
error in dependencies
libread...so.....is needed.
libncurses ......is needed
How to solve this problem
P.Murugappan
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
************************************************************
Registered Office:
J.O. Sims Ltd
Pudding Lane
Pinchbeck
Spalding
Lincs
PE11 3TJ
Company reg No: 2084187 Vat reg No: GB 437 4621 47
Tel: +44 (0) 1775 842100
Fax: +44 (0) 1775 842101
Web: www.josims.com
Email: enquiries at josims.com
************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential
and is intended for the addressee only. The contents of
this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the
sender's consent. If you are not the intended recipient of
the message, please notify the sender immediately, and
delete the message.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are
those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those
of the company. No commitment may be inferred from the
contents unless explicitly stated. The company does not
take any responsibility for the personal views of the
author.
This message has been scanned for viruses before sending,
but the company does not accept any responsibility for
infection and recommends that you scan any attachments.
************************************************************
Return-Path: <implast at neti.ee>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from adsl7010.estpak.ee (adsl7010.estpak.ee [213.219.78.16])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F5724389 for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 00:02:20 +0300
From: implast <implast at neti.ee>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.49)
Reply-To: implast <implast at neti.ee>
Message-ID: <18450717161.20010619000220 at neti.ee>
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: =?koi8-r?B?TW9uZXlSLi4uIChPcHBvcnR1bml0eSBvZiBlYXJuaW5ncykgKPfP
2s3P1s7P?= =?koi8-r?B?09gg2sHSwcLP1MvBISk=?=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
Thank you for giving attention to this message.
The work is connected with processing and sending of electronic mail.
You can make up your own flexible schedule (we offer full-time and
part-time job). You can work at any time, which is convenient for you,
at home or at office. For the work you need the computer connected to
the Internet with the functions of sending the electronic messages.
You will earn from $ 900 up to $ 4.000 working for 7-14 hours per week.
The income will make more than $ 9.000 if you work 30 and more hours
per week in the Internet monthly.
Everything depends on your diligence and desire.
To receive the further instructions write to the following e-mail
address: implast at neti.ee.
In the column Subject write "Report".
In the message write: " Id like to get the further instructions
and do not forget to write your e-mail. The detailed information
will be sent to you, and all the questions will be answered.
P.S. This letter is not a spam. If you are not interested in it,
simply remove and forget about it, it will not be sent to you again.
If this letter has caused you any inconveniences, accept
my deep apologies!!!
I wish you success!
(Cyrillic KOI8-R)
bLAGODAR@ wAS ZA TO, ^TO wY UDELILI WNIMANIE \TOMU SOOB]ENI at .
wAM PREDLAGAETSQ RABOTA PO SWOBODNOMU GRAFIKU (POLNAQ ILI ^ASTI^NAQ
ZANQTOSTX), SWQZANNAQ S OBRABOTKOJ I OTPRAWKOJ \LEKTRONNOJ PO^TY.
wY MOVETE RABOTATX W L at BOE UDOBNOE DLQ wAS WREMQ DOMA ILI W OFISE. dLQ
RABOTY wAM NEOBHODIM pk, DOSTUP W iNTERNET S FUNKCIQMI OTPRAWKI
\LEKTRONNYH SOOB]ENIJ.
pROWODQ ZA KOMPX at TEROM 7-14 ^ASOW W NEDEL@, wY BUDETE ZARABATYWATX OT
$900 DO $4.000. rABOTAQ 30 I BOLX[E ^ASOW W NEDEL@ W iNTERNETE wA[
EVEMESQ^NYJ DOHOD SOSTAWIT BOLEE $9.000.
gLAWNOE - WS# ZAWISIT OT wA[EGO TRUDOL at BIQ I VELANIQ.
dLQ POLU^ENIQ DALXNEJ[IH INSTRUKCIJ NAPI[ITE MNE PO ADRESU:
implast at neti.ee . w GRAFE tEMA UKAVITE Report. w SOOB]ENII NAPI[ITE:
"pRO[U WYSLATX DALXNEJ[IE INSTRUKCII I NE ZABUDXTE UKAZATX SWOJ Email. wAM
BUDET WYSLANA WSQ PODROBNAQ INFORMACIQ, BUDUT DANY IS^ERPYWA@]IE OTWETY NA
WSE INTERESU@]IE wAS WOPROSY.
P.S. |TO PISXMO NE ESTX NAGLYJ I NADOEDLIWYJ SPAM. eSLI wAS \TO
PREDLOVENIE NE ZAINTERESOWALO, TO PROSTO UDALITE I ZABUDTE O NEM,
BOLX[E ONO K wAM NE PRIJDET.
eSLI \TO PISXMO PRI^INILO wAM KAKIE LIBO NEUDOBSTWA, TO PRIMITE MOI
GLUBOKIE IZWINENIQ!!!
bolx{ih wam uspehow!!!
--
Best regards,
Aleksei K. mailto:implast at neti.ee
Return-Path: <don_mccall at hp.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from palrel10.hp.com (palrel10.hp.com [192.151.10.58]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D11A4445 for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xparelay2.corp.hp.com (unknown [15.58.137.112]) by
palrel10.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B041F835; Thu, 21 Jun 2001
06:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xpabh2.corp.hp.com (xpabh2.corp.hp.com [15.58.136.192])
by xparelay2.corp.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A471F520; Thu, 21
Jun 2001 06:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by xpabh2.corp.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <NHG2WH0N>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:24:31 -0700
Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050AE0 at xatl02.atl.hp.com>
From: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>
To: 'Serge Gracia' <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>, samba at samba.org,
"MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>
Subject: RE: Use of Samba 2.2.0
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:24:28 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello Serge,
Sorry - I really discourage the use of samba under inetd; seen too many
problems
from the interaction. Nothing you can put your finger on, but I would
recommend that
you remove the samba lines from your inetd.conf file, restart inetd, and
then run
samba in daemon mode:
nmbd -D
smbd -D
I think you will be happier.
Also, what you mentioned that you did (running samba from inetd, and then
actually STARTING
another smbd via smbd -D SHOULD be impossible under normal circumstances -
smbd has to
bind to port 139, and if inetd is already controlling this port on behalf of
samba,
the samba daemon should have failed to bind to that port when you tried to
start it manually.
I think we're probably missing some pieces of the puzzle here.
Again, I would recommend that you remove samba from inetd, and put your
effort into getting
it to work in daemon mode first...
BTW, one samba (smbd) process per client is the way samba is designed. When
you start it as a daemon, that daemon will spawn another process for each
successful client connection.
Hope this helps,
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Serge Gracia [mailto:serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 8:03 AM
To: samba at samba.org; MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)
Cc: Serge Gracia
Subject: Use of Samba 2.2.0
Hello Don,
I thank you for your speed for answering me and for the precision of your
answers; it is really sympathique; I simply thought of thanking you; but I
have another question to put you:
- I start samba by the process " inetd "; I was able to connect only 3 users
(I looked at the number of processes " smbd "; it has had three there); it
was necessary that I create a supplementary process " smbd " by the "
smbd -D " command so that the fourth user can connect.
Why has daemons " smbd " not launched automatically? What is what in every
connection of a new user: there is creation of a supplementary " smbd "
daemon?
Please, know you an answer?
Really thank you still.
Bye...
serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr
----- Original Message -----
From: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) <don_mccall at hp.com>
To: 'Serge Gracia' <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>; <samba at samba.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 4:25 PM
Subject: RE: Use of Samba 2.2.0
> Hello Serge,
> In answer to your questions,
> 1. Nt 4.0 only allows you to have one set of credentials
(username/password)
> when attached
> to a particular server at a time. So if you are accessing a share using
> user1, then you cannot attach to another share on the same server as
user2.
> You can 'fool' NT 4.0 by making the second attachment with the IP address
> instead, and then you could use user2; for instance
> net use f: \\server1\share1 password1 /user:user1
> net use g: \\ip.of.server1\share2 password2 /user:user2
>
> You can also use netbios aliases (see chapter 4, section "virtual servers"
> in "Using Samba" for details) and connect to different netbios names for
the
> same server as different users
> to overcome this limitation of NT 4.0.
>
> 2. Windows uses cr/lf as a line terminator for ascii files, Unix uses just
> lf. Samba does
> not do any translation of this for you; this discussion has been had many
> times on this list, and this is not ever likely to change. If you don't
> want to use dos2ux/ux2dos to do the conversion, then you will have to use
an
> editor on the pc that can deal with files whose
> lines are terminated with just a lf, like microsoft word, or microsoft
> write, etc.
>
> 3. Locking in samba is non-trivial; many people seem to have problems with
> locks turned on,
> and the various permutations of oplocks, strict locking, etc. I can only
> suggest that you read up on the various smb.conf parameters dealing with
> this subject, and customize samba
> to do locking only on the files/shares that you really NEED locking on.
> Again the "Using Samba" from O'Reilly, or the "Special Edition Using
Samba"
> from QUE are excellent references for this subject - there are other books
> as well, but these are the ones I am most familiar with.
>
> I hope this helps,
> Don
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serge Gracia [mailto:serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 5:09 AM
> To: samba at samba.org
> Cc: Serge Gracia
> Subject: Use of Samba 2.2.0
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I installed Samba 2.2.0 on a hp9000 / 700; I can use it correctly since PC
> NT
> 4; it works; but, I meet several difficulties:
>
> - When I mount directories Unix since the PC under user's name xxxxx, I am
> obliged to stop the session NT and to redo the login to be able to mount a
> directory under another user's name yyyyy?
> - The format of files is not the same between Windows and Unix: I can not
> read
> correctly ,since the PC, a file created under Unix (not use of Unix2dos)
and
> the opposite as well?
> - Samba says that it is better not to use locks?; I would like to avoid
that
> two persons modify a file at the same time; is this possible?
>
> Thank you if you can read to me and try it more to answer me.
>
> Thank you still.
>
> Goodbye.
>
> serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
Return-Path: <ctooley at amoa.org>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from c000.snv.cp.net (c000-h000.c000.snv.cp.net
[209.228.32.64]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B14C44DA
for <samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (cpmta 7249 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2001 06:37:11 -0700
Received: from amoa.org (HELO ?192.168.1.50?) (207.207.51.226) by
smtp.tooley.com (209.228.32.64) with SMTP; 21 Jun 2001 06:37:11 -0700
X-Sent: 21 Jun 2001 13:37:11 GMT
Subject: RE: Use of Samba 2.2.0
From: Chris Tooley <ctooley at amoa.org>
To: samba at samba.org
In-Reply-To: <06490DE5320D9C0786256A720049D793.0049D80286256A72 at amoa.org
>
References: <06490DE5320D9C0786256A720049D793.0049D80286256A72 at amoa.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10.99 (Preview Release)
Date: 21 Jun 2001 08:37:12 -0500
Message-Id: <993130633.2448.1.camel at itspec.amoa.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
My set up works fine for the most part. But... how do I get the
different smbd processes to spawn as the user that it is providing
service for?
Chris Tooley
On 21 Jun 2001 08:26:34 -0500, MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) wrote:
>
>
> Hello Serge,
> Sorry - I really discourage the use of samba under inetd; seen too many
> problems
> from the interaction. Nothing you can put your finger on, but I would
> recommend that
> you remove the samba lines from your inetd.conf file, restart inetd, and
> then run
> samba in daemon mode:
> nmbd -D
> smbd -D
> I think you will be happier.
> Also, what you mentioned that you did (running samba from inetd, and then
> actually STARTING
> another smbd via smbd -D SHOULD be impossible under normal circumstances -
> smbd has to
> bind to port 139, and if inetd is already controlling this port on behalf
> of
> samba,
> the samba daemon should have failed to bind to that port when you tried to
> start it manually.
>
> I think we're probably missing some pieces of the puzzle here.
>
> Again, I would recommend that you remove samba from inetd, and put your
> effort into getting
> it to work in daemon mode first...
> BTW, one samba (smbd) process per client is the way samba is designed. When
> you start it as a daemon, that daemon will spawn another process for each
> successful client connection.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Don
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serge Gracia [mailto:serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 8:03 AM
> To: samba at samba.org; MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)
> Cc: Serge Gracia
> Subject: Use of Samba 2.2.0
>
>
> Hello Don,
>
> I thank you for your speed for answering me and for the precision of your
> answers; it is really sympathique; I simply thought of thanking you; but I
> have another question to put you:
>
> - I start samba by the process " inetd "; I was able to connect only 3
> users
> (I looked at the number of processes " smbd "; it has had three there); it
> was necessary that I create a supplementary process " smbd " by the "
> smbd -D " command so that the fourth user can connect.
>
> Why has daemons " smbd " not launched automatically? What is what in every
> connection of a new user: there is creation of a supplementary " smbd "
> daemon?
>
> Please, know you an answer?
>
> Really thank you still.
>
> Bye...
>
> serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) <don_mccall at hp.com>
> To: 'Serge Gracia' <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>; <samba at samba.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 4:25 PM
> Subject: RE: Use of Samba 2.2.0
>
>
> > Hello Serge,
> > In answer to your questions,
> > 1. Nt 4.0 only allows you to have one set of credentials
> (username/password)
> > when attached
> > to a particular server at a time. So if you are accessing a share using
> > user1, then you cannot attach to another share on the same server as
> user2.
> > You can 'fool' NT 4.0 by making the second attachment with the IP address
> > instead, and then you could use user2; for instance
> > net use f: \\server1\share1 password1 /user:user1
> > net use g: \\ip.of.server1\share2 password2 /user:user2
> >
> > You can also use netbios aliases (see chapter 4, section "virtual
> servers"
> > in "Using Samba" for details) and connect to different netbios names for
> the
> > same server as different users
> > to overcome this limitation of NT 4.0.
> >
> > 2. Windows uses cr/lf as a line terminator for ascii files, Unix uses
> just
> > lf. Samba does
> > not do any translation of this for you; this discussion has been had many
> > times on this list, and this is not ever likely to change. If you don't
> > want to use dos2ux/ux2dos to do the conversion, then you will have to use
> an
> > editor on the pc that can deal with files whose
> > lines are terminated with just a lf, like microsoft word, or microsoft
> > write, etc.
> >
> > 3. Locking in samba is non-trivial; many people seem to have problems
> with
> > locks turned on,
> > and the various permutations of oplocks, strict locking, etc. I can only
> > suggest that you read up on the various smb.conf parameters dealing with
> > this subject, and customize samba
> > to do locking only on the files/shares that you really NEED locking on.
> > Again the "Using Samba" from O'Reilly, or the "Special Edition Using
> Samba"
> > from QUE are excellent references for this subject - there are other
> books
> > as well, but these are the ones I am most familiar with.
> >
> > I hope this helps,
> > Don
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Serge Gracia [mailto:serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 5:09 AM
> > To: samba at samba.org
> > Cc: Serge Gracia
> > Subject: Use of Samba 2.2.0
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I installed Samba 2.2.0 on a hp9000 / 700; I can use it correctly since
> PC
> > NT
> > 4; it works; but, I meet several difficulties:
> >
> > - When I mount directories Unix since the PC under user's name xxxxx, I
> am
> > obliged to stop the session NT and to redo the login to be able to mount
> a
> > directory under another user's name yyyyy?
> > - The format of files is not the same between Windows and Unix: I can not
> > read
> > correctly ,since the PC, a file created under Unix (not use of Unix2dos)
> and
> > the opposite as well?
> > - Samba says that it is better not to use locks?; I would like to avoid
> that
> > two persons modify a file at the same time; is this possible?
> >
> > Thank you if you can read to me and try it more to answer me.
> >
> > Thank you still.
> >
> > Goodbye.
> >
> > serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <samba at hoekstra.nu>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from cobalt01.skybernet.nl (unknown [217.17.128.197]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFCF4648 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from snws52 (SkyberNet [217.17.139.4]) by
cobalt01.skybernet.nl (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f5LDcMH31675; Thu,
21 Jun 2001 15:38:30 +0200
Message-ID: <003f01c0fa57$be748560$4801010a at skybernet>
From: "Robert Hoekstra" <samba at hoekstra.nu>
To: <ICQMaster at tesla.ispjae.edu.cu>
Cc: "Samba list" <samba at lists.samba.org>
References: <200106201704.AA231604430 at tesla.ispjae.edu.cu>
Subject: Re: Clients error
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:40:24 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I'm not really sure, with w2k I nicely receive a user list..
I cannot tell is windows 98 behaves / expects different information. Anyone
who can?
----- Original Message -----
From: Yoandy Mesa <ICQMaster at tesla.ispjae.edu.cu>
To: Robert Hoekstra <samba at hoekstra.nu>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 11:04 PM
Subject: Re: Clients error
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: "Robert Hoekstra" <samba at hoekstra.nu>
>
> >Which version of Samba are you using?
>
> I'm using 2.2.0 and i get the same client error:
> "the lists of users is not available, try later" or something like that,
does anyone know what is causing this error??
>
>
>
> --
> Yoandy Mesa Fiallo
> Grupo de Redes ISPJAE
> Linux Regist. user #182390
> ICQMaster at tesla.ispjae.edu.cu
>
> Visite http://intranet.ispjae.edu.cu/icqservice
> --
Return-Path: <mekilroy at risingedge.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F994666; Thu, 21 Jun 2001
06:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by
mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5LDjaS86267;
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:45:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by
wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id
<B0000084669 at wizzard.rising-edge>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:43:15 -0400
Message-ID: <08b501c0fa58$1f680270$1a00a8c0 at diamondback>
From: "M. Kilroy" <mekilroy at risingedge.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>, <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: lmhosts
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:43:15 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Should the lmhosts file be somewhere besides /etc/samba/ when running the
0.5-1 appliance? How can I find out where it looks to resolve_lmhosts???
Thanks!
Return-Path: <christoph_schumacher at web.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailgate3.cinetic.de (mailgate3.cinetic.de
[212.227.116.80]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D3B45AB
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cinetic.de (fmomail02.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.1.46]) by
mailgate3.cinetic.de (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with SMTP
id f5LDlbF26373 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:47:37
+0200
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:47:37 +0200
Message-Id: <200106211347.f5LDlbF26373 at mailgate3.cinetic.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Organization: http://freemail.web.de/
From: "Christoph Schumacher" <christoph_schumacher at web.de>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Samba 2.0.9 would not announce as master browser
Precedence: fm-user
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello !
I have an suse-linux box with samba 2.0.9 running.
After we changed the IP of the server ( that has two nic's ) and still the same name ( cluster [ don't mess about the name ;-) ]) it always shows the following in nmb.log:
[2001/06/21 15:28:22, 10] nmbd/nmbd_sendannounce.c:announce_myself_to_domain_master_browser(395)
announce_myself_to_domain_master_browser: no unicast subnet, ignoring.
[2001/06/21 15:28:22, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:dump_workgroups(292)
dump_workgroups()
dump workgroup on subnet 192.168.1.2: netmask= 255.255.255.0:
NT40(1) current master browser = UNKNOWN
CLUSTER 40009b2b (Samba Server)
My smb.conf looks as follows:
workgroup = NT40
netbios name = CLUSTER
server string = Samba Server
username map = /etc/smbuser
interfaces = 192.168.1.2/255.255.255.0
remote announce = 192.168.1.255/NT40
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
time server = Yes
keepalive = 30
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
oplocks = yes
read raw = yes
write raw = yes
logon script = %U.bat
logon home =
domain logons = Yes
os level = 50
preferred master = No
domain master = No
local master = no
hosts allow = localhost, 192.168.1.,192.168.16.
hosts deny = ALL
As you see, theres no wins server and before we've changed IP it worked the way we'd liked it to do. Please help me, I'm standing at the edge of a cliff getting insane ! thanks
Christoph Schumacher
______________________________________________________________________________
Ferienklick.de - Jede Menge Urlaub auf einen Blick!
Hier geht's zu Ihrem Traumstrand: http://ferienklick.de/?PP=2-0-100-105-1
Return-Path: <mike at infostoreweb.com.br>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from server.infostoreweb.com.br (server.infostoreweb.com.br
[200.247.164.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B5246CD
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oficina ([192.168.1.13]) by server.infostoreweb.com.br
(8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f5LEY4X12312 for <samba at lists.samba.org>;
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:34:04 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from
mike at infostoreweb.com.br)
Message-ID: <002401c0fa5a$d31bf7c0$0d01a8c0 at infostoreweb.com.br>
From: "Michelangelo Pisa" <mike at infostoreweb.com.br>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Backup in Samba
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:02:35 -0300
Organization: =?iso-8859-1?Q?INFOSTORE_INFORM=C1TICA?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello
How can I do a backup from my samba server to a share of the a win98
workstation?
how to use tar? or other program of backup...
thanks a lot..
---
Michelangelo Pisa
INFOSTORE INFORMATICA
http://www.infostoreweb.com.br
michelangelo at infostoreweb.com.br
(47) 348-4840
---
Return-Path: <schumi-news at gmx.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BAEE461A for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 905 invoked by uid 0); 21 Jun 2001 14:27:50 -0000
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:27:50 +0200 (MEST)
From: Christoph Schumacher <schumi-news at gmx.de>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Samba 2.0.9 does not announce as domain master
X-Authenticated-Sender: #0001157897 at gmx.net
X-Authenticated-IP: [217.88.53.101]
Message-ID: <1181.993133670 at www31.gmx.net>
X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange)
X-Flags: 0001
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello !
I have an suse-linux box with samba 2.0.9 running.
After we changed the IP of the server ( that has two nic's ) and still
the same name ( cluster [ don't mess about the name ;-)]) it always shows
the following in nmb.log:
[2001/06/21 15:28:22, 10]
nmbd/nmbd_sendannounce.c:announce_myself_to_domain_master_browser(395)
announce_myself_to_domain_master_browser: no unicast subnet, ignoring.
[2001/06/21 15:28:22, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:dump_workgroups(292)
dump_workgroups()
dump workgroup on subnet 192.168.1.2: netmask= 255.255.255.0:
NT40(1) current master browser = UNKNOWN
CLUSTER 40009b2b (Samba Server)
My smb.conf looks as follows:
workgroup = NT40
netbios name = CLUSTER
server string = Samba Server
username map = /etc/smbuser
interfaces = 192.168.1.2/255.255.255.0
remote announce = 192.168.1.255/NT40
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
time server = Yes
keepalive = 30
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
oplocks = yes
read raw = yes
write raw = yes
logon script = %U.bat
logon home =
domain logons = Yes
os level = 50
preferred master = No
domain master = No
local master = no
hosts allow = localhost,192.168.1.,192.168.16.
hosts deny = ALL
As you see, theres no wins server and before we've changed IP it worked the
way we'd liked it to do.
It does not announce as the local master. so all our users use our backup
logon server ( that, by the way, has the same log-output ).
Please help me, I'm standing at the edge of a cliff getting insane ! thanks
Christoph Schumacher
--
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net
--
GMX Tipp:
Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1!
http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a
Return-Path: <mekilroy at risingedge.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A346D4716; Thu, 21 Jun 2001
07:27:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by
mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5LEY5S90426;
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:34:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by
wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id
<B0000084694 at wizzard.rising-edge>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:31:54 -0400
Message-ID: <08ea01c0fa5e$eb2e16f0$1a00a8c0 at diamondback>
From: "M. Kilroy" <mekilroy at risingedge.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>, <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: wbinfo
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:31:54 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Could someone please tell me what are some possible reasons to get "could not
check secret" with a wbinfo -t??
Thanks
Return-Path: <davide.dozza at yacme.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailrelay2.inwind.it (unknown [212.141.54.102]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5CF4640 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yacme.com (62.98.123.137) by mailrelay2.inwind.it
(5.5.029) id 3B27925C003D804C; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:36:45 +0200
Message-ID: <3B32062A.307BC555 at yacme.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:35:22 +0200
From: Davide Dozza <davide.dozza at yacme.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-7.0.1smp i686)
X-Accept-Language: sl
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michelangelo Pisa <mike at infostoreweb.com.br>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Backup in Samba
References: <002401c0fa5a$d31bf7c0$0d01a8c0 at infostoreweb.com.br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Michelangelo Pisa wrote:
>
> Hello
> How can I do a backup from my samba server to a share of the a win98
> workstation?
> how to use tar? or other program of backup...
> thanks a lot..
>
You can use smbclient to access the share in the same way ad ftp
does.
Otherwise you can use smbmount to mount the share on your file
system and then you can use tar :-)
Davide
> ---
> Michelangelo Pisa
> INFOSTORE INFORMATICA
> http://www.infostoreweb.com.br
> michelangelo at infostoreweb.com.br
> (47) 348-4840
> ---
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of davide.dozza.vcf]
Return-Path: <don_mccall at hp.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from palrel10.hp.com (palrel10.hp.com [192.151.10.58]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E6B4419 for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xparelay1.corp.hp.com (unknown [15.58.136.173]) by
palrel10.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E14E1F6A2; Thu, 21 Jun 2001
07:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xpabh1.corp.hp.com (xpabh1.corp.hp.com [15.58.136.191])
by xparelay1.corp.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BAB1F514; Thu, 21
Jun 2001 00:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by xpabh1.corp.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <NHGPP0KJ>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:56:33 -0700
Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050AE7 at xatl02.atl.hp.com>
From: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>
To: "'palme at uni-wuppertal.de'" <palme at uni-wuppertal.de>,
debian-user at lists.debian.org, Samba Liste <samba at samba.org>,
debian-user-de at lehmanns.de
Subject: RE: Samba: Can't Rename the Log File
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:56:30 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi;
you may want to check the PATH to the log file as well; perhaps
there is not the appropriate execute permission to allow samba to
traverse /var or /var/log to GET to the smb file that has write permissions.
Hope this helps,
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: palme at uni-wuppertal.de [mailto:palme at uni-wuppertal.de]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 9:11 AM
To: debian-user at lists.debian.org; Samba Liste;
debian-user-de at lehmanns.de
Cc: Hubert Palme
Subject: Samba: Can't Rename the Log File
Hmm..., I'll try it once more because I can't beleive that nobody can
give me a hint...
Received: (from palme at localhost) by wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de
(8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id OAA05903; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:26:42
+0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID: <15140.47352.452773.624270 at wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de>
X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 10) "Capitol Reef" XEmacs Lucid
From: palme at uni-wuppertal.de (Hubert Palme)
To: debian-user at lists.debian.org, Samba Liste <samba at samba.org>
Cc: Hubert Palme <palme>
Subject: Samba: Problem mit check_log_size
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:26:32 +0200 (CEST)
Hi,
in the syslog file I repeatedly find the following messages:
Jun 8 08:19:40 wrpc3 smbd[8296]: [2001/06/08 08:19:40, 0]
lib/debug.c:check_log_size(311)
Jun 8 08:19:40 wrpc3 smbd[8296]: check_log_size: open of debug file
/var/log/smb failed - using console.
The file /var/log/smb has the following attributes:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1024067 Jun 6 12:14 smb
(Thus being writable for smbd!?)
The concerning entry in smb.conf is:
max log size = 1000
(obviously just exceeded)
I run Debian Potato with
ii samba 2.0.7-3.3 A LanManager like file and printer server
fo
ii samba-common 2.0.7-3.3 Samba common files used by both the server
a
ii samba-doc 2.0.7-3.3 Samba documentation.
ii swat 2.0.7-3.3 Samba Web Administration Tool
Samba runs as a daemon, not via inetd -- could there be a coherence?
Waiting for a hint...
Thanks in advance,
--
======================================================================
Hubert Palme Bergische Universitaet-Gesamthochschule Wuppertal
Computing Center
D-42097 Wuppertal
E-Mail: palme at uni-wuppertal.de (Germany)
http://www.hrz.uni-wuppertal.de/hrz/personen/h_palme.html
- can someone explain me the mechanism how smbd/nmbd rename their
files?
- How else can I interpret the error message? (The permits of the file
seem to be OK)
- What if I run smnd/nmbd via inetd? Are the files ever renamed then?
- Could there be a bug that smbd keeps the file open and thus cannot
"re"open it? And how to ship around then?
That's all very strange...
Thanks in advance,
--
======================================================================
Hubert Palme Bergische Universitaet-Gesamthochschule Wuppertal
Computing Center
D-42097 Wuppertal
E-Mail: palme at uni-wuppertal.de (Germany)
http://www.hrz.uni-wuppertal.de/hrz/personen/h_palme.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <mekilroy at risingedge.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8BA4790; Thu, 21 Jun 2001
08:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by
mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5LFhuS96742;
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:43:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by
wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id
<B0000084734 at wizzard.rising-edge>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:41:35 -0400
Message-ID: <093d01c0fa68$a7473b60$1a00a8c0 at diamondback>
From: "M. Kilroy" <mekilroy at risingedge.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>, <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: winbind -d 3 -i
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:41:35 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Can someone please clear this up for an exceptionally dumb newbie??
I did a winbindd -d 3 -i and left it running....
Then I tried to get into the linux box from my nt machine and got this in the
winbindd output window:
[ 1400]: getgrent
[ 1400]: endgrent
[ 1400]: setgrent
[ 1400]: getgrent
[ 1400]: getgrent
[ 1400]: endgrent
[ 1403]: getpwnam diamondback
[ 1403]: getpwnam diamondback
[ 1403]: getpwnam DIAMONDBACK
[ 1403]: getpwnam Diamondback
[ 1403]: getpwnam diamondbacK
[ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroy
[ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroy
[ 1403]: getpwnam MEKILROY
[ 1403]: getpwnam Mekilroy
[ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroY
[ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroy
[ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroy
[ 1403]: getpwnam MEKILROY
[ 1403]: getpwnam Mekilroy
[ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroY
[ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroy
[ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroy
[ 1403]: getpwnam MEKILROY
[ 1403]: getpwnam Mekilroy
[ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroY
[ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroy
[ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroy
[ 1403]: getpwnam MEKILROY
[ 1403]: getpwnam Mekilroy
[ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroY
[ 1403]: setgrent
[ 1403]: getgrent
mekilroy is my user name and DIAMONDBACK is my NT machine. So it knows who I
am and that I am trying to access the linux box. BUT, when I open the linux
box from my NT explorer, a folder appears called 'nobody.' I thought this
meant it was letting me in as a guest, but am I wrong about that? Is it
actually letting me in as me or as nobody?? (btw- i still get "could not
check secret" so I suspect winbindd isn't actually running or at least working
correctly)
Thanks in advance!
Return-Path: <mnehemiah at urschel.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.urschel.com (unknown [208.193.3.4]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A06C46A7 for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [208.193.3.5] by mail.urschel.com (NTMail
4.30.0010/QS0633.00.71509e67) with ESMTP id tztraaaa for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:02:28 -0500
Received: by EXCHANGE with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<MJ1PPCYF>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:59:38 -0500
Message-ID: <E139411D3415D311872E006008319454E060 at EXCHANGE>
From: "Nehemiah, Mark" <mnehemiah at urschel.com>
To: "'samba at samba.org'" <samba at samba.org>
Subject: 2.2 vs 2.0.7 locking problem (testlock.zip)utility
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:59:37 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Script: \\filterscript.mml
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello all.
I am trying to evaluate samba in a production environment for our company.
We use Clarion programming language for our windows database information.
We have approx 200 users and currently data(~10Gig) resides on a Netware
4.11 server. I have tried installing some of the applications on samba and
here are my results.
2 servers, both RH7.1 kern2.4.2-2(Intel)
1 running samba 2.0.7
1 running samba 2.2.0
( I know 2.2.1 has fixed some stale locking issues, but haven't tried it to
see if it helps me.)
samba 2.2
a))).single user database access - works
b)))multi user single shared database - works
c)))single user(machine) open data table twice, either 2 instances of the
same app, or 2 different apps that access the same data table - does not
work from 98se- appears to effectively lock any further file access for any
user. (BIG problem for us)
samba 2.0.7
a)))works
b)))works
c)))works
appears to work fine on 2.0.7
***Troubleshooting so far:
move binaries from 1 machine to another.
I ran both versions of samba on both different machines with the same
results.
smbstatus shows no locks on the files that are inaccessible
Try to learn how Clarion works and locks, was at the
http://www.clarionmag.com site, found a utility called testlock that they
had available for free download. Testlock is a program by www.burtonsys.com
that is wrote in c for windows to test file sharing and locking on network
servers.
I have been running testlk32(the 32bit version) with interesting results.
It consistently works ok by itself on either samba v.
It has a switch that lets it run so many tests and then wait for another
instance to start up so they can both try locking on the same files. When I
run `testlock o:\ auto2` from the second computer it 70-80% of the time
fails on test 7-a(2-session file region locking). It works consistently OK
on samba 2.0.7 for me but not 2.2.0
note:testlock program is proprietary, but it looks like they will distribute
source code, if wanted by developers(after non-disclosure), to see exactly
what it does.
Is this possibly fixed in 2.2.1?
I would definitely suggest a good look at the testlock program suite, as it
may help the samba team.
regards,
Mark
*******************************
Mark E. Nehemiah Urschel Laboratories, Inc.
Network Administrator http://www.urschel.com/
mailto:mnehemiah at urschel.com mailto:info at urschel.com
*******************************
Return-Path: <torriem at cs.byu.edu>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.cs.byu.edu (mail.cs.byu.edu [128.187.2.20]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731A44872 for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from verdi.cs.byu.edu (IDENT:torriem at verdi.cs.byu.edu
[128.187.101.86]) by mail.cs.byu.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5LGIkP00739 for <samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:18:46 -0600
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:18:46 -0600 (MDT)
From: Michael L Torrie <torriem at cs.byu.edu>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: non-domain computers accessing samba in PDC relationship
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106211014550.23793-100000 at verdi.cs.byu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have a samba server that's joined to a domain. when I try to connect
to the samba server from a machine that's not currently part of the
domain, I of course get an error, and samba complains that it can't find a
trust key for domain 'COMPUTERNAME' where that's the name of the
non-domain computer. Is it possible to get this to work? Basically I'd
like the samba server to authenticate the username/password against the
PDC regardless of whether the client computer is in the domain. I'd
appreciate some help in this matter.
thanks,
Michael
Return-Path: <grandjea at dgrsung.epfl.ch>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from dgrsung.epfl.ch (dgrsung.epfl.ch [128.178.7.18]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0292F48AB for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sidgrsun2.epfl.ch (grandjea at sidgrsun2.epfl.ch
[128.178.7.252]) by dgrsung.epfl.ch (8.8.X/EPFL-8.1d) with SMTP id
SAA24364; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:32:22 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <200106211632.SAA24364 at dgrsung.epfl.ch>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:33:21 +0200 (MEST)
From: Daniel Grandjean <Daniel.Grandjean at epfl.ch>
Reply-To: Daniel Grandjean <Daniel.Grandjean at epfl.ch>
Subject: RE: Supported Samba on Solaris (finally :-).
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Cc: grandjea at dgrsung.epfl.ch
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-MD5: vokbu7HVoIDezOU/9hhLxA==
X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Great!
Just a pity that I dont see any credit to Samba in this press release.
Because:
Uneducated Sun customer may think it is still PC NetLink as in
the former Sun NAS products.
For the small history of Samba in Sun distribution,
Sun had a Samba package in I-Planet portal which was using smbclient
to browse NT (and Samba servers.)
Daniel.
_
Daniel Grandjean, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology __ __
Address: EPFL SI-DGR, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland | \/ |
E-mail: Daniel.Grandjean at epfl.ch |o ()o _
Phone: +41 21 693 27 24 (Central European Time) |__/\__/
Fax: +41 21 693 27 27
WWW: http://dgrwww.epfl.ch \__/
>Since VERITAS is too shy to announce it on this list (I think
>they don't want to spam people with commercials) I thought
>I'd mention it for them :-).
>
>For everyone who has wanted an officially supported Samba
>on Solaris solution, supported by Sun, check out the VERITAS
>whitepaper at :
>
>http://www.veritas.com/us/article/article-061901.html
>
>Yes, it's Samba based (currently 2.0.9). VERITAS is working
>with us to add new stuff like MS-DFS and MMC support to 2.2
>as well.
>
>The reason I'm so pleased is that I've been trying to get
>Sun to officially support Samba for some time now (with
>the valliant attempts of Dave Collier-Brown and Don DeVitt
>at Sun) and now, with this joint announcement, they've
>done it !
>
>Thanks to everyone at VERITAS and Sun who made this (finally :-)
>happen ! Now people have a good business and technical
>response to doubts about running Samba on Solaris.
>
>Regards,
>
> Jeremy Allison,
> Samba Team.
Return-Path: <gcarter at valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCD44406 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (root at ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by
Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA05849; Thu, 21 Jun 2001
12:03:21 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:06:21 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter at pogo.plainjoe.org>
To: Scot Kreienkamp <skreien at wcnet.org>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Win2k Terminal Server: SMB uid's
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010620221215.02891b80 at mcewen.wcnet.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106211204490.6345-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Scot Kreienkamp wrote:
> I definitely cannot go backwards. I have 2.0.7 installed right now,
> and 2000 TSE. They don't use it as a TSE right now, but will begin in
> about 2 months or so. Hopefully 2.2.1 will be out by then, including
> this fix. :)
There is no known fix for this issue. (not yet) MS
would need to re-enable the "individual
session per user" ability. We've looked at some other options
but they are all very nasty hacks.
jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <pmolina at bellsouth.net>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from imf05bis.bellsouth.net (mail305.mail.bellsouth.net
[205.152.58.165]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C87A45C7
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from terminator ([216.77.211.197]) by imf05bis.bellsouth.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.01.01 201-252-104) with SMTP id
<20010621170631.RQFY25213.imf05bis.bellsouth.net at terminator> for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:06:31 -0400
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:10:58 -0400
To: samba at lists.samba.org
From: Pete Molina <pmolina at bellsouth.net>
Subject: samba 2.0.7 very very slow authenticating
Reply-To: pmolina at bellsouth.net
X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <20010621170631.RQFY25213.imf05bis.bellsouth.net at terminator>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
good day... newbie here... im a LAN admin at my place of employment and im looking to
give my company options.. please mind you im coming from a NT environment and have
about 3 weeks into linux.. and that is even limited to when i can get to it... i choose
mandrake 8 on a recommendation.. since i was just starting out .. it would be easy to
configure.. and it is.. samba on the other hand has not been.. i bought the teach yourself
samba in 24hr book.. and managed to get the box to show up in the network neighborhood..
in 2.07 i can get the domain auth. working BUT it is extremely slow.. about 30 to 45 seconds
to auth.. i tried going to 2.09 and 2.2.0 but they seem to break my domain auth.. the
smb.conf file is very plain.. my PDC (password server) it an nt sp6 box and one of my BDC's
(another passwords server) is also a nt sp6 box... here is the internals of the smb.conf file..
can you guru's out there tell me what im doing wrong,..
thanks alot for you help..
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = DME_FTL
netbios name = FREEDOM
server string = Samba Server %v on Linux Mandrake ver. 8
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = Yes
password server = Goliath
password level = 3
username level = 3
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
printcap name = lpstat
local master = No
dns proxy = No
wins server = 10.2.8.185
hosts allow = 10.2.0.0
printing = cups
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
writeable = Yes
browseable = No
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
create mask = 0700
guest ok = Yes
printable = Yes
print command = lpr-cups -P %p -o raw %s -r # using client side printer drivers.
lpq command = lpstat -o %p
lprm command = cancel %p-%j
Return-Path: <gajean at airfrance.fr>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail1out.ory.airfrance.fr (mail1out.airfrance.fr
[212.234.214.7]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914D14A4F
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from airfrance.fr (unverified) by mail1out.ory.airfrance.fr
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id
<T5448acb5e3391a469b1a8 at mail1out.ory.airfrance.fr> for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:35:31 +0200
To: samba at lists.samba.org
From: gajean at airfrance.fr
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:35:29 +0200
Message-ID: <OFBC742D2D.BCD9AB02-ONC1256A72.005ADEED at fr>
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on SLN1HUBMAIL/BACKBONE/GRAF/FR(Release
5.0.4 |June 8, 2000) at 06/21/2001 06:35:31 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: (no subject)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have troubles to compile samba 2.0.9 on a redhat 7.1, I have the
following errors
./configure --prefix=/local --with-privatedir=/local/etc/samba/private
--sysconfdir=/local/etc/samba --localstatedir=/local/var/samba
make
[..OK..]
Linking bin/smbd
lib/util.o: In function `smbd_mktemp':
lib/util.o(.text+0x5d6c): the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use
`mkstemp'
lib/interface.o: In function `interpret_interface':
lib/interface.o(.text+0x256): undefined reference to `ap_fnmatch'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [bin/smbd] Error 1
Thank you for helping me,
Gakl Jean
---------------
Les donnies et renseignements contenus dans ce message sont personnels,
confidentiels et secrets. Ce message est adressi ` l'individu ou l'entiti dont
les coordonnies figurent ci-dessus. Si vous n'jtes pas le bon destinataire,
nous vous demandons de ne pas lire, copier, utiliser ou divulguer cette
communication. Nous vous prions de notifier cette erreur ` l'expiditeur et
d'effacer immediatement cette communication de votre systhme.
The information contained in this message is privileged, confidential, and
protected from disclosure. This message is intended for the individual or
entity adressed herein. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not
read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others ;also please notify
the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Return-Path: <cbourne at xapnet.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from hedges.xapnet.com (unknown [63.141.165.131]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA264AFA for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:23:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xapnet.com (IDENT:stork at localhost.localdomain
[127.0.0.1]) by hedges.xapnet.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5LHSaV14729 for <samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:28:37 -0700
Message-ID: <3B322EC4.B8CCB6A8 at xapnet.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:28:36 -0700
From: Chris Bourne <cbourne at xapnet.com>
Organization: Xapnet
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: smbmount permissions
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello!!
I was wondering if someone could help me with smbmount
permissions?
I am running Redhat 7.0 (will be upgrading to 7.1 soon) and on the other
side is WindowsNT. The mount takes place no problem but I am confused
about the windowsNT -> Unix permissions. I need the permissions set on
the WindowsNT side for a particular user to be taking place on the Unix
side. Oh ye one other question, when I am mounted to NT and I check out
my fstab file I get type smbfs (0). what is the "(0)" mean?
Thank you, Chris
(cbourne at xapnet.com)
Return-Path: <mosborne at jacads.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from re-fw0.omc.johnston.af.mil (re-fw0.omc.johnston.af.mil
[207.133.186.90]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
BA4044ADA; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from recmail.omc.johnston.af.mil (recmail.omc.johnston.af.mil
[172.20.10.97]) by re-fw0.omc.johnston.af.mil (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP
id HAA25512; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:26:51 -1000
Received: by recmail.omc.johnston.af.mil(Lotus SMTP MTA v1.2 (600.1
3-26-1998)) id 0A256A72.005FD8B3 ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:26:53 -1000
X-Lotus-FromDomain: REC
From: "Michael E Osborne" <mosborne at jacads.com>
To: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at samba-tng.org>
Cc: samba at samba.org, samba-technical at samba.org, samba-ntdom at samba.org
Message-ID: <0A256A72.005EED9E.00 at recmail.omc.johnston.af.mil>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:26:49 -1000
Subject: Re: web page
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have been using Samba a long time and there was a time when I actually
looked forward to your posts on this list. That time is definately over
now. While I respect your technical abilities and appreciate the work that
you have done on Samba, your posts now are simply sad. I'm not sure what
you intend these posts to accomplish. I can tell you how that they reflect
*very* poorly on you not Samba or the people you are unhappy with.
Just person offering a view
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at samba-tng.org> on 06/21/2001 02:06:52 AM
To: samba at samba.org, samba-technical at samba.org, samba-ntdom at samba.org
cc: (bcc: Michael E Osborne/JACADS/REC)
Subject: web page
http://us1.samba.org/samba/team.html
please take me off this page.
i do not want your 'credit' nor your thanks, and you -
the authors of this page - do not deserve to use or to
continue to use my code without due recognition.
a 'credit' on a web page is pitiful recognition, so
take it off. now.
luke
Return-Path: <ae at aevetts.virtualynx.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from qmail.virtualynx.com (qmail.virtualynx.com
[204.244.216.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BD1C4E82
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 13717 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2001 19:11:22 -0000
Received: from schoolgirl.virtualynx.com (HELO user121.virtualynx.com)
(mail at 207.194.66.120) by qmail.virtualynx.com with SMTP; 21 Jun 2001
19:11:22 -0000
Received: from ae by user121.virtualynx.com with local (Exim 3.12 #1
(Debian)) id 15D9wd-00006E-00 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun
2001 12:16:47 -0700
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:16:47 -0700
From: Alan Evetts <aevetts at virtualynx.com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Conversion Issues with W2K sp2 characters on default roaming
profile
Message-ID: <20010621121647.A335 at virtualynx.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi There,
After lots of struggling, I have finally been able to get my W2K SP2 machines to logon to my samba domain (Running current CVS release "Version pre-3.0.0"). Now I am having troubles with Character sets and conversion. What the problem is, is that in the default Win2k sp2 roaming profile there is a link to your floppy drive, stored in the SendTo Folder. This links name is "3= Floppy (A)". In case email clients mangle that, the 2nd character in that string is the "1/2" symbol.
When first logging onto a w2k machine (with the Client code page set to 850), it creates this profile, and when you save the roaming profile to the samba server, the Filename in the Sendto folder is "3= Floppy (A).lnk". When you try and re-open this profile from the w2k machine - it fails to find that file. The error that follows is:
Windows cannt copy file \\DOMAIN\profiles\asdf\SendTo\3| Floppy (A).lnk to location C:\Documents and Settings\asdf\SendTo\3| Floppy (A).lnk. Contact your network Administrator.
Details - The filenmae, directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect.
When repeating this process, but with Client code page set to 437, the error on re-opening the profile is the same, but instead of a pipe it has the cent sign symbol (as in dollars and cents), and the Detail is: The system cannot find the file specified.
Has anyone had similar trouble / have any advice for me? The only workaround I have come up with is to remove the .lnk file from the Roaming profile - but that is only a workaround .. and I'm looking for a solution :)
Alan Evetts
Return-Path: <barry at arhosting.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from arhosting.com (arhosting.com [216.63.180.37]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A373F49B4 for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 1725 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2001 19:04:48 -0000
Received: from proxy.bryant.dsc.k12.ar.us (HELO bspiii800)
(165.29.94.254) by arhosting.com with SMTP; 21 Jun 2001 19:04:48 -0000
From: "Barry Smoke" <barry at arhosting.com>
To: "Michael E Osborne" <mosborne at jacads.com>, "Luke Kenneth Casson
Leighton" <lkcl at samba-tng.org>
Cc: <samba at samba.org>, <samba-technical at samba.org>,
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: RE: web page
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:20:51 -0500
Message-ID: <IMEKIDMFAEBICGFFGJPKKEPKFOAA.barry at arhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <0A256A72.005EED9E.00 at recmail.omc.johnston.af.mil>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I am not a developer, just a very strong SAMBA supporter. I have only been
on the list a short time, but I would like to say that this sort of thing
looks badly on the whole opensource community. If you contributed code to
the SAMBA project, then credit for that code should appear in the sources.
If this code was submitted under the GPL, then it is open, and can be used
in the SAMBA project. If you wanted to remain in control of your specific
code, you should have not submitted it under an opensource project in the
first place. You could have taken the SAMBA source, and applied your code
changes, and forked the project. Your forked project could have remained
closed source, as long as all of the source to the opensource parts remained
available to the public, and kany kchanges to the opensource parts of the
code were also made public.
I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm wrong, but this is my understanding of the
GPL.
Actually, I looked on samba.org, and don't even see gpl mentioned....but it
is my understanding that this is an opensource run project....
anyway, I digress...
Just another View....
Barry Smoke
District Network Administrator
Bryant Public Schools
Owner/arhosting.com
-----Original Message-----
From: samba-admin at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin at lists.samba.org]On
Behalf Of Michael E Osborne
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 12:27 PM
To: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
Cc: samba at samba.org; samba-technical at samba.org; samba-ntdom at samba.org
Subject: Re: web page
I have been using Samba a long time and there was a time when I actually
looked forward to your posts on this list. That time is definately over
now. While I respect your technical abilities and appreciate the work that
you have done on Samba, your posts now are simply sad. I'm not sure what
you intend these posts to accomplish. I can tell you how that they reflect
*very* poorly on you not Samba or the people you are unhappy with.
Just person offering a view
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at samba-tng.org> on 06/21/2001 02:06:52 AM
To: samba at samba.org, samba-technical at samba.org, samba-ntdom at samba.org
cc: (bcc: Michael E Osborne/JACADS/REC)
Subject: web page
http://us1.samba.org/samba/team.html
please take me off this page.
i do not want your 'credit' nor your thanks, and you -
the authors of this page - do not deserve to use or to
continue to use my code without due recognition.
a 'credit' on a web page is pitiful recognition, so
take it off. now.
luke
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <urban at teststation.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from fungus.teststation.com (fungus.teststation.com
[212.32.186.211]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED2B4D75
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cola.teststation.com (tron.teststation.com
[212.32.186.212]) by fungus.teststation.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP
id f5LJGu021699; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:17:01 +0200
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:16:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Urban Widmark <urban at teststation.com>
X-Sender: <puw at cola.teststation.com>
To: Oren Held <mar_garina at opinionz.cjb.net>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Mounting a cdrom using samba problem
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106152055070.29141-100000 at deot.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106212107440.6700-100000 at cola.teststation.co
m>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Oren Held wrote:
> Hello!
>
> (I use SuSE 7.1/Linux 2.4.5/Samba 2.2.0. I'm trying to mount the cdrom
> of a win98 machine)
>
> I have a pretty weird problem:
> Samba mounts drives on the other computer (win98) very well.
> However, when I mount a cdrom on the other machine comes a weird problem.
> It mounts well, but then when I try to go into some directory inside the
> cd- after several 'ls' commands it tells me either 'Input/output error' or
> 'Not a directory' error, depends on what I do.
>
> What makes it weird is that in the first 'ls' commands it works, but then
> suddenly (usually after one or two working tries) it cannot ls these
> directories inside the cd and returns these errors.
It sort of sounds like the old connection timeout problem. But I don't
understand why you'd get it so quickly, or is it not as short time between
the commands as I think?
Windows servers (at least) likes to disconnect clients that are too idle,
like smbfs can be. The symptom of that is that things work and then they
stop with input/output errors.
Perhaps this is some other cd-rom related bug ...
Have you tried versions before 2.4.5? It is rather evil towards win98s.
2.4.4 or 2.4.6-pre4 should be nicer, although I fail to see why it would
matter here.
I have waited with answering this as I'm not really sure what I want to
ask. smbfs doesn't treat a remote cd any differently from a remote hd. I
don't even have a cdrom in my testmachine, but I'll try to repeat it
later.
In the meantime, welcome to my bag of unsolved smbfs problems :)
/Urban
Return-Path: <urban at teststation.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from fungus.teststation.com (fungus.teststation.com
[212.32.186.211]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 642C94CEE
for <samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cola.teststation.com (tron.teststation.com
[212.32.186.212]) by fungus.teststation.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP
id f5LJKr021716; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:20:57 +0200
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:20:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Urban Widmark <urban at teststation.com>
X-Sender: <puw at cola.teststation.com>
To: <grega at krneki.org>
Cc: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Re: i see just 256 megs
In-Reply-To: <200106152320480910.005434E3 at razor.arnes.si>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106212117090.6700-100000 at cola.teststation.co
m>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 grega at krneki.org wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm quite new to samba so i'm sorry if
> this mail will look funny or dumb.
Nothing wrong with this email.
You could include version numbers, both of the linux-kernel (where smbfs
lives) and samba (where smbmount lives).
> I do:
> mount -t smbfs -o username=xxx //f2-ijs/Kgb_backup /backup
>
> bash-2.04# du -H /backup
> 2.5G /backup
> bash-2.04# df -H /backup
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> //f2-ijs/Kgb_backup 262M 262M 0 100% /backup
>
> So hmm how is this possible: i always see just ~256 megs.
Are there any disk quotas on that share? To the server all accesses are
made as the xxx user. So any limits on that user will affect all users on
the linux side.
> There is no max disk size in smb.conf. And besides that
smb.conf is mostly irrelevant for smbmount/smbfs.
/Urban
Return-Path: <urban at teststation.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from fungus.teststation.com (fungus.teststation.com
[212.32.186.211]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C49D4D84
for <samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cola.teststation.com (tron.teststation.com
[212.32.186.212]) by fungus.teststation.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP
id f5LJQ4021738; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:26:04 +0200
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:25:59 +0200 (CEST)
From: Urban Widmark <urban at teststation.com>
X-Sender: <puw at cola.teststation.com>
To: Chris Bourne <cbourne at xapnet.com>
Cc: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Re: smbmount permissions
In-Reply-To: <3B322EC4.B8CCB6A8 at xapnet.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106212122380.6700-100000 at cola.teststation.co
m>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Chris Bourne wrote:
> Hello!!
> I was wondering if someone could help me with smbmount
> permissions?
> I am running Redhat 7.0 (will be upgrading to 7.1 soon) and on the other
> side is WindowsNT. The mount takes place no problem but I am confused
> about the windowsNT -> Unix permissions. I need the permissions set on
> the WindowsNT side for a particular user to be taking place on the Unix
> side. Oh ye one other question, when I am mounted to NT and I check out
> my fstab file I get type smbfs (0). what is the "(0)" mean?
0 means nothing. smbmount does not set that field to anything useful.
How do you mount the share?
Something like this makes all files belong to the puw user & group, and
files get 0644 permission and dirs 0755.
% mount -t smbfs -o username=puw,uid=puw,gid=puw,fmask=0644,dmask=0755 ...
Look at the smbmount manpage for the uid, gid, fmask and dmask options.
/Urban
Return-Path: <wilmar.perez at caribe.udea.edu.co>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from caribe.udea.edu.co (caribe.udea.edu.co [200.24.18.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A0A470B for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ewdpb (biblio1-233.red-udea [192.168.73.233]) by
caribe.udea.edu.co (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA13414; Thu, 21 Jun
2001 15:05:01 -0400
Message-ID: <007601c0fa8b$36333e60$e949a8c0 at udea.edu.co>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wilmar_P=E9rez?= <wilmar.perez at caribe.udea.edu.co>
To: "Samba List" <samba at lists.samba.org>, "Servidores U de A"
<computo at quimbaya.udea.edu.co>
Subject: Sveral logon scripts
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:48:57 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello guys
I wonder whether it's possible or not to have several user's groups on the
same box running a different logon script each.
Thanks a lot
-----------------------------------------------
Wilmar Pirez
IT Manager - Central Library
University of Antioquia
Medellmn - Colombia
tel: ++57(4)2105145
-----------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <gcarter at valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8350249B4; Thu, 21 Jun 2001
13:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (root at ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by
Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA23366; Thu, 21 Jun 2001
15:05:07 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:08:05 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter at pogo.plainjoe.org>
To: Barry Smoke <barry at arhosting.com>
Cc: Michael E Osborne <mosborne at jacads.com>, Luke Kenneth Casson
Leighton <lkcl at samba-tng.org>, <samba at samba.org>,
<samba-technical at samba.org>, <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: RE: web page
In-Reply-To: <IMEKIDMFAEBICGFFGJPKKEPKFOAA.barry at arhosting.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106211459450.17981-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Barry,
I will provide some very limited responses. I'll not be very
active in this thread if it takes off.
Cheers, jerry
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Barry Smoke wrote:
> If you contributed code to the SAMBA project, then credit for that
> code should appear in the sources. If this code was submitted under
> the GPL, then it is open, and can be used in the SAMBA project. If
It does and is.
> you wanted to remain in control of your specific code, you should have
> not submitted it under an opensource project in the first place. You
> could have taken the SAMBA source, and applied your code changes, and
> forked the project. Your forked project could have remained closed
> source, as long as all of the source to the opensource parts remained
> available to the public, and kany kchanges to the opensource parts of
> the code were also made public. I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm
> wrong, but this is my understanding of the GPL.
The only means of not getting "infected" from GPL course is to
o put the code in "our of process" areas such as kernel space
or to use a mechanism such as RPC
o place it is a library which is considered to be part of the
OS (thing the libc on Solaris).
btw...samba-tng is a code fork of Samba now of which Luke is a
developer as well as Sander and Elrond. :) It is also released
under the GNU GPL.
> Actually, I looked on samba.org, and don't even see gpl
> mentioned....but it is my understanding that this is an opensource run
> project.... anyway, I digress...
Please refer to the from page
http://samba.org/samba/samba.html
cheers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <c-koehn at bethel.edu>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from luther.acns.bethel.edu (unknown [140.88.32.29]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912844C8A for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ckoehn at localhost) by luther.acns.bethel.edu
(8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5LKT6016687; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:29:06
-0500
X-Authentication-Warning: luther.acns.bethel.edu: ckoehn owned process
doing -bs
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:29:06 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Curtis J. Koehn" <c-koehn at bethel.edu>
X-Sender: <ckoehn at luther.acns.bethel.edu>
To: Robert Meiners <robert.meiners at gonicus.de>
Cc: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Re: samba y ldap
In-Reply-To: <01062016362801.21371 at ots-1>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106211455310.2236-100000 at luther.acns.bethel.
edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Great topic, mind if I bud in with a few more questions? There are some
things about this that might be painfully obvious to others but I just
don't get. By the way, I am runing Samba 2.2.0 on RedHat 6.2.
> You only have to insert the pam-modules in the
> pam.d/samba
Which ones? Would the pam_ldap module work? What about NSS (specifically
nss_ldap)?
> But then you have to disable the cypted authentication on the
> Windows-clients and the Account managing is no longer
> possible via SWAT.
Why does encryption cause a problem? Can't the passwords be stored in
LDAP encrypted or is the problem the the pam modules need to do the
encryption?
This whole authentication thing is a tough nut to crack. We are using
LDAP for user accounts. I could use windbind to do domain authentication
against the PDC on our network but it is just being synched with LDAP so I
would rather minimize points of failure and use PAM to authenticate
directly against LDAP. The last thing I want to do is maintian another
user account file on my samba server (i.e. smbpasswd). That just means
more syncronization issues and more complexity. Our goal is to have
everything eventually authenticate against LDAP.
Thanks!
--
Curt Koehn
ITS Operations System Analyst
Bethel College
St. Paul, MN 55112
(651) 635-8618
Return-Path: <r.claeson at computer.org>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from smtp.brightinteractive.net (smtp.brightinteractive.net
[213.242.165.9]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5436B4783
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brighte3ltolsd (d00-1005.brightinteractive.net
[213.242.165.28]) by smtp.brightinteractive.net (Postfix) with SMTP id
65F1A57245 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:38:20
+0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <009201c0fa96$03ebb030$820110ac at sto.brightinteractive.com>
From: "Robert Claeson" <r.claeson at computer.org>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Problems uploading printer driver to Samba 2.2.0
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:06:18 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I'm running Samba 2.2.0 under Red Hat Linux 7.1 as a domain master and am
having problems accessing printers from the Windows client side.
First, when I right-click on the printer in the Printers share, I get the
expected warning "Device settings cannot be displayed. The driver for the
specified printer is not installed. Only spooler properties will be
displayed. Do you want to install the driver now?".
I click No and get the properties dialog for the printer. Under the Advanced
tab, the Driver dropdown just contains "NO DRIVER AVAILABLE FOR THIS
PRINTER", as it should. I click on the New Driver... button to upload a new
driver from a Windows 2000 client.
I get the Add Printer Driver Wizard. On the second screen I click the Have
Disk... button and select the folder where the printer drivers are located.
I continue the dialog, and Windows starts copying files, until the very end
where I get the following error: "Unable to install Lexmark Optra T614 PS3,
Windows NT 4.0 or 2000, Intel driver. Operation could not be completed."
I've tried this from several systems. I've also tried it against an NT
server, where it works beautifully well. I've also checked the file
permissions and configuration on the server to the best of my knowledge.
This is what it looks like under the directory where the printer drivers are
located:
[root at server01 printers]# ls -la
total 12
drwxrwxrwx 3 root wheel 4096 Jun 21 22:58 .
drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Jun 20 20:58 ..
drwxrwxrwx 4 root wheel 4096 Jun 21 22:57 W32X86
[root at server01 printers]#
The W32X86 directory got created and contains two subfolders, "2" and "3",
but both are empty. The permissions of those directories are rwxrwxrwx.
This is the relevant configuration that I use:
[global]
admin users = robert
printer admin = robert
printing = lprng
[print$]
path = /opt/samba/printers
write list = robert
force group = wheel
create mask = 0664
force create mode = 0664
directory mask = 0775
force directory mode = 0775
guest ok = Yes
browseable = No
[optra01]
path = /tmp
printable = Yes
The hard part here is that it's impossible to use the printers from Windows
2000 or NT without having the drivers installed. I'm leaning towards setting
up a separate Windows NT server just for the purpose of being able to print,
but perhaps there's a simple solution that I've overlooked? Or are there
simply gotchas with Red Hat 7.1 that makes the normal instructions invalid?
/Robert
Return-Path: <barry at arhosting.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from arhosting.com (arhosting.com [216.63.180.37]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA9D8464C for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 3537 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2001 20:49:04 -0000
Received: from proxy.bryant.dsc.k12.ar.us (HELO bspiii800)
(165.29.94.254) by arhosting.com with SMTP; 21 Jun 2001 20:49:04 -0000
From: "Barry Smoke" <barry at arhosting.com>
To: "Gerald Carter" <gcarter at valinux.com>, "Barry Smoke"
<barry at arhosting.com>
Cc: "Michael E Osborne" <mosborne at jacads.com>, "Luke Kenneth Casson
Leighton" <lkcl at samba-tng.org>, <samba at samba.org>,
<samba-technical at samba.org>, <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: RE: web page
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:05:05 -0500
Message-ID: <IMEKIDMFAEBICGFFGJPKIEAEFPAA.barry at arhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106211459450.17981-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org
>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I appologize for not knowing the whole situation. I was very excited to
hear that samba-TNG was released, and being forked.
It is nice to have two code bases to pull lfrom when playing with NT
alternatives. It is unfortunate that there are creative differences , and
hard feelings going on here. I hope the development of both projects can
continue to bring features to both projects, each benefiting from the other.
I can see both sides, but, that is also why you have a development
branch...hoping to slowly integrate stable features. That's why we call it
"alpha".
I will be watching both projects closely. We are replacing all Novell at
our school district wtih SAMBA this summer. SAMBA and school districts
should be a great combination. We are constatnly trying to find ways of
saving taxpayers money. Opensource is one tool we use.
Thanks,
Barry Smoke
District Network Administrator
Bryant Public Schools
-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald Carter [mailto:gcarter at valinux.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 3:08 PM
To: Barry Smoke
Cc: Michael E Osborne; Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton; samba at samba.org;
samba-technical at samba.org; samba-ntdom at samba.org
Subject: RE: web page
Barry,
I will provide some very limited responses. I'll not be very
active in this thread if it takes off.
Cheers, jerry
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Barry Smoke wrote:
> If you contributed code to the SAMBA project, then credit for that
> code should appear in the sources. If this code was submitted under
> the GPL, then it is open, and can be used in the SAMBA project. If
It does and is.
> you wanted to remain in control of your specific code, you should have
> not submitted it under an opensource project in the first place. You
> could have taken the SAMBA source, and applied your code changes, and
> forked the project. Your forked project could have remained closed
> source, as long as all of the source to the opensource parts remained
> available to the public, and kany kchanges to the opensource parts of
> the code were also made public. I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm
> wrong, but this is my understanding of the GPL.
The only means of not getting "infected" from GPL course is to
o put the code in "our of process" areas such as kernel space
or to use a mechanism such as RPC
o place it is a library which is considered to be part of the
OS (thing the libc on Solaris).
btw...samba-tng is a code fork of Samba now of which Luke is a
developer as well as Sander and Elrond. :) It is also released
under the GNU GPL.
> Actually, I looked on samba.org, and don't even see gpl
> mentioned....but it is my understanding that this is an opensource run
> project.... anyway, I digress...
Please refer to the from page
http://samba.org/samba/samba.html
cheers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <gcarter at valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFB24F52 for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (root at ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by
Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA29722; Thu, 21 Jun 2001
16:04:46 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:07:44 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter at pogo.plainjoe.org>
To: Barry Smoke <barry at arhosting.com>
Cc: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: RE: web page
In-Reply-To: <IMEKIDMFAEBICGFFGJPKIEAEFPAA.barry at arhosting.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106211605490.18705-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Barry Smoke wrote:
> I appologize for not knowing the whole situation. I was very excited
> to hear that samba-TNG was released, and being forked. It is nice to
> have two code bases to pull lfrom when playing with NT alternatives.
> It is unfortunate that there are creative differences , and hard
> feelings going on here. I hope the development of both projects can
> continue to bring features to both projects, each benefiting from the
> other.
I know that Elrond has informed us of problems he has found in
our code and in return has been able to use some of the
patches and functionality we have implemented in our HEAD and
SAMBA_2_2 branches.
cheers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <torriem at cs.byu.edu>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.cs.byu.edu (mail.cs.byu.edu [128.187.2.20]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34B64273 for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from verdi.cs.byu.edu (IDENT:torriem at verdi.cs.byu.edu
[128.187.101.86]) by mail.cs.byu.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5LLoMP09183 for <samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:50:22 -0600
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:50:22 -0600 (MDT)
From: Michael L Torrie <torriem at cs.byu.edu>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Re: samba y ldap
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106211455310.2236-100000 at luther.acns.bethel
. edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106211542250.23698-100000 at verdi.cs.byu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
If you configured samba to use plain text passwords, and don't need PDC
stuff, then pam_ldap should be able to work just fine for samba, so long
as you add the appropriate pam_ldap.so stuff to the pam.d entry from
samba. This would allow samba to authenticate against your already
existing ldap database that handles normal unix accounts
If you wish to have encrypted passwords, then each user in the ldap
database will need to be of class sambaAccount, in addition to
posixAccount and whatever else they are. In this case, though, you'll
have to maintain 3 password fields per user record: the userPassword
field (can be crypt, md5, or kerberos) and then the ntpassword and
lmpassword fields that samba will use.
Even though ldap stores your unix passwords in some encrypted form, when
pam is called, it receives the plaintext password from the authenticating
program (be it login or sshd or whatever). Then pam feeds it to ldap,
which encrypts it according to whatever method is needed and compares the
hashes. In samba, the password is arriving at the samba server already
hashed, so samba can't pass on a plaintext version to pam. Also, the
hashing algorithm is not the same as standard unix crypts or md5s, so we
can simply compare hashes. (Are the samba hashes 2-way? if so, then why
can't samba unencrypt the passwords and send them to pam in plain?)
I'm using a variety of scripts to keep my three entries per person
synchronized. It's not too bad. Of course it will be ideal when We can
get win2k, samba and kerberos to all play nice together. Then kerberos
can be the one authentication database (using ldap for session/account
information).
Michael
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Curtis J. Koehn wrote:
> Great topic, mind if I bud in with a few more questions? There are some
> things about this that might be painfully obvious to others but I just
> don't get. By the way, I am runing Samba 2.2.0 on RedHat 6.2.
>
> > You only have to insert the pam-modules in the
> > pam.d/samba
>
> Which ones? Would the pam_ldap module work? What about NSS (specifically
> nss_ldap)?
>
> > But then you have to disable the cypted authentication on the
> > Windows-clients and the Account managing is no longer
> > possible via SWAT.
>
> Why does encryption cause a problem? Can't the passwords be stored in
> LDAP encrypted or is the problem the the pam modules need to do the
> encryption?
>
> This whole authentication thing is a tough nut to crack. We are using
> LDAP for user accounts. I could use windbind to do domain authentication
> against the PDC on our network but it is just being synched with LDAP so I
> would rather minimize points of failure and use PAM to authenticate
> directly against LDAP. The last thing I want to do is maintian another
> user account file on my samba server (i.e. smbpasswd). That just means
> more syncronization issues and more complexity. Our goal is to have
> everything eventually authenticate against LDAP.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
Return-Path: <halflife at meteng.on.ca>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from meteng.on.ca (meteng.on.ca [216.129.13.49]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CB9445F for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from meteng.on.ca (cr643746-a.ym1.on.wave.home.com
[24.43.78.105]) by meteng.on.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA29325
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:43:10 -0400
Message-ID: <3B32791F.21713B11 at meteng.on.ca>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:45:51 -0400
From: lejer <halflife at meteng.on.ca>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Backup in Samba
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello, I had the very same thought when I first started. What I ended
up doing was using a bash script called from the cron daemon which
mounts a remote share and copies files to it, then unmounts the share.
This is very rough and can easily be polished up and improved with
some error checking:
#!/bin/bash
# crude SMB backup program
BACKUP_MACHINE='backup_machine_name'
BACKUP_SHARE='backup_share_name'
# where to mount the share locally
MOUNT_DIR='/samba/smb_backup'
# location of files we want backed up (revise to suit)
DIR_TO_COPY='/var/share'
# check for the share, and if it doesn't exist, mount it
/bin/mount |grep smbfs |grep "^//$BACKUP_MACHINE/$BACKUP_SHARE" \
// >/dev/null || smbmount $BACKUP_MACHINE/$BACKUP_SHARE /$MOUNT_DIR \
// -o guest 1>/dev/null
# copy files to share
cp -vufR ${DIR_TO_COPY}/* ${MOUNT_DIR}/ 1>/dev/null
# make sure we aren't in the directory otherwise we cannot unmount it
cd /
# unmount the share
umount /$MOUNT_DIR 1>/dev/null
## end script
-----
IMPORTANT:
Keep in mind an important issue which I had found out the hard way.
Be mindful of where you are mounting the remote share to locally. If
the local directory /samba/smb_backup is mounted under / and the
mount fails for any reason, the script will still copy the contents
of /var/share to /samba/smb_backup which will actually be local and
will fill up the root partition of your machine. This is BAD. IF
possible try to mount the share to a separate partition in order to
protect the root partition or simply rewrite the script to cancel the
copy in the event that the mount fails.
Hope this helps a bit.
Message me if you need any help setting things up. Hopefully the
script is readable to you after me using this Windoze mail client.
Regards,
Lejer
Michelangelo Pisa wrote:
>
> Hello
> How can I do a backup from my samba server to a share of the a win98
> workstation?
> how to use tar? or other program of backup...
> thanks a lot..
>
> ---
> Michelangelo Pisa
> INFOSTORE INFORMATICA
> http://www.infostoreweb.com.br
> michelangelo at infostoreweb.com.br
> (47) 348-4840
> ---
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <halflife at meteng.on.ca>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from meteng.on.ca (meteng.on.ca [216.129.13.49]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03639508D for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from meteng.on.ca (cr643746-a.ym1.on.wave.home.com
[24.43.78.105]) by meteng.on.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA29999
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:43:45 -0400
Message-ID: <3B329545.313FCE at meteng.on.ca>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:45:57 -0400
From: lejer <halflife at meteng.on.ca>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Yet another problem with locking
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Greetings. I'm having trouble with clients accessing shared files
on my samba 2.0.7 server and not releasing the lock on a self extracting
archive file. Each evening, windows clients are scheduled to run
an Antivirus update executable in order to stay current. The problem
being, the next day if someone wishes to replace that update file
with a newer version, the last client to run the update keeps
a lock on it and noone can replace it. For some reason other clients
will release the lock for other each other to run the update, but
the last client to touch it holds onto it.
Ideas?
Lejer
Return-Path: <sstauffer at uswest.net>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from ptldpop2.ptld.uswest.net (ptldpop2.ptld.uswest.net
[198.36.160.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95B7450CE
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 6244 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2001 00:47:13 -0000
Delivered-To: fixup-samba at lists.samba.org@fixme
Received: (qmail 6233 invoked by uid 0); 22 Jun 2001 00:47:13 -0000
Received: from ptlddslgw4poolc186.ptld.uswest.net (HELO dave)
(63.229.130.186) by ptldpop2.ptld.uswest.net with SMTP; 22 Jun 2001
00:47:13 -0000
Message-ID: <000a01c0fab4$6fc96220$ba82e53f at dave>
From: "Dave Phillips" <sstauffer at uswest.net>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Samba IPC$ passwords and security in general
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:44:03 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi, I am a newbie struggling with samba. I have it configured to the point
that I have a basic setup between my RedHat 7.1 and win 98 machines (using
samba 2.0.7). I was having problems accessing my Linux shares in network
neighborhood, I would be prompted for a IPC$ password (I only have 2 different
passwords I use right now to keep this simple and neither would work), the
only way I found around this was to include the 'guest ok =yes' in my
smb.conf. But I know this can't be the proper or only way. I have tried using
'valid users=(win98 logon name)' but this seems to do nothing. I have my
password encryption enabled in my smb.conf. What am I doing wrong. The Linux
machine can access my win98 files no problem. Any help would be greatly
appreciated.
Return-Path: <halflife at meteng.on.ca>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from meteng.on.ca (meteng.on.ca [216.129.13.49]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A9B50CE for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from meteng.on.ca (cr643746-a.ym1.on.wave.home.com
[24.43.78.105]) by meteng.on.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA30024
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:47:39 -0400
Message-ID: <3B32964A.13B78998 at meteng.on.ca>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:50:18 -0400
From: lejer <halflife at meteng.on.ca>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: SMB errors
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Good evening. Can anyone shed some light on this particular error which
seems to fill my smb.log files?
>[2001/06/21 15:17:55, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(566)
> write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 6: ERRNO = Broken pipe
Should I be worried about this? There hasn't been any evidence of
data corruption with any of the shares and noone has complained about
missing or damaged files.
Lejer
Return-Path: <eric_boucher60 at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from web9404.mail.yahoo.com (web9404.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.129.110]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26C344518
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20010622010457.84155.qmail at web9404.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [64.228.188.23] by web9404.mail.yahoo.com; Thu, 21 Jun
2001 18:04:57 PDT
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Boucher <eric_boucher60 at yahoo.com>
Subject: starting unix script from windows client
To: SAMBA <samba at lists.samba.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi everyone,
Is it possible to start a unix script that will act on
unix from windows with samba? I mean script that was
already created or executable file for unix, but to
start them on a windows client?
Thanks
Eric Boucher
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Return-Path: <sanderson at squidworks.net>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from smtp-server2.tampabay.rr.com (smtp-server2.cfl.rr.com
[65.32.2.69]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD114840 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from squid (ubr-33.186.136.palmbayII.cfl.rr.com
[65.33.186.136]) by smtp-server2.tampabay.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with
SMTP id f5M1dlv21337 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001
21:39:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Shannon Anderson" <sanderson at squidworks.net>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Ipsec Tunnels and Browsing
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:32:18 -0400
Message-ID: <KAEPJAGNFKJKOEHJOAKNGEOOCBAA.sanderson at squidworks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi samba users,
Just thought I would throw this out there,
Currently we (SLUG) are working on a dynamic tunneling process across public
networks. Geared towards cable, DSL, Broadband users but I won't get in to
that now. Any how we just started trying to get samba to browse across those
networks using NMB and we are having varied success.
Are there any tools for NMB other than nmblookup that would get us access to
a NMB database in a complete form or a way to log the activity being added
to browse list?
SLUG= Squidworks Linux Users Group
Shannon M. Anderson
sanderson at squidworks.net <mailto:sanderson at squidworks.net>
Return-Path: <murugappan at hgsolutions.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from host2.ecsecure.com (host2.ecsecure.com [209.239.38.173])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74627510B for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hg04 ([64.64.109.149]) by host2.ecsecure.com
(8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f5M1fga25427 for <samba at samba.org>; Thu,
21 Jun 2001 21:41:42 -0400
Message-ID: <000c01c0fac4$794198d0$956d4040 at hg04>
From: "Murugappan" <murugappan at hgsolutions.com>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: samba NT domain unable to connect
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:38:48 -0500
Organization: Hourglass Solutions Inc.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have installed RH 7.1 Linux and samba. I have set up samba and able to see
in my NT machine as a shared account.
I log in as admin in to my NT machine and try to change my domain,it says
"unable to connect to domain ,have ur administrator checked ur account on
domain"
I have set smbpasswd correctly
Where I am wrong??
any help pls.
P.Murugappan
Return-Path: <ajoostin at students.cs.uu.nl>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.students.cs.uu.nl (solar.students.cs.uu.nl
[131.211.82.28]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C3A4226
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from abeel.students.cs.uu.nl (abeel.students.cs.uu.nl
[131.211.82.40]) by mail.students.cs.uu.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id
95E7885F8 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 06:03:48 +0200
(MET DST)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 06:03:48 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Arjan Oosting <ajoostin at students.cs.uu.nl>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Roaming profile problems
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106220547320.27340-100000 at abeel.students.cs.
uu.nl>
X-Org: Students of the Department of Computer Science; Utrecht
University
X-Org: P.O. Box 80.089; 3508 TB Utrecht; The Netherlands.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
I've got a linux (kernel 2.4.5) server with samba 2.2.0 installed and a
Windows 2000 professional client. This server is PDC for my network. But
whenever I logout on the windows machine, samba seems not able to save my
roaming profile. In my samba log i find entries like this
[2001/06/22 05:46:0, 0] smbd/open.c:open_directory(1037)
open_directory: unable to create arjan/Start Menu/Programs/Startup.
Error was no such file or directory
after a lot of these entries samba seems to stop responding to the client.
I've tried al king of permissions on the profile directory, all kind of
compile- smb.conf-options and the latest sources from cvs and windows 2000
professional without sp1, with sp1 an with sp2. Verifying my username &
password works, but i just can't save my profile. Please help me, i'm
desperate.
Greetings Arjan
--
This signature has been infected by the signature virus.
Please help me spread and copy me to your .signature
--
Arjan Oosting
Student Informatica, Universiteit Utrecht
E-mail : ajoostin at students.cs.uu.nl
E-mail @home : arjanoosting at home.nl
Telephone : +31384221224
Mobile telephone: +31629148383
Return-Path: <dm at belkam.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from pipe.aspec.ru (pipe.aspec.ru [195.161.29.125]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC3A4650 for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from belkam.com (dm.p100.belkam.com [192.168.21.111]) by
pipe.aspec.ru (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5M4Lh804609 for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:21:44 +0500 (SAMST)
Message-ID: <3B32C7D6.BCE6C584 at belkam.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:21:42 +0500
From: Dmitry Melekhov <dm at belkam.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4-xfs i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: 2.2.0.5?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello!
Many bugs were fixed since 2.2.0 release, but there is still no new
versions.
Why not to roll back nonstable code (like large read/write) and release
something like
2.2.0.5 which can be used for production?
Now I want to use 2.2 CVS as PDC, but I can't because of bug in large
read/write.
--
Wire connection and Windows reinstallation senior engineer
Dmitry Melekhov
http://www.belkam.com/~dm
2:5050/11.23 at fidonet
Return-Path: <nailed at videotron.ca>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from VL-MS-MR001.sc1.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca
[24.201.245.36]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D035D4840
for <samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alain ([24.201.55.103]) by VL-MS-MR001.sc1.videotron.ca
(Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GFBEA405.H22 for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:39:40 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r"
From: Alain Toussaint <nailed at videotron.ca>
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: Re: 2.2.0.5?
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:39:40 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <3B32C7D6.BCE6C584 at belkam.com>
In-Reply-To: <3B32C7D6.BCE6C584 at belkam.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01062200394006.05755 at alain>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Now I want to use 2.2 CVS as PDC, but I can't because of bug in
> large read/write.
may i ask what are these bugs (large read/write),that's because i
planned to wipe out clean my hard drives (i got a new one and it's
currently sitting idle in my tower) and re-install my box and among the
software to be installed was Samba 2.2 current CVS.
Alain Toussaint
p.s. if you want to know why i'm wipping out my hd,it's because a
format/re-install is less long for me than figuring everything out
(that's despite i'm running Linux since 5 or 6 years ago).
Return-Path: <jbuser at ionium.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from ionium.com (ionium.com [216.122.97.112]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC58F50C9 for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ionium.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA13397; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
01:27:10 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 01:27:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: Justin Buser <jbuser at ionium.com>
Message-Id: <200106220527.BAA13397 at ionium.com>
To: samba at samba.org
Reply-To: jbuser at ionium.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
User-Agent: IMP/PHP3 Imap webMail Program 2.0.11
X-Originating-IP: 64.67.117.98
Subject: Win 2000 compatibility
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
It seems that no matter how I try to configure Samba it
won't let me connect using a win2000 pro machine. The
error says unauthorized to connect from this terminal.
I am using the same username and password in windows
that I have setup in the server. I am not using
encryption and can connect from win98 machines. (which
occasionally have been unable to connect as well.) I
have made all the appropriate registry changes. I have
been using webmin to configure everything, is this a
common problem? I have attached the configuration file
if it helps. We are using this as a test to determine
whether or not we want to use Samba for our Boston and
New York offices. Any help would be greatly
appreciated, even if its pointing me to a relative doc
or link on your site. Thank you for your time,
Justin Buser
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of smb.conf]
Return-Path: <krivka at carmagnus.cz>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from vega.inec.cz (vega.inec.cz [212.47.0.2]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69760517A for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unspecified.host (mail.carmagnus.cz [212.47.14.42]) by
vega.inec.cz (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id HAA29597 for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:58:21 +0200
Received: from 192.168.1.25 ([192.168.1.25]) by 192.168.1.66 (WinRoute
Pro 4.1) with SMTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:59:22 +0200
Message-ID: <001501c0fae0$56ca7120$1901a8c0 at carmagnus.cz>
From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Michal_K=F8ivka?= <krivka at carmagnus.cz>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Invisible samba server
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:58:19 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
my Samba 2.2.0 on SuSE 6.4 is now running.
When typing "smbclient -L name", then is reported:
added interface ip = 192.168.1.230 bcast = 192.168.1.255 mask =255.255.255.0
and all W95 computers are listed, including my samba server.
But from all W95 stations samba server cannot be located, using
\\name\........ , using network browser or using find computer.
Can you help me?
--
Michal Kxivka
krivka at carmagnus.cz
Michal Kxivka
krivka at carmagnus.cz
www.carmagnus.cz
068-541 80 16
0602-184 980
Return-Path: <Rob at the-macgregors.org>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from the-macgregors.org (pc-62-30-96-87-st.blueyonder.co.uk
[62.30.96.87]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2C54CB3
for <samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from macathlon (rob at macathlon.macgregor [192.168.32.101])
(authenticated (0 bits)) by the-macgregors.org
(8.12.0.Beta12/8.12.0.Beta10) with ESMTP id f5M6JwJo002654 (using
TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified NO) for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 06:20:00 GMT
From: "Rob MacGregor" <Rob at the-macgregors.org>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Bug report - Samba 2.2.0
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:19:57 +0100
Organization: The MacGregors
Message-ID: <000001c0fae3$5dad42d0$6520a8c0 at macgregor>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViSperl10-milter (http://amavis.org/
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Samba 2.2.0 compiled from source with the following options:
./configure --with-smbmount --with-ssl --with-syslog
--with-quotas --with-lockdir=/var/lock/samba --prefix=/usr
--sysconfdir=/etc
Kernel 2.4.4, Linux-Mandrake 7.2.
Log messages (and this is it I'm afraid):
Jun 21 17:19:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[15898]:
Jun 21 17:19:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[15898]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 17:19:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[15898]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 17:19:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[15898]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 15898 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 17:19:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[15898]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 17:19:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[15898]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 17:19:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[15898]: [2001/06/21 17:19:21, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 17:19:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[15898]: [2001/06/21 17:19:21, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 17:19:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[15898]: [2001/06/21 17:19:21, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 17:19:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[15898]: [2001/06/21 17:19:21, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 17:39:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[20363]:
Jun 21 17:39:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[20363]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 17:39:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[20363]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 17:39:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[20363]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 20363 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 17:39:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[20363]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 17:39:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[20363]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 17:39:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[20363]: [2001/06/21 17:39:34, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 17:39:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[20363]: [2001/06/21 17:39:34, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 17:39:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[20363]: [2001/06/21 17:39:34, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 17:39:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[20363]: [2001/06/21 17:39:34, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 18:00:11 (UTC) aleph nmbd[26097]:
Jun 21 18:00:11 (UTC) aleph nmbd[26097]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 18:00:11 (UTC) aleph nmbd[26097]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 18:00:11 (UTC) aleph nmbd[26097]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 26097 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 18:00:11 (UTC) aleph nmbd[26097]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 18:00:11 (UTC) aleph nmbd[26097]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 18:00:11 (UTC) aleph nmbd[26097]: [2001/06/21 18:00:11, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 18:00:11 (UTC) aleph nmbd[26097]: [2001/06/21 18:00:11, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 18:00:11 (UTC) aleph nmbd[26097]: [2001/06/21 18:00:11, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 18:00:11 (UTC) aleph nmbd[26097]: [2001/06/21 18:00:11, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 18:20:08 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27663]:
Jun 21 18:20:08 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27663]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 18:20:08 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27663]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 18:20:08 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27663]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 27663 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 18:20:08 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27663]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 18:20:08 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27663]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 18:20:08 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27663]: [2001/06/21 18:20:08, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 18:20:08 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27663]: [2001/06/21 18:20:08, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 18:20:08 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27663]: [2001/06/21 18:20:08, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 18:20:08 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27663]: [2001/06/21 18:20:08, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 18:40:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27824]:
Jun 21 18:40:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27824]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 18:40:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27824]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 18:40:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27824]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 27824 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 18:40:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27824]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 18:40:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27824]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 18:40:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27824]: [2001/06/21 18:40:21, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 18:40:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27824]: [2001/06/21 18:40:21, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 18:40:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27824]: [2001/06/21 18:40:21, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 18:40:21 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27824]: [2001/06/21 18:40:21, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 19:00:38 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27973]:
Jun 21 19:00:38 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27973]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 19:00:38 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27973]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 19:00:38 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27973]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 27973 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 19:00:38 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27973]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 19:00:38 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27973]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 19:00:38 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27973]: [2001/06/21 19:00:38, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 19:00:38 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27973]: [2001/06/21 19:00:38, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 19:00:38 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27973]: [2001/06/21 19:00:38, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 19:00:38 (UTC) aleph nmbd[27973]: [2001/06/21 19:00:38, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 19:20:55 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28123]:
Jun 21 19:20:55 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28123]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 19:20:55 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28123]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 19:20:55 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28123]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 28123 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 19:20:55 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28123]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 19:20:55 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28123]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 19:20:55 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28123]: [2001/06/21 19:20:55, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 19:20:55 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28123]: [2001/06/21 19:20:55, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 19:20:55 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28123]: [2001/06/21 19:20:55, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 19:20:55 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28123]: [2001/06/21 19:20:55, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 19:41:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28287]:
Jun 21 19:41:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28287]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 19:41:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28287]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 19:41:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28287]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 28287 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 19:41:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28287]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 19:41:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28287]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 19:41:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28287]: [2001/06/21 19:41:28, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 19:41:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28287]: [2001/06/21 19:41:28, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 19:41:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28287]: [2001/06/21 19:41:28, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 19:41:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28287]: [2001/06/21 19:41:28, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 20:01:45 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28438]:
Jun 21 20:01:45 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28438]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 20:01:45 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28438]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 20:01:45 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28438]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 28438 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 20:01:45 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28438]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 20:01:45 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28438]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 20:01:45 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28438]: [2001/06/21 20:01:45, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 20:01:45 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28438]: [2001/06/21 20:01:45, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 20:01:45 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28438]: [2001/06/21 20:01:45, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 20:01:45 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28438]: [2001/06/21 20:01:45, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 20:22:02 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28616]:
Jun 21 20:22:02 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28616]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 20:22:02 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28616]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 20:22:02 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28616]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 28616 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 20:22:02 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28616]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 20:22:02 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28616]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 20:22:02 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28616]: [2001/06/21 20:22:02, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 20:22:02 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28616]: [2001/06/21 20:22:02, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 20:22:02 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28616]: [2001/06/21 20:22:02, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 20:22:02 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28616]: [2001/06/21 20:22:02, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 20:41:53 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28741]:
Jun 21 20:41:53 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28741]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 20:41:53 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28741]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 20:41:53 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28741]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 28741 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 20:41:53 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28741]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 20:41:53 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28741]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 20:41:53 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28741]: [2001/06/21 20:41:53, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 20:41:53 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28741]: [2001/06/21 20:41:53, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 20:41:53 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28741]: [2001/06/21 20:41:53, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 20:41:53 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28741]: [2001/06/21 20:41:53, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 21:02:31 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28913]:
Jun 21 21:02:31 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28913]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 21:02:31 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28913]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 21:02:31 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28913]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 28913 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 21:02:31 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28913]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 21:02:31 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28913]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 21:02:31 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28913]: [2001/06/21 21:02:31, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 21:02:31 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28913]: [2001/06/21 21:02:31, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 21:02:31 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28913]: [2001/06/21 21:02:31, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 21:02:31 (UTC) aleph nmbd[28913]: [2001/06/21 21:02:31, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 21:22:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29077]:
Jun 21 21:22:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29077]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 21:22:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29077]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 21:22:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29077]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 29077 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 21:22:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29077]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 21:22:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29077]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 21:22:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29077]: [2001/06/21 21:22:28, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 21:22:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29077]: [2001/06/21 21:22:28, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 21:22:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29077]: [2001/06/21 21:22:28, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 21:22:28 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29077]: [2001/06/21 21:22:28, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 21:42:40 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29228]:
Jun 21 21:42:40 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29228]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 21:42:40 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29228]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 21:42:40 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29228]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 29228 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 21:42:40 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29228]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 21:42:40 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29228]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 21:42:40 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29228]: [2001/06/21 21:42:40, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 21:42:40 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29228]: [2001/06/21 21:42:40, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 21:42:40 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29228]: [2001/06/21 21:42:40, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 21:42:40 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29228]: [2001/06/21 21:42:40, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 22:03:17 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29379]:
Jun 21 22:03:17 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29379]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 22:03:17 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29379]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 22:03:17 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29379]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 29379 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 22:03:17 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29379]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 22:03:17 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29379]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 22:03:17 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29379]: [2001/06/21 22:03:17, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 22:03:17 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29379]: [2001/06/21 22:03:17, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 22:03:17 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29379]: [2001/06/21 22:03:17, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 22:03:17 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29379]: [2001/06/21 22:03:17, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 22:23:30 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29550]:
Jun 21 22:23:30 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29550]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 22:23:30 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29550]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 22:23:30 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29550]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 29550 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 22:23:30 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29550]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 22:23:30 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29550]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 22:23:30 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29550]: [2001/06/21 22:23:30, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 22:23:30 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29550]: [2001/06/21 22:23:30, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 22:23:30 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29550]: [2001/06/21 22:23:30, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 22:23:30 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29550]: [2001/06/21 22:23:30, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 22:43:37 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29705]:
Jun 21 22:43:37 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29705]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 22:43:37 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29705]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 22:43:37 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29705]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 29705 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 22:43:37 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29705]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 22:43:37 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29705]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 22:43:37 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29705]: [2001/06/21 22:43:37, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 22:43:37 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29705]: [2001/06/21 22:43:37, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 22:43:37 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29705]: [2001/06/21 22:43:37, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 22:43:37 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29705]: [2001/06/21 22:43:37, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 23:03:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29849]:
Jun 21 23:03:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29849]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 23:03:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29849]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 23:03:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29849]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 29849 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 23:03:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29849]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 23:03:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29849]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 23:03:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29849]: [2001/06/21 23:03:34, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 23:03:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29849]: [2001/06/21 23:03:34, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 23:03:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29849]: [2001/06/21 23:03:34, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 23:03:34 (UTC) aleph nmbd[29849]: [2001/06/21 23:03:34, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 23:23:47 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30010]:
Jun 21 23:23:47 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30010]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 23:23:47 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30010]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 23:23:47 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30010]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 30010 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 23:23:47 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30010]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 23:23:47 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30010]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 23:23:47 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30010]: [2001/06/21 23:23:47, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 23:23:47 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30010]: [2001/06/21 23:23:47, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 23:23:47 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30010]: [2001/06/21 23:23:47, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 23:23:47 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30010]: [2001/06/21 23:23:47, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Jun 21 23:44:24 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30168]:
Jun 21 23:44:24 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30168]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 23:44:24 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30168]:
===============================================================
Jun 21 23:44:24 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30168]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 30168 (2.2.0)
Jun 21 23:44:24 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30168]: PANIC: internal error
Jun 21 23:44:24 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30168]: Please read the file
BUGS.txt in the distribution
Jun 21 23:44:24 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30168]: [2001/06/21 23:44:24, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
Jun 21 23:44:24 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30168]: [2001/06/21 23:44:24, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
Jun 21 23:44:24 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30168]: [2001/06/21 23:44:24, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
Jun 21 23:44:24 (UTC) aleph nmbd[30168]: [2001/06/21 23:44:24, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139)
Nothing was using samba at the times above and hadn't been for over 10
hours. After these messages samba stopped responding to any requests
and had to be restarted.
This has happened before and I've never been able to identify the cause.
Compiling without syslog support appeared to stop these, but they're
very intermittent.
Rob MacGregor (MCSE) [PGP key ID 0xDA4A5818]
If I cannot bend Heaven, I shall move Hell.
-- Publius Vergilius Maro (Virgil).
http://www.the-macgregors.org/
Return-Path: <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.filmakademie.de (mail.filmakademie.de
[193.196.129.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
740D7517F for <samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from filmakademie.de (g3goetz.filmakademie.de [172.17.20.7])
by mail.filmakademie.de (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5M6YgS13983 for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:34:42 +0200
Message-ID: <3B32F5D0.3BB4176E at filmakademie.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:37:52 +0100
From: Goetz Reinicke <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de>
Organization: Filmakademie
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: de,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba-ml <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Connections to Samba 2.2.0 freeze....
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I recently installed samba 2.2.0 on my RedHat 7.1-System. There is only
one share for guests. On this server the Windows-NT users noticed, that
there are the following problems:
- sometimes files larger than 100 MB will freeze the connection and the
whole NT system.
- after some uptime of samba there is the message on the NT systems: no
more connections are allowed.
Any Ideas? (If you like, I'll post the config-file)
cu...
...GVtz
Return-Path: <on at cs.ait.ac.th>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5E2518F for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (on at banyan.cs.ait.ac.th
[192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.11.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
f5M6kNp29116; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:46:25 +0700 (ICT)
Received: (from on at localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.8.5/8.8.5) id
NAA06375; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:45:44 +0700 (ICT)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:45:44 +0700 (ICT)
Message-Id: <200106220645.NAA06375 at banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
X-Authentication-Warning: banyan.cs.ait.ac.th: on set sender to
on at banyan.cs.ait.ac.th using -f
From: Olivier Nicole <on at cs.ait.ac.th>
To: goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de
Cc: samba at samba.org
In-reply-to: <3B32F5D0.3BB4176E at filmakademie.de> (message from Goetz
Reinicke on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:37:52 +0100)
Subject: Re: Connections to Samba 2.2.0 freeze....
References: <3B32F5D0.3BB4176E at filmakademie.de>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
>- sometimes files larger than 100 MB will freeze the connection and the
>whole NT system.
Would the same happen for some other file transfert protocol? What
about FTP 100MB between those 2 machines? does it hangs? Then you
could suspect network equipment (card, hub...)
Olivier
Return-Path: <samba at hoekstra.nu>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from cobalt01.skybernet.nl (unknown [217.17.128.197]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006F047EC for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from snws52 (SkyberNet [217.17.139.4]) by
cobalt01.skybernet.nl (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f5M6llH08953; Fri,
22 Jun 2001 08:47:48 +0200
Message-ID: <007601c0fae7$88bf4640$4801010a at skybernet>
From: "Robert Hoekstra" <samba at hoekstra.nu>
To: "Dave Phillips" <sstauffer at uswest.net>, <samba at lists.samba.org>
References: <000a01c0fab4$6fc96220$ba82e53f at dave>
Subject: Re: Samba IPC$ passwords and security in general
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:49:49 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I'm sorry if I tell you things you already did, but that'll be because you
provided so little information.
You are using Samba 2.0.7. Great version!.. not to use with w2k, but that
doesn't matter.
Set up your smb.conf to encrypt passwords.. great I encourage encryption.
Furthermore, Have you added users to the samba user database through the
smbpasswd tool?
smbpasswd -a user
Is your windows machine in the same domain as your linux machine (samba
domain)?
Do you have security = server in your smb.conf?
If for one reason the windows 98 logon name is not being used on your linux
you can either add the name in linux (using adduser AND smbpasswd -a) or use
a remap file, explained in the smb.conf.
These are afaik some essential items to check for getting smb on the tracks.
If not, please provide some more information, so it's more easy to find out
what's going on.
Good luck,
Robert.
----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Phillips <sstauffer at uswest.net>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 2:44 AM
Subject: Samba IPC$ passwords and security in general
> Hi, I am a newbie struggling with samba. I have it configured to the
point
> that I have a basic setup between my RedHat 7.1 and win 98 machines (using
> samba 2.0.7). I was having problems accessing my Linux shares in network
> neighborhood, I would be prompted for a IPC$ password (I only have 2
different
> passwords I use right now to keep this simple and neither would work), the
> only way I found around this was to include the 'guest ok =yes' in my
> smb.conf. But I know this can't be the proper or only way. I have tried
using
> 'valid users=(win98 logon name)' but this seems to do nothing. I have my
> password encryption enabled in my smb.conf. What am I doing wrong. The
Linux
> machine can access my win98 files no problem. Any help would be greatly
> appreciated.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <oliver at samera.com.py>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from Polaris.Pla.net.PY (polaris.pla.net.py [216.250.196.10])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B0651A5 for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp at localhost) by Polaris.Pla.net.PY (8.11.2/8.11.2)
with UUCP id f5LMpJK00577; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 02:51:19 +0400
Received: from samera.com.py (sojourner.samera.com [192.168.1.1]) by
samera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA06861; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
02:47:32 -0400
Message-ID: <3B32EA03.1040003 at samera.com.py>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 02:47:31 -0400
From: "Oliver Schulze L." <oliver at samera.com.py>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1)
Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-py
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jbuser at ionium.com
Cc: samba at samba.org
Subject: Re: Win 2000 compatibility
References: <200106220527.BAA13397 at ionium.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
What version of samba are you using?
Here are some tips:
- samba 2.0.x does not support Win2k logins, Samba 2.2.x does
- samba 2.2.0 does no support Win2k SP2 logins
- in samba 2.2.0 use the root acount(previously add with smbpasswd) to
join a Domain from Win2k.
Oliver
Justin Buser wrote:
>It seems that no matter how I try to configure Samba it
>won't let me connect using a win2000 pro machine. The
>error says unauthorized to connect from this terminal.
>I am using the same username and password in windows
>that I have setup in the server. I am not using
>encryption and can connect from win98 machines. (which
>occasionally have been unable to connect as well.) I
>have made all the appropriate registry changes. I have
>been using webmin to configure everything, is this a
>common problem? I have attached the configuration file
>if it helps. We are using this as a test to determine
>whether or not we want to use Samba for our Boston and
>New York offices. Any help would be greatly
>appreciated, even if its pointing me to a relative doc
>or link on your site. Thank you for your time,
>
>Justin Buser
>
>[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of smb.conf]
>
--
Oliver Schulze L.
oliver at samera.com.py
Asuncion-Paraguay
Return-Path: <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.filmakademie.de (mail.filmakademie.de
[193.196.129.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
8C6A851A7 for <samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from filmakademie.de (g3goetz.filmakademie.de [172.17.20.7])
by mail.filmakademie.de (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5M6ojS14031 for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:50:45 +0200
Message-ID: <3B32F993.EA47FE37 at filmakademie.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:53:55 +0100
From: Goetz Reinicke <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de>
Organization: Filmakademie
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: de,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: Re: Connections to Samba 2.2.0 freeze....
References: <3B32F5D0.3BB4176E at filmakademie.de>
<200106220645.NAA06375 at banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
Olivier Nicole wrote:
>
> >- sometimes files larger than 100 MB will freeze the connection and the
> >whole NT system.
>
> Would the same happen for some other file transfert protocol? What
No, NFS works fine, AppleTalk and FTP also (The Share ist an
"multi-system-interconnection-temp" ;-))
> about FTP 100MB between those 2 machines? does it hangs? Then you
> could suspect network equipment (card, hub...)
cu...
...GVtz
Return-Path: <oliver at samera.com.py>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from Polaris.Pla.net.PY (polaris.pla.net.py [216.250.196.10])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356975186 for
<samba at samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp at localhost) by Polaris.Pla.net.PY (8.11.2/8.11.2)
with UUCP id f5LMu1k00643; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 02:56:01 +0400
Received: from samera.com.py (sojourner.samera.com [192.168.1.1]) by
samera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA06963; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
02:53:10 -0400
Message-ID: <3B32EB55.1020308 at samera.com.py>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 02:53:09 -0400
From: "Oliver Schulze L." <oliver at samera.com.py>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1)
Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-py
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michal =?ISO-8859-2?Q?K=F8ivka?= <krivka at carmagnus.cz>
Cc: samba at samba.org
Subject: Re: Invisible samba server
References: <001501c0fae0$56ca7120$1901a8c0 at carmagnus.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Do you have a WINS server in your network or Samba acting like one?
Maybe this help
Oliver
Michal Kxivka wrote:
>Hi,
>my Samba 2.2.0 on SuSE 6.4 is now running.
>When typing "smbclient -L name", then is reported:
>added interface ip = 192.168.1.230 bcast = 192.168.1.255 mask =255.255.255.0
>and all W95 computers are listed, including my samba server.
>But from all W95 stations samba server cannot be located, using
>\\name\........ , using network browser or using find computer.
>
>Can you help me?
>
>
>
>--
>Michal Kxivka
>krivka at carmagnus.cz
>
>Michal Kxivka
>krivka at carmagnus.cz
>www.carmagnus.cz
>068-541 80 16
>0602-184 980
>
--
Oliver Schulze L.
oliver at samera.com.py
Asuncion-Paraguay
Return-Path: <oliver at samera.com.py>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from Polaris.Pla.net.PY (polaris.pla.net.py [216.250.196.10])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234935186 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp at localhost) by Polaris.Pla.net.PY (8.11.2/8.11.2)
with UUCP id f5LMu1W00639; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 02:56:01 +0400
Received: from samera.com.py (sojourner.samera.com [192.168.1.1]) by
samera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA06958; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
02:52:03 -0400
Message-ID: <3B32EB12.20004 at samera.com.py>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 02:52:02 -0400
From: "Oliver Schulze L." <oliver at samera.com.py>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1)
Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-py
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Arjan Oosting <ajoostin at students.cs.uu.nl>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Roaming profile problems
References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106220547320.27340-100000 at abeel.students.cs.
uu.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Do you have write acces in the Unix box for that user?
The directory for the profile of that user must be fully writeable for
that user.
There is also a problem(I hate the word bug, but anyway) with creating
directories inside the profile directory. The problem is that samba creates
the directories in mode 600 and not 700.
I solved this with this .conf:
[profiles]
comment = Win2k profiles
path = /home/samba/profiles
read only = No
create mask = 0600
directory mask = 0700
force directory mode = 0700
inherit permissions = Yes
map system = Yes
map hidden = Yes
browseable = No
Good luck
Oliver
Arjan Oosting wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I've got a linux (kernel 2.4.5) server with samba 2.2.0 installed and a
>Windows 2000 professional client. This server is PDC for my network. But
>whenever I logout on the windows machine, samba seems not able to save my
>roaming profile. In my samba log i find entries like this
>
>[2001/06/22 05:46:0, 0] smbd/open.c:open_directory(1037)
> open_directory: unable to create arjan/Start Menu/Programs/Startup.
>Error was no such file or directory
>
>after a lot of these entries samba seems to stop responding to the client.
>I've tried al king of permissions on the profile directory, all kind of
>compile- smb.conf-options and the latest sources from cvs and windows 2000
>professional without sp1, with sp1 an with sp2. Verifying my username &
>password works, but i just can't save my profile. Please help me, i'm
>desperate.
>
> Greetings Arjan
>
--
Oliver Schulze L.
oliver at samera.com.py
Asuncion-Paraguay
Return-Path: <on at cs.ait.ac.th>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103E851D1 for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (on at banyan.cs.ait.ac.th
[192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.11.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
f5M7Bdp29269; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:11:40 +0700 (ICT)
Received: (from on at localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.8.5/8.8.5) id
OAA06399; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:10:58 +0700 (ICT)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:10:58 +0700 (ICT)
Message-Id: <200106220710.OAA06399 at banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
X-Authentication-Warning: banyan.cs.ait.ac.th: on set sender to
on at banyan.cs.ait.ac.th using -f
From: Olivier Nicole <on at cs.ait.ac.th>
To: oliver at samera.com.py
Cc: jbuser at ionium.com, samba at samba.org
In-reply-to: <3B32EA03.1040003 at samera.com.py> (oliver at samera.com.py)
Subject: Re: Win 2000 compatibility
References: <200106220527.BAA13397 at ionium.com>
<3B32EA03.1040003 at samera.com.py>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I love the way Microsoft is undeterministic... (in other words, if you
are lucky, some day, it may work)
> - samba 2.0.x does not support Win2k logins, Samba 2.2.x does
I use samba 2.0.7 and from a W2K machine I manage to connect onto my
samba server and subsequently retreive files.
Olivier
Return-Path: <oliver at samera.com.py>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from Polaris.Pla.net.PY (polaris.pla.net.py [216.250.196.10])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C0151BF for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp at localhost) by Polaris.Pla.net.PY (8.11.2/8.11.2)
with UUCP id f5LNg6V01309; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 03:42:06 +0400
Received: from samera.com.py (sojourner.samera.com [192.168.1.1]) by
samera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA07494; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
03:39:32 -0400
Message-ID: <3B32F633.4020103 at samera.com.py>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 03:39:31 -0400
From: "Oliver Schulze L." <oliver at samera.com.py>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1)
Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-py
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Olivier Nicole <on at cs.ait.ac.th>
Cc: samba at samba.org
Subject: Re: Win 2000 compatibility
References: <200106220527.BAA13397 at ionium.com>
<3B32EA03.1040003 at samera.com.py>
<200106220710.OAA06399 at banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
thats correct.
By "login" I mean using a samba server as a PDC and joining the domain
with a Win2k machine and also autenticate Win2k users againts that PDC.
I'm having this scenario right now because my PDC runs Samba 2.0.8
Cheers
Oliver
Olivier Nicole wrote:
>I love the way Microsoft is undeterministic... (in other words, if you
>are lucky, some day, it may work)
>
>>- samba 2.0.x does not support Win2k logins, Samba 2.2.x does
>>
>
>I use samba 2.0.7 and from a W2K machine I manage to connect onto my
>samba server and subsequently retreive files.
>
>Olivier
>
--
Oliver Schulze L.
oliver at samera.com.py
Asuncion-Paraguay
Return-Path: <robert at hoekstra.nu>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from cobalt01.skybernet.nl (unknown [217.17.128.197]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1B451CC for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from snws52 (SkyberNet [217.17.139.4]) by
cobalt01.skybernet.nl (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f5M7jGZ11421; Fri,
22 Jun 2001 09:45:25 +0200
Message-ID: <00c001c0faef$980472d0$4801010a at skybernet>
From: "Robert Hoekstra" <robert at hoekstra.nu>
To: "Olivier Nicole" <on at cs.ait.ac.th>, <oliver at samera.com.py>
Cc: <jbuser at ionium.com>, <samba at samba.org>
References: <200106220527.BAA13397 at ionium.com>
<3B32EA03.1040003 at samera.com.py>
<200106220710.OAA06399 at banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
Subject: Re: Win 2000 compatibility
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:47:18 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
But have you JOINED the domain???
I bet not. you can access the server on a share-level basis, not on a domain
basis.
----- Original Message -----
From: Olivier Nicole <on at cs.ait.ac.th>
To: <oliver at samera.com.py>
Cc: <jbuser at ionium.com>; <samba at samba.org>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: Win 2000 compatibility
> I love the way Microsoft is undeterministic... (in other words, if you
> are lucky, some day, it may work)
>
> > - samba 2.0.x does not support Win2k logins, Samba 2.2.x does
>
> I use samba 2.0.7 and from a W2K machine I manage to connect onto my
> samba server and subsequently retreive files.
>
> Olivier
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <as at unitis.li>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.ltn.li (unknown [80.66.224.140]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id E519C51E7 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22
Jun 2001 00:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 20668 invoked by uid 104); 22 Jun 2001 07:48:59 -0000
Received: from as at unitis.li by mail with qmail-scanner-0.94 (. Clean.
Processed in 0.027874 secs); 22/06/2001 09:48:59
Received: from unknown (HELO ltnexch.vad.ltn.li) (80.66.224.98) by
mail.unitis.li with SMTP; 22 Jun 2001 07:48:59 -0000
Received: by ltnexch.ltn.li with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<MQ0P3QL9>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:48:42 +0200
Message-ID: <E4FD2A385B5DD311830700105A9C4BA581081D at ltnexch.ltn.li>
From: Schupp Alex <as at unitis.li>
To: 'Alan Evetts' <aevetts at virtualynx.com>, samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Conversion Issues with W2K sp2 characters on default
roaming profile
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:48:34 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi Alan
Had the same problem and solved it after some extended headscratching.
I dont know why, but it seems to me that the CP850.TXT is
not correct in my case:
Win2K SP1 english, but with german locale
samba pre-3 from about 2 weeks ago
smb.conf:
client code page = 850
Following is my codepage file i use now.
You also have to compile the codepage text file to a codepage map,
and copy the resulting unicode_map.850 file to $SAMBA/lib/codepages
> make_unicodemap 850 CP850_W2k.TXT unicode_map.850
Good luck
Alex
> cat CP850_W2k.TXT
#
# Name: ISO 8859-1 (1987) to Unicode
# Unicode version: 1.1
# Table version: 0.1
# Table format: Format A
# Date: 16 January 1995
# Authors: Tim Greenwood <greenwood at r2me2.enet.dec.com>
# John H. Jenkins <John_Jenkins at taligent.com>
#
# Copyright (c) 1991-1995 Unicode, Inc. All Rights reserved.
#
# This file is provided as-is by Unicode, Inc. (The Unicode
Consortium).
# No claims are made as to fitness for any particular purpose. No
# warranties of any kind are expressed or implied. The recipient
# agrees to determine applicability of information provided. If this
# file has been provided on magnetic media by Unicode, Inc., the sole
# remedy for any claim will be exchange of defective media within 90
# days of receipt.
#
# Recipient is granted the right to make copies in any form for
# internal distribution and to freely use the information supplied
# in the creation of products supporting Unicode. Unicode, Inc.
# specifically excludes the right to re-distribute this file directly
# to third parties or other organizations whether for profit or not.
#
# General notes:
#
# This table contains the data the Unicode Consortium has on how
# ISO 8859-1 (1987) characters map into Unicode.
#
# Format: Three tab-separated columns
# Column #1 is the ISO 8859-1 code (in hex as 0xXX)
# Column #2 is the Unicode (in hex as 0xXXXX)
# Column #3 the Unicode name (follows a comment sign, '#')
#
# The entries are in ISO 8859-1 order
#
# Any comments or problems, contact <John_Jenkins at taligent.com>
#
0x20 0x0020 # SPACE
0x21 0x0021 # EXCLAMATION MARK
0x22 0x0022 # QUOTATION MARK
0x23 0x0023 # NUMBER SIGN
0x24 0x0024 # DOLLAR SIGN
0x25 0x0025 # PERCENT SIGN
0x26 0x0026 # AMPERSAND
0x27 0x0027 # APOSTROPHE
0x28 0x0028 # LEFT PARENTHESIS
0x29 0x0029 # RIGHT PARENTHESIS
0x2A 0x002A # ASTERISK
0x2B 0x002B # PLUS SIGN
0x2C 0x002C # COMMA
0x2D 0x002D # HYPHEN-MINUS
0x2E 0x002E # FULL STOP
0x2F 0x002F # SOLIDUS
0x30 0x0030 # DIGIT ZERO
0x31 0x0031 # DIGIT ONE
0x32 0x0032 # DIGIT TWO
0x33 0x0033 # DIGIT THREE
0x34 0x0034 # DIGIT FOUR
0x35 0x0035 # DIGIT FIVE
0x36 0x0036 # DIGIT SIX
0x37 0x0037 # DIGIT SEVEN
0x38 0x0038 # DIGIT EIGHT
0x39 0x0039 # DIGIT NINE
0x3A 0x003A # COLON
0x3B 0x003B # SEMICOLON
0x3C 0x003C # LESS-THAN SIGN
0x3D 0x003D # EQUALS SIGN
0x3E 0x003E # GREATER-THAN SIGN
0x3F 0x003F # QUESTION MARK
0x40 0x0040 # COMMERCIAL AT
0x41 0x0041 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A
0x42 0x0042 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER B
0x43 0x0043 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C
0x44 0x0044 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D
0x45 0x0045 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E
0x46 0x0046 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER F
0x47 0x0047 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G
0x48 0x0048 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H
0x49 0x0049 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I
0x4A 0x004A # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER J
0x4B 0x004B # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER K
0x4C 0x004C # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L
0x4D 0x004D # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER M
0x4E 0x004E # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N
0x4F 0x004F # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O
0x50 0x0050 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER P
0x51 0x0051 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Q
0x52 0x0052 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER R
0x53 0x0053 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER S
0x54 0x0054 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER T
0x55 0x0055 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U
0x56 0x0056 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER V
0x57 0x0057 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W
0x58 0x0058 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER X
0x59 0x0059 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y
0x5A 0x005A # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Z
0x5B 0x005B # LEFT SQUARE BRACKET
0x5C 0x005C # REVERSE SOLIDUS
0x5D 0x005D # RIGHT SQUARE BRACKET
0x5E 0x005E # CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT
0x5F 0x005F # LOW LINE
0x60 0x0060 # GRAVE ACCENT
0x61 0x0061 # LATIN SMALL LETTER A
0x62 0x0062 # LATIN SMALL LETTER B
0x63 0x0063 # LATIN SMALL LETTER C
0x64 0x0064 # LATIN SMALL LETTER D
0x65 0x0065 # LATIN SMALL LETTER E
0x66 0x0066 # LATIN SMALL LETTER F
0x67 0x0067 # LATIN SMALL LETTER G
0x68 0x0068 # LATIN SMALL LETTER H
0x69 0x0069 # LATIN SMALL LETTER I
0x6A 0x006A # LATIN SMALL LETTER J
0x6B 0x006B # LATIN SMALL LETTER K
0x6C 0x006C # LATIN SMALL LETTER L
0x6D 0x006D # LATIN SMALL LETTER M
0x6E 0x006E # LATIN SMALL LETTER N
0x6F 0x006F # LATIN SMALL LETTER O
0x70 0x0070 # LATIN SMALL LETTER P
0x71 0x0071 # LATIN SMALL LETTER Q
0x72 0x0072 # LATIN SMALL LETTER R
0x73 0x0073 # LATIN SMALL LETTER S
0x74 0x0074 # LATIN SMALL LETTER T
0x75 0x0075 # LATIN SMALL LETTER U
0x76 0x0076 # LATIN SMALL LETTER V
0x77 0x0077 # LATIN SMALL LETTER W
0x78 0x0078 # LATIN SMALL LETTER X
0x79 0x0079 # LATIN SMALL LETTER Y
0x7A 0x007A # LATIN SMALL LETTER Z
0x7B 0x007B # LEFT CURLY BRACKET
0x7C 0x007C # VERTICAL LINE
0x7D 0x007D # RIGHT CURLY BRACKET
0x7E 0x007E # TILDE
0x80 0x0080
0xA0 0x00A0 # NO-BREAK SPACE
0xA1 0x00A1 # INVERTED EXCLAMATION MARK
0xA2 0x00A2 # CENT SIGN
0xA3 0x00A3 # POUND SIGN
0xA4 0x00A4 # CURRENCY SIGN
0xA5 0x00A5 # YEN SIGN
0xA6 0x00A6 # BROKEN BAR
0xA7 0x00A7 # SECTION SIGN
0xA8 0x00A8 # DIAERESIS
0xA9 0x00A9 # COPYRIGHT SIGN
0xAA 0x00AA # FEMININE ORDINAL INDICATOR
0xAB 0x00AB # LEFT-POINTING DOUBLE ANGLE QUOTATION MARK
0xAC 0x20AC # EURO
0xAD 0x00AD # SOFT HYPHEN
0xAE 0x00AE # REGISTERED SIGN
0xAF 0x00AF # MACRON
0xB0 0x00B0 # DEGREE SIGN
0xB1 0x00B1 # PLUS-MINUS SIGN
0xB2 0x00B2 # SUPERSCRIPT TWO
0xB3 0x00B3 # SUPERSCRIPT THREE
0xB4 0x00B4 # ACUTE ACCENT
0xB5 0x00B5 # MICRO SIGN
0xB6 0x00B6 # PILCROW SIGN
0xB7 0x00B7 # MIDDLE DOT
0xB8 0x00B8 # CEDILLA
0xB9 0x00B9 # SUPERSCRIPT ONE
0xBA 0x00BA # MASCULINE ORDINAL INDICATOR
0xBB 0x00BB # RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE ANGLE QUOTATION MARK
0xBC 0x00BC # VULGAR FRACTION ONE QUARTER
0xBD 0x00BD # VULGAR FRACTION ONE HALF
0xBE 0x00BE # VULGAR FRACTION THREE QUARTERS
0xBF 0x00BF # INVERTED QUESTION MARK
0xC0 0x00C0 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH GRAVE
0xC1 0x00C1 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH ACUTE
0xC2 0x00C2 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH CIRCUMFLEX
0xC3 0x00C3 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH TILDE
0xC4 0x00C4 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH DIAERESIS
0xC5 0x00C5 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH RING ABOVE
0xC6 0x00C6 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER AE
0xC7 0x00C7 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH CEDILLA
0xC8 0x00C8 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH GRAVE
0xC9 0x00C9 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH ACUTE
0xCA 0x00CA # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH CIRCUMFLEX
0xCB 0x00CB # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH DIAERESIS
0xCC 0x00CC # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH GRAVE
0xCD 0x00CD # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH ACUTE
0xCE 0x00CE # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH CIRCUMFLEX
0xCF 0x00CF # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH DIAERESIS
0xD0 0x00D0 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER ETH (Icelandic)
0xD1 0x00D1 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH TILDE
0xD2 0x00D2 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH GRAVE
0xD3 0x00D3 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH ACUTE
0xD4 0x00D4 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH CIRCUMFLEX
0xD5 0x00D5 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH TILDE
0xD6 0x00D6 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH DIAERESIS
0xD7 0x00D7 # MULTIPLICATION SIGN
0xD8 0x00D8 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH STROKE
0xD9 0x00D9 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH GRAVE
0xDA 0x00DA # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH ACUTE
0xDB 0x00DB # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH CIRCUMFLEX
0xDC 0x00DC # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH DIAERESIS
0xDD 0x00DD # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH ACUTE
0xDE 0x00DE # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER THORN (Icelandic)
0xDF 0x00DF # LATIN SMALL LETTER SHARP S (German)
0xE0 0x00E0 # LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH GRAVE
0xE1 0x00E1 # LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH ACUTE
0xE2 0x00E2 # LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH CIRCUMFLEX
0xE3 0x00E3 # LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH TILDE
0xE4 0x00E4 # LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH DIAERESIS
0xE5 0x00E5 # LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH RING ABOVE
0xE6 0x00E6 # LATIN SMALL LETTER AE
0xE7 0x00E7 # LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CEDILLA
0xE8 0x00E8 # LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH GRAVE
0xE9 0x00E9 # LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH ACUTE
0xEA 0x00EA # LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH CIRCUMFLEX
0xEB 0x00EB # LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH DIAERESIS
0xEC 0x00EC # LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH GRAVE
0xED 0x00ED # LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH ACUTE
0xEE 0x00EE # LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH CIRCUMFLEX
0xEF 0x00EF # LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH DIAERESIS
0xF0 0x00F0 # LATIN SMALL LETTER ETH (Icelandic)
0xF1 0x00F1 # LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH TILDE
0xF2 0x00F2 # LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH GRAVE
0xF3 0x00F3 # LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH ACUTE
0xF4 0x00F4 # LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH CIRCUMFLEX
0xF5 0x00F5 # LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH TILDE
0xF6 0x00F6 # LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH DIAERESIS
0xF7 0x00F7 # DIVISION SIGN
0xF8 0x00F8 # LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH STROKE
0xF9 0x00F9 # LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH GRAVE
0xFA 0x00FA # LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH ACUTE
0xFB 0x00FB # LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH CIRCUMFLEX
0xFC 0x00FC # LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH DIAERESIS
0xFD 0x00FD # LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH ACUTE
0xFE 0x00FE # LATIN SMALL LETTER THORN (Icelandic)
0xFF 0x00FF # LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH DIAERESIS
-----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Alan Evetts [mailto:aevetts at virtualynx.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2001 21:17
An: samba at lists.samba.org
Betr
eff: Conversion Issues with W2K sp2 characters on default roaming
profile
Hi There,
After lots of struggling, I have finally been able to get my W2K SP2
machines to logon to my samba domain (Running current CVS release "Version
pre-3.0.0"). Now I am having troubles with Character sets and conversion.
What the problem is, is that in the default Win2k sp2 roaming profile there
is a link to your floppy drive, stored in the SendTo Folder. This links
name is "3= Floppy (A)". In case email clients mangle that, the 2nd
character in that string is the "1/2" symbol.
When first logging onto a w2k machine (with the Client code page set to
850), it creates this profile, and when you save the roaming profile to the
samba server, the Filename in the Sendto folder is "3= Floppy (A).lnk".
When you try and re-open this profile from the w2k machine - it fails to
find that file. The error that follows is:
Windows cannt copy file \\DOMAIN\profiles\asdf\SendTo\3| Floppy (A).lnk to
location C:\Documents and Settings\asdf\SendTo\3| Floppy (A).lnk. Contact
your network Administrator.
Details - The filenmae, directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect.
When repeating this process, but with Client code page set to 437, the error
on re-opening the profile is the same, but instead of a pipe it has the cent
sign symbol (as in dollars and cents), and the Detail is: The system cannot
find the file specified.
Has anyone had similar trouble / have any advice for me? The only
workaround I have come up with is to remove the .lnk file from the Roaming
profile - but that is only a workaround .. and I'm looking for a solution :)
Alan Evetts
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <krivka at carmagnus.cz>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from vega.inec.cz (vega.inec.cz [212.47.0.2]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47AB4DFE for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 01:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unspecified.host (mail.carmagnus.cz [212.47.14.42]) by
vega.inec.cz (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA24551 for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:43:27 +0200
Received: from 192.168.1.25 ([192.168.1.25]) by 192.168.1.66 (WinRoute
Pro 4.1) with SMTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:41:46 +0200
Message-ID: <003f01c0faf7$0741e900$1901a8c0 at carmagnus.cz>
From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Michal_K=F8ivka?= <krivka at carmagnus.cz>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Invisible Samba - part two
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:40:44 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
As I asked some time befor, I can't see samba server. Now I know more:
Server is still invisible, but working. I can mount disk space and copy
files. So only server's visibility is my problem.
Thanks
Michal Kxivka
krivka at carmagnus.cz
Return-Path: <tbsky at lansir.com.tw>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from qmail.lansir.com.tw (61-218-112-26.HINET-IP.hinet.net
[61.218.112.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C3B54666
for <samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 02:08:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 11266 invoked by uid 329); 22 Jun 2001 09:30:14 -0000
Received: from tbsky at lansir.com.tw by qmail.lansir.com.tw with
qmail-scanner-0.96 (sweep: 2.4/3.46. . Clean. Processed in 0.871319
secs); 22 Jun 2001 09:30:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lansir.com.tw) (127.0.0.1) by localhost
with SMTP; 22 Jun 2001 09:30:13 -0000
Received: from 172.16.10.1 (SquirrelMail authenticated user tbsky) by
mail.lansir.com.tw with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:30:13 +0800 (CST)
Message-ID: <4753.172.16.10.1.993202213.squirrel at mail.lansir.com.tw>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:30:13 +0800 (CST)
Subject: samba wins server not stable(drop entries)
From: "=?big5?Q?=A7=F5=A5=FC=AD=F0?=" <tbsky at lansir.com.tw>
To: <samba at samba.org>
X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.1.2)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
we are using Mandrake 7.2 and samba 2.0.7.
we have 2 samba servers act as PDC for two domain.server1 act as
wins server also. and server2 point wins server to server1.
sometimes people can not login to server2, because server1 wins
server drop server2 data (can not find server2 data at server1's
wins.dat). so clients can not find server2, and they can not logon.
it happened several times. i must restart samba at server2, let it
re-register itself to server1 wins server, then everything will ok.
but i don't know why this happen. can we add staic wins entry at samba
server in the future someday? because samba sometime drop important
wins entyies :( or any good sugestions?
Best Regards,
Tbsky
Return-Path: <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from tm.turbomeca.fr (unknown [156.28.8.1]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BEE49A4 for <samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun
2001 02:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bdoisc.turbomeca.fr (unknown [156.28.97.7]) by
tm.turbomeca.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0276B40026; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
11:39:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from p3696 (p3696.clients.turbomeca.fr [156.28.109.1]) by
bdoisc.turbomeca.fr (Mirapoint) with SMTP id ABL02996; Fri, 22 Jun
2001 11:39:50 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <000a01c0faff$485ef100$016d1c9c at clients.turbomeca.fr>
From: "Serge Gracia" <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>
To: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>, <samba at samba.org>
Cc: "Serge Gracia" <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>
References: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050AE0 at xatl02.atl.hp.com>
Subject: Use of Samba 2.2.0
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:39:49 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello Don,
I did as you said it to me (launch of smdb and nmbd after deletion of lines
in inetd.conf and services); I am sorry, but I do not still manage to
connect several users at the same time.
In every demand of connection, there is creation of a process " smbd ";Ok,
but only the first or both first connections work on the PCs; others send
back to me errors.
I noticed that there were errors in the file log of smbd and I you supplied
the text.
Remark: I saw that in the file /etc/services, the port 139 was defined:
< /etc/services
netbios_ssn 139 / tcp * NetBIOS
Session Service
netbios_ssn 139 / udp *
>
Please, Excuse I for setting to yourselves still problems and thank you very
much for your help.
Thank you.
< /usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd =
[2001/06[2001/06/22 11:12:22, 0] lib/util_sock.c:(542)
/22 11:12:22, 0] lib/util_sock.c:(542)
write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
[2001/06/22 11:12:22, 0] lib/util_sock.c:(565)
write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 10: ERRNO = Broken pipe
[2001/06/22 11:12:22, 0] lib/util_sock.c:(753)
Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
[2001/06/22 11:12:22, 0] lib/util_sock.c:(565)
write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 10: ERRNO = Broken pipe
[2001/06/22 11:12:22, 0] lib/util_sock.c:(753)
Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
>
Goodbye.
----- Original Message -----
From: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) <don_mccall at hp.com>
To: 'Serge Gracia' <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>; <samba at samba.org>;
MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) <don_mccall at hp.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 3:24 PM
Subject: RE: Use of Samba 2.2.0
> Hello Serge,
> Sorry - I really discourage the use of samba under inetd; seen too many
> problems
> from the interaction. Nothing you can put your finger on, but I would
> recommend that
> you remove the samba lines from your inetd.conf file, restart inetd, and
> then run
> samba in daemon mode:
> nmbd -D
> smbd -D
> I think you will be happier.
> Also, what you mentioned that you did (running samba from inetd, and then
> actually STARTING
> another smbd via smbd -D SHOULD be impossible under normal
circumstances -
> smbd has to
> bind to port 139, and if inetd is already controlling this port on behalf
of
> samba,
> the samba daemon should have failed to bind to that port when you tried to
> start it manually.
>
> I think we're probably missing some pieces of the puzzle here.
>
> Again, I would recommend that you remove samba from inetd, and put your
> effort into getting
> it to work in daemon mode first...
> BTW, one samba (smbd) process per client is the way samba is designed.
When
> you start it as a daemon, that daemon will spawn another process for each
> successful client connection.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Don
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serge Gracia [mailto:serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 8:03 AM
> To: samba at samba.org; MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)
> Cc: Serge Gracia
> Subject: Use of Samba 2.2.0
>
>
> Hello Don,
>
> I thank you for your speed for answering me and for the precision of your
> answers; it is really sympathique; I simply thought of thanking you; but I
> have another question to put you:
>
> - I start samba by the process " inetd "; I was able to connect only 3
users
> (I looked at the number of processes " smbd "; it has had three there); it
> was necessary that I create a supplementary process " smbd " by the "
> smbd -D " command so that the fourth user can connect.
>
> Why has daemons " smbd " not launched automatically? What is what in every
> connection of a new user: there is creation of a supplementary " smbd "
> daemon?
>
> Please, know you an answer?
>
> Really thank you still.
>
> Bye...
>
> serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) <don_mccall at hp.com>
> To: 'Serge Gracia' <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>; <samba at samba.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 4:25 PM
> Subject: RE: Use of Samba 2.2.0
>
>
> > Hello Serge,
> > In answer to your questions,
> > 1. Nt 4.0 only allows you to have one set of credentials
> (username/password)
> > when attached
> > to a particular server at a time. So if you are accessing a share using
> > user1, then you cannot attach to another share on the same server as
> user2.
> > You can 'fool' NT 4.0 by making the second attachment with the IP
address
> > instead, and then you could use user2; for instance
> > net use f: \\server1\share1 password1 /user:user1
> > net use g: \\ip.of.server1\share2 password2 /user:user2
> >
> > You can also use netbios aliases (see chapter 4, section "virtual
servers"
> > in "Using Samba" for details) and connect to different netbios names for
> the
> > same server as different users
> > to overcome this limitation of NT 4.0.
> >
> > 2. Windows uses cr/lf as a line terminator for ascii files, Unix uses
just
> > lf. Samba does
> > not do any translation of this for you; this discussion has been had
many
> > times on this list, and this is not ever likely to change. If you don't
> > want to use dos2ux/ux2dos to do the conversion, then you will have to
use
> an
> > editor on the pc that can deal with files whose
> > lines are terminated with just a lf, like microsoft word, or microsoft
> > write, etc.
> >
> > 3. Locking in samba is non-trivial; many people seem to have problems
with
> > locks turned on,
> > and the various permutations of oplocks, strict locking, etc. I can
only
> > suggest that you read up on the various smb.conf parameters dealing with
> > this subject, and customize samba
> > to do locking only on the files/shares that you really NEED locking on.
> > Again the "Using Samba" from O'Reilly, or the "Special Edition Using
> Samba"
> > from QUE are excellent references for this subject - there are other
books
> > as well, but these are the ones I am most familiar with.
> >
> > I hope this helps,
> > Don
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Serge Gracia [mailto:serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 5:09 AM
> > To: samba at samba.org
> > Cc: Serge Gracia
> > Subject: Use of Samba 2.2.0
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I installed Samba 2.2.0 on a hp9000 / 700; I can use it correctly since
PC
> > NT
> > 4; it works; but, I meet several difficulties:
> >
> > - When I mount directories Unix since the PC under user's name xxxxx, I
am
> > obliged to stop the session NT and to redo the login to be able to mount
a
> > directory under another user's name yyyyy?
> > - The format of files is not the same between Windows and Unix: I can
not
> > read
> > correctly ,since the PC, a file created under Unix (not use of Unix2dos)
> and
> > the opposite as well?
> > - Samba says that it is better not to use locks?; I would like to avoid
> that
> > two persons modify a file at the same time; is this possible?
> >
> > Thank you if you can read to me and try it more to answer me.
> >
> > Thank you still.
> >
> > Goodbye.
> >
> > serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >
>
Return-Path: <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED454551 for <samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun
2001 02:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as1-196.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.9.196]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2)
with ESMTP id f5M9idI22063; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:44:41 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root at yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
TAA21046; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:44:11 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet at piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
TAA18171; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:44:10 +1000
Message-ID: <3B33136A.227CB493 at bartlett.house>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:44:10 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at pcug.org.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=A7=F5=A5=FC=AD=F0?= <tbsky at lansir.com.tw>
Cc: samba at samba.org
Subject: Re: samba wins server not stable(drop entries)
References: <4753.172.16.10.1.993202213.squirrel at mail.lansir.com.tw>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
'u%|-p wrote:
>
> Hello,
> we are using Mandrake 7.2 and samba 2.0.7.
> we have 2 samba servers act as PDC for two domain.server1 act as
> wins server also. and server2 point wins server to server1.
> sometimes people can not login to server2, because server1 wins
> server drop server2 data (can not find server2 data at server1's
> wins.dat). so clients can not find server2, and they can not logon.
> it happened several times. i must restart samba at server2, let it
> re-register itself to server1 wins server, then everything will ok.
> but i don't know why this happen. can we add staic wins entry at samba
> server in the future someday? because samba sometime drop important
> wins entyies :( or any good sugestions?
If you are reffering to samba's irritating habit of killing WINS entries
over a restart then this is fixed in 2.2.0. Also, I think its a known
issue that samba isn't very persistant about its registrations - it only
does them when it thinks they have expired - I understand NT checks them
more often than that. If this is the issue, then file it as a bug at
bugs.samba.org, as it needs to be noted somewhere.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
abartlet at samba.org
Return-Path: <palme at uni-wuppertal.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.urz.uni-wuppertal.de (mail.urz.uni-wuppertal.de
[132.195.64.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6C54386
for <samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 03:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de (wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de
[132.195.20.7]) by mail.urz.uni-wuppertal.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP
id MAA366641265; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:37:37 +0200 (MDT)
Received: (from palme at localhost) by wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de
(8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id MAA20268; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:37:37
+0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15155.8122.549848.609648 at wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:36:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: palme at uni-wuppertal.de (Hubert Palme)
To: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>
Cc: "'palme at uni-wuppertal.de'" <palme at uni-wuppertal.de>,
debian-user at lists.debian.org, Samba Liste <samba at samba.org>,
debian-user-de at lehmanns.de
Subject: RE: Samba: Can't Rename the Log File
In-Reply-To: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050AE7 at xatl02.atl.hp.com
>
References: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050AE7 at xatl02.atl.hp.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 10) "Capitol Reef" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
>>>>> "dm" == HP-USA,ex1 <MCCALL> writes:
dm> Hi;
dm> you may want to check the PATH to the log file as well; perhaps
dm> there is not the appropriate execute permission to allow samba to
dm> traverse /var or /var/log to GET to the smb file that has write permissions.
If you mean the execute permission of the directorys: They are
OK:
# ll / | grep var
drwxr-xr-x 16 root root 1024 Nov 21 2000 var
# ll /var/ | grep log
drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 5120 Jun 22 12:28 log
# ll /var/log/smb
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 117 Jun 22 12:28 /var/log/smb
#
Otherwise smbd wouldn't be able to write to it, but it does.
dm> Hope this helps,
No, sorry.
What could be the reason for smbd to be able to write but not to
rename the log file????
I now did it by hand and set "max log size" to 10. Let's see what
happens...
--
======================================================================
Hubert Palme Bergische Universitaet-Gesamthochschule Wuppertal
Computing Center
D-42097 Wuppertal
E-Mail: palme at uni-wuppertal.de (Germany)
http://www.hrz.uni-wuppertal.de/hrz/personen/h_palme.html
Return-Path: <Stittel at kluwer.nl>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailrelay2.kpn.net (mailrelay2.kpn.net [194.151.226.228])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897674DF0 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 04:35:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [193.173.83.254] (helo=sammail.samsom.nl) by
mailrelay2.kpn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 15DPHq-0000Bi-00 for
samba at lists.samba.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:39:42 +0200
Received: by sammail.samsom.nl with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <M3RAZY12>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:38:53 +0200
Message-ID: <15659396090AD411AC6F00500478FA90033B8794 at sammail.samsom.nl>
From: "Tittel, Stephen" <Stittel at kluwer.nl>
To: "'samba at lists.samba.org'" <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: xsmBrowser
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:38:51 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I'm working with the xsmBrowser GUI version 3.4.0. My question is: I can't
browse the shares of Windows machines because I get the following error:
The command which is issued automatically by xsmBrowser is: smbclient -N -L
<servername> -I <Ip-address> -W <domainname>
Anonymous login succesfully
Error returning browse list:Errdos Err no access (Access Denied).
I found out that with the command smbclient -L <servername>
-Uusername%password the shares will show up. So maybe I could adjust the
command in xsmBrowser.
What could be the problem of this?
Stephen
Return-Path: <oliver at samera.com.py>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from Polaris.Pla.net.PY (polaris.pla.net.py [216.250.196.10])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583F7509E for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 04:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp at localhost) by Polaris.Pla.net.PY (8.11.2/8.11.2)
with UUCP id f5M41PS05797; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:01:25 +0400
Received: from samera.com.py (sojourner.samera.com [192.168.1.1]) by
samera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA10344; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
07:26:32 -0400
Message-ID: <3B332B67.4050908 at samera.com.py>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:26:31 -0400
From: "Oliver Schulze L." <oliver at samera.com.py>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1)
Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-py
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michal =?ISO-8859-2?Q?K=F8ivka?= <krivka at carmagnus.cz>,
samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Invisible samba server
References: <001501c0fae0$56ca7120$1901a8c0 at carmagnus.cz>
<3B32EB55.1020308 at samera.com.py>
<002601c0faee$d54c9420$1901a8c0 at carmagnus.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Configure Samba to act as a WINS server.
The option is in Swat->General (at the botom)
Then, configure your clients to use a WINS server and set
the IP of the WINS server to the IP of your Samba server.
Good luck
Oliver
Michal Kxivka wrote:
>There is no WINS server. it is only samba and three W95. I want only use
>Samba as file server, no printers and no other services.
>
>Michal
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Oliver Schulze L." <oliver at samera.com.py>
>To: "Michal Kxivka" <krivka at carmagnus.cz>
>Cc: <samba at samba.org>
>Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 8:53 AM
>Subject: Re: Invisible samba server
>
>
>Do you have a WINS server in your network or Samba acting like one?
>
>Maybe this help
>
>Oliver
>
>Michal Kxivka wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>my Samba 2.2.0 on SuSE 6.4 is now running.
>>When typing "smbclient -L name", then is reported:
>>added interface ip = 192.168.1.230 bcast = 192.168.1.255 mask
>>
>=255.255.255.0
>
>>and all W95 computers are listed, including my samba server.
>>But from all W95 stations samba server cannot be located, using
>>\\name\........ , using network browser or using find computer.
>>
>>Can you help me?
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Michal Kxivka
>>krivka at carmagnus.cz
>>
>>Michal Kxivka
>>krivka at carmagnus.cz
>>www.carmagnus.cz
>>068-541 80 16
>>0602-184 980
>>
>
>--
>Oliver Schulze L.
>oliver at samera.com.py
>Asuncion-Paraguay
>
>
>
>
>
--
Oliver Schulze L.
oliver at samera.com.py
Asuncion-Paraguay
Return-Path: <oliver at samera.com.py>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from Polaris.Pla.net.PY (polaris.pla.net.py [216.250.196.10])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB12518D for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 04:57:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp at localhost) by Polaris.Pla.net.PY (8.11.2/8.11.2)
with UUCP id f5M41Qh05800; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:01:26 +0400
Received: from samera.com.py (sojourner.samera.com [192.168.1.1]) by
samera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA10353; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
07:29:28 -0400
Message-ID: <3B332C17.7010100 at samera.com.py>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:29:27 -0400
From: "Oliver Schulze L." <oliver at samera.com.py>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1)
Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-py
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Hoekstra <robert at hoekstra.nu>
Cc: samba at samba.org
Subject: Re: Win 2000 compatibility
References: <200106220527.BAA13397 at ionium.com>
<3B32EA03.1040003 at samera.com.py>
<200106220710.OAA06399 at banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
<00c001c0faef$980472d0$4801010a at skybernet>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
For me, that's correct.
I can join the Domain in Win2k and Samba 2.2.0
But, with Samba 2.0.8 and Win2k, I can only access the shares
on the samba PDC, but not join the domain.
Oliver
Robert Hoekstra wrote:
>But have you JOINED the domain???
>I bet not. you can access the server on a share-level basis, not on a domain
>basis.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Olivier Nicole <on at cs.ait.ac.th>
>To: <oliver at samera.com.py>
>Cc: <jbuser at ionium.com>; <samba at samba.org>
>Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 9:10 AM
>Subject: Re: Win 2000 compatibility
>
>
>>I love the way Microsoft is undeterministic... (in other words, if you
>>are lucky, some day, it may work)
>>
>>>- samba 2.0.x does not support Win2k logins, Samba 2.2.x does
>>>
>>I use samba 2.0.7 and from a W2K machine I manage to connect onto my
>>samba server and subsequently retreive files.
>>
>>Olivier
>>--
>>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>>
--
Oliver Schulze L.
oliver at samera.com.py
Asuncion-Paraguay
Return-Path: <oliver at samera.com.py>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from Polaris.Pla.net.PY (polaris.pla.net.py [216.250.196.10])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E02509E for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 04:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp at localhost) by Polaris.Pla.net.PY (8.11.2/8.11.2)
with UUCP id f5M41Pu05793; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:01:25 +0400
Received: from samera.com.py (sojourner.samera.com [192.168.1.1]) by
samera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA10484; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
07:40:41 -0400
Message-ID: <3B332EB8.70708 at samera.com.py>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:40:40 -0400
From: "Oliver Schulze L." <oliver at samera.com.py>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1)
Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-py
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Murugappan <murugappan at hgsolutions.com>
Cc: samba at samba.org
Subject: Re: samba NT domain unable to connect
References: <000c01c0fac4$794198d0$956d4040 at hg04>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
How do you configured your smbpasswd?
What version of samba and NT are you using?
Have you enable WINS?
Good luck
Oliver
Murugappan wrote:
>I have installed RH 7.1 Linux and samba. I have set up samba and able to see
>in my NT machine as a shared account.
>I log in as admin in to my NT machine and try to change my domain,it says
> "unable to connect to domain ,have ur administrator checked ur account on
>domain"
>I have set smbpasswd correctly
>Where I am wrong??
>any help pls.
>
>P.Murugappan
>
--
Oliver Schulze L.
oliver at samera.com.py
Asuncion-Paraguay
Return-Path: <Carl.G.Jones at usa.xerox.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from pasiphae.eastgw.xerox.com (pasiphae.xerox.com
[208.140.33.23]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BF642FD
for <samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 05:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pmdf2.cinops.xerox.com (pmdf2.cinops.xerox.com
[13.250.20.176]) by pasiphae.eastgw.xerox.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP
id IAA12473 for <samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:46:57 -0400
(EDT)
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON by mail.xerox.com (PMDF V5.1-12 #U3277)
id <01K5281L8D3498PMWD at mail.xerox.com> for samba at samba.org; Fri, 22
Jun 2001 08:46:48 EST
Received: from usaxeroxbh1.USA.XEROX.COM by mail.xerox.com (PMDF V5.1-12
#U3277) with ESMTP id <01K5281HEGQS98PEPN at mail.xerox.com> for
samba at samba.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:45:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: by usaxeroxbh1.usa.xerox.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <M0XNFCNA>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:45:34 -0400
Content-return: allowed
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:45:31 -0400
From: "Jones, Carl G" <Carl.G.Jones at usa.xerox.com>
Subject: Problem with printer queues.
To: "'tng-user at samba-tng.org'" <tng-user at samba-tng.org>,
"'samba at samba.org'" <samba at samba.org>
Message-id: <7D1F97C0D1ACD21186C40008C7095A41C71B39 at USA0812MS1>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Gentlemen;
This may or may not be a simple question.
Situation.
IBM network system running AIX (various Versions).
Sun system used as print server.
Print engine uses a Windows NT Server rip. (Raster Image Processor)
Problem.
All pages need to be printed in proper order.
What happens.
The Sun system when executing the lp command sends the print jobs
in order but they appear on the Windows System in the wrong order.
Solutions We Can Up With
1. We scripted a delay 10 seconds, in the system and indexed the
print jobs by PID.
This works for most of the jobs but they still over time
get rearranged. (I believe its the network and the store and forward
process).
Question?
Can Samba help me here? Oh almost forgot when submitting from the AIX
machine all of the print run come over correctly, all of the time.
Thank you for your time and any help you can provided.
Return-Path: <bbowler at bigelow.org>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from alpha1.bigelow.org (blosfw.bigelow.org [198.116.72.8]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641125004 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 05:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from b141.bigelow.org ([198.116.72.141] helo=bruce) by
alpha1.bigelow.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 15DQRk-0003WB-00 for
samba at lists.samba.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:54:00 -0400
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:54:00 -0400
From: Bruce Bowler <bbowler at bigelow.org>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: newbie, looking for a FAQ
X-Face: ,\m{?h\)X
Message-Id: <20010622085259.94CF.BBOWLER at bigelow.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.01
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Before I start posting stupid questions, I'd like to read the FAQ
and/or see a list of sample configurations (if either exist). Can
someone point me to the right place?
Thanks!
Bruce
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
Bruce Bowler +1.207.633.9600 BBowler at bigelow.org
Progress is man's ability to complicate simplicity.
- Thor Heyerdahl
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
Return-Path: <davecb at canada.sun.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D6244B6; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
06:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from canadamail1.Canada.Sun.COM ([129.155.5.100]) by
mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA17896; Fri, 22 Jun
2001 06:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opcom-mail.canada.sun.com (scot.Canada.Sun.COM
[129.155.8.107]) by canadamail1.Canada.Sun.COM
(8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id JAA24258; Fri, 22 Jun
2001 09:42:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from canada.sun.com (elsbeth [129.155.8.39]) by
opcom-mail.canada.sun.com (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA11705;
Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:42:08 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3B334B1D.D2C83439 at canada.sun.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:41:49 -0400
From: David Collier-Brown <davecb at canada.sun.com>
Organization: Priv ate Person
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Samba mailing list <samba at samba.org>, samba-technical at samba.org
Subject: Re: web page
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Independant of Luke's particular issues, could the web maintainer
look for suitable place to describe and link to
the Samba TNG project
the licence in use
--dave
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
Performance & Engineering Team | some people and astonish the rest.
Americas Customer Engineering | -- Mark Twain
(905) 415-2849 | davecb at canada.sun.com
Return-Path: <joerk at lag.justiz.sachsen.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from s0dd0021.ihl.sachsen.de (s0dd0021.ihl.sachsen.de
[62.225.117.76]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0B54BFB
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 06:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from s0dd0023.ihl.sachsen.de by S0DD0021.ihl.sachsen.de with
ESMTP for samba at lists.samba.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:55:23 +0200
Received: from proxy.justiz.sachsen.de (172.17.11.1 [172.17.11.1]) by
s0dd0023.ihl.sachsen.de with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail
Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id L9WSV7SX; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:55:23
+0200
Received: from proxy1.justiz.sachsen.de ([172.17.4.253]) by
proxy.justiz.sachsen.de (8.10.2/8.10.2/SuSE Linux 8.10.0-0.3) with
ESMTP id f5MDrkr03212 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
15:53:46 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: proxy.justiz.sachsen.de: Host [172.17.4.253]
claimed to be proxy1.justiz.sachsen.de
Received: from ns.lag.justiz.sachsen.de ([172.17.90.40]) by
proxy1.justiz.sachsen.de (8.10.2/8.10.2/SuSE Linux 8.10.0-0.3) with
ESMTP id f5MDrk005461 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
15:53:46 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: proxy1.justiz.sachsen.de: Host [172.17.90.40]
claimed to be ns.lag.justiz.sachsen.de
Received: from adv-mobil (adv-mobil.lag.justiz.sachsen.de
[172.17.90.120]) by ns.lag.justiz.sachsen.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP
id PAA01587 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:53:48
+0200
Message-Id: <010001c0fb22$c31b4ce0$785a11ac at adv-mobil.lag.justiz.sachsen
.de>
From: "Olaf Joerk" <joerk at lag.justiz.sachsen.de>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: virtual interfaces for samba
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:53:48 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hallo,
I want to setup two "virtual" smb-servers on an unix-host. The unix-host
has two interfaces with different addresses and each of the virtual
interfaces
should belong to different network addresses and different NT.domain.
So I want to use the "socket address" option and two different smb.conf
files.
But I found no information how to deal with the tcp/udp-ports. Can you give me
some hints either: where to find more information or how to setup these
"virtual servers".
I use Samba 2.0.7 on ReliantUnix 5.44.
Thanks in advance
Olaf
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
Sdchs. Landesarbeitsgericht
Olaf Jvrk
Zwickauer Stra_e 54
09112 Chemnitz
Tel.: +49 371 9112-233
Fax: +49 371 9112-222
E-Mail: joerk at lag.justiz.sachsen.de
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
Return-Path: <don_mccall at hp.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from atlrel2.hp.com (atlrel2.hp.com [156.153.255.202]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939EC4DE2 for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 06:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xatlrelay2.atl.hp.com (xatlrelay2.atl.hp.com
[15.45.89.191]) by atlrel2.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973B573F;
Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:56:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xatlbh2.atl.hp.com (xatlbh2.atl.hp.com [15.45.89.187]) by
xatlrelay2.atl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D704D1F51C; Fri, 22 Jun
2001 09:55:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by xatlbh2.atl.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <MZ6WG99Y>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:56:20 -0400
Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050AEE at xatl02.atl.hp.com>
From: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>
To: "'palme at uni-wuppertal.de'" <palme at uni-wuppertal.de>, "MCCALL,DON
(HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>
Cc: debian-user at lists.debian.org, Samba Liste <samba at samba.org>,
debian-user-de at lehmanns.de
Subject: RE: Samba: Can't Rename the Log File
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:56:18 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi palme,
I don't know anything about the debian distribution, but just to make
sure that this isn't some issue with debian standard log directory, and
log rollover, or wierd permission issues, maybe you could try this;
create a directory called /sambalog and open it wide up;
chmod 777 /sambalog
Then change your log file entry in smb.conf to be
log file = /sambalog/log.%m
and see if you still get the problem with samba not being able to
rename the logfiles...
Just a thought; maybe we can get some more data to lead us this way...
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: palme at uni-wuppertal.de [mailto:palme at uni-wuppertal.de]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 6:37 AM
To: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)
Cc: 'palme at uni-wuppertal.de'; debian-user at lists.debian.org; Samba Liste;
debian-user-de at lehmanns.de
Subject: RE: Samba: Can't Rename the Log File
>>>>> "dm" == HP-USA,ex1 <MCCALL> writes:
dm> Hi;
dm> you may want to check the PATH to the log file as well; perhaps
dm> there is not the appropriate execute permission to allow samba to
dm> traverse /var or /var/log to GET to the smb file that has write
permissions.
If you mean the execute permission of the directorys: They are
OK:
# ll / | grep var
drwxr-xr-x 16 root root 1024 Nov 21 2000 var
# ll /var/ | grep log
drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 5120 Jun 22 12:28 log
# ll /var/log/smb
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 117 Jun 22 12:28 /var/log/smb
#
Otherwise smbd wouldn't be able to write to it, but it does.
dm> Hope this helps,
No, sorry.
What could be the reason for smbd to be able to write but not to
rename the log file????
I now did it by hand and set "max log size" to 10. Let's see what
happens...
--
======================================================================
Hubert Palme Bergische Universitaet-Gesamthochschule Wuppertal
Computing Center
D-42097 Wuppertal
E-Mail: palme at uni-wuppertal.de (Germany)
http://www.hrz.uni-wuppertal.de/hrz/personen/h_palme.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <don_mccall at hp.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from palrel1.hp.com (palrel1.hp.com [156.153.255.242]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D234246 for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xparelay1.corp.hp.com (unknown [15.58.136.173]) by
palrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F037A169F; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
07:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xpabh2.corp.hp.com (xpabh2.corp.hp.com [15.58.136.192])
by xparelay1.corp.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CA31F51D; Fri, 22
Jun 2001 00:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by xpabh2.corp.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <NHG2Y15R>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:04:30 -0700
Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050AF0 at xatl02.atl.hp.com>
From: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>
To: 'Serge Gracia' <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>, "MCCALL,DON
(HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall at hp.com>, samba at samba.org
Subject: RE: Use of Samba 2.2.0
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:04:27 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi Serge,
the errors in the log file you show often indicate that the server cannot do
a reverse lookup in dns or /etc/hosts file; can you post a copy of your
smb.conf
file for us to take a look at - for instance do you have any hosts allow or
hosts
deny lines in the smb.conf file?
Also, am I correct in thinking that you started samba now by
nmbd -D
smbd -D
and still only the first two pc's that try to connect are able to connect?
If you do a ps -ef|grep smbd
what do you see?
And if you do a
smbclient -L servername
after you notice that other pc's cannot connect, does this give you an error
as well?
And finally, are you getting any core files in the directory that smbd lives
in?
Thanks,
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Serge Gracia [mailto:serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 5:40 AM
To: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1); samba at samba.org
Cc: Serge Gracia
Subject: Use of Samba 2.2.0
Hello Don,
I did as you said it to me (launch of smdb and nmbd after deletion of lines
in inetd.conf and services); I am sorry, but I do not still manage to
connect several users at the same time.
In every demand of connection, there is creation of a process " smbd ";Ok,
but only the first or both first connections work on the PCs; others send
back to me errors.
I noticed that there were errors in the file log of smbd and I you supplied
the text.
Remark: I saw that in the file /etc/services, the port 139 was defined:
< /etc/services
netbios_ssn 139 / tcp * NetBIOS
Session Service
netbios_ssn 139 / udp *
>
Please, Excuse I for setting to yourselves still problems and thank you very
much for your help.
Thank you.
< /usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd =
[2001/06[2001/06/22 11:12:22, 0] lib/util_sock.c:(542)
/22 11:12:22, 0] lib/util_sock.c:(542)
write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
[2001/06/22 11:12:22, 0] lib/util_sock.c:(565)
write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 10: ERRNO = Broken pipe
[2001/06/22 11:12:22, 0] lib/util_sock.c:(753)
Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
[2001/06/22 11:12:22, 0] lib/util_sock.c:(565)
write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 10: ERRNO = Broken pipe
[2001/06/22 11:12:22, 0] lib/util_sock.c:(753)
Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
>
Goodbye.
----- Original Message -----
From: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) <don_mccall at hp.com>
To: 'Serge Gracia' <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>; <samba at samba.org>;
MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) <don_mccall at hp.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 3:24 PM
Subject: RE: Use of Samba 2.2.0
> Hello Serge,
> Sorry - I really discourage the use of samba under inetd; seen too many
> problems
> from the interaction. Nothing you can put your finger on, but I would
> recommend that
> you remove the samba lines from your inetd.conf file, restart inetd, and
> then run
> samba in daemon mode:
> nmbd -D
> smbd -D
> I think you will be happier.
> Also, what you mentioned that you did (running samba from inetd, and then
> actually STARTING
> another smbd via smbd -D SHOULD be impossible under normal
circumstances -
> smbd has to
> bind to port 139, and if inetd is already controlling this port on behalf
of
> samba,
> the samba daemon should have failed to bind to that port when you tried to
> start it manually.
>
> I think we're probably missing some pieces of the puzzle here.
>
> Again, I would recommend that you remove samba from inetd, and put your
> effort into getting
> it to work in daemon mode first...
> BTW, one samba (smbd) process per client is the way samba is designed.
When
> you start it as a daemon, that daemon will spawn another process for each
> successful client connection.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Don
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serge Gracia [mailto:serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 8:03 AM
> To: samba at samba.org; MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)
> Cc: Serge Gracia
> Subject: Use of Samba 2.2.0
>
>
> Hello Don,
>
> I thank you for your speed for answering me and for the precision of your
> answers; it is really sympathique; I simply thought of thanking you; but I
> have another question to put you:
>
> - I start samba by the process " inetd "; I was able to connect only 3
users
> (I looked at the number of processes " smbd "; it has had three there); it
> was necessary that I create a supplementary process " smbd " by the "
> smbd -D " command so that the fourth user can connect.
>
> Why has daemons " smbd " not launched automatically? What is what in every
> connection of a new user: there is creation of a supplementary " smbd "
> daemon?
>
> Please, know you an answer?
>
> Really thank you still.
>
> Bye...
>
> serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) <don_mccall at hp.com>
> To: 'Serge Gracia' <serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr>; <samba at samba.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 4:25 PM
> Subject: RE: Use of Samba 2.2.0
>
>
> > Hello Serge,
> > In answer to your questions,
> > 1. Nt 4.0 only allows you to have one set of credentials
> (username/password)
> > when attached
> > to a particular server at a time. So if you are accessing a share using
> > user1, then you cannot attach to another share on the same server as
> user2.
> > You can 'fool' NT 4.0 by making the second attachment with the IP
address
> > instead, and then you could use user2; for instance
> > net use f: \\server1\share1 password1 /user:user1
> > net use g: \\ip.of.server1\share2 password2 /user:user2
> >
> > You can also use netbios aliases (see chapter 4, section "virtual
servers"
> > in "Using Samba" for details) and connect to different netbios names for
> the
> > same server as different users
> > to overcome this limitation of NT 4.0.
> >
> > 2. Windows uses cr/lf as a line terminator for ascii files, Unix uses
just
> > lf. Samba does
> > not do any translation of this for you; this discussion has been had
many
> > times on this list, and this is not ever likely to change. If you don't
> > want to use dos2ux/ux2dos to do the conversion, then you will have to
use
> an
> > editor on the pc that can deal with files whose
> > lines are terminated with just a lf, like microsoft word, or microsoft
> > write, etc.
> >
> > 3. Locking in samba is non-trivial; many people seem to have problems
with
> > locks turned on,
> > and the various permutations of oplocks, strict locking, etc. I can
only
> > suggest that you read up on the various smb.conf parameters dealing with
> > this subject, and customize samba
> > to do locking only on the files/shares that you really NEED locking on.
> > Again the "Using Samba" from O'Reilly, or the "Special Edition Using
> Samba"
> > from QUE are excellent references for this subject - there are other
books
> > as well, but these are the ones I am most familiar with.
> >
> > I hope this helps,
> > Don
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Serge Gracia [mailto:serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 5:09 AM
> > To: samba at samba.org
> > Cc: Serge Gracia
> > Subject: Use of Samba 2.2.0
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I installed Samba 2.2.0 on a hp9000 / 700; I can use it correctly since
PC
> > NT
> > 4; it works; but, I meet several difficulties:
> >
> > - When I mount directories Unix since the PC under user's name xxxxx, I
am
> > obliged to stop the session NT and to redo the login to be able to mount
a
> > directory under another user's name yyyyy?
> > - The format of files is not the same between Windows and Unix: I can
not
> > read
> > correctly ,since the PC, a file created under Unix (not use of Unix2dos)
> and
> > the opposite as well?
> > - Samba says that it is better not to use locks?; I would like to avoid
> that
> > two persons modify a file at the same time; is this possible?
> >
> > Thank you if you can read to me and try it more to answer me.
> >
> > Thank you still.
> >
> > Goodbye.
> >
> > serge.gracia at turbomeca.fr
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >
>
Return-Path: <lkcl at angua.rince.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from angua.rince.de (angua.rince.de [194.120.0.21]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FCD4FBB; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
07:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by angua.rince.de (Postfix, from userid 1011) id 622922A42B;
Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:05:03 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:05:01 +0200
From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at samba-tng.org>
To: Barry Smoke <barry at arhosting.com>
Cc: Michael E Osborne <mosborne at jacads.com>, samba at samba.org,
samba-technical at samba.org, samba-ntdom at samba.org
Subject: Re: web page
Message-ID: <20010622160501.C3051 at angua.rince.de>
References: <0A256A72.005EED9E.00 at recmail.omc.johnston.af.mil>
<IMEKIDMFAEBICGFFGJPKKEPKFOAA.barry at arhosting.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i
In-Reply-To: <IMEKIDMFAEBICGFFGJPKKEPKFOAA.barry at arhosting.com>; from
barry at arhosting.com on Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 03:20:51PM -0500
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: samba-admin at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin at lists.samba.org]On
> Behalf Of Michael E Osborne
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 12:27 PM
> To: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> Cc: samba at samba.org; samba-technical at samba.org; samba-ntdom at samba.org
> Subject: Re: web page
>
>
> I have been using Samba a long time and there was a time when I actually
> looked forward to your posts on this list.
yes, they were good times. i enjoyed what i was doing, i appreciated
the support and encouragement i got from everybody. it was fun,
exciting. i was fighting microsoft, but keeping them happy at
the same time [reports to secure at microsoft.com]. i was...
important, needed, respected and quietly appreciated.
> That time is definately over now.
well, things change. you know, like being told by
dr andrew tridgell for five months that any idea i
came up with was either unjustifiable, worthless,
that it was someone else's problem or responsibility.
i'll explain more, below.
did you know that when tim completed winbindd, which
i helped him design, andrew thanked tim for his work...
but failed to say thank you to me, in front of the
rest of the company, for the work done for THREE YEARS,
without which tim's work would not even have been possible?
simple thanks and gratitude go a long, long way in
project management - ESPECIALLY so in open source development.
> While I respect your technical abilities and appreciate the work that
> you have done on Samba, your posts now are simply sad.
yes. i know.
> I'm not sure what
> you intend these posts to accomplish. I can tell you how that they reflect
> *very* poorly on you not Samba or the people you are unhappy with.
okay. well would it help for me to explain _why_ i am making these
posts?
i will assume that the answer is yes, because of the people
who have contacted me [to say pretty much what you have said,
here], their reaction to my privately made explanations has been
the same.
ah, heck. here goes.
*nervous*.
i started on the samba project back in june 1995. rewrote nmbd,
then in august 97, quit the company i was working for, and
decided to focus - in my _own time and money_, on samba.
with paul ashton, and later jean micouleau francois, we got
the first 'Welcome to the SAMBA Domain' message. it was great.
over the next few months, my weight dropped down to 63 kilos
(i'm 6ft1) which is 70% of what i am now. by january 98, i had
to use two hands to turn they key in the lock to get into my house,
and to ask the neighbour and friends to get the lids off jars.
[i damaged a couple of doors, you see, using them as a lever.]
august 98, i was working for ISS. i spent 18 months with them,
continuing to develop samba, with a view to licensing that
code to them so they could also use it in their products.
these were good times.
some time in '99, redhat went public. several people, including
the samba team, were offered shares in redhat. i didn't have
enough $ at the time, so could not take part.
needless to say, at a conference a couple of months later,
i was a bit annoyed when someone came up to me and said,
'oo, wasn't the redhat ipo good, i was able to pay off my
mortgage with it, i made $50,000 out of it, what did _you_
do?' and he was a bit embarrassed when i said, nothing.
november '99, valinux went public. they contacted several
people, including jeremy and andrew. jeremy was on holiday
at the time, and was working for them, so he got lots of
shares, but he had _assumed_ that i had also been contacted,
knowing the value of my work, he was very surprised.
i spoke to larry and chris de bono, but it was too late.
they promised to get back to me, to see if anything could
be done, but never did [and a year later, when i was introduced
by andrew to chris when we visited VA, he didn't acknowledge
that i was even there - just looked straight ahead, at right
angles to me, and ignored me.]
now, what were the 'warning' signs that, coding-wise, something
was amiss.
actually, from andrew, the warning signs were back in about...
october 97. i got word that andrew was jumping up and down
and had to be 'warned off' by john terpestra, to let me
discover this stuff on my own.
the warning signs from jeremy were actually back in 96.
does anybody remember samba-1.9.17-multiworkgroup.tar.gz?
the first time that a single host was demonstrated on the
microsoft campus of being capable of managing multiple domains
was samba 1.9.17-multiworkgroup, in august 96.
he he he :)
anyway. that code had the 'cascading WINS' capability that
chris hertel *only just recently added to samba 2*. and
it had it *four years ago*.
that code sat there, rotting. for several months - probably
about six - i was watching andrew and jeremy make *the
same mistakes* and *fix the same problems i already had*.
the archives are full of messages, 'i already fixed that
bug in the mwg code, two months ago'. '
'i already fixed that bug in the mwg code, _four_ months ago'.
until eventually, i gave up, and discovered DCE/RPC
[welcome to the SAMBA domain].
the warning signs, there, were when jeremy couldn't deal
with the rapid development pace i was keeping. i deliberately
sacrificed certain aspects, knowing that the code would
be thrown out or morphed later into better code.
to save time, i used static arrays, i mean we didn't even
_know_ what a sizeof() was, or ANYTHING! we were basically
missing an entire infrastructure and just network-reverse-
engineering not only a codebase that's 250,000 LOC in its
own right (the Dce/rpc IDL compiler _alone_ is 50,000, and
the TOG's NDR marshalling library is 20,000, and we only
_had_ about 20,000 LOC *in total* in the BRANCH_NTDOM)
.... which is where, in cvs, i ended up. with hindsight,
i realise that this was a mistake, to let this happen.
it would have been _far_ better to just continue in
main-line samba, and wow, big deal, the code works in
smbd absolutely fine, but the NT domain stuff? pffh :)
crashes like a Cable & Wireless CableTV play-thing.
... but well, so what? it's open source, right?
some bits are stable, some are in development. we _expect_
this.
but no, jeremy wanted 'stability, stability, stability'.
in code that wasn't even pre-alpha quality and we
didn't even know what the protocol was, he got so
irked that he ran purify on it, cleaned it up and then
stamped his 'approval' on it - andrew even claimed
the code was _his_ - and refused to accept, repeatedly,
and adopt and run the same clean-up and assistance
process, again, on future versions of the same codebase.
with the result that HP sent in patches to the samrd
code that was 2 YEARS OUT OF DATE!
amazing. absolutely amazing.
anyway.
my health got slightly better, at ISS. i had a chair
from ergointerfaces.com, it's utterly cool: the
keyboard is split and mounted on the arms on gimballs.
i was the only person to be able to _comfortably_ sit
at 'The Command Console' with my feet up on the desk,
six feet away from the monitor :) :)
good for the eyes, good for my arms, good for my ATTITUDE :)
he he.
so, anyway, november 99, i was irked, _all_ of the
Linux Companies that had recently IPO'd had offered
jeremy and andrew shares, and me, i had none.
i figured, hey, there's this new company, Linuxcare,
they're planning to go public, maybe i'll join them.
and with andrew's encouragement, i did.
he was really enthusiastic. when i arrived, the first
thing we did was go out canoeing on canberra's lake.
we went *through* the 100-ft fountain's spray, like
you're not supposed to. it was great, he really
looked after me, and i began the 'brain-dump' process
right then - i explained SURS to him - on the lake.
it became known as 'the canoe algorithm' :) :)
anyway, it became evident that there was something wrong,
at linuxcare. the warning signs were that a) i hadn't
received a computer to use b) i wasn't on a payroll.
i got the computer, after a while, but pay? _that_ took
8 weeks, and... okay, it cost linuxcare about USD $2,000
in bank charges, probably a lot more in other costs
such as lost time and international telephone calls,
and it cost _me_ my standing IMMEDIATELY - RIGHT FROM
THE FIRST WEEKS WHEN I STARTED - with the management
and some of my colleagues at linuxcare.
10,000 miles from anywhere, with no money, i stand to
lose my home in the u.k, and i can't do a DAMN THING
about it.
it's raining. i haven't slept. i'm worried sick.
four in the morning, i'm staying at a hotel, i call up
linuxcare's personnel manager, and i say, hi, can i
talk to you? she says sure, what's wrong? and...
i couldn't answer. that's never happened to me before.
i was _that_ upset, i couldn't answer a simple question.
anyway, she suggested i try get some sleep - 5 hours -
and i was able to answer her question. just knowing
that there was someone who could help was enough to
ease my mind, a bit.
anyway, alarm bells are going off everywhere. andrew's
starting to be affected by this. my salary from ISS
was what i was used to, and all of it accounted for.
compared to canberra salaries [a university lecturer at
ANU only gets $AUD 40,000, which is about $USD 20,000]
i was on _mad_ money. andrew, i think, got jealous.
i mean, why was i creating such a fuss when i was
being paid what he thought was stupid amounts of money?
so, amongst these psychological pressures - probably
some of the worst i've ever had to deal with in my life
so far - i'm still trying to explain to andrew what's
been going on in the TNG codebase for the last three
years.
now, i've written a book about it. he's read it. and
it's _nowhere near_ everything. he even said to me,
'you know, i really don't get this stuff as well as
you do'.
the thing is, i _know_ my weaknesses. lack of confidence
being one of them. ability to fight and stand up for
what i believe is the right way to do things, even
if it has limitations.
well, i'm learning.
anyway. in short, andrew became an enemy of every idea
i came up with. i mean evvverrryything.
over a period of five months, i eventually had to
stop speaking to him or to tell him anything.
because he wasn't interested any more in technical
solutions, he was more interested in doing it
'a different way from me'.
secrets.tdb. i spent three months developing an LSA.
i'd investigated LsaQuerySecret, and come up with an
interface to store $MACHINE.ACC and trust accounts.
it uses Unicode strings and NT times, which contain
more info.
andrew, of course, wanted unix conventions. char*
and time_t. now, of course, a domain name in anything
other than an 8-bit character set won't be recognised
by Samba 2.2 / Main, and now you know the reason why.
because mister dr andrew tridgell just _had_ to come
up with something that trashed three months development
work in favour of a quick hack of three days.
so, in the end, to save my sanity, i had to quit.
you've seen that: we now have TNG, and i haven't developed
a single _new_ line of code of Samba Source - including TNG -
for eighteen months, now.
FOUR YEARS WORK, and i'm now doing NOTHING???? how do you
think that makes me feel?
so now you know.
i own the copyright on 25 to 30% of the 350,000 line samba
codebase, and i have damaged nerves and tendons to show for
it, and not enough money to get that fixed, and not enough
money to retire from computing - which is my LIFE, dammit.
several companies and individuals are beholden, and in
a position to be blackmailed by me, over that code, and
not only _that_, but i am sufficiently... wound up,
hurt and insanely upset, enough to actually consider
doing just that.
i may just assign all copyright to the Apache Software
Foundation so that i don't actually succumb to the
temptation [that has implications, though: i have
conditional agreements with people regarding code copyright
/ ownership, it must be GPL or they receive ownership back
again].
so please, when you talk of 'oo, he makes himself look
a bit of a sad idiot', perhaps you might wish to take
a look from my viewpoint, and see how things stand.
what would you do?
what would you do, andrew?
what would you do, jeremy?
> Just person offering a view
much appreciated. inspired me to offer this... reflective
and hopefully more rational view.
all best,
luke
Return-Path: <G.Hollestelle at student.tue.nl>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from amsmta06-svc.chello.nl (mail-out.chello.nl
[213.46.240.7]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F7951DD
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boromir ([212.187.92.182]) by amsmta06-svc.chello.nl
(InterMail vK.4.03.02.00 201-232-124 license
dd4a379df8e387594186908c65258374) with SMTP id
<20010622141831.FOW13241.amsmta06-svc at boromir> for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:18:31 +0200
Message-ID: <005701c0fb26$6803ea70$1e00a8c0 at boromir>
From: "Gijs Hollestelle" <G.Hollestelle at student.tue.nl>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Unlocking workstations without closing all programs
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:19:53 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I am an adminstator of some windows boxes connected to a FreeBSD samba
server that serves them files and is their domain master so users can log
into any of the boxes and use their files there. Now there is a slight
problem when a user locks his workstation, the admin can not unlock it
without closing all programs automaticly (which could result in lost data
for the user). Or see what the user is doing at that moment. Therefore i
wondered if it is possible (maybe using a patch or something of the sort) on
the windows or the unix side to allow for a master password or some other
means of unlocking without closing all programs.
Kind regards,
Gijs Hollestelle
Return-Path: <robert at rmpdsch.freeserve.co.uk>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from cmailg5.svr.pol.co.uk (cmailg5.svr.pol.co.uk
[195.92.195.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC9251C8
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from modem-36.maryland.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.71.36]
helo=rmpdsch.freeserve.co.uk) by cmailg5.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim
3.13 #0) id 15DRrq-00034I-00 for samba at lists.samba.org; Fri, 22 Jun
2001 15:25:02 +0100
Message-Id: <010701c0fb25$d4adde20$150a0180 at vig062>
Reply-To: "Robert Royall" <r.a.royall at iee.org>
From: robert at rmpdsch.freeserve.co.uk
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: . Re: Win2k Terminal Server: SMB uid's (Gerald Carter)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:15:46 +0100
Organization: Regional Medical Physics
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
SOrry I've missed part of the discussion,
What problems are there with using one UID ?
Robert Royall - Principal Physicist
Regional Medical Physics Department South Cleveland Hospital,
Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW , UK
Tel +44 1642 854747 fax +44 1642 823574 email:
r.a.royall at iee.org
Return-Path: <ajoostin at students.cs.uu.nl>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.students.cs.uu.nl (solar.students.cs.uu.nl
[131.211.82.28]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD59151FC
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from abeel.students.cs.uu.nl (abeel.students.cs.uu.nl
[131.211.82.40]) by mail.students.cs.uu.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id
C8C2B860F for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:30:54 +0200
(MET DST)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:30:54 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Arjan Oosting <ajoostin at students.cs.uu.nl>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Roaming profile problems
In-Reply-To: <3B32EB12.20004 at samera.com.py>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106221620200.29382-100000 at abeel.students.cs.
uu.nl>
X-Org: Students of the Department of Computer Science; Utrecht
University
X-Org: P.O. Box 80.089; 3508 TB Utrecht; The Netherlands.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Do you have write acces in the Unix box for that user?
> The directory for the profile of that user must be fully writeable for
> that user.
Yes i have (drwxrwxrwt).
> There is also a problem(I hate the word bug, but anyway) with creating
> directories inside the profile directory. The problem is that samba creates
> the directories in mode 600 and not 700.
When my profile gets saved, it seems that al my directories created and are
mode 0700, but al the files in the roaming profile are NOT saved.
The strange part is that yesterday everything seemed to work for about
half an hour, but after that the problem was bask (no chances in my
config whatsoever). So i'm pretty confused.
By the way, my entry for the profile directory in smb.conf is this
[profiles]
path = /data/samba/profiles
writeable = yes
create mode = 0600
directory mode = 0700
browseable = No
guest ok = yes
> >Hello,
> >
> >I've got a linux (kernel 2.4.5) server with samba 2.2.0 installed and a
> >Windows 2000 professional client. This server is PDC for my network. But
> >whenever I logout on the windows machine, samba seems not able to save my
> >roaming profile. In my samba log i find entries like this
> >
> >[2001/06/22 05:46:0, 0] smbd/open.c:open_directory(1037)
> > open_directory: unable to create arjan/Start Menu/Programs/Startup.
> >Error was no such file or directory
> >
> >after a lot of these entries samba seems to stop responding to the client.
> >I've tried al king of permissions on the profile directory, all kind of
> >compile- smb.conf-options and the latest sources from cvs and windows 2000
> >professional without sp1, with sp1 an with sp2. Verifying my username &
> >password works, but i just can't save my profile. Please help me, i'm
> >desperate.
> >
--
This signature has been infected by the signature virus.
Please help me spread and copy me to your .signature
--
Arjan Oosting
Student Informatica, Universiteit Utrecht
E-mail : ajoostin at students.cs.uu.nl
E-mail @home : arjanoosting at home.nl
Telephone : +31384221224
Mobile telephone: +31629148383
Return-Path: <rshields at customcolor.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from customcolor.com (customcolor.com [216.122.237.241]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A843151E0 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leedo ([209.248.198.210]) by customcolor.com
(8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f5MEYdj95986 for <samba at lists.samba.org>;
Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:34:39 GMT (envelope-from rshields at customcolor.com)
From: "Richard Shields" <rshields at customcolor.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: HELP! Third Post same question...Ownership privileges Still no
reply
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:38:37 -0500
Message-ID: <NFBBKMHCKLFBEHOPKPMAKEGMCAAA.rshields at customcolor.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I am running Samba 2.0.7 on a Macintosh OSX server ver 1.2 A file created,
copied or otherwise altered by a Windows client on this server is
unalterable by the Macintosh clients. Is there a way to fix this? A file
created, ETC by a Mac client can be altered by anyone... I have only limited
Unix/Linux exp so feel free to email me in person if the answer is too wordy
for the list server. Thank you for your help in advance...
Richard L. Shields
rshields at customcolor.com
Custom Color Corp.
300 W. 19th Terr.
K.C., MO 64108
ph. 816-474-3200
fx. 816-842-4909
http://www.customcolor.com
Return-Path: <mgerdts at aur.alcatel.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from aurms0.aur.alcatel.com (hostr41.alcatel.com
[143.209.4.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E9951E0
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aursea.aur.alcatel.com (aursea [143.209.6.105]) by
aurms0.aur.alcatel.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f5MEeuJ27856 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:40:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mgerdts at localhost) by aursea.aur.alcatel.com
(8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id KAA11173 for samba at lists.samba.org; Fri, 22 Jun
2001 10:40:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:40:56 -0400
From: Michael Gerdts <Michael.Gerdts at usa.alcatel.com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: joining resource domain, trust account for master domain
needed
Message-ID: <20010622104055.B11122 at aur.alcatel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I am using SAMBA_2_2 from CVS as of 2001/06/18 13:23.
I have a master domain (MASTER) that takes care of all authentication. I
have a resource domain (RES) that all file servers belong to. The PDC in
RES is PDC. The samba server has the netbios name SAMBA (Names changed to
protect the almost innocent.)
I have followed the instructions for joining an NT domain. Specifically, I
did the following:
1) had the NT admin create a machine account that matches my netbios
name.
2) smbpasswd -j RES -r PDC
secrets.tbd exists. strings(1) suggests that it has the right
information in it.
3) edited smb.conf,
security = domain
workgroup = RES
password server = PDC (also tried *)
4) started smbd
More information about the samba
mailing list