[Samba] Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference
dkrnic at lycos.com
Sat Aug 16 20:19:15 GMT 2003
|> Do you want to say that nobody ever lost any data on
|> ext3-formatted disks? Be realistic.
|> But does it warrant my exhortation to stay away from
|> it? Probably not. It was a joke without a smiley
|> sign. ext3 is probably a solid, though a bit clumsy
|> and slow fs.
|> I appreciate your criticism. I jumped the same way
|> when someone else used the same kind of FUD about
|> reiserfs which I would always recommend over all
| Agreed,, ext3 is used in lots of situations where
| Reiser would probably be a better choice....
| As for nobody loosing data,,, I don't really think
| it matters what Filesystem you have if your system
| decides to stick random bits on the hard drive.
| Staying away from any of them won't help much.
Yes, it's an fs-neutral kind of problem but there are
ways to minimize its impact. My production system is
an expensive SCSI RAID system but I keep a day-old
copy of it on another identically setup box, except
that the disks are lowly IDEs strapped together with
LVM (2-3 times faster than RAID, it restores a tarball
faster than RAID can make it). If something happens to
the production server the backup server can take over
Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!
More information about the samba