[Samba] About SOCKET options

[Chris Smith]

On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 10:50, David Morel wrote:
> Le jeu 26/09/2002 à 14:47, Benjamin Weber a écrit :
> > Ok, as some of you read I was the guy who experimented with SOCKET options.
> > 
> > In my last post, where I figured that I needed to use the right syntax I
> > found out that SO_SNDBUF=4096 and SO_RCVBUF=4096 worked way better than with
> > 8192 as value. Today I verified this behavior.
> > 
> 
> so did I! 4069 is much faster here (Win XP pro for the clients,
> 2.4.19(gentoo) kernel, samba 2.2.5.

Are either of you using "large readwrite = yes" as well?