[Samba] About SOCKET options

David Morel david.morel at amakuru.net
Thu Sep 26 14:49:00 GMT 2002

Le jeu 26/09/2002 à 14:47, Benjamin Weber a écrit :
> Ok, as some of you read I was the guy who experimented with SOCKET options.
> In my last post, where I figured that I needed to use the right syntax I
> found out that SO_SNDBUF=4096 and SO_RCVBUF=4096 worked way better than with
> 8192 as value. Today I verified this behavior.

so did I! 4069 is much faster here (Win XP pro for the clients,
2.4.19(gentoo) kernel, samba 2.2.5.


More information about the samba mailing list