[Samba] Samba and large implementations
Daniel Jarboe
djarboe0993 at aol.com
Wed Nov 13 17:11:01 GMT 2002
abartlet at samba.org wrote:
> There are some known scalability issues with Samba 2.2, --with-pam or
> --with-utmp (an n^2) problem. You will no doubt find other issues too,
> but I do believe it will be more reliant on who Linux/390 scales.
>
> How will these users be authenticated etc? This is the main area where
> I can comment, and one of the first problems you will encounter.
What is --with-utmp supposed to buy you anyway? I'm working in a RH 7.2
environment with 2.2.6, using winbindd to authenticate against an NT
PDC. Is --with-utmp supposed to cause connected users to show up in a
'who'? It doesn't seem to. Also, is the default of obey pam
restrictions = no sufficient to avoid this n^2 problem, or am I better
off rebuilding the spec without it? Will that cause me to lose
pam_winbind.so et al? I'm looking at a much smaller domain (about 3000
NT id's, with no more than 500-700 concurrent connections). Are there
more of these configuration settings that could cause significant
bottle-necks?
Thanks,
~ Daniel
More information about the samba
mailing list