[Samba] smbmount and win2k permissions

[Urban Widmark]

On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, LAUTIER Sabrina wrote:

> I can then see that toto owns all files and directories
> (fmask=664,dmask=775):  does this mean that he can do what he wants ?
> As if the SMB share was a regular linux fs ?
> Isn't there permissions checking from the win2k server ?
> Are the windows ACLs still valid ?

Yes, they are. smbfs simply doesn't know about them or have any way of
showing them.

/Urban