[Samba] Samba-2.2.5pre1 - all binaries require libldap with --with-ldapsam

Buchan Milne bgmilne at cae.co.za
Mon Jun 10 06:41:04 GMT 2002


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

While preparing packaging of te upcoming samba-2.2.5, we are looking at
having samba packages with and without ldap enabled, however, we would
like to try and minimize the duplication. But, it seems that most (all?)
binaries resulting from a --with-ldapsam build en up linking to libldap.

Are there really good reasons for nmblookup, smbcacls, smbclient,
smbmount, smbprint, smbspool, smbtar, smbumount to need to link against
libldap (we have these in a samba-client sub-package, I don't see a need
for a samba-client-ldap package), or should I be compiling them differently?

I would prefer not to have to worry about whether I last compiled with
or without ldapsam, which is one of the points of making the -ldap
specific sub-packages.

Buchan

Please cc me in reply, I'm subscribed in digest.
- --
|----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------|
Buchan Milne                Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work            +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering         http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key                   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE9BKtIrJK6UGDSBKcRAuIMAJ9svaIWMC+3n+200iEm6wLPuEBrOACcD3qO
4bsImFuRjaK3doYyrrUVpDk=
=QDq1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the samba mailing list