Petter T. Olsson
po26 at ulfhild.cornell.edu
Wed Oct 17 07:55:03 GMT 2001
Is there a filesystem for Linux that will get around this problem?
Petter T. Olsson
Veterinary College CPPS/DCS
Ithaca, NY 14853-6401
From: Andrew V. Samoilov [mailto:kai at cmail.ru]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:51 AM
To: Joseph Loo
Cc: samba list
Subject: Re: large files
Joseph Loo wrote:
> I am not sure but you might be running into the limitations of the
> ext2 file ssytem. I believe it has a 4 Gbyte limitation on a single
> file. You might have to consider another file system for your large
ext2 fs limitation is 2GB blocks. Block is at least 1024 bytes long.
> Ivan Fernandez wrote:
>> I'm reposting this problem (perhaps a bug) now I've got more
>> information on it. This is another point of view of the situation and
>> I hope someone could have run into the same trouble before (and
>> solved it :-))
>> This is it:
>> * with ntbackup 2000 I create a 22Gb .bkf file in the windows
>> * I can copy that file over a samba share and get correct
>> info form the file in windows explorer.
>> * ls -l also returns correct info, *WHILE* stat, mc, and
>> other programs raise up with an error regarding a value too high for
>> defined data type.
Some program was compiled with large file support, some without. MC
4.5.55 can be configured with --enable-largefile. This also fixes some
mc problems over ntfs on 2.4 kernels.
>> * If I try to create the file with ntbackup directly over the
>> share, it gets downsized to 0 bytes and grows slowly while ntbackup
>> dies when the file crosses the 4 Gb (exactly) size.
>> *I have compiled myself version 2.2.2 of samba and,
>> surprisingly, the 4Gb "limit" situation described above was taken
>> down to 2 Gb exactly.
>> Any idea on what's happening, please??
Please mail me kernel and glibc versions.
> Joseph Loo
> jloo at acm.org
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
More information about the samba