Samba swamps the server's CPU
Jeremy Allison
jra at samba.org
Sat Nov 3 01:24:03 GMT 2001
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 04:17:36AM -0500, Eric P. McCoy wrote:
> Hi. I'm running Samba 2.2.2 and Linux 2.4.7 on a dual PPro-200/256KB
> server. The relevant NIC is an Intel EtherExpress PRO/100+. The
> problem I'm having is that certain programs will swamp the server; the
> load will spike immediately to 50% (i.e., 100% on one CPU) and
> performance will, naturally, bite. Having another active connection
> to the server at the same time causes _monster_ slowdowns. I didn't
> think much of this until I ran vmstat and noticed that when I ran one
> of these programs, the context switches per second would jump from
> about 300 to over 10000. I pulled out strace and this is what I got:
>
> % time seconds usecs/call calls errors syscall
> ------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
> 41.82 12.716340 638 19934 select
> 19.31 5.870802 294 19935 send
> 14.33 4.357302 91 47760 read
> 5.15 1.567179 51 30435 fcntl64
> 5.03 1.530087 9162 167 write
> 4.03 1.226924 201 6110 getdents64
> 2.85 0.867619 40 21692 gettimeofday
> 2.84 0.864095 72 12044 2812 stat64
> 1.55 0.470409 44 10642 _llseek
> 1.12 0.339316 80 4263 192 open
> 0.91 0.276100 45 6190 fstat64
> 0.74 0.226241 55 4084 3 close
> 0.12 0.036709 243 151 ftruncate64
> 0.03 0.009962 39 255 geteuid32
> 0.03 0.009618 38 253 getegid32
> [snipped for brevity]
> ------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
> 100.00 30.407128 184547 3021 total
>
> I have no idea where to go from here, really. There's nothing in the
> SMB log. The client on the other end is a Windows 2000 box (Server,
> but the same thing happens with Pro). Samba is running as a daemon
> rather than from inetd.
>
> The odd thing is that 98% of programs work just fine. (Winamp, most
> noticeably, but I can also copy files and do regular things without
> this problem.) I'm certain that this problem exists in both 2.2.1 and
> 2.2.2, but I believe that, in some previous version, it didn't exist;
> at least, Alpha Centauri (one of the offending programs) now runs
> unacceptably slowly and it used to work just fine.
>
> Can anyone point me in the right direction or provide a solution?
Can you test something for me - add the line "kernel oplocks = no"
to the [global] section of the smb.conf.
Is the slowdown 100% reproducible with certain apps ? If so, a
debug level 10 trace would alsio help.
Thanks,
Jeremy.
More information about the samba
mailing list