Red Hat 6.2 vs NT/Windows 2K
urban at teststation.com
Wed Jan 24 22:40:20 GMT 2001
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Peter Klosky wrote:
> Can anyone suggest who would contract some time to answer this
> question for money? We really do want to solve this problem, and have
> a budget.
Somewhere on the samba webpages there are links to companies providing
> [2001/01/24 09:46:15, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(341)
> Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12]
> [2001/01/24 09:46:15, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(421)
> Selected protocol NT LM 0.12
> [2001/01/24 09:46:15, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(854)
> end of file from client
Someone is being rude ...
> encrypt passwords = no
win2k wants encrypted passwords, unless you regedit them not to. I think
someone said that it would just terminate the connection if encryption is
We run a samba 2.0.6 (I don't admin it or it would have been 2.0.7 a long
time ago ...) with some 30 win2k clients and a NT4 as PDC/password server.
There really is nothing special to configure:
workgroup = <DOMAIN name>
encrypt passwords = yes
security = domain
password server = <PDC name>
and of course ...
character set = iso8859-1
client code page = 850
and other than the shares it's all from the sample config.
Read the ENCRYPTION.txt, Win95.txt and WinNT.txt documents if you haven't
fixed encrypted passwords.
More information about the samba