SMBSH vs CIFS/SMB FS type

[William Stuart]

Sami Cokar wrote:
> 
> Samba Team:
>    Instead of having 'smbsh', what are the drawbacks of developing a
> CIFS/SMB filesytem type that you can mount using "mount -F smb/cifs
> NTSERVER:/sharename /mntpoint"?
> 
> Thanx.


in a word...portability...

This is available for Linux....see smbmount.

--
William Stuart (wstuart at hae.com)
My email address, wstuart at hae.com, is (C) Copyright 1999 William
Stuart...
Use of this email address is restricted.  See http://www.hae.com/cr.html
for acceptible use.  (unless your a spammer, don't worry about it)