SMBSH vs CIFS/SMB FS type
wstuart at hae.com
Thu Jul 8 17:14:10 GMT 1999
Sami Cokar wrote:
> Samba Team:
> Instead of having 'smbsh', what are the drawbacks of developing a
> CIFS/SMB filesytem type that you can mount using "mount -F smb/cifs
> NTSERVER:/sharename /mntpoint"?
in a word...portability...
This is available for Linux....see smbmount.
William Stuart (wstuart at hae.com)
My email address, wstuart at hae.com, is (C) Copyright 1999 William
Use of this email address is restricted. See http://www.hae.com/cr.html
for acceptible use. (unless your a spammer, don't worry about it)
More information about the samba