SAMBA digest 1853 (NFS vs. SAMBA)
sarma at usa.net
Mon Oct 26 03:34:35 GMT 1998
Jan, You are NOT going to get better performance out of Samba, because
your clients are NOT microsoft-born. The UNIX machines are better off
with NFS. If the networked-file system (similar to the expansion of NFS,
but NOT the same) is slow, you need 100Mbps cards and excellent
RAID file systems. I heard that if clients are transferring extremely large
files (> 1meg) then the total time between SMB and NFS is negligible.
But, NFS is much much better at a series of file operations == which
take up a significant amount of time (almost as much as the data transfer).
After all that's why WEBNFS as a concept arose.
Sarma at usa.net
More information about the samba