Retire Fedora 29 / OpenSUSE 15.0 from CI?
William Brown
wbrown at suse.de
Thu Mar 12 03:40:47 UTC 2020
> On 12 Mar 2020, at 13:17, Andrew Bartlett via samba-technical <samba-technical at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> G'Day Andreas and the list,
>
> It bothers me a little that for every Samba change we make we spin up
> 37 builds on 37 VMs. It feels a little excessive, and while CI is
> awesome when it saves us all time we should also use the earth and
> Samba Team's resources carefully. (Even jobs aimed at the 'free' CI
> can be run on our servers if GitLab.com's servers are busy, and the
> planet pays either way).
>
> Therefore I wondered if we should also stop running CI on Fedora 29 and
> OpenSUSE 15.0, both of which are now it is EOL upstream?
>
> Both went EOL in Nov/Dec 2019.
>
> In the future I think we should set policy to only CI on (some, subject
> to other constraints) supported distributions.
>
> What do folks think?
This sounds like a 100% reasonable policy to only run CI on active/supported distributions. :)
>
> Andrew Bartlett
> --
> Andrew Bartlett
> https://samba.org/~abartlet/
> Authentication Developer, Samba Team https://samba.org
> Samba Development and Support, Catalyst IT - Expert Open Source
> Solutions
> https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
>
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list