Using vfs_fruit alongside vfs_recycle
slow at samba.org
Fri Mar 6 11:16:21 UTC 2020
Am 3/6/20 um 12:02 PM schrieb Isaac Boukris via samba-technical:
> The manpage of vfs_fruit states that "This module is not stackable
> other than described in this manpage.", is this still correct?
well, everything is is simply not tested systematically. Many
combinations may work, with some you may run into issues...
> I'm looking into a bug report which I can reproduce on master, where
> usage of vfs_fruit alongside vfs_recycle causes an error log at level
> 0 upon deleting a file, failing to find "._filename". So I wonder if
> this configuration is unsupported or is there a logical bug here.
Iirc I've never worked with systems where vfs_recycle was configured
with fruit, so I haven't seen this before.
> [2020/03/06 12:28:48.627691, 0]
> recycle: stat for ./._test.txt returned No such file or directory
Hm, maybe just a too high log level in vfs_recycle? You may want to
check a log level 10 log of a reproducer to check that trail that leads
up to this error message.
Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/
Samba Developer, SerNet GmbH https://sernet.de/en/samba/
More information about the samba-technical