[Release Planning 4.11] Samba 4.11.2

Alexander Bokovoy ab at samba.org
Wed Oct 23 07:57:05 UTC 2019


On ke, 23 loka 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba-technical wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 2:34 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 1:51 AM Andreas Schneider <asn at samba.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, 23 October 2019 01:53:58 CEST Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba-
> > > technical wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 2:14 PM Denis Cardon via samba-technical
> > > >
> > > > <samba-technical at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> > > > > Hi Dario,
> > > > >
> > > > > Le 10/22/2019 à 12:17 PM, Dario Lesca via samba-technical a écrit :
> > > > > > Il giorno sab, 19/10/2019 alle 12.22 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via
> > > > > >
> > > > > > samba-technical ha scritto:
> > > > > >> Cool! I just managed to get 4.11.1 into my published CentOS 7, 8,
> > > > > >> andFedora setup at https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo. This setup
> > > > > >> usesHeimdal Kerberos, which eased the gnutls requirements and made
> > > > > >> CentOS7 easier.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Nico
> > > > > > How can use your great work?
> > > > > > I must rebuild all on my system (Centos8) or I can use a binary repo?
> > > > >
> > > > > I just published RPMS and SRPMS at
> > > > > https://samba.tranquil.it/centos7/samba-4.11.1/
> > > > > https://samba.tranquil.it/centos7/samba-4.11.1-srcrpm (note : freshly
> > > > > baked from the oven, not yet thoroughly tested). You may try to rebuild
> > > > > the srcrpm on CentOS8. I've not yet had time to look at that new CentOS
> > > > > release.
> > > >
> > > > RHEl 8 does not include "quota-devel" and some dependencies such as
> > > > "libtommath", unless you build them from a setup like, say, mine over
> > > > at github. You are certainly welcome to any useful parts of that.
> > >
> > > RHEL8 **does** include quota-devel, CentOS8 *doesn't*.
> > >
> > >
> > > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=16549
> >
> > No, Red Hat does not publish the package in any of their channels. I
> > just checked on my licensed RHEL 8 box, the one I use to run
> > "reposync" on to build up a full local RHEL 8 mirror for
> > "mock" compilatoin of Samba before CentOS 8 was published. This is why
> > my public tools to build Samba 4.11 have a local setup, based on the
> > published SRPM, to build the quota packages as needed on CentOS or
> > RHEL 8.
> 
> Looking at that, it came off a bit... sharp. It's not you, it's that
> Red Hat has elected to do this for a number of different devel
> packages I've tried to compile with, and the excuses for publishing
> only the SRPM and binary packaes have been.... well, let's say it
> raises questions about renewing my licenses.
Please raise a question through the support lines to add this and other
missing devel packages back. A feedback is needed.


-- 
/ Alexander Bokovoy



More information about the samba-technical mailing list