[Release Planning 4.11] Samba 4.11.2
nkadel at gmail.com
Wed Oct 23 06:42:28 UTC 2019
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 2:34 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 1:51 AM Andreas Schneider <asn at samba.org> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 23 October 2019 01:53:58 CEST Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba-
> > technical wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 2:14 PM Denis Cardon via samba-technical
> > >
> > > <samba-technical at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> > > > Hi Dario,
> > > >
> > > > Le 10/22/2019 à 12:17 PM, Dario Lesca via samba-technical a écrit :
> > > > > Il giorno sab, 19/10/2019 alle 12.22 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via
> > > > >
> > > > > samba-technical ha scritto:
> > > > >> Cool! I just managed to get 4.11.1 into my published CentOS 7, 8,
> > > > >> andFedora setup at https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo. This setup
> > > > >> usesHeimdal Kerberos, which eased the gnutls requirements and made
> > > > >> CentOS7 easier.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks Nico
> > > > > How can use your great work?
> > > > > I must rebuild all on my system (Centos8) or I can use a binary repo?
> > > >
> > > > I just published RPMS and SRPMS at
> > > > https://samba.tranquil.it/centos7/samba-4.11.1/
> > > > https://samba.tranquil.it/centos7/samba-4.11.1-srcrpm (note : freshly
> > > > baked from the oven, not yet thoroughly tested). You may try to rebuild
> > > > the srcrpm on CentOS8. I've not yet had time to look at that new CentOS
> > > > release.
> > >
> > > RHEl 8 does not include "quota-devel" and some dependencies such as
> > > "libtommath", unless you build them from a setup like, say, mine over
> > > at github. You are certainly welcome to any useful parts of that.
> > RHEL8 **does** include quota-devel, CentOS8 *doesn't*.
> > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=16549
> No, Red Hat does not publish the package in any of their channels. I
> just checked on my licensed RHEL 8 box, the one I use to run
> "reposync" on to build up a full local RHEL 8 mirror for
> "mock" compilatoin of Samba before CentOS 8 was published. This is why
> my public tools to build Samba 4.11 have a local setup, based on the
> published SRPM, to build the quota packages as needed on CentOS or
> RHEL 8.
Looking at that, it came off a bit... sharp. It's not you, it's that
Red Hat has elected to do this for a number of different devel
packages I've tried to compile with, and the excuses for publishing
only the SRPM and binary packaes have been.... well, let's say it
raises questions about renewing my licenses.
More information about the samba-technical