[PATCH] Selftest improvements

Jamie McClymont jamiemcclymont at catalyst.net.nz
Thu Feb 8 02:55:08 UTC 2018

Agh, you're right!

I missed the rpc_proxy environment (and can now see that this is the
only mistake of that type which occurred).

New patch attached.


On 08/02/18 15:41, Andrew Bartlett via samba-technical wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 15:25 +1300, Jamie McClymont via samba-technical
> wrote:
>> On 07/02/18 11:01, Jamie McClymont via samba-technical wrote:
>>> At your request, I'm running some private autobuilds now, attempting to
>>> confirm that there are no differences in which tests are run.
>> As some validation that these patches do not reduce the number of tests
>> being run, below are the sizes of the stdout files for each autobuild
>> job with none, the first, and both of my commits.
> Can you also look at this line-wise?  I know some times will change,
> but I'm really nervous about missing lines.  We should then be able to
> eliminate the lines that should go missing as 'clearly' they will
> belong to the excluded environments. 
> Thanks!
> Andrew Bartlett
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: samba-jamie-selftest-improvements-6th-attempt.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 23270 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20180208/328b901a/samba-jamie-selftest-improvements-6th-attempt.bin>

More information about the samba-technical mailing list