Replication test flapping

Andreas Schneider asn at samba.org
Tue Jun 7 12:57:04 UTC 2016


On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 14:11:13 CEST Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 01:07:29PM +0200, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 22:11:23 CEST Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > Thankfully my latest autobuild not only shortens the test time
> > > (trimming down the krb5.kdc test runs), it also includes a fix for a
> > > use-after-free we found with AddressSanitizer, in the schema
> > > replication code.
> > 
> > I've had a phone call with metze last week. I just talked briefly with
> > him,
> > but he agreed that we should move all SMB tests against ntvfs in
> > 'selftest/
> > knownfail' to 'selftest/skip'. The features will not be implemented and it
> > will safe us quite some test time.
> 
> As I've just come across a duplicate function name again -- will we
> ever be able to just remove ntvfs? I haven't really looked, but I
> believe someone said that some tests depend on it (printer notify?).
> Are these tests important enough to keep ntvfs?

The S4U2Self and S4U2Proxy tests rely on it.

-- 
Andreas Schneider                   GPG-ID: CC014E3D
Samba Team                             asn at samba.org
www.samba.org



More information about the samba-technical mailing list