Replication test flapping
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Tue Jun 7 12:11:13 UTC 2016
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 01:07:29PM +0200, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 22:11:23 CEST Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > Thankfully my latest autobuild not only shortens the test time
> > (trimming down the krb5.kdc test runs), it also includes a fix for a
> > use-after-free we found with AddressSanitizer, in the schema
> > replication code.
> I've had a phone call with metze last week. I just talked briefly with him,
> but he agreed that we should move all SMB tests against ntvfs in 'selftest/
> knownfail' to 'selftest/skip'. The features will not be implemented and it
> will safe us quite some test time.
As I've just come across a duplicate function name again -- will we
ever be able to just remove ntvfs? I haven't really looked, but I
believe someone said that some tests depend on it (printer notify?).
Are these tests important enough to keep ntvfs?
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de
SerNet & BSI laden ein: 29. Juni 2016,
2. IT-Grundschutztag 2016, BPA Berlin.
More information about the samba-technical