[PATCH] Reintroduce support for RPC modules
Andreas Schneider
asn at samba.org
Fri Feb 19 14:37:07 UTC 2016
On Friday 19 February 2016 13:39:47 Ralph Boehme wrote:
> Hi!
Hi Ralph,
could you please fix a few things in the source code. Some functions are
inconsistent to others. See comments below.
+static struct rpc_module *find_rpc_module(const char *name)
+{
+ struct rpc_module *module = rpc_modules;
+
+ while (module) {
+ if (strequal(module->name, name)) {
+ return module;
+ }
+ module = module->next;
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
+}
I would prefer a for loop:
for (module = rpc_modules; module != NULL; module = module->next)
You use that in setup_rpc_modules() ...
+NTSTATUS register_rpc_module(struct rpc_module_fns *fns,
+ const char *name)
+{
+ struct rpc_module *module = NULL;
+
+ if (!name || !name[0]) {
+ DBG_ERR("called with NULL pointer or empty name!\n");
+ return NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER;
+ }
Please use: if (name == NULL || name[0] == '\0')
Also bool helper variables in that functions would not hurt.
==============
In rpc_setup_embedded() please check return values of load_samba_modules() and
run_init_functions()
With these changes you can push that code with my RB+.
I'm still against this as history showed we start to break these things. See
the auth module code. (auth_domain can't be compiled as a static module, same
for auth_builtin because it also provides auth_guest, so when compiled as a
module smbd can't find the guest module).
Best regards,
-- andreas
--
Andreas Schneider GPG-ID: CC014E3D
Samba Team asn at samba.org
www.samba.org
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list