[PATCH] Fix ETIME handling for Solaris event ports

Jeremy Allison jra at samba.org
Thu Feb 4 23:18:56 UTC 2016

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 04:05:51PM -0700, Nathan Huff wrote:
> I read that thread and still wasn't 100% sure that you couldn't get an
> event with EINTR.  I think the current patch won't break anything, but it
> may be overly cautious.  I am willing to go back to the version that only
> checks ETIME for events if that seems better to people.
> The two events I have definitely seen on running systems are ETIME with
> events and EINTR with no events and not updating nget.

I just posted a version of your patch that only
does the ETIME check and doesn't fall through
for EINTR. Let me know what you think.

I think Ralph is probably right that the EINTR
case doesn't return events - if it did and didn't
update nget then the API would be broken for n > 1.

More information about the samba-technical mailing list