[PATCH] Fix bug 11053

[Thomas Schulz]

>On 2015-09-29 at 12:24 +0200, Michael Adam wrote:
>> The patches look great!
>> I have them sitting with my review tags in my local checkout.
>> But I want to do a few more builds/tests even though
>> Tom Schulz has already reported success.
>>=20
>> So expect me to push later.
>
> pushed to autobuild.
>
> :-)
>
I assume that this patch set will have to be attached to the bug 11053
in order to get it applied to Samba 3.0.1. Should that be the whole
patch set or just the last 4 patches? If the whole patch set is to be
used, the fuzz on patch 2 should probably be addressed. Nothing breaks
using patch 2 as it is, but lib/replace/wscript is not making the checks
as specific as was intended.

Tom Schulz
Applied Dynamics Intl.
schulz at adi.com