Fwd: Reg:SMB1.0 disabled in 2012

[VigneshDhanraj G]

sorry forget to add technical team
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: VigneshDhanraj G <vigneshdhanraj.g at gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: Reg:SMB1.0 disabled in 2012
To: Alejandro <aescanero at gmail.com>


Hi Alejandro,

Thanks for the update.

But i don't want to enable smb1.0 in windows 2012 R2. My client Support
SMB2.0 and windows 2012 also support SMB2.0 why it is necessary to Enable
SMB1.0 in windows 2012 R2.

Regards
Vigneshdhanraj G

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Alejandro <aescanero at gmail.com> wrote:

> You must do some changes:
> http://blog.workinghardinit.work/2014/04/25/windows-xp-clients-cannot-execute-logon-scripts-against-a-windows-server-2012-r2-domain-controller-workaround/
> in Windows Server 2012 to make SMB1.0 negotiate by default.
>
> Regards
>
> 2015-05-21 8:23 GMT+02:00 VigneshDhanraj G <vigneshdhanraj.g at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I face issue when connecting to the AD if SMB1.0 is disabled in windows
>> 2012 R2.
>> It shows NT_CONNECTION_RESET.
>>
>> I found windows 2012 R2 server not supporting SMB1.0 Then why it is
>> necessary to be enabled. I am using samba 4.0.25.
>>
>> I found Negotiating using SMB1.0 first, if it is disabled it throws error.
>> In 260 Negotiate Request dialects  not at all showing SMB2. 002 it shows
>> till NT LM 0.12. After sometime it uses 282 Negotiate Request, In that it
>> shows SMB2. 002 and start communication using SMB2.0.
>>
>> Is anything open issue Regarding this?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Vigneshdhanraj G
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Alejandro Escanero Blanco
> Consultor de sistemas basados en fuentes abiertas
> Desarrollador de FusionDirectory (http://www.fusiondirectory.org)
> Blog: http://www.disasterproject.com
> Jabber: blainett at jabberes.com
>