Investigating CI options for Samba test branches
abartlet at samba.org
Tue May 5 19:06:52 MDT 2015
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 09:58 +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 01:34:14PM +1200, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 07:06 +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 03:28:07PM +1200, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > > Are there any other solutions we should be looking at, beyond just
> > > > running autobuld on sn-devel?
> > >
> > > selfhosted buildbot.net ?
> > Thanks, that also looks like another good option.
> > In parallel, I've asked nicely, and travis-ci.org is extending my build
> > time so I can run our full autobuild.
> > The main blocker that I see to any of this is either
> > - using github (a number of us are uncomfortable about hitching our
> > project to non-free network services like that, both for free software
> > and project longivity reasons)
> > - for the open source options (buildbot.net, drone.io), having a gitlab
> > or similar instance for such a tool to report back to.
> Not sure I understand why buildbot should require something like
> gitlab for reporting. It has a simple web UI and can of course report
> via email.
I've looked at some buildbot instances, but I can't see how you would
follow an ad-hoc try branch there. The key for me is that it reports
into a tool that can also be used for review, and that the link to
getting and perhaps reviewing the code (ie to gitlab) includes the build
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
More information about the samba-technical