Windows vs POSIX directory rename with open files behaviour
jra at samba.org
Thu Jan 29 10:24:34 MST 2015
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 02:55:01PM +0100, Ralph Böhme wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:49:37AM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 09:34:41PM +0200, Jussi Uosukainen wrote:
> > > For what it's worth, I would really like for samba (or vfs_fruit) to
> > > be bug compatible with OS X Server. It makes it easier to implement
> > > samba environments to replace mac server environments.
> > OK, but we already have a problem with this.
> > OS X server allows open file rename over SMB1 with
> > no AAPL create context or UNIX extensions. Windows
> > doesn't.
> > Who should we be bug compatible with here ?
> With both! :) With my change to vfs_fruit every OS get's its desired
> behaviour, not for SMB1, but at least for SMB2.
OK, post it again :-). But as I recall you did something
to the fsp struct, which would be a VFS ABI change :-(.
More information about the samba-technical