Windows vs POSIX directory rename with open files behaviour
rb at sernet.de
Thu Jan 29 06:55:01 MST 2015
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:49:37AM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 09:34:41PM +0200, Jussi Uosukainen wrote:
> > For what it's worth, I would really like for samba (or vfs_fruit) to
> > be bug compatible with OS X Server. It makes it easier to implement
> > samba environments to replace mac server environments.
> OK, but we already have a problem with this.
> OS X server allows open file rename over SMB1 with
> no AAPL create context or UNIX extensions. Windows
> Who should we be bug compatible with here ?
With both! :) With my change to vfs_fruit every OS get's its desired
behaviour, not for SMB1, but at least for SMB2.
More information about the samba-technical