Do anyone here have the experience with 64bits compiled Samba on SPARC?
dam at opencsw.org
Tue Dec 1 09:25:00 UTC 2015
Am 01.12.2015 um 10:20 schrieb Ralph Boehme <rb at sernet.de>:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 09:18:39PM +0100, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 06:20:40AM +0100, Jiri Sasek - Solaris Prague wrote:
>>>> I have built 64bits Samba and winbindd is receiving the SIGBUS(*)
>>> The problem is that we don't have SPARC in any way easily
>>> accessible. If you look at CLANG warnings, there's hundreds
>>> of alignment problems we potentially have. Fixing all of
>>> them will be a big challenge, but finding the relevant ones
>>> would be much easier if we had access to such a box.
>> I can provide access to our Solaris buildfarm and already wrote to both
>> build at samba.org and Jeremy some time ago but didn’t get a reply.
> iirc you got a reply from me saying that https://build.samba.org/ is
> essentially dead. Automated testing has moved to autobuild which is
> Linux only atm.
Ah yes, I remember now, sorry. I’d be happy to provide automatic builds on
Solaris if that would be possible.
> fwiw: slowfranklin at opencsw.org = slow at samba.org = me :) I have access,
> but I'm lacking time.
Ok, if anybody else from the Samba project (Volker?) needs access just let
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the samba-technical