Patch: Implement FSCTL_LMR_REQUEST_RESILIENCY

[Jeremy Allison]

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:09:12PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:37:35AM +0200, Michael Adam wrote:
> > On 2014-10-09 at 16:43 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > Yeah, we can do that.
> > But we have to make sure that the documentation
> > carries a big fat disclaimer. Also the code
> > should spit out warning debug messages when these
> > are used.
> > 
> > We could do the same for persistent handles,
> > ca shares, etc. We have code that implements
> > parameters to trigger these options since >= 2 years
> > but only used them for test and development purposes.
> > We never proposed them upstream, because there is no
> > flesh behind them yet, and they are hence dangerous
> > if used in real setups. But I could imagine bringing
> > these to master with the "fake " prefix as tracer
> > ammunition so that people can see in test setups where
> > the journey is leading...
> 
> What about adding that only in developer builds?

Yes, I think that is a reasonable restriction.