new messaging subsystem
abartlet at samba.org
Tue Oct 7 02:27:02 MDT 2014
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 09:56 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:19:36AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > Looking over them quickly, I did want to re-assure you that putting the
> > messaging sockets in the lock directory is quite reasonable, as I see
> > it, because like other lock files, they may/should be removed by the OS
> > on reboot. Perhaps put both the privileged and public sockets under the
> > lock dir?
> Can you describe what you mean by "public sockets"? For
> smbds, the messaging subsystem is trusted, only root should
> be able to send messages. Is this different for the samba
I just noticed that you had something under private, some under lock and
assumed (incorrectly) you were planning/using some public/private split.
The existing s4 system is all privileged as far as I'm aware, and I
think both should stay that way.
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
More information about the samba-technical