[PATCH] Remove "read raw" and "write raw" (make inverted synonym for "async smb echo handler")
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at samba.org
Wed Jan 15 01:01:25 MST 2014
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 08:02 +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 06:24:14PM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 14:56 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > Jeremy,
> > >
> > > Per our chat this morning, this patch helps remove an annoying special
> > > case in our loadparm system. You indicated that this was only really
> > > needed for broken Ethernet adaptors on Win95, so I think it's safe to
> > > have go away, but just in case, I've made it an inverted synonym of
> > > 'async smb echo handler' which is why it became a special case in the
> > > first place.
> > >
> > > Can you please comment or review?
> >
> > Attached is a corrected patch.
>
> We have quite a few of these dependencies for aio, sendfile,
> write cache and possibly others. Making a smb feature depend
> on something completely different seems wrong to me. If you
> want this out of the loadparm layer, can't you add the
> async echo check to the place where lp_readwraw is used,
> just moving it out of loadparm.c and into negprot.c?
I'll do that. I agree the deprecated inverted synonym was just a bit
'too cute'.
We also need a good, clear pattern for how to express these dependencies
across the codebase, and in the SMB server in particular.
For a future, distinct patch, aside from the interaction with the async
smb echo handler, do you think we still need read raw and write raw as
specific smb.conf options?
Thanks,
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list