[PATCH] small KCC fixes

Jelmer Vernooij jelmer at samba.org
Tue Apr 22 07:15:10 MDT 2014

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 02:50:41PM +0200, Kamen Mazdrashki wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:55:47PM +0200, Kamen Mazdrashki wrote:
> > > Thanks Jelmer!
> > >
> > > Btw, what do you think about porting those patches to samba 4.0.x, 4.1.x?
> > > Some of them looks like fixing real bugs when building topology?
> > In principle, it seems like a good idea to backport fixes like this. How
> > did you find them though, and are you sure kcc works properly now?
> >
> I was trying to run something like "bin/samba_kcc -H private/sam.ldb
> --readonly --debug" to see
> what the output is - it wasn't working so I dig it further. I am currently
> using two IDEs to make
> light my way in code I have forgotten - PyDev and PyCharm. And they are
> awesome - constantly
> 'pylint'-ing the code I am looking at (not to mention highlight for
> selected var). So I am able to quickly
> find small and big problems here and there. Surprisingly, there are a lot :)
> Does kcc works properly now? It is hard for me to answer this - it should
> be working much
> properly that it was before the patch. But if it is working like totally
> properly - I am not sure.
> It seems to me that there is more fixes to be done so it runs without
> errors for more that one DC in Site :)
> I hope to be able to test it with more DCs and Sites.
In that case, it's probably not worth backporting these fixes right now,,
if it's not clear it's actually going to help users.



More information about the samba-technical mailing list