LDB: schema syntax comparison

Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer mdw at samba.org
Thu Sep 5 16:03:16 CEST 2013

Hi Simo & others,

I do not remember the exact problem, but I think it would be very 
tedious to enforce 100%-correct schema validation for index entries as well.

And then: does comparison strictly require preliminar validation? My 
opinion in this case is no, since if something is comparable let us just 
do the comparison. But okay, this is a little philosophical.


Simo schrieb:
> On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 08:50 +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
>> Hi Simo,
>> can I get an ack from you for the attached patches?
>> They fix https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8929 (correct
>> "servicePrincipalName" handling)
>> You had some comments in the referenced bug
>> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7485.
> Looks good to me in general, but why is it ok to skip validation in
> patch2 instead of fixing provisioning ?
> Simo.

More information about the samba-technical mailing list