repenny241155 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 3 13:59:29 MDT 2013
On 03/10/13 20:36, Lukasz Zalewski wrote:
> On 03/10/2013 18:15, Rowland Penny wrote:
>> On 03/10/13 18:05, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 04:04:25PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
>>>> just a quick question, if samba-tool does something differently to
>>>> the way that windows works, would this be regarded as a bug?
>>> Different in what way, can you give a specific example? There is no
>>> command-line tool on Windows called 'samba-tool', and
>>> we long seem to have given up on trying to make it match
>>> the behaviour of the 'net' tool on Windows.
>> Hi Jelmer, If you create a user in ADUC and add the Unix attributes,
>> this is done totally differently to the way that samba-tool does it. For
>> instance, '--uid-number' requires that you give a 'uidNumber' but ADUC
>> (provided AD is setup correctly) supplies it automatically, samba-tool
>> also doesn't add all the attributes that ADUC does.
> Hi Rowland,
> Indeed only portion of the attributes are configurable via samba-tool.
> Are there particular attributes you are interested in?
Hi, what I am trying to get across is, for adding a unix user,
samba-tool does not work in the same way as ADUC does.
If you have the attribute 'msSFU30MaxUidNumber' in
then ADUC will get the uidNumber automatically, if you use samba-tool,
you have to supply the uidNumber, ADUC also adds the following attributes:
uid, msSFU30Name, msSFU30NisDomain, uidNumber, gidNumber,
unixHomeDirectory, loginShell, unixUserPassword
I know that I can do what ADUC does with a bash script and ldif's, but I
do not know anything about python to alter samba-tool, but I do believe
that samba-tool should, when it comes to creating a unix user, work the
same as ADUC
More information about the samba-technical