[PATCH] Re: patch to add "winbind domain before username" parameter, and bugfix for handing of template homedir

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Wed Nov 20 21:44:09 MST 2013


On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 20:55 -0500, rick at microway.com wrote:
> Can this patch please be accepted?
> 
> Thanks,
> Rick
> 
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Using samba4, I have now had a problem where the usernames pulled from
> > winbind all had the domain name prepended to them.  I found a bug report
> > from a couple years ago of someone complaining of the opposite, and the
> > code was changed at that time to prepend "DOMAIN\user" instead of just
> > "user".
> >
> > I have made a patch now to add the smb.conf global parameter:
> > "winbind domain before username".  I have it defaulting to true to
> > preserve
> > the current behavior, but if you set it to false/no you will get just the
> > regular username from both wb_cmd_getpwnam.c and wb_cmd_getpwuid.c

The parameter you are looking for is "winbind use default domain".  I'm
not opposed to this being added, but if we did it this way, we would
block the multi-domain work.  We are trying to swap the source3 winbind
at the same time, but in the meantime we need to ensure we don't break
that future use case, by only doing this for the default domain.

The main issue I have is that your change isn't symmetric.  We need the
input and output code paths to match.  

I would also be cautious, because we got into a lot of trouble when we
did 'winbind use default domain' in the source3 code, and while I very
much understand why you want it (I added that originally), I'm also
aware of the issues. 

> > Also, I have found a bug in the "template homedir" parameter. The manpage
> > and docs I've read all refer to using %D to represent the domain, and %U
> > to represent the username. However, the code was actually using
> > %WORKGROUP% and %ACCOUNTNAME%.  I left the handling for those 2, but added
> > in the %D and %U as referenced elsewhere.
> >
> > This patch handles both the new feature and the bugfix.

I'm aware of this inconstancy.  We probably need to make the code cope
with both in both winbind trees, it comes from the merging of the two
code bases. 

Sorry we took so long to get back to you,

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT                   http://catalyst.net.nz




More information about the samba-technical mailing list