Internal DNS server. Failure, when a client a) registers an IP b) deletes that IP c) registers again

Michael Wood esiotrot at gmail.com
Sat Jun 1 02:57:02 MDT 2013


On 1 June 2013 10:49, Michael Wood <esiotrot at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 1 June 2013 10:00, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 09:48 +0200, Michael Wood wrote:
>> > Hi Ricky and Kai
>> >
>> > On 1 June 2013 09:39, Kai Blin <kai at samba.org> wrote:
>>
>  [...]
>
>
>> > I was proposing to get rid of the following (IMO misleading) options:
>> >
>> > allow dns updates = yes
>> > allow dns updates = true
>> > allow dns updates = 1
>> > allow dns updates = on
>> > allow dns updates = enabled
>> >
>> > I was NOT proposing to get rid of the following:
>> >
>> > allow dns updates = nonsecure and secure
>> > allow dns updates = nonsecure
>> >
>> > I hope that clarifies my proposal.
>>
>> Sounds like a very good idea.  I still think this applies:
>>
>> > > Patches are welcome.
>>
>> (and I would be very happy to give positive review to such a patch, if
>> Kai concurred).
>>
>> Thanks :-)
>>
>
> Here are three trivial patches related to the above.  I hope you don't
> mind them attached to the e-mail like this.
>
> The first two are documentation patches that I believe make sense for 4.0.
>  The third one is the one to remove the IMO misleading options for the
> "allow dns updates" parameter.
>

I've updated https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS#Configuration too.

-- 
Michael Wood <esiotrot at gmail.com>


More information about the samba-technical mailing list